Adjunctive techniques in endovascular repair of postcarotid endarterectomy pseudoaneurysm: Case report and literature review.

Pseudoaneurysm (PA) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a rare and dangerous complication. In recent years endovascular approach has been preferred to open surgery as it is less invasive and reduces complications in an already operated neck, especially cranial nerve injuries. We report a case of large post-CEA PA causing dysphagia, successfully treated by deployment of two balloon-expandable covered stents and coil embolization of the external carotid artery. A literature review dealing with all cases of post-CEA PAs since 2000 treated by endovascular means is also reported. The research was conducted on Pubmed database using keywords "carotid pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy," "false aneurysm after carotid endarterectomy," "postcarotid endarterectomy pseudoaneurysm," and "carotid pseudoaneurysm."

Eversion Endarterectomy of the Femoral Bifurcation: Technique, Results and Potential Advantages.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endovascular techniques, surgical endarterectomy remains the "gold standard" for treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the femoral bifurcation. Eversion endarterectomy (EE) of the femoral bifurcation is a well-known technique that ensures an extensive plaque removal; furthermore, EE can be performed to avoid the use of prosthetic material. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EE of the femoral bifurcation in a contemporary prospective series from a single-center experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing EE at our institution between January 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. EE was performed as an isolated procedure or in a hybrid fashion. Clinical presentation was defined according to Rutherford's classification. End points included major complications and patency rates. RESULTS: Thirty-three EEs were performed on 31 patients during the study period. Thirteen procedures (39%) were performed in a hybrid fashion with concurrent endovascular interventions. Technical success was achieved in 100%. Thirty-day mortality was null, whereas 5 overall complications (15%) were recorded; among those, 2 (6%) were major. In both cases, an early thrombosis of the femoral bifurcation occurred, successfully treated by a short Dacron replacement of the common femoral artery. During follow-up, no femoral pseudoaneurysm or groin infections were observed. Two restenosis occurred at 7 and 10 months after EE, respectively. Two-year primary patency and assisted primary patency rates were 87% and 100%, respectively. During follow-up, two patients underwent percutaneous revascularization of the contralateral femoropopliteal axis at 5 and 8 months after EE, respectively. In both of them, the procedure was successfully performed through direct puncture of the endoarterectomized common femoral artery, without any access-site complications. CONCLUSIONS: Endarterectomy remains the gold standard in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the femoral bifurcation with excellent long-term patency rates. Furthermore, EE adds the advantages of avoiding the use of prosthetic materials in the groin and the possibility to use the treated vessels as access for further percutaneous procedures.

First Case of 2 Synchronous Gluteal Arteries Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Plug Embolization: Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Gluteal artery aneurysms (GAAs) are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all arterial aneurysms. Most of them are post-traumatic in nature and involve the superior gluteal artery (SGA), while injuries of the inferior gluteal artery (IGA) have been reported less frequently. We report an unusual case of a patient with double saccular GAA of unknown etiology, involving both the SGA and IGA, successfully treated by endovascular embolization. CASE REPORT: A 80-year-old man referred to our hospital complaining of the progressive onset of left buttock pain and swelling exacerbated by sitting position in the last 4 months. His past medical history was positive for hypertension, prostatic adenocarcinoma treated by brachytherapy, and endocarditis diagnosed about 30 years before and treated by cardiac surgical valve replacement; no history of trauma was reported. After ultrasonography was carried out, an enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed the presence of 2 large GAAs involving both the SGA and IGA, with maximum transverse diameter of 38 and 84 mm, respectively. The patient was referred for endovascular treatment after informed consent was provided. After sequential selective catheterization of SGA and IGA, 3 Amplatzer Plugs II (St. Jude Medical, Zaventem, Belgium) were deployed inside the aneurysms. Postoperative course was uneventful as buttock pain completely disappeared on the second postoperative day. The patient was discharged to home on the third postoperative day. One-month CT scan confirmed the complete thrombosis of the aneurysms without any endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: GAAs represent a rare pathology, and for that reason, the correct timing and choice of treatment are not clearly defined. Endovascular techniques are the first step in the approach to GAAs. In case of complex anatomy, GAAs embolization by the use of vascular plugs can be successfully performed.

Simultaneous Open Surgical Treatment of Aortic Coral Reef and Leriche Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review.

The coral reef aorta (CRA) is a rare syndrome commonly referred to a distribution of calcified plaques in the visceral part of the aorta. Because those plaques can cause malperfusion of the lower limbs, visceral ischemia or renovascular hypertension, surgical treatment is recommended. Transaortic endarterectomy is accepted as a standard repair and it is often performed through an extensive thoracoabdominal approach. CRA has been reported in association with polidistrectual atherosclerotic disease, such as Leriche syndrome. When these 2 conditions coexist, surgical invasivity increases raising several issues concerning the type of surgical access and the revascularization techniques. We report the case of a patient with CRA and Leriche syndrome treated by simultaneous aortic endarterectomy and aortibifemoral bypass at our institution. Intervention was performed through left lumbotomy at 10th intercostal space extended by a left pararectal abdominal incision with section of 11th rib. Through extraperitoneal access visceral vessels were isolated. Aortic cross-clamping was performed at supraceliac and infrarenal levels and a longitudinal arteriotomy was performed on the posterolateral wall of visceral aorta for an overall 4-cm extension. Aortic endarterectomy was then performed and complete plaque excision was easily achieved. Superior mesenteric artery angioplasty was then performed by a DeBakey dilator, gaining an optimal backflow. The aortotomy was then closed with running 3-0 polypropylene suture. Subsequently, through a transperitoneal access an aortobi-femoral bypass was performed by a Dacron knitted graft. Postoperative course was uneventful. At a 6-month follow-up, the patient is in good clinical condition with normal patency of visceral vessels.

Preliminary Results from a National Enquiry of Infection in Abdominal Aortic Endovascular Repair (Registry of Infection in EVAR--R.I.EVAR).

BACKGROUND: To preliminary report on epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes in a multicenter series of patients treated for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) infection and detected by an Italian National enquiry. METHODS: From June 2012, 26 cases of abdominal aortic endograft infection were collected by a National Enquiry and recorded in the Italian National Registry of Infection in EVAR. Cases collected were available for patients submitted to EVAR implantation from January 2004 to June 2013. RESULTS: Mean time from EVAR treatment to infection diagnosis was 20.5 ± 20.3 months (range, 1-72). In 6 cases (23.1%), an aortoenteric fistula (AEF) was detected. Positive microbiologic cultures were found in 20 patients (76.9%). More than 1 infectious agent was found in 6 cases (19.2%). EVAR infection treatment was conservative in 4 cases, endovascular in 2. Endograft excision was performed in 10 cases by conventional treatment (aortic stump + extra-anatomic bypass) and in 10 cases by in situ reconstruction (cryopreserved allograft or rifampin-soaked silver Dacron graft). A 30-day mortality was 38.4% (10 of 26 cases), 3 patients died from 2 to 24 months after infection treatment, accounting for a mean time from infection treatment to death of 1.25 ± 0.62 months. Mortality rates were 50% in all treatment groups. In those survived (13 of 26 cases) recurrence-free follow-up after infection treatment was 27.9 ± 22.4 months (range, 2-74). Four patients with AEF died in the first month after treatment (66.6%). Suprarenal endografts required supraceliac aortic cross-clamping for removal. Supraceliac cross-clamping was burdened by higher mortality rates than infrarenal cross-clamping (71.4% vs. 30.7%). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR infection diagnosis is burdened by extremely high mortality rates. Prospective registries could help monitoring outcomes in EVAR infection patients and, possibly, developing new surveillance protocols in patients at high risk of recurrence.

Infective etiology affects outcomes of late open conversion after failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review all patients undergoing late open conversion (LOC) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in order to identify any clinical or technical predictors of poor outcome. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients (24 men; mean age 74.7 ± 8.3 years) underwent LOC between June 2006 and April 2013 at our institution. The mean interval from index EVAR to LOC was 40.4 ± 29.2 months (range 5-93 months). The indication for LOC was endoleak in 14 (54%) patients and infection in 12 (46%): 2 (8%) patients with endoleak had a ruptured aneurysm and 6 (23%) patients with infection had a recurrent secondary aortoesophageal fistula (sAEF). RESULTS: In all 12 cases of infection and in 12 of 14 endoleaks, the entire endograft was explanted. A rifampin-soaked Dacron silver graft was implanted in all patients with infection. Patients with any infection and with recurrent AEF required more blood units than patients with endoleak (6.40 vs. 1.86, p = 0.045; 6.76 vs. 1.86, p = 0.0036, respectively). Compared with endoleak, the duration of conversions in the setting of infection (274 vs. 316 minutes, p = 0.42) and recurrent sAEF (274 vs. 396 minutes, p = 0.021) was longer. All patients with recurrent sAEF died at a mean 3.0 ± 2.5 days after LOC from proximal anastomosis disruption and hemorrhagic shock (n = 2), myocardial infarction (n = 2), acute stroke (n = 1), or persistent sepsis (n = 1). Perioperative mortality was significantly higher in patients with endograft infection (6/12, p = 0.002) and in cases of supraceliac cross-clamping (4/6, p = 0.003). The association of infection with supraceliac cross-clamping was a strong predictor for perioperative mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our experience, endograft infection led to greater perioperative mortality after LOC. Recurrent aortoenteric fistula in association with supraceliac cross-clamping is a strong predictor of poor outcome. Patients surviving the perioperative period may have good chances of long-term survival.

Preoperative Intrasac Thrombus Load Predicts Worse Outcome after Elective Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of two-dimensional and three-dimensional preoperative morphologic features analyzed on computed tomography (CT) angiography on midterm outcome in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected database. Morphologic features considered as potentially influencing outcomes were maximum aortic diameter, thrombus area, overall aneurysm volume, and intrasac thrombus volume. Outcome measures were all perioperative and midterm AAA-related reinterventions and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Investigators reviewed 191 preoperative CT angiography scans. Mean maximum aortic diameter was 58 mm; thrombus area, 49.6%; aortic volume, 159.36 cm(3); and thrombus volume, 58.6%. Technical success was achieved in all cases. No reintervention was required in the perioperative period, and there was no perioperative mortality. At a mean follow-up of 32 months ± 16.8 (range, 3-66 mo), mortality rate was 9.4%, AAA-related death was 0, and reintervention rate was 8.9%. Causes of reintervention included type I endoleak (n = 3 [1.6%]), type II endoleak (n = 7 [3.7%]), type III endoleak (n = 1 [0.5%]), endograft limb thrombosis (n = 4 [2.1%]), and access vessel thrombosis (n = 2; 1%). Greater thrombus area (> 60%) and thrombus volume (> 59%) were predictors for reintervention (P = .005 and P = .0034). Greater maximum aortic diameter (> 59 mm) and aortic volume (> 159 cm(3)) were related to higher reintervention rate without statistical significance (P = .62 and P = .12). Aortic volume was a predictor of any adverse event, reintervention, and all-cause mortality after EVAR (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus area and volume are related to higher rates of reintervention. Maximum aortic diameter was related to a higher reintervention rate, but this was not significant.

Retrograde type B aortic dissection as a complication of standard endovascular aortic repair.

Endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is becoming the standard of practice in most vascular centers, even if some concerns remain about the occurrence of early and long-term failure and reintervention. A rare but potential catastrophic event is represented by retrograde type B aortic dissection (RTBAD). We report 2 cases of RTBAD after 425 standard EVARs performed in our institution. Both patients were treated for AAA without perioperative complication, and in both the patients, the presence of a preexisting disease of the thoracic aortic wall (ulcerated plaque in 1 case and aortic ectasia in the other) may have played an important role in the rapid evolution toward an early onset of the dissection. Only few cases of type B dissection after EVAR have been reported in literature, and the etiology of this complication remains uncertain. For the first time, our experience highlights the possible etiologic role of preexisting lesions of the thoracic aorta. In these cases, the only possible strategy may be to carefully study the entire aorta before an EVAR procedure, eventually switching the indication to an open surgical repair or carrying out a more aggressive management, treating the defects of the thoracic aorta.

Superficial Femoral Artery Stent Disruption Treated by Peripheral Endograft.

We report a case of superficial femoral artery (SFA) stent fractures (SF) with atypical symptoms and site of disruption. Patient was hospitalized for sudden onset of right thigh pain, nonrelated to steno-obstructive disease. Preoperative ultrasound suspected and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) confirmed multiple proximal SFA SFs with concurrent pseudoaneurysms. A peripheral endograft was deployed covering the entire SFA, achieving a complete "relining" with exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm. Pain disappeared and postoperative control demonstrated good patency of the SFA. After 1 month, patient reported no further events and CTA revealed patency of the endograft and exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm. At 1 year follow-up, Viabahn is patent with no further symptoms reported by the patient.

Ten years' experience in endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysm using the Viabahn endoprosthesis: a report from two Italian vascular centers.

BACKGROUND: Although rare, popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most commonly observed peripheral arterial aneurysms. Surgical repair is considered the gold standard, even if with debated results. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcome of endovascular treatment of PAAs using the Viabahn peripheral endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) in 2 high-volume Italian centers. METHODS: All consecutive PAA patients treated by endovascular procedures between January 2004 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. True atherosclerotic aneurysms, symptomatic and asymptomatic, were included in the analysis. All patients were treated by high-skilled vascular surgeons. The outcome measures were graft thrombosis, reintervention rate, and limb salvage at early and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-three PAAs were treated. Patients were more frequently male (98.1%) with a mean age of 73.6 ± 7.8 years. Twelve patients (22.6%) were symptomatic and in 8 of them a local fibrinolysis was required before definitive surgery. Mean PAA diameter was 30.9 ± 10.9 mm (range 17-60). Fifty-two patients (98.1%) had at least 1 patent runoff vessel. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Overall, 80 stent grafts were deployed and in 21 patients (39.6%) more than 1 stent graft was deployed. In-hospital mortality rate and 30-day reinterventions were null. At a mean follow-up of 37.4 ± 29.3 months, primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were respectively 73.6%, 92.4%, and 100%. CONCLUSION: In our limited, retrospective experience, the endovascular treatment of PAA by Viabahn stent graft allowed satisfactory technical and clinical results even at long-term follow-up.

Endovascular treatment of a small infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm causing duodenal obstruction: Case report and literature review.

Duodenal obstruction caused by abdominal aortic aneurysm was first described by Osler in 1905 and is named "aortoduodenal syndrome." This condition has always been treated by open surgical repair. We report the first case of aortoduodenal syndrome successfully treated by endovascular aneurysm repair. A 74-year-old male patient referred to our hospital complaining postprandial vomit, reporting a consistent weight loss in the latest weeks. Enhanced computed tomography scans showed a small saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm compressing duodenum and inferior vena cava without any other evident pathological finding. As the patient underwent a successful endovascular treatment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, symptoms immediately resolved so that he started back to feed and progressively gained body weight. Despite aortoduodenal syndrome is generally caused by large abdominal aortic aneurysm, this condition has to be suspected also in case of small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Differently from what has been reported in literature, endovascular aneurysm repair could be effective in the treatment of aortoduodenal syndrome.

Infected pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy: mismatch between clinical presentation and origin.

Pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a rare complication, with an incidence lower than 1%. Infection as a cause of carotid pseudoaneurysm is uncommon, and is mostly caused by staphylococci. An 81-year-old woman, treated with right carotid endarterectomy 7 years earlier, presented with a diagnosis of right carotid pseudoaneurysm. The patient was neurologically asymptomatic; clinical status, laboratory, and imaging findings were negative for infection. She was referred to surgical treatment consisting of patch excision and a carotid polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting. During intervention a purulent fluid collection was discovered, and therefore an inverted great saphenous vein carotid bypass was performed. The postoperative course was normal. Microbiological examination on the purulent fluid collection and excised patch showed the presence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Carotid pseudoaneurysms after CEA often arise in asymptomatic patients. Despite this common clinical presentation, an infective origin must always be taken into account before any intervention is planned.

Technical adjunct for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patient with renal transplant.

One of the most discussed issues in abdominal aortic surgery in kidney-transplanted patients is represented by organ protection during aortic cross-clamping. We report the case of a kidney-transplanted woman who underwent surgical correction for an abdominal aortic aneurysm after she refused any endovascular approach. To maintain kidney perfusion, during surgical aortic reconstruction, a biopump was chosen. Nowadays, abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair, when feasible, allows avoiding cross-clamping-related renal ischemia, although a potential risk for contrast-induced nephrotoxicity still exists. When open surgical repair is chosen, several different techniques to protect the transplanted organ have been proposed, with different potential advantages and results. In the case we reported, the use of biopump allowed an effective protection from ischemia, minimizing perioperative stress and complications.

Abdominal aortic rupture and spondylodiscitis: emergent EVAR and staged spinal fixation.

Concomitant aortic aneurismal pathology and vertebral erosion are seldom reported in literature. The differential diagnosis between a primary vertebral disease affecting the aortic wall and a primary aortic pathology causing a vertebral disruption is quite difficult. We report on a patient presenting with increasing lumbar pain and neurologic lower limbs deficit due to a vertebral erosion accompanied by aortic rupture treated by emergent endovascular aortic repair procedure and then staged vertebral fixation. Microbiological tests on intraoperative periaortic fluid collection samples showed no clear sign of infection and clinical conditions progressively improved. At 12-month follow-up, the patient is in good clinical condition, with a small residual walking impairment and no clinical, laboratory, or imaging sign of aortic endograft infection.

Mandibular subluxation as an adjunct in very distal carotid arterial reconstruction: incidence of peripheral and cerebral neurologic sequelae in a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The location of the carotid bifurcation and a very distal extension of internal carotid atherosclerotic disease may challenge vascular surgeons performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by increasing technical difficulty and possibly the incidence of cranial nerve damage or palsies. The objective of the present study is to report on the safety of CEA with mandibular subluxation (MS) and to compare results of CEA in 2 groups of patients treated by standard CEA or by MS-CEA according to rates of major neurologic complications, death, and the occurrence of postoperative peripheral nerve palsy. METHODS: Between July 2000 and June 2012, 1,357 CEAs were performed. MS was additionally used in 43 patients. Only patients with primary atherosclerotic internal carotid artery (ICA) lesions in the 2 groups (38 in the MS-CEA group and 1,289 in the standard CEA group) were considered for comparative analysis. RESULTS: MS-CEA patients were more frequently male (P = 0.03), presented more frequently with symptomatic lesions (P = 0.007), longer lesions (P = 0.01), and had common ICA bypass implantation (P = 0.02). Mean follow-up was 68.75 ± 37.87 months (range: 1-144 months). No perioperative neurologic mortality and no prolonged discomfort related to MS was recorded. The overall neurologic morbidity rate (major stroke/minor stroke/transient ischemic attach) was comparable in the 2 groups (P = 0.78). The overall immediate peripheral nerve injury rate was 7.89% in the MS-CEA group and 5.27% in the standard CEA group (P = 0.73). Three cases of permanent dysphonia in the standard CEA group (0.23%) and 1 case of dysphagia in the MS-CEA group (2.63%) were reported at follow-up (P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: MS-CEA can be a very useful technical adjunct for high-located carotid bifurcations or challenging carotid lesions, with an overall risk comparable to that of standard CEA.

Immediate and two-year outcomes after EVAR in "on-label" and "off-label" neck anatomies using different commercially available devices. analysis of the experience of two Italian vascular centers.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has fast become the therapeutic strategy of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Nowadays, the most important limit to the effectiveness of this technique is represented by complex anatomical situations, especially regarding the morphology of the proximal sealing zone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year outcome of unselected, real-world patients with "off-label" (off-L) proximal necks treated in 2 high-volume Italian vascular centers. METHODS: A double-center study was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database between January 2010 and December 2011. One hundred and ninety-six consecutive elective surgery patients were analyzed and divided into 2 groups ("on-label" [on-L] and "off-L" necks) on the basis of their aortic neck anatomy. The neck was classified as an "off-L neck" in the presence of: (1) a noncylindrical neck, (2) an angulated neck, (3) a short neck, and (4) an enlarged neck. The end points were 30-day and 2-year technical and clinical success, evaluated in terms of freedom from reintervention and death. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three elective patients were treated by standard EVAR in the presence of an "off-L" proximal neck anatomy. Technical success was achieved in all cases in both groups. Six (9.5%) unplanned adjunctive procedures were necessary in the on-L group and 16 (12%) in the off-L group (P = ns). Perioperative endoleaks, reinterventions, stent-graft migration rates, and AAA-related deaths were null. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the subgroups of patients with 2 or > 2 anatomic factors that indicate a challenging neck. In patients with 2 such factors, a significant difference was observed in terms of intraoperative adjunctive procedures, intraoperative endoleaks, and all-cause mortality: 26.7% vs. 9.9% (P = 0.048), 6.7% vs. 0.5% (P = 0.023), and 13.3% vs. 1.1% (P = 0.0012), respectively. The same differences became increasingly evident when analyzing patients with > 2 criteria: 50% vs. 10% (P = 0.0022), 16.7% vs. 0.5% (P < 0.001), and 16.7% vs. 1.0% (P = 0.01). No AAA-related deaths or AAA ruptures were reported in either group at the end of the 2-year follow-up. High-flow endoleaks, stent-graft migration, and, consequently, reintervention were more frequent in the off-L group, but none of these parameters reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience seems to show that the off-L use of EVAR could be considered effective for the treatment of patients unfit for open surgery. In patients with more than one anatomical proximal neck feature contraindicating open surgery, the rate of immediate complications and reinterventions was higher, but this did not affect the clinical benefit and success at 2-year follow-up.

Percutaneous Retrograde Trans-Gluteal Embolization of Type 2 Endoleak Causing Iliac Aneurysm Enlargement after Endovascular Repair: Case Report and Literature Review.

Late type II endoleaks (T2ELs) arising from the internal iliac artery (IIA) may present during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of aortoiliac aneurysm and may warrant embolization if enlargement of the aneurysmal sac is demonstrated. When coverage of the IIA ostium has been made due to extensive iliac disease, access options can be challenging. Different treatment options have been reported over recent years, and a careful selection of the best one must be made based on the characteristics of each case. The present study reports a simple and reproducible sheathless percutaneous superior gluteal artery (SGA) access and provides a discussion based on a review of the existing literature on this topic.

Carotid endarterectomy with saphenous vein patch angioplasty: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: When performing a conventional CEA it is recommended the use of patch angioplasty (PA), since previous meta-analyses have shown PA to be superior to primary closure (PRC) in terms of stroke and restenosis rates. Different materials patches can be employed although none of them has been proved to be superior. Although autologous veins are potentially more resistant to immediate thrombosis as well as infection, cons may be represented by patch rupture and late dilatation. Aim of this study is to evaluate immediate and long-term results of CEA with saphenous vein patch angioplasty (SVPA) in a single-center experience. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed analyzing all patients undergoing CEA with SVPA at our institution from January 2012 to March 2020. CEA was performed in symptomatic patients with 50-99% carotid stenosis degree or asymptomatic patients with 70-99% stenosis degree. Exclusion criteria were critical limb ischemia, varicose disease, unavailability of saphenous veins, vein diameter <3.5 mm. All CEAs were performed under general anesthesia with routine shunting. Primary endpoints were perioperative stroke, death, carotid thrombosis and hematoma requiring surgery rates. Secondary endpoints included the rate of recurrent stenosis >70%, patch aneurysm/rupture/infection at follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 488 interventions were performed on 461 patients. Most patients were male (77.8%) with a mean age of 71.2±8.3 years. Thirty-day mortality and stroke rates were 0.4% and 1.2% respectively. Carotid thrombosis occurred in five patients (1%). Five patients (1%) developed a surgical site hematoma requiring surgical drainage. At a mean follow-up of 34.4±25.8 months 12 restenoses (2.5%) were detected. Five-year freedom from restenosis rate was 96.7%. Restenosis at follow-up was more frequent in patients who had contralateral carotid stenosis (P=0.019). Two patients (0.4%) developed carotid patch aneurysmal degeneration at a mean follow-up of 78.7 months. No infection nor patch disruption were detected. CONCLUSIONS: CEA with SVPA resulted safe and effective in terms of early and late results. The perioperative complications rates we recorded were quite similar to those reported by other larger reviews and meta-analyses.