Use of adenine base editing and homology-independent targeted integration strategies to correct the cystic fibrosis causing variant, W1282X.

Small molecule drugs known as modulators can treat ~90% of people with cystic fibrosis (CF), but do not work for premature termination codon variants such as W1282X (c.3846G>A). Here we evaluated two gene editing strategies, Adenine Base Editing (ABE) to correct W1282X, and Homology-Independent Targeted Integration (HITI) of a CFTR superexon comprising exons 23-27 (SE23-27) to enable expression of a CFTR mRNA without W1282X. In Flp-In-293 cells stably expressing a CFTR expression minigene bearing W1282X, ABE corrected 24% of W1282X alleles, rescued CFTR mRNA from nonsense mediated decay and restored protein expression. However, bystander editing at the adjacent adenine (c.3847A>G), caused an amino acid change (R1283G) that affects CFTR maturation and ablates ion channel activity. In primary human nasal epithelial cells homozygous for W1282X, ABE corrected 27% of alleles, but with a notably lower level of bystander editing, and CFTR channel function was restored to 16% of wild-type levels. Using the HITI approach, correct integration of a SE23-27 in intron 22 of the CFTR locus in 16HBEge W1282X cells was detected in 5.8% of alleles, resulting in 7.8% of CFTR transcripts containing the SE23-27 sequence. Analysis of a clonal line homozygous for the HITI-SE23-27 produced full-length mature protein and restored CFTR anion channel activity to 10% of wild-type levels, which could be increased three-fold upon treatment with the triple combination of CF modulators. Overall, these data demonstrate two different editing strategies can successfully correct W1282X, the second most common class I variant, with a concomitant restoration of CFTR function.

Comparison of Cas9 and Cas12a CRISPR editing methods to correct the W1282X-CFTR mutation.

BACKGROUND: W1282X-CFTR variant (c.3846G>A) is the second most common nonsense cystic fibrosis (CF)-causing mutation in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. Even though remarkable breakthroughs have been done towards CF treatment with the approval of four CFTR protein modulators, none of these are approved for patients with nonsense mutations. CRISPR gene editing tools can be of great value to permanently correct the genetic defects caused by these mutations. METHODS: We compared the capacity of homology-directed repair (HDR) mediated by Cas9 or Cas12a to correct W1282X CFTR mutation in the CFF-16HBEge W1282X CFTR cell line (obtained from CFF), using Cas9/gRNA and Cas12a/gRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) and single strand DNA (ssODN) oligonucleotide donors. RESULTS: Cas9 shows higher levels of correction than Cas12a as, by electroporating cells with Cas9 RNPs and ssODN donor, nearly 18% of precise editing was achieved compared to just 8% for Cas12a. Such levels of correction increase the abundance of CFTR mRNA and protein, and partially restore CFTR function in the pool of edited cells to 18% of WT CFTR function. Moreover, homozygous corrected clones produced levels of mRNA, protein, and function comparable to those of cells expressing WT CFTR. CONCLUSION: Altogether, this work demonstrates the potential of gene editing as a therapeutic strategy for CF directly correcting the root cause of the disease.

Gene and Base Editing as a Therapeutic Option for Cystic Fibrosis-Learning from Other Diseases.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenic autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the CFTR gene. There are at least 346 disease-causing variants in the CFTR gene, but effective small-molecule therapies exist for only ~10% of them. One option to treat all mutations is CFTR cDNA-based therapy, but clinical trials to date have only been able to stabilise rather than improve lung function disease in patients. While cDNA-based therapy is already a clinical reality for a number of diseases, some animal studies have clearly established that precision genome editing can be significantly more effective than cDNA addition. These observations have led to a number of gene-editing clinical trials for a small number of such genetic disorders. To date, gene-editing strategies to correct CFTR mutations have been conducted exclusively in cell models, with no in vivo gene-editing studies yet described. Here, we highlight some of the key breakthroughs in in vivo and ex vivo gene and base editing in animal models for other diseases and discuss what might be learned from these studies in the development of editing strategies that may be applied to cystic fibrosis as a potential therapeutic approach. There are many hurdles that need to be overcome, including the in vivo delivery of editing machinery or successful engraftment of ex vivo-edited cells, as well as minimising potential off-target effects. However, a successful proof-of-concept study for gene or base editing in one or more of the available CF animal models could pave the way towards a long-term therapeutic strategy for this disease.