Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(5): 672-679, 2023 09 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36881940

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the outcomes of patients treated with intravenous (IV)-only vs oral transitional antimicrobial therapy for infective endocarditis (IE) after implementing a new expected practice within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (LAC DHS). METHODS: We conducted a multicentered, retrospective cohort study of adults with definite or possible IE treated with IV-only vs oral therapy at the 3 acute care public hospitals in the LAC DHS system between December 2018 and June 2022. The primary outcome was clinical success at 90 days, defined as being alive and without recurrence of bacteremia or treatment-emergent infectious complications. RESULTS: We identified 257 patients with IE treated with IV-only (n = 211) or oral transitional (n = 46) therapy who met study inclusion criteria. Study arms were similar for many demographics; however, the IV cohort was older, had more aortic valve involvement, were hemodialysis patients, and had central venous catheters present. In contrast, the oral cohort had a higher percentage of IE caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. There was no significant difference between the groups in clinical success at 90 days or last follow-up. There was no difference in recurrence of bacteremia or readmission rates. However, patients treated with oral therapy had significantly fewer adverse events. Multivariable regression adjustments did not find significant associations between any selected variables and clinical success across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate similar outcomes of real-world use of oral vs IV-only therapy for IE, in accord with prior randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 82, 2023 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36750777

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Platelets are recognized as key immune effectors, but they are targets of bacterial virulence factors. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship between early platelet dynamics and the outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). METHOD: Electronic medical records of adult patients hospitalized for SAB between July 2012 and November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for relevant demographic, laboratory, and clinical data. The outcome endpoints were mortality and microbial persistence. RESULTS: Among the 811 patients evaluated, 29% experienced thrombocytopenia on Day 1. Platelet count nadir occurred on Days 2-3 following SAB onset, and Day 4 was a determining point of platelet count trajectory and mortality. Mortality risk was 6% or less for those with normal platelet count by Day 4 regardless of whether they experienced thrombocytopenia on Day 1, but the risk increased to 16-21% for those who experienced thrombocytopenia on Day 4 regardless of whether they had normal platelet count on Day 1 or sustained thrombocytopenia. The duration of bacteremia was prolonged by one day (median 3 d vs. 2 d) for those with sustained thrombocytopenia compared to those without. CONCLUSION: Early platelet dynamics during SAB have prognostic significance and represent an early window for potential platelet-directed therapeutic interventions to improve outcome.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Trombocitopenia , Adulto , Humanos , Prognóstico , Staphylococcus aureus , Plaquetas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 317, 2021 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33820537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that an early dysregulated cytokine response [high interleukin-10 to tissue necrosis factor (IL-10/TNF) ratio] predicted poor outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). However, high interpatient variability in cytokine levels were observed. We grouped cytokine measurements in quartiles and assessed their additive value to clinical variables for predicting bacterial persistence and 30-day mortality in patients with SAB. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was conducted in hospitalized patients with SAB. Medical charts were reviewed for relevant information. Blood samples were obtained for cytokine measurements by ELISA: interferon-gamma (IFNγ), interleukin (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17) and tissue necrosis factor (TNF). Cytokine measurements were grouped into quartiles. Significant predictors for bacterial persistence and 30-day mortality were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis was performed and predictive performance was compared between models with and without cytokine quartiles. RESULTS: Among 606 patients with SAB, a subset of patients (n = 239) had Day 1 cytokine measurements and clinical data collected; of those, 53 (22%) had persistent bacteremia. Accounting for septic shock, the addition of either IL-10 (AUC 0.708) or TNF (AUC 0.714) quartiles measured on Day 1 improved model performance for predicting bacterial persistence. All patients had Day 4 cytokine measurements; 52 patients (8.5%) died within 30-days of SAB onset. Inclusion of either IL-10 (AUC 0.873) or TNF (AUC 0.879) quartiles, but not both, measured on Day 4 to the significant clinical predictors (coronary artery disease, Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 4, and septic shock) improved model performance for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: IL-10 or TNF levels falling within the range in the upper quartiles, when combined with clinical variables, improved model performance for predicting outcomes, and may potentially be used to support aggressive management and biomarker-guided studies to evaluate the benefit of adjunctive immunotherapy for SAB in the future.


Assuntos
Citocinas/análise , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/metabolismo , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/metabolismo , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiologia , Análise de Sobrevida
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 70(4): 566-573, 2020 02 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is defined based on varying duration in literature. The primary objective was to determine the risk of poor outcomes in relation to bacteremia duration. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational study of adult hospitalized patients with SAB. Medical records were reviewed for pertinent data. Patients were grouped by bacteremia duration: short (1-2 days), intermediate (3-6 days), and prolonged (≥7 days) and compared for risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 884 patients, 63% had short, 28% intermediate, and 9% prolonged bacteremia. Overall mean age was 57 years, and 70% were male. The prolonged group had the highest proportion of methicillin-resistant SAB (P < .0001). Choice of antibiotic therapy did not significantly affect bacteremia duration; however, time to source-control procedure was delayed in the prolonged and intermediate groups compared with the short group (3.5 vs 3 vs 1 day, P < .0001). Metastatic complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality were progressively worse as bacteremia duration increased (P < .0001). Every continued day of bacteremia was associated with a relative risk of death of 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.22; P < .0001), with a significant increase in risk starting at 3 days as determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal management of SAB should target bacterial clearance as soon as possible to minimize incremental risk of mortality with each day of positive blood culture. Delay in source control but not type of antistaphylococcal therapy was significantly associated with prolonged bacteremia and worse outcomes.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(7)2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043468

RESUMO

Fluoroquinolones remain some of the more commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents in the United States, despite the wide array of reported side effects that are associated with their use. In 2019, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revised the fluoroquinolone antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints for both Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa This breakpoint revision was deemed necessary on the basis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses suggesting that the previous breakpoints were too high, in addition to the inability of the previous breakpoints to detect low-level resistance to this antibiotic class. In this minireview, we review the published data in support of this revision, as well as the potential challenges that these breakpoint revisions are likely to pose for clinical laboratories.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Laboratório Clínico/organização & administração , Serviços de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacocinética , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 149, 2019 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30760213

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prognostic capability of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) bedside scoring tool is uncertain in non-ICU patients with sepsis due to bacteremia given the low number of patients previously evaluated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult hospitalized patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Medical charts were reviewed to determine qSOFA score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) at initial presentation; their predictive values were compared for ICU admission within 48 h, ICU stay duration > 72 h, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-two patients were included; 22% had qSOFA score ≥2. Overall, mean age was 56y and 75% were male. More patients with qSOFA ≥2 had altered mentation (23% vs 5%, p < 0.0001), were infected with MRSA (42% vs 30%, p = 0.03), had endocarditis or pneumonia (29% vs 15%, p = 0.0028), and bacterial persistence ≥4d (34% vs 20%, p = 0.0039) compared to qSOFA <2 patients. Predictive performance based on AUROC was better (p < 0.0001) with qSOFA than SIRS criteria for all three outcomes, but similar to PBS ≥2. qSOFA≥2 was the strongest predictor for poor outcome by multivariable analysis and showed improved specificity but lower sensitivity than SIRS ≥2. CONCLUSIONS: qSOFA is a simple 3-variable bedside tool for use at the time of sepsis presentation that is more specific than SIRS and simpler to calculate than PBS in identifying septic patients at high risk for poor outcomes later confirmed to have S. aureus bacteremia.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/etiologia , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29203493

RESUMO

We hypothesized that dosing vancomycin to achieve trough concentrations of >15 mg/liter overdoses many adults compared to area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing. We conducted a 3-year, prospective study of vancomycin dosing, plasma concentrations, and outcomes. In year 1, nonstudy clinicians targeted trough concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/liter (infection dependent) and controlled dosing. In years 2 and 3, the study team controlled vancomycin dosing with BestDose Bayesian software to achieve a daily, steady-state AUC/MIC ratio of ≥400, with a maximum AUC value of 800 mg · h/liter, regardless of trough concentration. For Bayesian estimation of AUCs, we used trough samples in years 1 and 2 and optimally timed samples in year 3. We enrolled 252 adults who were ≥18 years old with ≥1 available vancomycin concentration. Only 19% of all trough concentrations were therapeutic versus 70% of AUCs (P < 0.0001). After enrollment, median trough concentrations by year were 14.4, 9.7, and 10.9 mg/liter (P = 0.005), with 36%, 7%, and 6% over 15 mg/liter (P < 0.0001). Bayesian AUC-guided dosing in years 2 and 3 was associated with fewer additional blood samples per subject (3.6, 2.0, and 2.4; P = 0.003), shorter therapy durations (8.2, 5.4, and 4.7 days; P = 0.03), and reduced nephrotoxicity (8%, 0%, and 2%; P = 0.01). The median inpatient stay was 20 days among nephrotoxic patients versus 6 days (P = 0.002). There was no difference in efficacy by year, with 42% of patients having microbiologically proven infections. Compared to trough concentration targets, AUC-guided, Bayesian estimation-assisted vancomycin dosing was associated with decreased nephrotoxicity, reduced per-patient blood sampling, and shorter length of therapy, without compromising efficacy. These benefits have the potential for substantial cost savings. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01932034.).


Assuntos
Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Teorema de Bayes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Crit Care Med ; 44(4): 671-9, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26540400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The contribution of individual immune response to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on outcome has not been well studied. The objective was to relate the host cytokine response to outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Three U.S. university-affiliated medical centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia hospitalized between July 2012 and August 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Blood specimens were obtained at Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia onset and 72 hours after therapy initiation. Levels of tissue necrosis factor, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-17A, and interleukin-10 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at each time point and compared between those with persistent bacteremia (≥ 4 d) and resolving bacteremia. Primary outcome was persistent bacteremia after 4 days of effective therapy. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day recurrence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included (mean age, 59 yr); of them, 33% had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Forty-seven percent of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains were staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec IV. Persistent bacteremia occurred in 24% of patients (47/196); they were more likely to die than resolving bacteremia group (28% vs 5%; p < 0.001). Compared with resolving bacteremia group, persistent bacteremia patients had higher initial median levels of tissue necrosis factor (44.73 vs 21.68 pg/mL; p < 0.001), interleukin-8 (124.76 vs 47.48 pg/mL; p = 0.028), and interleukin-10 (104.31 vs 29.72 pg/mL; p < 0.001). Despite 72 hours of treatment, levels remained higher for the persistent bacteremia group than for the resolving bacteremia group (tissue necrosis factor: 26.95 vs 18.38 pg/mL, p = 0.02; interleukin-8: 70.75 vs 27.86 pg/mL, p = 0.002; interleukin-6: 67.50 vs 21.81 pg/mL, p = 0.005; and interleukin-10: 30.98 vs 12.60 pg/mL, p < 0.001). Interleukin-17A levels were similar between groups at both time points. After controlling for confounding variables by multivariate analysis, interleukin-10/tissue necrosis factor ratio at 72 hours most significantly predicted persistence (odds ratio, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.39-6.39; p = 0.005) and mortality (odds ratio, 9.87; 95% CI, 2.64-36.91; p < 0.001) at values more than 1.00 and more than 2.56, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained elevation of interleukin-10/tissue necrosis factor ratio at 72 hours suggests a dysregulated immune response and may be used to guide management to improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/imunologia , Interleucinas/sangue , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/imunologia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 252, 2014 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24885158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Concern for MRSA in patients presented to the hospital with pneumonia may be overestimated leading to excessive prescribing of empiric anti-MRSA therapy. This study aims to identify at-risk patients and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Adults hospitalized during 2005-2011 with pneumonia diagnosed within 48 h of admission were included. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for relevant data. Patients with MRSA were matched 1:1 to those with non-MRSA pathogen or negative culture. A published risk scoring system for MRSA pneumonia was applied. RESULTS: 268 elderly patients were included, 134 patients in each group. Compared to non-MRSA group, MRSA patients presented more acutely ill (p < 0.0001) (pneumonia severity index score, 150 vs 93; vasopressor therapy, 34% vs 6%; ICU admission, 47% vs 13%; and mechanical ventilation, 35% vs 10%) and had worse outcomes (p < 0.0001) (time to reach clinical stability, 6 vs 2.5d; length of stay, 10 vs 5d; clinical failure, 28% vs 4%; 28-day mortality, 22% vs 3%). When applied to our patients, a published risk scoring scheme had 93% sensitivity but lacked specificity at 55%; 40% of medium-risk patients did not have MRSA. A history of MRSA infection or pneumonia differentiated the latter group. Most MRSA patients (66%, 88/134) were treated empirically (primarily vancomycin) but outcome was not improved by receipt of empiric therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a published risk scoring scheme with additional variables from this study can potentially reduce overprescribing of anti-MRSA empiric therapy in patients presented to the hospital with pneumonia. Prospective studies evaluating the treatment benefit of non-vancomycin alternatives as empiric therapy are needed.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1268488, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170135

RESUMO

Background: Among patients with nosocomial bacterial pneumonia, those who decompensated to requiring mechanical ventilation (vHABP) faced the highest mortality followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VABP) and non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (nvHABP). The objectives of this study were to identify risk factors associated with the development and mortality of vHABP and to evaluate antibiotic management. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients with nosocomial pneumonia during 2014-2019 was performed. Groups were stratified by vHABP, nvHABP, and VABP and compared on demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Multivariable models were generated via machine learning to identify risk factors for progression to vHABP as well as pneumonia-associated mortality for each cohort. Results: 457 patients (32% nvHABP, 37% vHABP, and 31% VABP) were evaluated. The vHABP and nvHABP groups were similar in age (median age 66.4 years) with 77% having multiple comorbidities but more vHABP patients had liver disease (18.2% vs. 7.7% p = 0.005), alcohol use disorder (27% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.0001), and were hospitalized within the past 30 days (30.4% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.02). An immediate need for ventilatory support occurred in 70% of vHABP patients on the day of diagnosis. Mortality was the highest in vHABP followed by VABP and nvHABP groups (44.6% vs. 36% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.0001). Nearly all (96%) vHABP patients had positive cultures, with Gram-negative pathogens accounting for 58.8% whereby 33.0% were resistant to extended-spectrum ß-lactams (ESBLs), ceftriaxone (17.5%), fluoroquinolones (20.6%), and carbapenems (12.4%). Up to half of the vHABP patients with ESBL-Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa did not receive an effective empiric regimen; over 50% increase in mortality rate was observed among patients whom effective therapy was initiated past the day of pneumonia diagnosis. Risk factors associated with vHABP development were alcohol use disorder, APACHE II score, vasopressor therapy prior to infection, and culture positive for ESBL-Enterobacterales whereas history of hospitalization in the past 30 days, active malignancy, isolation of ceftriaxone-resistant pathogens or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and vasopressor therapy were risk factors for vHABP-associated mortality. Conclusion: Patients with vHABP experienced an acute and severe decompensation upon diagnosis. The risk factors identified in this study could provide actionable data for clinicians to identify those at risk for vHABP at the onset of pneumonia and to target antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve treatment success.

12.
J Appl Lab Med ; 8(3): 598-634, 2023 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37140163

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT), a peptide precursor of the hormone calcitonin, is a biomarker whose serum concentrations are elevated in response to systemic inflammation caused by bacterial infection and sepsis. Clinical adoption of PCT in the United States has only recently gained traction with an increasing number of Food and Drug Administration-approved assays and expanded indications for use. There is interest in the use of PCT as an outcomes predictor as well as an antibiotic stewardship tool. However, PCT has limitations in specificity, and conclusions surrounding its utility have been mixed. Further, there is a lack of consensus regarding appropriate timing of measurements and interpretation of results. There is also a lack of method harmonization for PCT assays, and questions remain regarding whether the same clinical decision points may be used across different methods. CONTENT: This guidance document aims to address key questions related to the use of PCT to manage adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with suspected sepsis and/or bacterial infections, particularly respiratory infections. The document explores the evidence for PCT utility for antimicrobial therapy decisions and outcomes prediction. Additionally, the document discusses analytical and preanalytical considerations for PCT analysis and confounding factors that may affect the interpretation of PCT results. SUMMARY: While PCT has been studied widely in various clinical settings, there is considerable variability in study designs and study populations. Evidence to support the use of PCT to guide antibiotic cessation is compelling in the critically ill and in some lower respiratory tract infections but is lacking in other clinical scenarios, and evidence is also limited in the pediatric and neonatal populations. Interpretation of PCT results requires guidance from multidisciplinary care teams of clinicians, pharmacists, and clinical laboratorians.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções Bacterianas , Sepse , Adulto , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Criança , Pró-Calcitonina , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico
13.
Ther Adv Infect Dis ; 9: 20499361211073248, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35127081

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the severity and frequency of streptococcal bloodstream infections (BSIs), the effectiveness of oral definitive therapy remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of step-down oral antibiotics for the treatment of uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients admitted with uncomplicated streptococcal BSI between June 2015 and June 2017 were included. Patients were excluded if they received <48 h of antibiotic therapy; therapy was started >48 h after first positive culture; had complicated infections of endocarditis, bone and joint infections, or central nervous system infections; Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) ⩾ 4; or failed to respond to effective therapy necessitating continued intravenous (IV) therapy. Patients were grouped by receipt of step-down oral antibiotic therapy (PO group) versus continued IV therapy (IV group). Outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day recurrence of BSI, 30-day readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, and catheter-related or drug-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 244 patients included, 40% received step-down oral therapy (n = 98). Overall, the most common source of BSI was pneumonia (22%), followed by skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) (18%). Severity of illness measured by intensive care unit (ICU) admission and PBS was similar. The IV group had significantly longer LOS [median 10 (interquartile range [IQR] = 5-21) versus 5 (4-6) days, p < 0.01] compared with the PO group. BSI recurrence, readmission, all-cause mortality within 30 days, and AEs were similar between the groups (p = ns). CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated streptococcal BSI, patients treated with step-down oral antibiotic therapy had significantly shorter LOS compared with continued IV therapy without compromise of clinical outcomes.

14.
J Clin Med ; 11(3)2022 Jan 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35160192

RESUMO

AIMS: Infections are associated with worse short-term outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, acute infections may have lasting pathophysiologic effects that adversely influence HF outcomes after discharge. Our objective was to describe the impact of acute bacterial infections on longitudinal outcomes of patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This paper is based on a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF with or without a secondary diagnosis of acute bacterial infection in Optum Clinformatics DataMart from 2010-2015. Primary outcomes were 30 and 180-day hospital readmissions and mortality, intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, and total hospital charge, compared between those with or without an acute infection. Cohorts were compared after inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine relationship to outcomes. Of 121,783 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF, 27,947 (23%) had a diagnosis of acute infection. After weighting, 30-day hospital readmissions [17.1% vs. 15.7%, OR 1.11 (1.07-1.15), p < 0.001] and 180-day hospital readmissions [39.6% vs. 38.7%, OR 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.006] were modestly greater in those with an acute infection versus those without. Thirty-day [5.5% vs. 4.3%, OR 1.29 (1.21-1.38), p < 0.001] and 180-day mortality [10.7% vs. 9.4%, OR 1.16 (1.11-1.22), p < 0.001], length of stay (7.1 ± 7.0 days vs. 5.7 ± 5.8 days, p < 0.001), and total hospital charges (USD 62,200 ± 770 vs. USD 51,100 ± 436, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with an infection. CONCLUSIONS: The development of an acute bacterial infection in patients hospitalized for HF was associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality after discharge.

15.
Public Health Rep ; 137(1): 110-119, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715536

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Bacteremia is the presence of bacteria in the bloodstream. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and the epidemiology, process of care, and outcomes of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study that evaluated adult patients with SAB in 3 Los Angeles County hospitals from July 15, 2012, through May 31, 2018. We determined SES (low SES, intermediate SES, and high SES) for each patient and compared sociodemographic and epidemiologic characteristics, management of care received by patients with SAB (ie, process of care), and outcomes. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to determine predictors of 30-day mortality for each SES group. RESULTS: Of 915 patients included in the sample, 369 (40%) were in the low-SES group, 294 (32%) in the intermediate-SES group, and 252 (28%) in the high-SES group. Most significant predictors of 30-day mortality in the Cox proportional hazards model were admission to an intensive care unit (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.04; 95% CI, 4.26-19.14), Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 indicating critical illness (HR = 4.30; 95% CI, 2.49-7.44), having ≥3 comorbidities (HR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.85), and advanced age (HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05). Distance between home and admitting hospital affected mortality only in the low-SES group (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: SES did not independently affect the outcome of SAB; however, the farther the patient's residence from the hospital, the greater the negative effect on survival in a low-SES population. Our findings underscore the need to develop multipronged, targeted public health efforts for populations that have transportation barriers to health care.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Meios de Transporte/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus aureus
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Based on multiple randomized-controlled clinical trials, shorter antibiotic courses are equally effective as traditional longer courses for many types of infections. However, longer courses are still being used widely in the clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To describe four components involved in the successful implementation of shorter antibiotic courses in our health care institutions, including an academic, public hospital and a community hospital staffed primarily by private practitioners. SOURCES: Clinical trials and peer-reviewed publications. CONTENT: We provide practical advice on how to support the change in clinical practice to shorten antibiotic duration. Specifically, we list the steps that we have successfully used to develop and implement an institutional practice change regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy: (a) establishing consensus documents outlining a data-driven expected practice for using antibiotics, (b) antibiotic stewardship programme support, (c) provider education, and (d) reinforcing behaviour through psychological and other tools. The implementation of these processes has successfully led to shorter antibiotic courses and decreased antibiotic use in our diverse practice settings. IMPLICATIONS: Intentional improvement in decreasing the duration of antibiotic therapy can be achieved by a specific antibiotic stewardship programme strategy and tactics. The implementation of shorter antibiotic courses has effects at individual and societal levels in an era of increasing antibacterial resistance and health care costs.

17.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(9): e0760, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38371947

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the temporal dynamics of two viral-induced inflammatory proteins interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and examine their prognostic significance. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter, inpatient. PATIENTS: Adult patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between March 2021 and October 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patient sera were collected on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of hospitalization. Levels of IP-10, TRAIL, and CRP were measured using a point-of-need diagnostic immunoassay platform (MeMed BV, MeMed, Haifa, Israel) and compared between patients grouped by disease severity (severe vs nonsevere). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar regardless of severity except for a higher prevalence of diabetes and heart failure among severe patients. The immune profile at admission was similar between groups; IP-10 and CRP levels generally decreased while TRAIL levels increased over time in all patients. However, the severe group had higher IP-10 (median 713 vs 328 pg/mL; p = 0.045) and lower TRAIL levels (median 21 vs 30 pg/mL; p = 0.003) on day 3 compared with nonsevere patients. A breakpoint IP-10 level of greater than or equal to 570 pg/mL and TRAIL level of less than 25 pg/mL on day 3 were associated with COVID-19 severity. Patients with elevated day 3 IP-10 levels (≥ 570 pg/mL) were more likely to experience prolonged recovery time (median 12 vs 3 d; p < 0.001). The severe group had prolonged use of corticosteroids (12 vs 5 d; p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of secondary infections (20% vs 6%; p = 0.04) and in-hospital mortality (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001) as compared with nonsevere patients. CONCLUSIONS: The observed patterns in host immune response revealed a turning point in COVID-19 disease on hospital day 3 and the potential utility of IP-10 and TRAIL as sensitive markers associated with disease severity and time to recovery.

18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(5): e2211321, 2022 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35536578

RESUMO

Importance: Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. Objective: To construct a clinical guideline for pyogenic osteomyelitis management, with a new standard of evidence to resolve the gap between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence, through the use of a novel open access approach utilizing social media tools. Evidence Review: This consensus statement and systematic review study used a novel approach from the WikiGuidelines Group, an open access collaborative research project, to construct clinical guidelines for pyogenic osteomyelitis. In June 2021 and February 2022, authors recruited via social media conducted multiple PubMed literature searches, including all years and languages, regarding osteomyelitis management; criteria for article quality and inclusion were specified in the group's charter. The GRADE system for evaluating evidence was not used based on previously published concerns regarding the potential dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. Instead, the charter required that clear recommendations be made only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were drafted to discuss pros and cons of care choices. Both clear recommendations and clinical reviews were planned with the intention to be regularly updated as new data become available. Findings: Sixty-three participants with diverse expertise from 8 countries developed the group's charter and its first guideline on pyogenic osteomyelitis. These participants included both nonacademic and academic physicians and pharmacists specializing in general internal medicine or hospital medicine, infectious diseases, orthopedic surgery, pharmacology, and medical microbiology. Of the 7 questions addressed in the guideline, 2 clear recommendations were offered for the use of oral antibiotic therapy and the duration of therapy. In addition, 5 clinical reviews were authored addressing diagnosis, approaches to osteomyelitis underlying a pressure ulcer, timing for the administration of empirical therapy, specific antimicrobial options (including empirical regimens, use of antimicrobials targeting resistant pathogens, the role of bone penetration, and the use of rifampin as adjunctive therapy), and the role of biomarkers and imaging to assess responses to therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: The WikiGuidelines approach offers a novel methodology for clinical guideline development that precludes recommendations based on low-quality data or opinion. The primary limitation is the need for more rigorous clinical investigations, enabling additional clear recommendations for clinical questions currently unresolved by high-quality data.


Assuntos
Osteomielite , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Humanos , Osteomielite/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa
19.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 55(7): 3278-83, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21576448

RESUMO

Acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with high-dose vancomycin (VAN) therapy is a clinical concern, but no uniform diagnostic criteria exist. The AKI Network (AKIN) proposed new criteria to diagnose AKI based on abrupt changes in serum creatinine or urine output. We conducted a prospective observational study to determine the incidence and severity of AKI and associated outcomes using the AKIN criteria versus traditional definitions. Eligible patients (n = 227) were elderly (median, 70 years) and received VAN therapy for 8 days (median). AKI occurred in 43 patients (19%) using AKIN criteria at an onset of 6 days. AKI incidence was similar for patients with a trough level of ≥15 (24%; 17/72) versus <15 (17%; 26/155) µg/ml. Compared to non-AKI patients, more AKI patients resided in the intensive care unit (ICU) (47% [20/43] versus 27% [50/184]; P = 0.017), had a prior AKI episode (19% [8/43] versus 7% [5/184]; P = 0.001), and received vasopressor (28% [12/43] versus 14% [25/184]; P = 0.04) and/or nephrotoxins (84% [36/43] versus 67% [123/184]; P = 0.04). Seventeen of the AKI patients met traditional criteria, of whom more patients had stage 2 and 3 AKI (76% versus 8%; P = 0.0001), dosage adjustment (41% versus 15%) and renal consultation (35% versus 12%), prolonged length of stay after AKI (11 versus 7.5 days) and died (29% versus 12%) than those diagnosed by AKIN criteria (P value not significant). Use of AKIN criteria for AKI has the potential to improve care of VAN-treated patients by facilitating early detection of AKI and warrants confirmation in large prospective trials.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/sangue , Injúria Renal Aguda/urina , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico
20.
J Appl Lab Med ; 6(1): 194-209, 2021 01 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33241269

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a complex variable that is derived primarily from an individual's education, income, and occupation and has been found to be inversely related to outcomes of health conditions. Sepsis is the sixth most common admitting diagnosis and one of the most costly conditions for in-hospital spending in the United States. The objective of this review is to report on the relationship between SES and sepsis incidence and associated outcomes. CONTENT: Sepsis epidemiology varies when explored by race, education, geographic location, income, and insurance status. Sepsis incidence was significantly increased in individuals of Black race compared with non-Hispanic white race; in persons who have less formal education, who lack insurance, and who have low income; and in certain US regions. People with low SES are likely to have onset of sepsis significantly earlier in life and to have poorly controlled comorbidities compared with those with higher SES. Sepsis mortality and hospital readmission is increased in individuals who lack insurance, who reside in low-income or medically underserved areas, who live far from healthcare, and who lack higher level education; however, a person's race was not consistently found to increase mortality. SUMMARY: Interventions to minimize healthcare disparity for individuals with low SES should target sepsis prevention with increasing measures for preventive care for chronic conditions. Significant barriers described for access to care by people with low SES include cost, transportation, poor health literacy, and lack of a social network. Future studies should include polysocial risk scores that are consistently defined to allow for meaningful comparison across studies.


Assuntos
Sepse , Classe Social , Humanos , Incidência , Renda , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA