Exercise echocardiography to assess left atrial function in patients with symptomatic AF.

Background: Left atrial (LA) function contributes to the augmentation of cardiac output during exercise. However, LA response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We explored the LA mechanical response to exercise and the association between LA dysfunction and exercise intolerance. Methods: We recruited consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Participants underwent exercise echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Two-dimensional and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed to assess LA function at rest and during exercise. Participants were grouped according to presenting rhythm (AF vs sinus rhythm). The relationship between LA function and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients maintaining SR was assessed using linear regression. Results: Of 177 consecutive symptomatic AF patients awaiting AF ablation, 105 met inclusion criteria; 31 (29.5 %) presented in AF whilst 74 (70.5 %) presented in SR. Patients in SR augmented LA function from rest to exercise, increasing LA emptying fraction (LAEF) and LA reservoir strain. In contrast, patients in AF demonstrated reduced LAEF and reservoir strain at rest, with failure to augment either parameter during exercise. This was associated with reduced VO2Peak compared to those in SR (18.4 ± 5.6 vs 22.5 ± 7.7 ml/kg/min, p = 0.003). In patients maintaining SR, LAEF and reservoir strain at rest and during exercise were associated with VO2Peak, independent of LV function. Conclusion: The maintenance of SR in patients with AF is associated with greater LA reservoir function at rest and greater augmentation with exercise compared to patients in AF. In patients in SR, reduced LA function is associated with reduced exercise tolerance, independent of LV function.

Structural, Functional, and Electrical Remodeling of the Atria With Reduced Cardiorespiratory Fitness: Implications for AF.

BACKGROUND: Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an independent risk factor for the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that reduced CRF is associated with structural, functional, and electrical remodeling of the left atrium. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to correlate objectively assessed CRF with functional and electrical left atrial (LA) parameters using invasive and noninvasive assessments. METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic AF undergoing catheter ablation were recruited. CRF was objectively quantified pre-ablation by using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Using peak oxygen consumption, participants were classified as preserved CRF (>20 mL/kg/min) or reduced CRF (<20 mL/kg/min). LA stiffness was assessed invasively with hemodynamic monitoring and imaging during high-volume LA saline infusion. LA stiffness was calculated as ΔLA diameter/ΔLA pressure over the course of the infusion. LA function was assessed with echocardiographic measures of LA emptying fraction and LA strain. Electrical remodeling was assessed by using high-density electroanatomical maps for LA voltage and conduction. RESULTS: In total, 100 participants were recruited; 43 had reduced CRF and 57 had preserved CRF. Patients with reduced CRF displayed elevated LA stiffness (P = 0.004), reduced LA emptying fraction (P = 0.006), and reduced LA reservoir strain (P < 0.001). Reduced CRF was also associated with reduced LA voltage (P = 0.039) with greater heterogeneity (P = 0.027) and conduction slowing (P = 0.04) with greater conduction heterogeneity (P = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, peak oxygen consumption was independently associated with LA stiffness (P = 0.003) and LA conduction velocities (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced CRF in patients with AF is independently associated with worse LA disease involving functional and electrical changes. Improving CRF may be a target for restoring LA function in AF.

Utility and Validity of the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF Scores in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a significant clinical challenge. Two diagnostic scoring tools have been developed to aid the noninvasive diagnosis of HFpEF: the HFA-PEFF (Heart Failure Association Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, Functional testing, Final etiology) and the H2FPEF scoring systems. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of these 2 scoring tools for the diagnosis of HFpEF against a gold standard of invasive evaluation in a cohort of patients with AF. METHODS: The authors recruited consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and preserved ejection fraction who were scheduled for an AF ablation procedure. Gold-standard invasive diagnosis of HFpEF was performed at the AF ablation procedure using mean left atrial pressure at rest and following infusion of 500 mL fluid. Each participant was scored according to the noninvasive HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scoring systems. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of these scoring systems in diagnosing HFpEF. RESULTS: In total, 120 participants were recruited. HFpEF was diagnosed invasively in 88 (73.3%) participants, whereas 32 (26.7%) had no HFpEF. Using the HFA-PEFF score, 38 (31.7%) participants had a high probability of HFpEF and 82 (68.3%) had low/intermediate probability of HFpEF. Using the H2FPEF tool, 72 (60%) participants had a high probability of HFpEF and 48 (40%) had intermediate probability. A high HFA-PEFF (≥5 points) score could diagnose HFpEF with a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 91%, and a high H2FPEF score (≥6 points) could diagnose HFpEF with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 66%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar using both tools (AUC: 0.663 vs 0.707, respectively; P = 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: Against a gold standard of invasively diagnosed HFpEF, the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores demonstrate only moderate accuracy in patients with AF and should be utilized with caution in this cohort of patients. (Characterising Left Atrial Function and Compliance in Atrial Fibrillation; ACTRN12620000639921).