Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for active surveillance of small renal masses.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for monitoring small (< 4 cm) renal masses (SRM) in patients undergoing active surveillance (AS). METHODS: We retrospectively selected all consecutive patients with SRMs who underwent AS for at least 6 months at our Institution between January 2014 and December 2018. CEUS imaging was performed by two experienced genitourinary radiologists at established time points. The accuracy of CEUS for monitoring SRM size was compared with that of CT scan. For solid SRMs, four enhancement patterns (EP) were recorded. Radiological progression was defined as SRM growth rate ≥ 5 mm/year. RESULTS: Overall, 158/1049 (15.1%) patients with SRMs underwent AS. At a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 13-39), no patient died due to renal cell carcinoma (RCC). No patients experienced CEUS-related adverse events. There was a large variability in the pattern of growth of SRMs (overall median growth rate: 0.40 mm/year), with 9.5% of SRMs showing radiological progression. The median SRM size was comparable between CEUS and CT scan examinations at all time points. The vast majority (92.7%) of SRMs did not show a change in their EP over time; and there was no association between the SRM's EP and radiological progression or SRM size. Overall, 43 (27.2%) patients underwent delayed intervention (DI); median SRM size, and median growth rate were significantly higher in these patients as compared to those continuing AS. CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, CEUS is a safe and effective strategy for active monitoring of SRMs in well-selected patients undergoing AS.

Exogenous lipoid pneumonia: when radiologist makes the difference.

PURPOSE: To report high-resolution CT (HRCT) findings in our group of patients with exogenous lipoid pneumonia (ELP), confirmed with histopathological findings and clinical-anamnestic data, in order to describe the most common radiological patterns of this rare disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, HRCT of 10 patients with ELP were evaluated by three radiologists. Diagnosis of ELP was made through CT, bronchiolo-alveolar lavage (BAL) and a pneumological examination associated with an accurate medical anamnesis. Five patients had a histologically proven ELP, through lung biopsy. All patients had a chronic exposition to substances made of animal fat or mineral/vegetable oils. RESULTS: In our cohort of patients with ELP, the following parenchymal patterns were observed: 8/10 patients had lung consolidation with adipose density (attenuation values < - 40 HU); 10/10 patients had multiple areas of ground glass opacity; 6/10 patients had smooth thickening of interlobular septa and ground glass opacities ("crazy-paving" pattern); 2/10 patients presented nodules > 2.5 cm with spiculated margins (tumor-like); 5/10 patients showed reactive lymph nodes enlargement. The oldest lesions were characterized by bronchiectasis and fibrosis around the lipidic consolidations. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary alterations found in HRCT exams can be confused with other lung diseases (especially lung tumors) and they are always a challenge even for the most experienced radiologist. In our experience, although non-specific, consolidation areas with low HU values and crazy-paving pattern are frequently associated in ELP. These characteristics should alert the radiologist to consider ELP among the possible differential diagnoses, always correlating the results of CT examination with appropriate clinical-laboratory evaluations and an accurate anamnesis.

Corrigendum to "Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Preoperative Staging and Work-Up of Patients Affected by Invasive Lobular Carcinoma or Invasive Ductolobular Carcinoma".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2018/1569060.].

Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Preoperative Staging and Work-Up of Patients Affected by Invasive Lobular Carcinoma or Invasive Ductolobular Carcinoma.

Purpose: The prevalence of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common type of breast cancer, accounts for 5%-15% of all invasive breast cancer cases. Its histological feature to spread in rows of single cell layers explains why it often fails to form a palpable lesion and the lack of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasound (US) to detect it. It also has a higher incidence of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral disease when compared to the other histological subtypes. The clinicopathologic features and outcomes of Invasive Ductolobular Carcinoma (IDLC) are very similar to the ILC. The purpose of our study is to assess the importance of MRI in the preoperative management and staging of patients affected by ILC or IDLC. Materials and Methods: We identified women diagnosed with ILC or IDLC. We selected the patients who had preoperative breast MRI. For each patient we identified the areas of multifocal, multicentric, or contralateral disease not visible to standard exams and detected by preoperative MRI. We analyzed the potential correlation between additional cancer areas and histological cancer markers. Results: Of the 155 women who met our inclusion criteria, 93 (60%) had additional cancer areas detected by MRI. In 61 women, 39,4% of the overall population, the additional cancer areas were confirmed by US/tomosynthesis second look and biopsy. Presurgical MRI staging changed surgical management in the 37,4% of the patients. Only six patients of the overall population needed a reoperation after the initial surgery. No statistically significant correlation was found between MRI overestimation and the presence of histological peritumoral vascular/linfatic invasion. No statistically significant correlation was found between additional cancer areas and histological cancer markers. Conclusions: Our study suggests that MRI is an important tool in the preoperative management and staging of patients affected by lobular or ductolobular invasive carcinoma.