Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 41(32): 4693-4699, 2023 07 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37349223

RESUMO

Basophil activation test (BAT) can tackle multiple mechanisms underlying acute and delayed hypersensitivity to drugs and vaccines and might complement conventional allergy diagnostics but its role in anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine-related hypersensitivity is ill-defined. Therefore, 89 patients with possible hypersensitivity (56 % with delayed mucocutaneous manifestations) to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were tested with BAT for Macrogol 3350, DMG-PEG 2000, PEG 20000, polysorbate-80 and trometamol and compared to 156 subjects undergoing pre-vaccine BAT. A positive BAT was associated with delayed reaction onset (p = 0.010) and resolution (p = 0.011). BAT was more frequently positive to DMG-PEG 2000 than to other excipients in both groups (p < 0.001). DMG-PEG 2000 reactivity was less frequent in vaccine-naïve (6 %) than vaccinated subjects (35 %, p < 0.001) and associated with mRNA-1273 vaccination. DMG-PEG 2000 BAT might therefore have a diagnostic role in subjects with delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Natural immunity might be a key player in basophil activation.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidade Tardia , Hipersensibilidade , Humanos , Basófilos , Excipientes/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Nutrients ; 12(6)2020 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517378

RESUMO

The spectrum of gluten-related disorders (GRD) has emerged as a relevant phenomenon possibly impacting on health care procedures and costs worldwide. Current classification of GRD is mainly based on their pathophysiology, and the following categories can be distinguished: immune-mediated disorders that include coeliac disease (CD), dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), and gluten ataxia (GA); allergic reactions such as wheat allergy (WA); and non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), a condition characterized by both gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms subjectively believed to be induced by the ingestion of gluten/wheat that has recently gained popularity. Although CD, DH, and WA are well-defined clinical entities, whose diagnosis is based on specific diagnostic criteria, a diagnosis of NCGS may on the contrary be considered only after the exclusion of other organic disorders. Neither allergic nor autoimmune mechanisms have been found to be involved in NCGS. Mistakes in the diagnosis of GRD are still a relevant clinical problem that may result in overtreatment of patients being unnecessary started on a gluten-free diet and waste of health-care resources. On the basis of our clinical experience and literature, we aim to identify the main pitfalls in the diagnosis of CD and its complications, DH, and WA. We provide a practical methodological approach to guide clinicians on how to recognize and avoid them.


Assuntos
Doença Celíaca/diagnóstico , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Glutens/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/diagnóstico , Doença Celíaca/etiologia , Dermatite Herpetiforme , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/etiologia
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32476878

RESUMO

Background and objective: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and irreversible interstitial lung disease whose diagnosis often requires surgical lung biopsies (SLB) in cases without consistent radiological findings. We previously published that the expression of the chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR4 on T cells is significantly different in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of IPF patients from other interstitial lung diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate cut-off values of CXCR3 and CCR4 receptors expressed on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and peripheral blood (PB) T cells useful for a differential diagnosis. Methods: Ninety-three patients were enrolled: 35 IPF, 36 interstitial lung diseases (nIPF) and 22 sarcoidosis. CXCR3 and CCR4 were evaluated on BAL and PB T lymphocytes with flow cytometry. Results: Among PB and BAL variables considered, the values of the ratio of BAL and PB CXCR3 on CD4 cells were clustered in the most informative way to obtain a classification rule for the diagnosis of patients without steroid therapy (n = 66/93). Patients with a CXCR3 ratio BAL/PB on CD4 T cells lower or equal than 1.43 were assigned to the IPF group with sensitivity = 0.87 and specificity = 0.90. All the other variables considered showed lower sensitivity and specificity in discriminating IPF patients. Conclusions: The evaluation of chemokine receptors on BAL and PB T lymphocytes could aid to discriminate IPF in subjects without steroid therapy, particularly in those patients with a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) non typical for Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP). (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2018; 35: 35-43).

6.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom ; 92(4): 279-285, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26184676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Food hypersensitivity is characterized by a wide range of symptoms. The relationship between symptoms and food is more frequently suspected than objectively proven. Basophil activation test (BAT) is based on the evaluation of activation markers on blood basophils in vitro stimulated with drugs or allergens. The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of BAT when introduced in the routine work-up of suspected food hypersensitivity. METHODS: BAT was requested in subjects with food adverse reactions when a discrepancy existed among history and skin prick test (SPT) and/or specific IgE. Data from 150 subjects were analysed using CD63 as basophil activation marker. Thirty controls were evaluated for cut-offs. Immunoblots was performed with the sera of representative subjects positive for BAT and negative for SPT and sIgE. RESULTS: 1,024 BAT were carried out, the agreement (positive/positive and negative/negative) was 78.5% for BAT vs. SPT and 78.3% for BAT vs. IgE. Atopic patients, but not atopic controls, more frequently had a positive BAT than non-atopic patients (P < 0.0001). Among subjects with positive BAT, those with negative sIgE had lower total IgE, P = 0.001. Nearly 23.3% of all subjects had positive BAT (for at least one tested food) and both negative sIgE and SPT. Immunoblots revealed the presence of sIgE for the tested foods in representative patients with positive BAT, negative SPT and sIgE. CONCLUSION: Introduction of BAT in routine of food hypersensitivity, limited to subjects with a discrepancy between history and traditional tests, might be useful particularly when total IgE are low. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/farmacologia , Teste de Degranulação de Basófilos/métodos , Basófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alérgenos/imunologia , Basófilos/imunologia , Basófilos/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/sangue , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/fisiopatologia , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Soros Imunes/química , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cultura Primária de Células , Testes Cutâneos , Tetraspanina 30/genética , Tetraspanina 30/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA