Psychological characteristics of Japanese patients and their family members receiving genetic counseling: A single-institute exploratory study.

In Japan, clinical genetic services became available in the 1970s, and genomic medicine, including genetic counseling (GC), developed rapidly. However, research on the outcomes of GC in Japan is limited. Japan has a unique cultural context, and appropriate GC methods have not yet been optimized for this population. The current study aimed to evaluate the psychological status of Japanese patients and their companions undergoing GC and the outcomes of GC. We used the Quality of Care Through the Patients' Eyes-gene cancer (QUOTE-geneCA ), the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale-24 (GCOS-24), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) to evaluate patients and their companions' needs and preferences regarding GC, empowerment, and anxiety, respectively. We evaluated stress status during GC by measuring saliva cortisol levels. QUOTE-geneCA results for patients (n = 69) and a group of patients and their companions (n = 96) revealed that participants felt that it was important that skilled medical staff explained medical information and provided advice in an easily understandable manner. Japanese patients and their companions regarded the procedural aspects of counseling as most important and their autonomy in decision-making as less important. GCOS-24 results revealed a significant increase in empowerment scores in 38 patients (by 9.63 points) from pre- to post-GC (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.79). STAI results revealed a significant decrease in state anxiety for patients (6.11 points; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.66). Cortisol levels in patients significantly decreased after GC (p = 0.001). The improvement of empowerment scores from pre- to post-GC among patients and their companions were significantly negatively correlated with pre-GC empowerment scores (p < 0.001), trait anxiety scores (p = 0.001), and the number of people living together (p = 0.011). The change of cortisol levels during GC in patients and their companions was significantly positively correlated with trait anxiety score (p = 0.027). This study suggested that these characteristics of Japanese patients and their companions may predict GC outcomes.

Cumulative perioperative lymphocyte/C-reactive protein ratio as a predictor of the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Systemic inflammatory response influences cancer development and perioperative surgical stress can affect the survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We developed a system to cumulatively assess perioperative inflammatory response and compare the prognostic value of various cumulative inflammatory and nutritional markers in patients with CRC. METHODS: We assessed perioperative cumulative markers using the trapezoidal area method in 307 patients who underwent surgery for CRC and analyzed the results statistically. RESULTS: The cumulative lymphocyte to C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio (LCR) predicted survival more accurately than other well-established markers (sensitivity: 80.0%, specificity: 69.3%; area under the curve (AUC): 0.779; P < 0.001). A low cumulative LCR was correlated with factors associated with disease development, including undifferentiated histology, advanced T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and advanced TNM stage classification. A decreased cumulative LCR was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio (HR):5.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42-11.2; P < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.07-3.31; P = 0.02), and its prognostic significance was verified in a different clinical setting. The cumulative LCR was correlated negatively with the intraoperative bleeding volume (P < 0.0001, R = -0.4). Combined analysis of cumulative and preoperative LCR could help stratify risk for the oncological outcomes of CRC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate the value of the cumulative LCR in the postoperative management of patients with CRC.

[Genomic Tests: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice].

Advanced genomic analytical technologies are developing and challenging the current framework of clinical laboratory testing. However, most genomic tests have been devised as laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) without sufficient validation of their analytical validity. Quality assurance (QA) of tests is mandatory for routine clinical practice. External quality management systems such as ISO add QA. Other than QAs of pre-analysis, analytical procedures, reports, and laboratory personnel should be regularly assessed using appropriate best practices and guidelines for analytical validity. Moreover, ethical, legal, and social issues concerning genomic information should be resolved in genomic tests. Taken together, clinicians and health care policymakers must consider the accuracy with which a test identifies a patient's clinical status and the risks and benefits resulting from test use. Genomic tests in current use vary in terms of their accuracy and potential to improve health outcomes. Recently, high-throughput analysis using next-generation sequencing and microarrays is being developed and introduced into clinical practice. As analysis of these data sets is a huge challenge, it requires novel analytical processes that include data quality assessment, comprehensive analysis, interpretation of the results, and presenting the results to users. Especially, human resources are required to develop genome informatics to interpret large amounts of data. Another issue is to regulate Direct To Consumers (DTC) genetic tests by medical institutions as a salutary health service. Although advanced genomic analytical technologies present some issues, they are useful and powerful tools in clinical practice. Thus, they will be properly introduced into clinical practices in a step by step manner.

Prognostic potential of METTL3 expression in patients with gastric cancer.

Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) is a crucial component of the m6A methyltransferase complex, which serves pivotal roles in tumor progression. The present study investigated the prognostic significance of METTL3 expression in gastric cancer (GC). The expression levels of METTL3 were assessed by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens from 158 patients with GC. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to clarify its prognostic potential. METTL3 gene expression was also investigated in fresh frozen specimens from another independent cohort of 57 patients with GC to establish its clinical relevance. Knockdown of METTL3 by small interfering RNA transfection was performed to evaluate its function in vitro. METTL3 expression was significantly higher in cancerous tissues compared with in corresponding normal mucosa (P<0.0001), and high METTL3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival in the FFPE cohort of patients with GC. PSM analysis revealed that elevated METTL3 expression was significantly associated with poor survival outcomes, which was subsequently validated in another cohort of fresh frozen specimens. Knockdown of METTL3 inhibited proliferation, invasion, migration and anoikis resistance in GC cells. In conclusion, METTL3 expression may be used as a clinically feasible prognostic marker and could serve as a potential therapeutic target in patients with GC.

Combined assessment of muscle quality and quantity predicts oncological outcome in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia consists of two dysregulation patterns of body composition, myopenia and myosteatosis. The aim of this study is to compare the preoperative status of various body composition indexes including our newly developed modified intramuscular adipose tissue content (mIMAC) to investigate these clinical values in esophageal cancer patients. METHOD: We assessed preoperative psoas muscle mass index (PMI), IMAC, and mIMAC in 150 esophageal cancer patients. RESULTS: Preoperative high IMAC and low mIMAC status were significantly associated with older age. Preoperative decreased mIMAC was significantly associated with advanced T classification and the presence of distant metastasis and low preoperative mIMAC was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival and disease-free survival in esophageal cancer patients. Combined assessment of preoperative mIMAC with PMI could help stratify risk for oncological outcomes. Finally, preoperative PMI and mIMAC were positively correlated with various nutritional factors in esophageal cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Combined assessment between preoperative PMI and mIMAC could stratify risk for oncological outcomes, and preoperative mIMAC might be surrogate marker for aging and nutritional status in esophageal cancer patients.

Clinical Relevance of Myopenia and Myosteatosis in Colorectal Cancer.

Sarcopenia was initially described as a decrease in muscle mass associated with aging and subsequently also as a consequence of underlying disease, including advanced malignancy. Accumulating evidence shows that sarcopenia has clinically significant effects in patients with malignancy, including an increased risk of adverse events associated with medical treatment, postoperative complications, and a poor survival outcome. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and several lines of evidence suggest that preoperative sarcopenia negatively impacts various outcomes in patients with CRC. In this review, we summarize the current evidence in this field and the clinical relevance of sarcopenia in patients with CRC from three standpoints, namely, the adverse effects of medical treatment, postoperative infectious complications, and oncological outcomes.

Modified intramuscular adipose tissue content as a feasible surrogate marker for malnutrition in gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Myosteatosis is gathering attention as a feasible indicator for sarcopenia and increased risk of morbidity. However, the prognostic value of intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) as an assessment method for myosteatosis remains controversial. The objectives of this study are to compare the prognostic value of intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) with our newly-developed modified IMAC (mIMAC), and to assess the clinical significance of mIMAC in colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: We evaluated 892 patients with CRC or GC, and assessed preoperative IMAC and mIMAC to compare their prognostic and predictive values for postoperative infectious complications in both cohorts. RESULTS: Both preoperative IMAC and mIMAC were sex- and disease-dependent, and positively or negatively correlated with age in CRC and GC patients (IMAC: CRC: r = 0.33, P < 0.0001; GC: r = 0.304, P < 0.0001; mIMAC: CRC: r = -0.364, P < 0.0001; GC: r = -0.263, P < 0.0001). In contrast to IMAC, lower preoperative mIMAC was significantly associated with disease-development factors, and was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in both CRC (OS: hazard ratio (HR): 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.03, p = 0.003; DFS: HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.22-3.04, p = 0.005) and GC patients (OS: HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.22-3.68, P = 0.008; DFS: HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.18-3.5, P = 0.011). Patients with postoperative remote infections had a poorer prognosis compared with those without in both cohorts (CRC: HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.46-4.89, P = 0.002; GC: HR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.47-6.19, P = 0.003), and low mIMAC was an independent risk factor for postoperative remote infection in both cancers (CRC: odds ratio (OR): 2.56, 95% CI: 1.06-6.23, P = 0.038; GC: OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.03-7.58, P = 0.043). Finally, we assessed the correlation between IMAC or mIMAC and the representative frailty markers body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). We found a positive correlation between preoperative mIMAC and all of these markers in both cohorts (CRC: BMI: r = 0.193, P < 0.0001; serum albumin: r = 0.42, P < 0.0001; PNI: r = 0.39, P < 0.0001; GC: BMI: r = 0.22, P < 0.0001; serum albumin: r = 0.212, P < 0.0001; PNI: r = 0.287, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative mIMAC could be useful for perioperative and postoperative management in CRC and GC.