Transitional conic toric intraocular lens evaluation after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using intraoperative aberrometry.

PURPOSE: To assess refractive and visual outcomes following phacoemulsification with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using intraoperative aberrometry and implantation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with different degrees of astigmatism. METHODS: One hundred two eyes of 70 patients who underwent implantation of the transitional toric 565 Precizon IOL (Ophtec BV) were enrolled. FLACS, capsular tension ring insertion, and intraoperative aberrometry were performed. Main outcome measures were refractive error, uncorrected- and corrected distance snellen decimal visual acuity values (UDVA and CDVA, respectively), and IOL rotation. Specifically, a vector analysis was carried out with J0 and J45 evaluation. Eyes were evaluated 1-year after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 94.12% (96 eyes) and 100% (102 eyes) of the eyes showed a spherical equivalent (SE) within ± 0.50D and ± 1.00D, respectively. The mean SE and refractive cylinder were - 0.06 ± 0.29D and - 0.23 ± 0.37D, respectively. Vector analysis revealed that 100% of the eyes were within ± 0.50D for the J0 and J45 cylindrical components. The mean toric axis rotation was 1.10 ± 1.71° (from 0° to 5°), 77% (79 eyes), and 100% (102 eyes) of the eyes showed UDVA and CDVA of 20/25, respectively. The postoperative mean values of monocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.88 ± 0.17 and 0.96 ± 0.07 (about 20/20), respectively. No patient required IOL realignment during the postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the use of the Precizon IOL after FLACS, using intraoperative aberrometry in patients with different amounts of astigmatism, provides good visual acuity, accurate refractive outcomes, and excellent rotational stability.

Optical and visual quality assessment of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration of different sign.

PURPOSE: To assess the optical quality and the visual performance of patients implanted with an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Thirty-eight eyes underwent implantation of the Mini WELL Ready EDOF IOL and were evaluated at 3-months postsurgery. Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and modular transfer function (MTF) were measured at 3- and 5-mm pupils. Binocular uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and corrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (CDIVA) at 80 cm, and uncorrected-distance near visual acuity (UNVA) and corrected-distance near visual acuity (CDNVA) at 40 cm were obtained. Postoperative refraction, binocular defocus curve, halometry and subjective ad hoc patients' questionnaire were also evaluated. RESULTS: HOAs were 0.171 ± 0.046 µm and 0.406 ± 0.137 µm at 3 and 5 mm, respectively. MTFs decreased as the spatial frequency increased being comparable for both pupils. 92.10% of eyes were within ± 1.00D, and the mean postoperative spherical equivalent was - 0.25 ± 0.65D. Mean UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were 0.06 ± 0.12, 0.05 ± 0.10 and 0.26 ± 0.28 logMAR, respectively. Mean CDVA, CDIVA and CDNVA were - 0.01 ± 0.08, 0.06 ± 0.11 and 0.24 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively. Defocus curve showed a continuous range of vision, especially at intermediate distances. Mean discrimination index was 0.79 ± 0.04. Questionnaire revealed that about 79% of patients reported a high or moderately high satisfaction with the procedure, and about 95% of patients would undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini WELL Ready EDOF IOL provided good optical and visual quality with high level of patient satisfaction and seems to be a valuable option to provide unaided vision at different distances minimizing visual disturbances.

Agreement of white-to-white measurements with swept-source OCT, Scheimpflug and color LED devices.

PURPOSE: To assess the interchangeability of different devices for measuring white-to-white (WTW) distance. METHODS: WTW distance was measured in 53 eyes of 53 patients using Anterion swept-source optical coherence topographer (SS-OCT), IOLMaster 700 SS-OCT, Pentacam HR Scheimpflug and Cassini color LED. Statistical analysis was done by means of the Friedman test and the post hoc Tukey test. The Bland-Altman analysis was applied to carry out pairwise comparisons with the average difference, 95% confidence interval of the average difference and limits of agreement 95% (LoA). RESULTS: WTW values obtained by the Anterion, IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR and Cassini were: 11.84 ± 0.41 mm, 11.96 ± 0.41 mm, 11.68 ± 0.38 mm and 12.65 ± 0.52 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in all pairwise comparison (p < 0.001). The lowest mean difference was found between the Anterion and IOLMaster 700 (- 0.11 mm) and the highest between the Pentacam HR and Cassini (- 0.96 mm). The widest LoA ranges were those that compared any device with the Cassini. LoA ranges when the other three devices were compared among them were similar: Anterion versus IOLMaster 700, Anterion versus Pentacam HR and IOLMaster versus Pentacam HR (about 0.2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there were statistically significant differences in WTW measurement among the four devices, but under a clinical point of view, we believe that Anterion and IOLMaster 700 may be considered interchangeable and so Anterion and Pentacam HR, however, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam HR may not and neither is Cassini with any of the other three devices.

Visual Function after Implantation of a Presbyopia-Correcting Trifocal Intraocular Lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients implanted with a trifocal aspheric presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Forty patients were bilaterally implanted with the AcrySofIQ PanOptix IOL after femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery. Binocular best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (4 m), best distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) (40 and 30 cm), best corrected distance intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) (70, 60, and 50 cm), binocular distance contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2), and defocus curves were evaluated at 6-months. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, the mean binocular Snellen decimal CDVA and DCNVA were 0.94 ± 0.10 (ranging from 0.70 to 1.25) and 0.85 ± 0.13 (ranging from 0.63 to 1.00), respectively. At a distance, all patients showed a cumulative binocular distance-corrected visual acuity of 0.8 or better, and about 80% (n = 31) of the patients had a value of 1.0 (20/20). At near and intermediate distances, all patients showed a cumulative distance-corrected visual acuity of 0.5 (20/40) or better at 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 cm. Specifically, 50 cm showed the highest percentage of patients with larger values of visual acuity (60% [n = 26] with 20/20). Defocus curve showed a wide range of useful vision with two peaks of best visual acuity at distance and at 50 cm, and the binocular distance contrast sensitivity was within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the present study show that the visual performance obtained with bilateral implantation of the trifocal aspheric AcrySofIQ PanOptix IOL is good at far, intermediate, and near distances.

Lensectomy after radial keratotomy: 1-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report visual and refractive results in radial keratotomy (RK) patients that underwent a cataract surgery with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-eight eyes of 15 patients with cataract and the previous RK were included. All eyes underwent phacoemulsification and monofocal IOL implantation. IOL power calculation was done using the Double-K formula of Aramberri. The preoperative versus postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) values were used to assess the efficacy and safety of the surgery; meanwhile, the achieved versus the expected refractive outcomes postoperatively were used to assess the predictability. RESULTS: Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation was performed successfully in all eyes, and no intra- and postoperative problems occurred. The mean logMAR UDVA significantly improved from 0.7 ± 0.3 to 0.4 ± 0.2 at 6 months, and 0.3 ± 0.2 at 12 months postoperatively. By the end of the follow-up period, about 60% of the eyes achieved 20/25 or better CDVA, 25% of the eyes gained three or more lines of visual acuity, and two eyes had lost one or more lines of visual acuity. The mean spherical equivalent improved from - 1 ± 6.00 to - 0.75 ± 1.1 D by the end of the follow-up, and about 60% of the eyes were within ± 1 D at 12 months after the surgery. No intra- and postoperative problems occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic monofocal IOL implantation offers good visual acuity recovery and acceptable refractive correction in RK patients after 1-year follow-up.

Ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using a new swept-source optical biometer. METHODS: Only the right eye was analyzed. Each subject was measured six times with the IOLMaster 700 swept-source optical biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with the subject looking at the stimulus shown by the instrument and with the subject looking at a target placed outside the instrument at 0D of vergence. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW), and keratometry readings (K1 and K2) were evaluated in both cases. To assess if the changes found may affect the intraocular (IOL) power calculation for surgical applications, we have applied some formulae, using the software provided by the optical biometer manufacturer, to the ocular parameters found in both situations for three different types of IOLs. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found for AL, CCT, WTW, K1 and K2 between the subject looking at the stimulus of the biometer and looking at the outside target at 0D of vergence (p > 0.05). However, the measurement of ACD revealed a statistically significant reduction of 20 microns (p = 0.03) and, on the contrary, LT increased significantly 30 microns (p = 0.02). ACD and LT changes were highly correlated (R2 = 0.91). As for the IOL power calculation, in all cases, the mean change was lower than 0.25 D both for IOL power selection and residual refraction. CONCLUSIONS: Although ACD and LT change significantly with different accommodative stimuli measured by swept-source optical biometry, these changes are not clinically relevant.

Repeatability assessment of anterior segment biometric measurements under accommodative and nonaccommodative conditions using an anterior segment OCT.

PURPOSE: As accommodation is a dynamic process changing anterior ocular structures, we aim to compare the repeatability between the biometric measurements taken with and without accommodation. METHODS: Thirty healthy right eyes were measured in a baseline and an accommodative state using Visante-OCT. Three repeated measurements were taken to obtain central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle-to-angle distance (ATA), iridocorneal angles (IA), and crystalline lens thickness (LT). Repeatability was evaluated by the calculation of coefficient of repeatability (CoR), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In addition, the Passing-Bablok regression method was applied. RESULTS: For the nonaccommodative state, the CoR for CCT, ACD, ATA, and LT was 20.02 µm, 0.09 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.12 mm respectively. The CoR for CCT, ACD, ATA, and LT in the 6D-accommodative state was 20.85 µm, 0.08 mm, 0.26 mm, and 0.14 mm respectively. IA had similar results for both states; the CoR ranged between 3 and 4°, CoV was less than 4%, and the ICC was between 0.984-0.988. There were no significant differences between the three repeated measurements for any measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Visante-OCT provides good repeatability for anterior segment measurements for both accommodative and nonaccommodative states.

Accommodative stimulus-response curves to low-pass filtered natural images.

PURPOSE: To assess how the monocular steady-state accommodative stimulus-response curve is modified when viewing low-pass filtered natural images. METHODS: Eighteen adult subjects participated in the study. The accommodative stimulus-response curve was objectively assessed by means of a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. Measurements were taken at different accommodative demands. Target images were low-pass filtered versions of a natural image that were obtained applying different digital spatial filters that limited the spatial frequency content of the natural image. Cutoff spatial frequencies were set at 30, 21, and 15 cycles per degree (cy/deg). RESULTS: Mean data obtained for each target were fitted to linear models. For the low-pass filtered natural image with a cutoff spatial frequency at 30 cy/deg, the slope for the averaged stimulus-response curve was 0.614, while the slopes obtained for the other two low-pass filtered images corresponding to cutoff frequencies at 21 and 15 cy/deg were 0.613 and 0.619, respectively (p < 0.01). The determination coefficient was R2 ≥ 0.988 for all targets. An ANCOVA analysis revealed that these slopes were not significantly different from each other (p = 0.82). Additionally, accommodative error indexes were obtained to measure both the discrepancy between the regression lines and the ideal lines and the degree of correlation between the stimulus and the response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that the low and middle spatial frequencies (< 15 cy/deg) are the most important to guide to the needed levels the accommodative response to natural images.

Semiautomatic procedure to assess changes in the eye accommodative system.

PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate a new semiautomatic procedure to assess in vivo changes in the crystalline lens and ciliary muscle during accommodation. METHODS: A total of 14 subjects were divided into two groups, young (aged between 20 and 25 years) and adult (aged between 35 and 40 years), and measured with an anterior segment optical coherence tomography. A semiautomatic procedure was implemented to measure the central lens thickness (CLT), anterior lens radius (ALR) and the ciliary muscle area (CMA) for the unaccommodated eye and for a vergence of - 3.00 D. RESULTS: The CLT increase for each population group was smaller than 5%, and the dispersion of each group was similar between them. Contrariwise, the reduction in the ALR was about 30% for both groups, although the young one showed the largest variability. The CMA increase was smaller than 30% for both groups, and the dispersion was similar between them. For each metric, differences between both groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The semiautomatic procedure seems to be useful for the in vivo analysis of the accommodative system. Additionally, the results obtained showed that changes in the CLT were much smaller compared to those obtained for the ALR or CMA.

Non-invasive measurements of the dynamic changes in the ciliary muscle, crystalline lens morphology, and anterior chamber during accommodation with a high-resolution OCT.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess non-invasively the changes in the anterior chamber eye, crystalline lens morphology, and ciliary muscle during accommodation by means of an anterior chamber optical coherence tomographer (OCT), and correlate them with vergence. METHODS: Twenty-five eyes of twenty-five healthy subjects, whose mean age was 29.9±7.1 years, were included and measured with an anterior chamber OCT. The central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior crystalline lens radius of curvature (ALRC), crystalline lens thickness (CLT), and ciliary muscle area (CMA) were measured for each participant at 0, -1, -2, and -3 D of target vergence. A linear model was used to assess the correlation of each eye parameter with the vergence demand. RESULTS: The mean CCT showed no change for all the accommodative stimuli. The mean ACD and ALRC decreased with the vergence, about 4.5 and 30 % at -3 D, respectively. On the contrary, the CLT and CMA showed an opposite tendency, where the mean CLT was increased by 4.0 % and the mean CMA was done by 26% at -3 D. Statistical significant differences (p < 0.001) were obtained among all vergences for each eye metric, except for the CCT (p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: The ACD and ALRC decreased about 2 and 10 % per dioptre of accommodation, respectively; whereas the CLT and CMA increased about 2 and 9 %, respectively. These results add knowledge regarding the understanding of accommodation and give new perspectives for biomechanics and biometry.