Implementation, Clinical Benefit and Safety of a D-Dimer-Focused Pulmonary Embolism Testing Pathway in the Emergency Department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is overused during pulmonary embolism (PE) testing in the emergency department (ED), whereas prediction rules and D-dimer are underused. We report the adherence, clinical benefit, and safety of a D-dimer-only strategy to guide need for PE imaging in the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter implementation study in 2 EDs with historical and external controls. Patients with suspected PE underwent D-dimer testing and imaging (CTPA or ventilation-perfusion scan) when D-dimer levels were 500 ng/mL or more. PE was ruled out if D-dimer was less than 500 ng/mL or with negative imaging. The primary implementation outcome was the proportion of patients tested for PE in adherence with the pathway. The primary clinical benefit outcome was the proportion of patients tested for PE who received pulmonary imaging. The primary safety outcome was diagnosis of PE in the 30 days following negative PE testing postimplementation. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and June 2021, 16,155 patients were tested for PE, including 33.4% postimplementation, 30.7% preimplementation, and 35.9% in an external control site. Adherence with the D-dimer-only pathway was 97.6% (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) post- versus preimplementation 5.26 (95% confidence interval 1.70 to 16.26). There was no effect on the proportion undergoing PE imaging. Imaging yield increased aOR 4.89 (1.17 to 20.53). Two cases of PE (0.04%; 0.01% to 0.16%) were diagnosed within 30 days. CONCLUSION: In this Canadian ED study, the uptake of a D-dimer-only PE testing strategy was high. Implementation was associated with higher imaging yield and a D-dimer level of less than 500 ng/mL safely excluded PE.

Post-Pandemic Growth in 9-1-1 Paramedic Calls and Emergency Department Transports Surpasses Pre-Pandemic Rates in the COVID-19 Era: Implications for Paramedic Resource Planning.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in emergency department (ED) visits and a subsequent return to baseline pre-pandemic levels. It is unclear if this trend extended to paramedic services and if patient cohorts accessing paramedics changed. We examined trends and associations between paramedic utilization (9-1-1 calls and ED transports) and the COVID-19 timeframe. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using paramedic call data from the Hamilton Paramedic Services from January 2016 to December 2023. We included all 9-1-1 calls where paramedics responded to an incident, excluding paramedic interfacility transfers. We calculated lines of best fit for the pre-pandemic period (January 2016 to January 2020) and compared their predictions to the actual volumes in the post-pandemic period (May 2021 to December 2023). We used an interrupted time series regression model to determine the association between pandemic timeframes (pre-, during-, post-COVID-19) and paramedic utilization (9-1-1 calls and ED transports), while testing for annual seasonality. RESULTS: During the study timeframe, 577,278 calls for paramedics were received and 413,491 (71.6%) were transported to the ED. Post-pandemic, 9-1-1 calls exceeded predicted pre-pandemic levels by 1,298 per month, while ED transports exceeded by 543 per month. The pandemic significantly reduced monthly 9-1-1 calls (-588.2, 95% CI -928.8 to -247.5) and ED transports (-677.3, 95% CI -927.0 to -427.5). Post-pandemic, there was a significant and sustained resurgence in monthly 9-1-1 calls (1,208.0, 95% CI 822.1 to 1,593.9) and ED transports (868.8, 95% CI 585.8 to 1,151.7). Both models exhibited seasonal variations. CONCLUSIONS: Post-pandemic, 9-1-1-initiated paramedic calls experienced a substantial increase, surpassing pre-pandemic growth rates. ED transports returned to pre-pandemic levels but with a steeper and continuous pattern of growth. The resurgence in paramedic 9-1-1 calls and ED transports post-COVID-19 emphasizes an urgent necessity to expedite development of new care models that address how paramedics respond to 9-1-1 calls and transport to overcrowded EDs.

Cost Evaluation of the Ontario Virtual Urgent Care Pilot Program: Population-Based, Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Ontario, Canada, introduced a virtual urgent care (VUC) pilot program to provide alternative access to urgent care services and reduce the need for in-person emergency department (ED) visits for patients with low acuity health concerns. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the 30-day costs associated with VUC and in-person ED encounters from an MoH perspective. METHODS: Using administrative data from Ontario (the most populous province of Canada), a population-based, matched cohort study of Ontarians who used VUC services from December 2020 to September 2021 was conducted. As it was expected that VUC and in-person ED users would be different, two cohorts of VUC users were defined: (1) those who were promptly referred to an ED by a VUC provider and subsequently presented to an ED within 72 hours (these patients were matched to in-person ED users with any discharge disposition) and (2) those seen by a VUC provider with no referral to an in-person ED (these patients were matched to patients who presented in-person to the ED and were discharged home by the ED physician). Bootstrap techniques were used to compare the 30-day mean costs of VUC (operational costs to set up the VUC program plus health care expenditures) versus in-person ED care (health care expenditures) from an MoH perspective. All costs are expressed in Canadian dollars (a currency exchange rate of CAD $1=US $0.76 is applicable). RESULTS: We matched 2129 patients who presented to an ED within 72 hours of VUC referral and 14,179 patients seen by a VUC provider without a referral to an ED. Our matched populations represented 99% (2129/2150) of eligible VUC patients referred to the ED by their VUC provider and 98% (14,179/14,498) of eligible VUC patients not referred to the ED by their VUC provider. Compared to matched in-person ED patients, 30-day costs per patient were significantly higher for the cohort of VUC patients who presented to an ED within 72 hours of VUC referral ($2805 vs $2299; difference of $506, 95% CI $139-$885) and significantly lower for the VUC cohort of patients who did not require ED referral ($907 vs $1270; difference of $362, 95% CI 284-$446). Overall, the absolute 30-day costs associated with the 2 VUC cohorts were $18.9 million (ie, $6.0 million + $12.9 million) versus $22.9 million ($4.9 million + $18.0 million) for the 2 in-person ED cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This costing evaluation supports the use of VUC as most complaints were addressed without referral to ED. Future research should evaluate targeted applications of VUC (eg, VUC models led by nurse practitioners or physician assistants with support from ED physicians) to inform future resource allocation and policy decisions.

Health care utilization and outcomes of patients seen by virtual urgent care versus in-person emergency department care.

BACKGROUND: Virtual urgent care (VUC) is intended to support diversion of patients with low-acuity complaints and reduce the need for in-person emergency department visits. We aimed to describe subsequent health care utilization and outcomes of patients who used VUC compared with similar patients who had an in-person emergency department visit. METHODS: We used patient-level encounter data that were prospectively collected for patients using VUC services provided by 14 pilot programs in Ontario, Canada. We linked the data to provincial administrative databases to identify subsequent 30-day health care utilization and outcomes. We defined 2 subgroups of VUC users; those with a documented prompt referral to an emergency department by a VUC provider, and those without. We matched patients in each cohort to an equal number of patients presenting to an emergency department in person, based on encounter date, medical concern and the logit of a propensity score. For the subgroup of patients not promptly referred to an emergency department, we matched patients to those who were seen in an emergency department and then discharged home. RESULTS: Of the 19 595 patient VUC visits linked to administrative data, we matched 2129 patients promptly referred to the emergency department by a VUC provider to patients presenting to the emergency department in person. Index visit hospital admissions (9.4% v. 8.7%), 30-day emergency department visits (17.0% v. 17.5%), and hospital admissions (12.9% v. 11.0%) were similar between the groups. We matched 14 179 patients who were seen by a VUC provider with no documented referral to the emergency department. Patients seen by VUC were more likely to have a subsequent in-person emergency department visit within 72 hours (13.7% v. 7.0%), 7 days (16.5% v. 10.3%) and 30 days (21.9% v. 17.9%), but hospital admissions were similar within 72 hours (1.1% v. 1.3%), and higher within 30 days for patients who were discharged home from the emergency department (2.6% v. 3.4%). INTERPRETATION: The impact of the provincial VUC pilot program on subsequent health care utilization was limited. There is a need to better understand the inherent limitations of virtual care and ensure future virtual providers have timely access to in-person outpatient resources, to prevent subsequent emergency department visits.

Development of a machine learning-based acuity score prediction model for virtual care settings.

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare is increasingly digitized, yet remote and automated machine learning (ML) triage prediction systems for virtual urgent care use remain limited. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is the gold standard triage tool for in-person care in Canada. The current work describes the development of a ML-based acuity score modelled after the CTAS system. METHODS: The ML-based acuity score model was developed using 2,460,109 de-identified patient-level encounter records from three large healthcare organizations (Ontario, Canada). Data included presenting complaint, clinical modifiers, age, sex, and self-reported pain. 2,041,987 records were high acuity (CTAS 1-3) and 416,870 records were low acuity (CTAS 4-5). Five models were trained: decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, gradient boosting regressor, and neural net. The outcome variable of interest was the acuity score predicted by the ML system compared to the CTAS score assigned by the triage nurse. RESULTS: Gradient boosting regressor demonstrated the greatest prediction accuracy. This final model was tuned toward up triaging to minimize patient risk if adopted into the clinical context. The algorithm predicted the same score in 47.4% of cases, and the same or more acute score in 95.0% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The ML algorithm shows reasonable predictive accuracy and high predictive safety and was developed using the largest dataset of its kind to date. Future work will involve conducting a pilot study to validate and prospectively assess reliability of the ML algorithm to assign acuity scores remotely.

Was Virtual Care as Safe as In-Person Care? Analyzing Patient Outcomes at Seven and Thirty Days in Ontario during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

In 2020, almost overnight, the paradigm for healthcare interactions changed in Ontario. To limit person-to-person transmission of COVID-19, the norm of in-person interactions shifted to virtual care. While this shift was part of broader public health measures and an acknowledgment of patient and societal concerns, it also represented a change in care modalities that had the potential to affect the quality of care provided, as well as short- and long-term patient outcomes. While public policy decisions were being made to moderate the use of virtual care at the end of the declared pandemic, a thorough analysis of short-term patient outcomes was needed to quantify the impact of virtual care on the population of Ontario.

Do Patients Respond to Posted Emergency Department Wait Times: Time-Series Evidence From the Implementation of a Wait Time Publication System in Hamilton, Canada.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: One proposed solution to prolonged emergency department (ED) wait times is a publicly available website that displays estimated ED wait times. This could provide information to patients so that they may choose sites with low wait times, which has the potential to smooth the overall wait times in EDs across a health system. We describe the effect of a novel city-wide ED wait time website on patient volume distributions throughout the city of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We compared the number of new patients arriving every 15 minutes during 2 separate time periods-before and after a publicly viewable wait time website was made available. For each ED site, the effect of the posted wait time was measured by assessing its association with the total number of patient arrivals in the subsequent hour at the same site and at all other sites in Hamilton. RESULTS: Linear models showed clinically modest changes in patient volumes when wait times changed. However, nonlinear models showed that a 60-minute increase in wait time at a site was associated with 10% fewer patients presenting over the next hour. Larger negative associations were observed at community hospitals and urgent care centers. Increases in wait times at a given site were also associated with increased patient volumes at other sites in the system. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of a public wait time website, elevated wait times led to fewer patients at the same site but more patient visits at other sites. This may be consistent with the wait time tracker inducing patients to avoid sites with high wait times and instead visit alternate sites in Hamilton, but only when wait times were very high.

Teaching M&M rounds skills: enhancing and assessing patient safety competencies using the Ottawa M&M model.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate medical education bodies and national patient safety institutes recommend that trainees develop patient safety competencies such as those for Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) rounds, yet there exists no model for their educational delivery. OBJECTIVE: We studied the effect of a single educational intervention on emergency medicine residents' aptitudes in selecting and analysing M&M rounds cases. METHODS: In this before-and-after study, participants attended an 1 h educational session based on the previously described Ottawa Morbidity and Mortality Model (OM3). Residents were asked to submit a case suitable for M&M rounds both preintervention and postintervention. A novel M&M rounds case critique tool was developed based on OM3 and used to assign a numerical score to each submitted case. Our primary outcome was an increase in mean scores between phases using the case critique tool. An a priori score increase of 1 was defined as educationally significant. Data were analysed using a paired Student's t test. RESULTS: A total of 19 residents were recruited for our pre-intervention and 15 residents for the post-intervention analysis. Mean M&M rounds case critique scores increased from 5.53 to 8.67 (p<0.01) between phases. Residents reported higher comfort with structured case selection and analysis, with an increase in five-point Likert scale means of 2.32 and 3.69 (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found that residents were more effective at M&M rounds case selection and analysis after our focused 1 h educational intervention. Training programmes should consider an M&M rounds training model to ensure future physicians have these skills for 21st-century practice.

A needs assessment for formal emergency medicine curriculum and training in Zambia.

Emergency medicine (EM) is a nascent field in Zambia. While not yet recognized as a medical specialty, there is national interest for developing more robust emergency care systems in this setting. One key element of strengthening EM in Zambia is identifying current gaps in emergency healthcare provision and opportunities for advancement in the field. This research used a modified version of the Emergency Care Assessment Tool to characterize the landscape of EM in Zambia. We collected data on the extent of EM training and teaching engagement among physicians practicing EM in Zambia. The survey assessed three aspects of core EM "signal functions" among the respondents which included; how often they performed the function, how confident they felt with the function, and how important they deemed the function to be in their practice. Finally, we asked respondents to identify barriers to performing the functions in their departments. The majority of respondents were early in their career, all below the age of 50, and participated in some form of teaching and supervision of learners, with minimal access to teaching resources to enhance their work. There was unanimous agreement with the need for formal postgraduate EM training in Zambia. The EM functions performed least often by EM physicians, and in which they felt the least confident, were high-acuity low-occurrence (HALO) procedures such as surgical airway and pericardiocentesis. The most common barrier to performing an EM function was access to supplies, equipment and medication. The second most commonly cited barrier was healthcare worker training. This research identified several critical needs for EM curricula in Zambia, specifically teaching resources for clinicians who supervise learners, directed learning on HALO procedures, and formal postgraduate training in EM based in Zambia.

The inseparability of context and clinical reasoning.

Early descriptions of clinical reasoning have described a dual process model that relies on analytical or nonanalytical approaches to develop a working diagnosis. In this classic research, clinical reasoning is portrayed as an individual-driven cognitive process based on gathering information from the patient encounter, forming mental representations that rely on previous experience and engaging developed patterns to drive working diagnoses and management plans. Indeed, approaches to patient safety, as well as teaching and assessing clinical reasoning focus on the individual clinician, often ignoring the complexity of the system surrounding the diagnostic process. More recent theories and evidence portray clinical reasoning as a dynamic collection of processes that takes place among and between persons across clinical settings. Yet, clinical reasoning, taken as both an individual and a system process, is insufficiently supported by theories of cognition based on individual clinicals and lacks the specificity needed to describe the phenomenology of clinical reasoning. In this review, we reinforce that the modern healthcare ecosystem - with its people, processes and technology - is the context in which health care encounters and clinical reasoning take place.

Recommendations for patient-centered emergency care.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-centred care is more than just an aspiration, it represents a fundamental shift in the way healthcare must be delivered. Patient-centred emergency care is important for improving the patient and clinician experience and is essential for optimizing health outcomes. Creating a patient-centred emergency department emphasizes the importance of the patient's experience, preferences, and values. METHODS: To formulate recommendations for patient-centred care, we synthesized a literature review, stakeholder interviews, consensus from an expert panel of diverse healthcare professionals and a patient advocate, and reviewed our recommendations for feedback with a presentation at the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) 2023 Annual Conference Academic Symposium. RESULTS: This paper gives practical recommendations for areas and strategies to improve patient-centredness in Emergency Medicine. It delves into the various dimensions of this approach, including the role of the physical environment, communications and interpersonal interactions, systems of care, and measurement, all of which are essential in providing optimal care to match the patients' needs. CONCLUSION: We seek to inspire a renewed commitment of placing the patient at the heart of emergency care, recognizing that patient-centredness is not merely an option but a fundamental aspect of delivering high quality, compassionate and effective healthcare in the emergency setting. In an era marked by technological advancements and evolving healthcare paradigms, the essence of medicine as a deeply human endeavour is becoming in some ways more possible, if we seize the opportunities.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: Les soins axés sur le patient sont plus qu'une simple aspiration, ils représentent un changement fondamental dans la façon dont les soins de santé doivent être dispensés. Les soins d'urgence axés sur les patients sont importants pour améliorer l'expérience des patients et des cliniciens et sont essentiels pour optimiser les résultats pour la santé. La création d'un service d'urgence axé sur le patient souligne l'importance de l'expérience, des préférences et des valeurs du patient. MéTHODES: Afin de formuler des recommandations pour les soins axés sur les patients, nous avons synthétisé une analyse documentaire, des entrevues avec les intervenants, le consensus d'un comité d'experts composé de divers professionnels de la santé et d'un défenseur des patients. et nous avons examiné nos recommandations en matière de rétroaction lors d'une présentation au colloque universitaire annuel 2023 de l'Association canadienne des médecins d'urgence (ACMU). RéSULTATS: Ce document donne des recommandations pratiques sur les domaines et les stratégies pour améliorer l'orientation des patients en médecine d'urgence. Il examine les diverses dimensions de cette approche, y compris le rôle de l'environnement physique, les communications et les interactions interpersonnelles, les systèmes de soins et la mesure, qui sont tous essentiels pour fournir des soins optimaux afin de répondre aux besoins des patients. CONCLUSION: Nous cherchons à inspirer un engagement renouvelé à placer le patient au cœur des soins d'urgence, reconnaissant que l'orientation du patient n'est pas seulement une option, mais un aspect fondamental de la prestation de soins de santé de haute qualité, compatissants et efficaces en milieu d'urgence. À une époque marquée par les progrès technologiques et l'évolution des paradigmes de la santé, l'essence de la médecine en tant qu'entreprise profondément humaine devient à certains égards plus possible, si nous saisissons les opportunités.

GridlockED as an Intervention for Nurses (GAAIN) Study.

BACKGROUND: GridlockED (The Game Crafter, LLC) is a serious game that was developed to teach challenges that face nursing and medical professionals in the emergency department (ED). However, few studies have explored nurses' perceptions of the utility, fidelity, acceptability, and applicability of the serious game modality. This study examined how ED nurses view GridlockED as a continuing education platform. METHOD: This single-center observational study explored how nurses engage with and respond to Grid-lockED. The convenience sample included participants recruited from a local continuing nursing education day. Participants completed a presurvey, engaged in a full game play session with the GridlockED game for approximately 45 minutes, and immediately completed a post-game play survey. RESULTS: Of the 48 participants (11 male, 37 female; 44 of 48 were RNs), most (91%) agreed that the workflow reflected in the game was equivalent to the flow in a typical ED. Almost all (96%) found the cases in the game reflective of real ED patients, and most (92%) found the game a useful educational tool to prepare new nurses to transition into the ED environment. CONCLUSION: The GridlockED game shows potential as a serious game to support nursing education, particularly for new ED nurse orientation and transition to ED practice. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(5):231-238.].

Validating the Emergency Department Avoidability Classification (EDAC): A cluster randomized single-blinded agreement study.

INTRODUCTION: The Emergency Department Avoidability Classification (EDAC) retrospectively classifies emergency department (ED) visits that could have been safely managed in subacute primary care settings, but has not been validated against a criterion standard. A validated EDAC could enable accurate and reliable quantification of avoidable ED visits. We compared agreement between the EDAC and ED physician judgements to specify avoidable ED visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized, single-blinded agreement study in an academic hospital in Hamilton, Canada. ED visits between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019 were clustered based on EDAC classes and randomly sampled evenly. A total of 160 ED visit charts were randomly assigned to ten participating ED physicians at the academic hospital for evaluation. Physicians judged if the ED visit could have been managed appropriately in subacute primary care (an avoidable visit); each ED visit was evaluated by two physicians independently. We measured interrater agreement between physicians with a Cohen's kappa and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We evaluated the correlation between the EDAC and physician judgements using a Spearman rank correlation and ordinal logistic regression with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We examined the EDAC's precision to identify avoidable ED visits using accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: ED physicians agreed on 139 visits (86.9%) with a kappa of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.79), indicating substantial agreement. Physicians judged 96.2% of ED visits classified as avoidable by the EDAC as suitable for management in subacute primary care. We found a high correlation between the EDAC and physician judgements (0.64), as well as a very strong association to classify avoidable ED visits (OR 80.0, 95% CI 17.1-374.9). The EDACs avoidable and potentially avoidable classes demonstrated strong accuracy to identify ED visits suitable for management in subacute care (82.8%, 95% CI 78.2-86.8). DISCUSSION: The EDAC demonstrated strong evidence of criterion validity to classify avoidable ED visits. This classification has important potential for accurately monitoring trends in avoidable ED utilization, measuring proportions of ED volume attributed to avoidable visits and informing interventions intended at reducing ED use by patients who do not require emergency or life-saving healthcare.

Evaluating emergency department transfers from urgent care centres: insights for paramedic integration with subacute healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: Paramedics redirecting non-emergent patients from emergency departments (EDs) to urgent care centres is a new and forthcoming strategy to reduce overcrowding and improve primary care integration. Which patients are likely not suitable for paramedic redirection are unknown. To describe and specify patients inappropriate for urgent care centres, we examined associations between patient characteristics and transfer to the ED after patients initially presented to an urgent care centre. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study of all adult (≥18 years) visits to an urgent care centre from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2020 in Ontario, Canada. Binary logistic regression was used to determine unadjusted and adjusted associations between patient characteristics and being transferred to an ED using OR and 95% CIs. We calculated the absolute risk difference for the adjusted model. RESULTS: A total of 1 448 621 urgent care visits were reported, with 63 343 (4.4%) visits transferred to an ED for definitive care. Being 65 years and older (OR 2.29, 95% CI 2.23 to 2.35), scored an emergent Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale of 1 or 2 (OR 14.27, 95% CI 13.45 to 15.12) and higher comorbidity count (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.58) had added odds of association with being transferred out to an ED. CONCLUSION: Readily available patient characteristics were independently associated with interfacility transfers between urgent care centres and the ED. This study can support paramedic redirection protocol development, highlighting which patients may not be best suited for ED redirection.

The COVID-19 impact and characterization on substance use-related emergency department visits for adolescents and young adults in Canada: Practical implications.

RATIONALE: Coronavirus (COVID-19)-related stressors precipitated the mental health crisis and increased substance use in Canada and worldwide. As the pandemic continues to evolve, monitoring and updating substance use-related ED visit trends is essential to ensure the stability and quality of ED services under the prolonged pandemic timeline. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the trends and characterization of substance use-related ED visits during the pandemic among adolescents and young adults (aged 13-25 years) in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted using population-based, repeated cross-sectional data. The volume, patient characteristics (age and sex) and hospital/ED visit features (triage to end time, timing of the visit, triage level and referral source) were compared before (2019) and during COVID-19 (2020 and 2021) by each substance type (alcohol, opioid, cannabis, sedatives, cocaine, stimulants and multiple psychoactive substances). RESULTS: Substance use-related ED visits decreased by 1.5 times during the pandemic compared to the prepandemic level. However, opioid-related ED visits continued to show an increasing trend and did not recover to the prepandemic level in 2021. Moreover, a significant increase in emergent/life-threatening triage levels (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scales 1 and 2) in substance-related ED visits is alarming (2019 = 36.8%, 2020 = 38.7% and 2021 = 38.4%). We also found a general decrease in weekend visits, overnight visits and visits on statutory holidays, and substance use-related ED patients tended to stay longer (over 6 h) in the ED during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate unmet substance use treatment needs due to the limited accessibility and heightened threshold for ED visits during the pandemic. Providing access to substance treatment/programs outside ED is critical to reducing substance use-related complications presenting in the ED. Also, policies addressing the pandemic-related complexities in the ED and Health Human Resource challenges are warranted.

Quantifying the escalating impact of paramedic transported emergency department visits for opioid-related conditions in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: While overdoses comprise the majority of opioid research, the comprehensive impact of the opioid crisis on emergency departments (EDs) and paramedic services has not been reported. We examined temporal changes in population-adjusted incidence rates of ED visits and paramedic transports due to opioid-related conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of all ED visits in the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019 in Ontario, Canada. We included all patients with a primary diagnosis naming opioids as the underlying cause for the visit, without any other drugs or substances. We clustered geographic regions using Local Health Integration Network boundaries. Descriptive statistics, incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to analyze population-adjusted temporal changes. RESULTS: Overall, 86,403 ED visits were included in our study. Incidence of opioid-related ED visits increased by 165% in the study timeframe, with paramedic transported patients increasing by 429%. Per 100,000 residents, annual ED visits increased from 40.4 to 97.2, and paramedic transported patients from 12.1 to 67.9. The proportion of opioid-related ED visits transported by paramedics increased from 35.0% to 69.9%. The medical acuity of opioid-related ED visits increased throughout the years (IRR 6.8. 95% CI 5.9-7.7), though the proportion of discharges remained constant (~75%). The largest increases in ED visits and paramedic transports were concentrated to urbanized regions. DISCUSSION: Opioid-related ED visits and paramedic transports increased substantially between 2009 and 2019. The proportion of ED visits transported by paramedics doubled. Our findings could provide valuable support to health stakeholders in implementing timely strategies aimed at safely reducing opioid-related ED visits. The increased use of paramedics followed by high rates of ED discharge calls for exploration of alternative care models within paramedic systems, such as direct transport to specialized substance abuse centres.

"It saved me from the emergency department": A qualitative study of patient experience of virtual urgent care in Ontario.

INTRODUCTION: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ontario Ministry of Health introduced a pilot program of 14 virtual urgent care (VUC) initiatives across the province to encourage physical distancing and provision of care by telephone and video-enabled visits. The implementation of the VUC pilot is currently being evaluated by an external academic team. The objective of this study was to understand patient experiences with VUC to determine barriers and facilitators to optimal virtual care as it rapidly expands during the current pandemic and beyond. METHOD: The qualitative component of the evaluation used one-on-one telephone interviews with patients, families, providers, and program administrators as the main method of data collection. Patient and family participants were invited to participate by the triage nurse after their VUC visit. Data analysis, using thematic analysis, occurred in conjunction with data collection to monitor emerging themes and areas for further exploration. RESULTS: Between April and October 2021, we completed 14 patient and/or family interviews from a representative cross-section of 6 pilot sites. Participants had a range of presenting complaints including infection, injury, medication side effects, and abdominal pain. The vast majority of participants were female (90%), and 70% were VUC patients themselves. Our analysis identified three key themes in the data which characterise patient and family member experience with VUC: a) emphasis on access to the ED; b) efficiency and quality of care; c) obtaining reassurance and next steps. CONCLUSION: Virtual care options are valued by patients and families; however, the nature of care needed by those accessing VUC and who can best provide that care needs to be evaluated to position it for sustainability. Understanding how virtual care performs from both a provider and patient perspective during the current crisis has implications for designing alternative care options beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.