Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 142
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 176(2): ITC17-ITC32, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780647

RESUMO

Chagas disease, which is caused by infection with the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is a leading neglected tropical disease in the United States. An estimated 240 000 to 350 000 persons in the United States are infected, primarily immigrants from Mexico, Central America, and South America, where the disease is endemic. The parasite is transmitted by the triatomine bug but can also be passed through blood transfusion, via organ transplant, or congenitally. Approximately 30% of infected persons later develop cardiac and/or gastrointestinal complications. Health care providers should consider screening at-risk patients with serologic testing. Early diagnosis and treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox can help prevent complications.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Transplante de Órgãos , Trypanosoma cruzi , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Doença de Chagas/diagnóstico , Doença de Chagas/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Chagas/epidemiologia , Nifurtimox/uso terapêutico
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(6): 1232-1235, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37209678

RESUMO

We describe a case of Baylisascaris procyonis roundworm infection in a child in Washington, USA, with autism spectrum disorder. Environmental assessment confirmed nearby raccoon habitation and B. procyonis eggs. B. procyonis infections should be considered a potential cause of human eosinophilic meningitis, particularly among young children and persons with developmental delays.


Assuntos
Infecções por Ascaridida , Ascaridoidea , Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Animais , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Washington/epidemiologia , Infecções por Ascaridida/diagnóstico , Guaxinins
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 47(1): 51-60, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37188558

RESUMO

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do morphokinetic profiles and treatment outcomes differ between embryos developed from vitrified or fresh oocytes? DESIGN: Retrospective multicentre analysis using data from eight CARE Fertility clinics across the UK between 2012 and 2019. Patients receiving treatment using embryos developed from vitrified oocytes (n = 118 women, n = 748 oocytes), providing 557 zygotes during this time period, were recruited and matched with patients undergoing treatment with embryos developed from fresh oocytes (n = 123 women, n = 1110 oocytes), providing 539 zygotes in the same time frame. Time-lapse microscopy was used to assess morphokinetic profiles, including early cleavage divisions (2- through to 8-cell), post-cleavage stages including time to start of compaction, time to morula, time to start of blastulation and time to full blastocyst. Duration of key stages such as the compaction stage were also calculated. Treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups (live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate). RESULTS: A significant delay of 2-3 h across all early cleavage divisions (2- through to 8-cell) and time to start of compaction occurred in the vitrified group versus fresh controls (all P ≤ 0.01). The compaction stage was significantly shorter in vitrified oocytes (19.02 ± 0.5 h) compared with fresh controls (22.45 ± 0.6 h, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the time that fresh and vitrified embryos reached the blastocyst stage (108.03 ± 0.7 versus 107.78 ± 0.6 h). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Vitrification is a useful technique for extending female fertility with no effects on IVF treatment outcome.


Assuntos
Criopreservação , Implantação do Embrião , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Criopreservação/métodos , Oócitos , Taxa de Gravidez , Vitrificação , Blastocisto
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(11): 273-277, 2023 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928071

RESUMO

Babesiosis is a tickborne disease caused by intraerythrocytic Babesia parasites. In the United States, most babesiosis cases are caused by Babesia microti, transmitted from bites of blacklegged ticks, Ixodes scapularis, in northeastern and midwestern states. Transmission can also occur through blood transfusions, transplantation of organs from infected donors, or congenital (mother-to-child) transmission (1). Babesia infection can be asymptomatic or cause mild to severe illness that can be fatal. Overall, U.S. tickborne disease cases have increased 25%, from 40,795 reported in 2011 to 50,856 in 2019 (2). Babesiosis trends were assessed in 10 states* where babesiosis was reportable during 2011-2019. Incidence increased significantly in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont (p<0.001), with the largest increases reported in Vermont (1,602%, from two to 34 cases), Maine (1,422%, from nine to 138), New Hampshire (372%, from 13 to 78), and Connecticut (338%, from 74 to 328). Unlike the other seven states, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont, were not included as states with endemic disease in previous CDC babesiosis surveillance summaries. These three states should now be considered to have endemic transmission comparable to that in other high-incidence states; they have consistently identified newly acquired cases every year during 2011-2019 and documented presence of Babesia microti in the associated tick vector (3). Because incidence in Northeastern states, including Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont, is increasing, tick prevention messaging, provider education, and awareness of infection risk among travelers to these states should be emphasized.


Assuntos
Babesia microti , Babesiose , Ixodes , Animais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Feminino , Babesiose/epidemiologia , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Ixodes/parasitologia , Connecticut/epidemiologia
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e131, 2023 07 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466070

RESUMO

Cyclosporiasis results from an infection of the small intestine by Cyclospora parasites after ingestion of contaminated food or water, often leading to gastrointestinal distress. Recent developments in temporally linking genetically related Cyclospora isolates demonstrated effectiveness in supporting epidemiological investigations. We used 'temporal-genetic clusters' (TGCs) to investigate reported cyclosporiasis cases in the United States during the 2021 peak-period (1 May - 31 August 2021). Our approach split 655 genotyped isolates into 55 genetic clusters and 31 TGCs. We linked two large multi-state epidemiological clusters (Epidemiologic Cluster 1 [n = 136 cases, 54 genotyped] and Epidemiologic Cluster 2 [n = 42 cases, 15 genotyped]) to consumption of lettuce varieties; however, product traceback did not identify a specific product for either cluster due to the lack of detailed product information. To evaluate the utility of TGCs, we performed a retrospective case study comparing investigation outcomes of outbreaks first detected using epidemiological methods with those of the same outbreaks had TGCs been used to first detect them. Our study results indicate that adjustments to routine epidemiological approaches could link additional cases to epidemiological clusters of cyclosporiasis. Overall, we show that CDC's integrated genotyping and epidemiological investigations provide valuable insights into cyclosporiasis outbreaks in the United States.


Assuntos
Cyclospora , Ciclosporíase , Humanos , Ciclosporíase/epidemiologia , Cyclospora/genética , Cyclospora/isolamento & purificação , Surtos de Doenças , Epidemiologia Molecular , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fezes/microbiologia
6.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 25(3): e14059, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37005911

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention led an investigation to determine if Strongyloides infection in a right kidney recipient was an existing chronic infection, or if the infection was transmitted from an infected organ donor. METHODS: Evidence regarding the organ donor and organ recipients Strongyloides testing, treatment, and risk factors were gathered and evaluated. The case classification algorithm created by the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee was utilized. RESULTS: The organ donor had risk factors for Strongyloides infection; the banked donor specimen, submitted for serology testing 112 days post-donor death, was positive. The right kidney recipient was negative for Strongyloides infection pretransplant. Strongyloides infection was diagnosed via small bowel and stomach biopsies. The left kidney recipient had risk factors for Strongyloides infection. Two posttransplant Strongyloides antibody tests were negative at 59 and 116 days posttransplant; repeat antibody tests returned positive at 158 and 190 days posttransplant. Examination of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid collected 110 days posttransplant from the heart recipient showed a parasite morphologically consistent with Strongyloides species. She subsequently developed complications from Strongyloides infection, including hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis. Based on the evidence from our investigation, donor-derived strongyloidiasis was suspected in one recipient and proven in two recipients. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation support the importance of preventing donor-derived Strongyloides infections by laboratory-based serology testing of solid organ donors. Donor positive testing results would direct the monitoring and treatment of recipients to avoid severe complications.


Assuntos
Transplante de Órgãos , Strongyloides stercoralis , Estrongiloidíase , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Estrongiloidíase/diagnóstico , Estrongiloidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Estrongiloidíase/parasitologia , Michigan , Ohio , Doadores de Tecidos , California , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(8): e0013422, 2022 08 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862752

RESUMO

The serologic diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease, caused by infection with the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is challenging and lacks a gold-standard assay. To overcome the problem, CDC uses an algorithm that uses two tests on different platforms and applies a third test as a tiebreaker. The Ortho T. cruzi ELISA Test System from Ortho Diagnostics was cleared by FDA for clinical diagnosis usage. We evaluated this test against the CDC algorithm for chronic Chagas disease. We tested several sets of serum specimens: 104 specimens tested positive for T. cruzi specific antibody and 283 (including 30 specimens positive for antibody to Leishmania spp.) tested negative based on the current CDC chronic T. cruzi infection diagnostic testing algorithm. Concordance of the Ortho T. cruzi ELISA Test System with the CDC algorithm result was 90% (95% CI 87 to 93%) overall and 92% (95% CI 89 to 95%) when excluding Leishmania spp. antibody positive specimens. The cross-reactivity of the Ortho T. cruzi ELISA Test System was 37% to Leishmania spp. serologically positive specimens, 1% to specimens from patients diagnosed with other parasitic infections, and 0% against specimens from a US noninfected population. In conclusion, the Ortho T. cruzi ELISA Test System compares well against the CDC diagnostic algorithm for chronic Chagas disease. The availability of this FDA-cleared assay will improve the chronic Chagas disease diagnosis.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas , Leishmania , Trypanosoma cruzi , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários , Doença de Chagas/parasitologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos
8.
Transfusion ; 62(9): 1808-1817, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35895440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is a parasitic infection that can insidiously cause non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Given the largely silent nature of this progressive disease, asymptomatic blood donors pose potential blood transfusion risk. Blood donation screening has become an unintentional form of Chagas disease surveillance, with thousands of new cases identified since national surveillance was initiated in 2007. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We recruited T. cruzi-positive blood donors identified from California and Arizona blood centers for confirmatory blood screening and assessment of lifetime infection risk. RESULTS: Among eight suspected cases, we identified four confirmed US autochthonous infections. The current manuscript details the transmission sources, healthcare-seeking behaviors post-blood donation resulting, and clinical course of disease among persons without any history of travel to endemic Latin American countries. DISCUSSION: This manuscript presents four additional US-acquired Chagas disease cases and identifies an opportunity for blood centers to assist in confronting barriers surrounding Chagas disease in the US.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas , Trypanosoma cruzi , Doadores de Sangue , Transfusão de Sangue , Doença de Chagas/diagnóstico , Doença de Chagas/epidemiologia , Doença de Chagas/parasitologia , Humanos , Sudoeste dos Estados Unidos
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(10): 371-374, 2022 03 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35271563

RESUMO

Chagas disease, or American trypanosomiasis, is caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Chagas disease is endemic in rural areas of Latin America, but T. cruzi, triatomine vectors, infected mammalian reservoir hosts, and rare cases of autochthonous vector borne transmission have been reported in the United States (1). Possible modes of transmission include the following: vector borne via skin or mucosal contact with feces of infected triatomine bugs, congenital, blood transfusion, organ transplantation, or laboratory accident. Chagas disease can be treated with benznidazole (commercially available since May 14, 2018) or nifurtimox (2). Before January 25, 2021, nifurtimox (Lampit) had been exclusively available through CDC under an Institutional Review Board-approved Investigational New Drug (IND) treatment protocol, at which time it became reasonably accessible to health care providers outside of the program. This report summarizes CDC Drug Service reports for selected characteristics of and adverse events reported by 336 patients for whom nifurtimox was requested under the CDC IND program during January 1, 2001-January 25, 2021. Of the 336 patients, 34.2% resided in California. Median age of patients was 37 years (range = 1-78 years). Most patients were aged ≥18 (91.8%; 305 of 332) and Hispanic (93.2%; 290 of 311). Among the patients with available information, 91.4% (222 of 243) reported an adverse event. Among those with information about the severity of their adverse events, 20.5% reported a severe event. On August 7, 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced approval of a nifurtimox product, Lampit (Bayer), for treatment of Chagas disease in patients aged <18 years weighing ≥5.5 lbs (≥2.5 kg). Lampit became commercially available during October 2020. Physicians should take frequency of adverse events into consideration when prescribing nifurtimox and counseling patients.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Drogas em Investigação/uso terapêutico , Nifurtimox/uso terapêutico , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Tripanossomicidas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Drogas em Investigação/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nifurtimox/efeitos adversos , Tripanossomicidas/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(7): 1958-1960, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152952

RESUMO

To investigate possible cardiac manifestations of Chagas disease, we tested 97 Latinx patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in Houston, Texas, USA, for Trypanosoma cruzi infection. We noted a high prevalence of underdiagnosed infection and discrepant results in clinical diagnostic assays. Latinx cardiac patients in the United States would benefit from laboratory screening for T. cruzi infection.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Doença de Chagas , Trypanosoma cruzi , Animais , Humanos , Insetos Vetores , Texas , Estados Unidos
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(8): 2201-2204, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34287125

RESUMO

Surveillance for soil-transmitted helminths, strongyloidiasis, cryptosporidiosis, and giardiasis was conducted in Mississippi, USA. PCR performed on 224 fecal samples for all soil-transmitted helminths and on 370 samples for only Necator americanus and Strongyloides stercoralis identified 1 S. stercoralis infection. Seroprevalences were 8.8% for Toxocara, 27.4% for Cryptosporidium, 5.7% for Giardia, and 0.2% for Strongyloides parasites.


Assuntos
Criptosporidiose , Cryptosporidium , Giardíase , Doenças Parasitárias , Fezes , Humanos , Mississippi/epidemiologia
12.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(5): 538-545, 2021 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292173

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lack of recognition of congenital Chagas disease in infants of mothers from endemic regions who are living in countries nonendemic for Trypanosoma cruzi infection suggests a high rate of underdiagnosis. Pregnancy is the optimal access point for identifying Chagas disease in at-risk mothers and their infants. In this review, we update progress toward implementation of pregnancy-based screening for congenital Chagas disease in nonendemic settings. RECENT FINDINGS: International organizations have updated recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of congenital Chagas disease. Reports of successful implementation of pregnancy-based screening at some centers provide a model for optimizing diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease. Screening family members of index patients may identify additional T. cruzi-infected persons. Promising tests to augment current diagnostic modalities for maternal and congenital Chagas disease are in development. Universal or risk-based screening would be cost-effective. More healthcare providers are now aware that treatment of congenital Chagas disease is curative and are promoting efforts to make pregnancy-based screening for congenital Chagas disease a standard of care. SUMMARY: Ongoing efforts to implement routine pregnancy-based screening for congenital Chagas disease in nonendemic regions will mutually benefit infants, their mothers and family members and can prevent potentially fatal Chagas cardiomyopathy.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas , Trypanosoma cruzi , Doença de Chagas/diagnóstico , Doença de Chagas/epidemiologia , Doença de Chagas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento , Mães , Gravidez
13.
Am Fam Physician ; 104(3): 277-287, 2021 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523888

RESUMO

Chagas disease, cysticercosis, and toxoplasmosis affect millions of people in the United States and are considered neglected parasitic diseases. Few resources are devoted to their surveillance, prevention, and treatment. Chagas disease, transmitted by kissing bugs, primarily affects people who have lived in Mexico, Central America, and South America, and it can cause heart disease and death if not treated. Chagas disease is diagnosed by detecting the parasite in blood or by serology, depending on the phase of disease. Antiparasitic treatment is indicated for most patients with acute disease. Treatment for chronic disease is recommended for people younger than 18 years and generally recommended for adults younger than 50 years. Treatment decisions should be individualized for all other patients. Cysticercosis can manifest in muscles, the eyes, and most critically in the brain (neurocysticercosis). Neurocysticercosis accounts for 2.1% of all emergency department visits for seizures in the United States. Diagnosing neurocysticercosis involves serology and neuroimaging. Treatment includes symptom control and antiparasitic therapy. Toxoplasmosis is estimated to affect 11% of people older than six years in the United States. It can be acquired by ingesting food or water that has been contaminated by cat feces; it can also be acquired by eating undercooked, contaminated meat. Toxoplasma infection is usually asymptomatic; however, people who are immunosuppressed can develop more severe neurologic symptoms. Congenital infection can result in miscarriage or adverse fetal effects. Diagnosis is made with serologic testing, polymerase chain reaction testing, or parasite detection in tissue or fluid specimens. Treatment is recommended for people who are immunosuppressed, pregnant patients with recently acquired infection, and people who are immunocompetent with visceral disease or severe symptoms.


Assuntos
Saúde da Família/tendências , Doenças Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Animais , Portador Sadio , Gatos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organização & administração , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./tendências , Doença de Chagas/complicações , Doença de Chagas/fisiopatologia , Cisticercose/complicações , Cisticercose/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Toxoplasmose/complicações , Toxoplasmose/fisiopatologia , Estados Unidos
14.
Genet Med ; 22(8): 1401-1406, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376981

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To better understand the longitudinal risks and benefits of telephone disclosure of genetic test results in the era of multigene panel testing. METHODS: Adults who were proceeding with germline cancer genetic testing were randomized to telephone disclosure (TD) with a genetic counselor or in-person disclosure (IPD) (i.e., usual care) of test results. All participants who received TD were recommended to return to meet with a physician to discuss medical management recommendations. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-three participants were randomized to TD and 497 to IPD. There were no differences between arms for any cognitive, affective, or behavioral outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Only 50% of participants in the TD arm returned for the medical follow-up appointment. Returning was associated with site (p < 0.0001), being female (p = 0.047), and not having a true negative result (p < 0.002). Mammography was lower at 12 months among those who had TD and did not return for medical follow-up (70%) compared with those who had TD and returned (86%) and those who had IPD (87%, adjusted p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Telephone disclosure of genetic test results is a reasonable alternative to in-person disclosure, but attention to medical follow-up may remain important for optimizing appropriate use of genetic results.


Assuntos
Revelação , Aconselhamento Genético , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Telefone
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(7): 193-195, 2020 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32078594

RESUMO

On December 13, 2017, the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (MDHSS) was notified of a suspected case of Chagas disease in a Missouri woman. The patient had donated blood, and laboratory screening revealed antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite that causes Chagas disease. Evaluation by physicians found no clinical symptoms consistent with Chagas disease. The patient had no travel history that would have suggested a significant risk for Chagas disease risk and had no occupational exposure to the disease agent. She had never received a blood transfusion or organ transplant. Confirmatory testing of the patient's serum at CDC for T. cruzi antibody was consistent with infection. These findings raise the possibility that the exposure to T. cruzi occurred locally (autochthonously) in Missouri. Although the insect vector for the parasite T. cruzi, triatomines (commonly known as "kissing bugs"), has been identified previously in Missouri, no locally acquired human cases of Chagas disease have been identified in the state. Health care providers and public health professionals should be aware of the possibility of locally acquired Chagas disease in the southern United States.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas/diagnóstico , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/isolamento & purificação , Doadores de Sangue , Doença de Chagas/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri , Trypanosoma cruzi/imunologia
16.
Clin Genet ; 95(2): 293-301, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30417332

RESUMO

Telephone disclosure of cancer genetic test results is noninferior to in-person disclosure. However, how patients who prefer in-person communication of results differ from those who agree to telephone disclosure is unclear but important when considering delivery models for genetic medicine. Patients undergoing cancer genetic testing were recruited to a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (NCT01736345) comparing telephone to in-person disclosure of genetic test results. We evaluated preferences for in-person disclosure, factors associated with this preference and outcomes compared to those who agreed to randomization. Among 1178 enrolled patients, 208 (18%) declined randomization, largely given a preference for in-person disclosure. These patients were more likely to be older (P = 0.007) and to have had multigene panel testing (P < 0.001). General anxiety (P = 0.007), state anxiety (P = 0.008), depression (P = 0.011), cancer-specific distress (P = 0.021) and uncertainty (P = 0.03) were higher after pretest counseling. After disclosure of results, they also had higher general anxiety (P = 0.003), depression (P = 0.002) and cancer-specific distress (P = 0.043). While telephone disclosure is a reasonable alternative to in-person disclosure in most patients, some patients have a strong preference for in-person communication. Patient age, distress and complexity of testing are important factors to consider and requests for in-person disclosure should be honored when possible.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Síndrome Hereditária de Câncer de Mama e Ovário/epidemiologia , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias/epidemiologia , Preferência do Paciente , Revelação da Verdade , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Feminino , Aconselhamento Genético/ética , Aconselhamento Genético/métodos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos/ética , Síndrome Hereditária de Câncer de Mama e Ovário/diagnóstico , Síndrome Hereditária de Câncer de Mama e Ovário/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias/diagnóstico , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias/genética , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente , Telefone
17.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1340, 2019 Oct 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31640646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, yet incidence and etiology data are limited. We conducted laboratory-based diarrhea surveillance in Guatemala. METHODS: A diarrhea case was defined as ≥3 loose stools in a 24-h period in a person presenting to the surveillance facilities. Epidemiologic data and stool specimens were collected. Specimens were tested for bacterial, parasitic, and viral pathogens. Yearly incidence was adjusted for healthcare seeking behaviors determined from a household survey conducted in the surveillance catchment area. RESULTS: From November 2008 to December 2012, the surveillance system captured 5331 diarrhea cases; among these 1381 (26%) had specimens tested for all enteric pathogens of interest. The adjusted incidence averaged 659 diarrhea cases per 10,000 persons per year, and was highest among children aged < 5 years, averaging 1584 cases per 10,000 children per year. Among 1381 (26%) specimens tested for all the pathogens of interest, 235 (17%) had a viral etiology, 275 (20%) had a bacterial, 50 (4%) had parasites, and 86 (6%) had co-infections. Among 827 (60%) specimens from children aged < 5 years, a virus was identified in 196 (23%) patients; 165 (20%) had norovirus and 99 (12%) rotavirus, including co-infections. Among 554 patients aged ≥5 years, 103 (19%) had a bacterial etiology, including diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in 94 (17%) cases, Shigella spp. in 31 (6%), Campylobacter spp. in 5 (1%), and Salmonella spp. in 4 (1%) cases. Detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium was infrequent (73 cases; 5%). CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial burden of viral and bacterial diarrheal diseases in Guatemala, highlighting the importance of strengthening laboratory capacity for rapid detection and control and for evaluation of public health interventions.


Assuntos
Disenteria/epidemiologia , Disenteria/etiologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/parasitologia , Fezes/virologia , Feminino , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Laboratórios , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
19.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(30): 825-828, 2018 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30070981

RESUMO

Angiostrongyliasis is caused by infection and migration to the brain of larvae of the parasitic nematode Angiostrongylus cantonensis, or rat lungworm. Adult A. cantonensis reside in the lungs of the definitive wild rodent host, where they produce larvae passed in feces, which are then ingested by snails and slugs (gastropods). Human infection typically occurs when gastropods containing mature larvae are inadvertently ingested by humans. Although human infection often is asymptomatic or involves transient mild symptoms, larval migration to the brain can lead to eosinophilic meningitis, focal neurologic deficits, coma, and death. The majority of cases of human angiostrongyliasis occur in Asia and the Pacific Islands, including Hawaii, but autochthonous and imported cases have been reported in the continental United States (1,2), underscoring the importance of provider recognition to ensure prompt identification and treatment. The epidemiologic and clinical features of 12 angiostrongyliasis cases in the continental United States were analyzed. These cases were identified through A. cantonensis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing (3) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) submitted to CDC from within the continental United States. Six cases were likely a result of autochthonous transmission in the southern United States. All 12 patients had CSF pleocytosis and eosinophilia, consistent with eosinophilic meningitis. Health care providers need to be aware of the possibility of angiostrongyliasis in patients with eosinophilic meningitis, especially in residents in the southern United States or persons who have traveled outside the continental United States and have a history of ingestion of gastropods or contaminated raw vegetables.


Assuntos
Angiostrongylus cantonensis/isolamento & purificação , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/epidemiologia , Infecções por Strongylida/complicações , Infecções por Strongylida/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Angiostrongylus cantonensis/genética , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
20.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(26): 738-741, 2018 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29975678

RESUMO

Chagas disease, a potentially life-threatening disease caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, has become a concern in the United States as a result of human emigration from Latin America where Chagas disease is endemic (1). It is estimated that as many as 8 million people living in Mexico, and Central and South America have Chagas disease.* Most cases of Chagas disease in the United States are chronic infections; however, rare cases of acute congenital infections and autochthonous vectorborne transmission have been reported (2). To understand how data are collected and used, a review of state-level public health surveillance for Chagas disease was conducted through semistructured interviews with health officials in six states (Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi Tennessee, and Texas) where Chagas disease is reportable and one (Massachusetts) where it was previously reportable. States implemented surveillance in response to blood donor screening for Chagas disease and to identify the route of disease transmission. Many states reported primarily chronic cases and had limited ability to respond to local transmission because acute cases were infrequently reported. Surveillance remains important in states with large populations of immigrants or frequent travelers from countries with endemic disease and for states with a risk for local transmission. Surveillance efforts can also help increase awareness among providers and assist in linking patients with Chagas disease to treatment to help prevent cardiac and gastrointestinal complications.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas/epidemiologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Vigilância da População , Emigração e Imigração/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Endêmicas , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , América Latina/etnologia , Trypanosoma cruzi/isolamento & purificação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA