RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of the US population reports having a ß-lactam allergy, although nearly 90% do not have a true immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reaction. This misconception results in using nonpreferred antibiotics, leading to antimicrobial resistance and treatment failure. To evaluate, clarify, and clear ß-lactam allergies, we implemented a pharmacist-driven ß-lactam allergy assessment (BLAA) protocol and penicillin allergy clinic (PAC). The purpose of this study was to illustrate the BLAA process, including the pharmacist-run PAC, and assess the impact on allergy clearance. METHODS: Clinical pharmacy specialists (CPS) evaluated hospitalized veterans with ß-lactam allergies, using the BLAA protocol. Eligible patients could later be seen in PAC. This was a retrospective observational review of the BLAA protocol to assess recommendations for ß-lactam antibiotic use and PAC outcomes. RESULTS: Between November 2017 and February 2020, 278 patients were evaluated, and 32 were seen in the clinic. The most common allergen was penicillin, and the most reported reaction was a rash (27%) or pruritus and urticaria (18%). Through PAC and the BLAA protocol, 86 patients (31%) were cleared for allergy removal, and 188 (68%) were cleared for alternative ß-lactams. The evaluation revealed that 274 patients (99%) were eligible to receive a ß-lactam antibiotic, and only 4 patients (1%) were recommended for avoidance of all ß-lactams. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the utility of the pharmacist-driven BLAA protocol. We illustrated that most patients with documented ß-lactam allergies were eligible for alternative ß-lactams. The implementation of the BLAA protocol and pharmacist-run PAC facilitated allergy clearance and has the potential to promote alternative ß-lactam use.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous (IV) vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone have shown promise in reducing hospital mortality. The Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) similarly implemented this regimen, called the vitamin C protocol, for patients presenting in sepsis or septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This retrospective study in Veteran ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock compared outcomes of patients treated with IV vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone (treatment) with those who received IV hydrocortisone alone (control). Data was propensity matched to ensure comparability at baseline. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was calculated at day of diagnosis (day 0) and daily for 3 subsequent days. At the 24-month follow-up, 12 months after the 1-year-intervention, survival and measures of mental and physical health were collected by telephone interviews. RESULTS: Hospital mortality, the primary outcome, did not differ significantly between groups. Secondary outcomes including ICU, 28-day, and 60-day mortality were also not different, nor were vasopressor duration or hospital length of stay. However, ICU length of stay was significantly reduced in the treatment group compared to control (7.1 vs 15.6 days, respectively, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although no significant mortality benefit was observed, the vitamin C protocol was not associated with patient harm. In this Veteran population, there was reduced ICU length of stay, suggesting possible benefit. Though further investigation is warranted, utilization of IV vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone in patients with sepsis or septic shock may be a treatment option worth considering.