Comparative analysis of perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease versus viral hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the accumulating evidence regarding the oncological differences between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and viral infection-related HCC, the short- and long-term outcomes of surgical resection of NAFLD-related HCC remain unclear. While some reports indicate improved postoperative survival in NAFLD-related HCC, other studies suggest higher postoperative complications in these patients. METHODS: Patients with NAFLD and those with hepatitis viral infection who underwent hepatectomy for HCC at our department were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical, surgical, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 1047 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC, 57 had NAFLD-related HCC (NAFLD group), and 727 had virus-related HCC (VH group). The body mass index and serum glycated hemoglobin levels were significantly higher in the NAFLD group than in the VH group. There were no significant differences in operative time and bleeding amount. Moreover, the morbidity and the length of postoperative hospital stays were similar across both groups. The pathological results showed that the tumor size was significantly larger in the NAFLD group than in the VH group. No significant differences between the groups in overall or recurrence-free survival were found. In a subgroup analysis with matched tumor diameters, patients in the NAFLD group had a better prognosis after hepatectomy than those in the VH group. CONCLUSION: Surgical outcomes after hepatectomy were comparable between the groups. Subgroup analysis reveals early detection and surgical intervention in NAFLD-HCC may improve prognosis.

Benefits of laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: The indications of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have expanded to high-risk patients, such as elderly people. However, to date, little evidence has been established of the safety and feasibility of LLR in elderly patients. The short-term outcomes of LLR in elderly patients as compared to non-elderly patients were investigated. METHODS: Data of a total of 297 patients who underwent LLR were reviewed. Among these 297 patients, 181 patients were < 75 years age (non-elderly) and 116 patients were ≥ 75 years age (elderly), and the surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. In addition, we evaluated the risk factors for postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) utilizing the preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables RESULTS: The preoperative liver/renal function, frequency of anti-thrombotic drug use, number of comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status classification were more unfavorable in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients. No significant inter-group differences were observed in the operation time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, or 30-day mortality. The 3-year overall survival rate was comparable between the two groups. Multivariate analysis identified anti-thrombotic drug use, operation time > 7 h, and peak serum total bilirubin > 2 mg/dl within postoperative day 3 as independent risk factors for Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa postoperative morbidity (P = 0.016, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LLR in elderly patients may provide comparable short-term outcomes to those in non-elderly patients.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018: a prospective single-center study of 201 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) poses multiple challenges. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) eliminated the time limit (< 72 h) and expanded the surgical indication to severe AC. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ELC for AC following the TG18 in a single high-volume center. METHODS: From 2019 to 2021, we managed all AC patients with a TG18 flowchart and prospectively enrolled those who underwent ELC within 7 days of symptom onset. The primary outcome was overall morbidity, with a comparison between mild (Grade I) and moderate/severe (Grade II/III) AC. RESULTS: During the study period, 201 patients underwent ELC was for Grade I (56.2%), II (40.3%), and III (3.5%) ACs. Mean age was 69 ± 15.2 years and time to surgery from symptom onset was 0 (12.9%), 1-3 (66.7%), and 4-7 days (20.4%). Mean operative time and blood loss were 118.9 ± 42.7 min and 57.8 ± 99.4 mL, respectively. The critical view of safety (CVS) was achieved in 76.1% of patients, and bailout procedures were performed in 21.4%. There were no open conversions or bile duct injuries. Major morbidities (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) were observed in 5.5% of cases and mortality in 0.5%. Comparing Grades II/III to Grade I, operative time was longer (112.3 vs. 127.3 min, p = 0.014), blood loss was higher (40.3 vs. 80.1 mL, p = 0.005), the CVS rate was lower (83.2 vs. 67.0%, p = 0.012), and the major morbidity rate was higher (1.8 vs. 10.2%, p = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis of Grade II/III, there were no significant differences in major morbidities (p = 0.288) between the two groups (0-3 vs. 4-7 days). CONCLUSION: ELC for AC following TG18 is feasible with low morbidity rates. However, ELC for Grade II/III ACs remains challenging, and surgeons must carefully assess intraoperative difficulties and surgical risks before proceeding.

Laparoscopic surgery reduced frequency of postoperative small bowel obstruction, and hospital stay compared with open surgery in a cohort of patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is reported to reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay compared with open surgery (OP). Because patient selection may have been biased in previous studies, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used in this study to test the benefits of LS compared with OP. METHODS: A total of 759 patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer undergoing curative surgery were retrospectively reviewed. To minimize confounding bias between LS and OP groups, a 1:1 PSM analysis was performed based on adjuvant chemotherapy, age, albumin, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status depth of tumor, gender, lymph node dissection, maximum tumor size, obstructive tumor, previous abdominal surgery, pathological stage, tumor differentiation, and tumor location. Statistical analyses including chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, univariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed using the data after PSM to investigate the benefits of LS compared with OP. RESULTS: After PSM analysis, 460 patients remained in the study. The LS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (34 ± 70 vs 237 ± 391, mL; P < 0.001), lower frequency of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) (17/213 vs 30/230; P = 0.045), lower rate of nasogastric tube insertion (7/223 vs 17/213; P = 0.036), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (13 ± 10 vs 25 ± 47, day; P < 0.001) than the OP group. Univariate analyses showed that LS significantly reduced the risk of postoperative SBO (odds ratio [OR] 0.532; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.285-0.995; P = 0.048) and nasogastric tube insertion (OR 0.393; 95% CI 0.160-0.967; P = 0.042) compared with OP. There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: LS reduced intraoperative blood loss, frequency of postoperative SBO, rate of nasogastric tube insertion, and postoperative hospital stay compared with OP.

Prognostic significance of preoperative hyaluronic acid level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Serum hyaluronic acid (HA) levels are increased in patients with solid tumors, and may predict outcomes. However, as HA levels also correlate with the degree of liver fibrosis, the prognostic significance of serum HA levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. METHODS: A total of 656 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC were divided into two groups by serum HA level (high HA [≥200 ng/mL], n = 248; low HA [<200 ng/mL], n = 408). Clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative survival were compared between groups. Moreover, 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was applied to adjust characteristics between groups. RESULTS: Both the 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates (OSR and RFSR) in the low HA group were significantly better than those in the high HA group (59.8% vs. 38.6%, respectively, p < 0.001 and 24.5% vs. 13.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, two comparable groups of 124 patients each were obtained. However, both the 5-year OSR and RFSR in the low HA group remained significantly better than those in the high HA group (57.4% vs. 38.3%, respectively, p = 0.006 and 22.5% vs. 14.7%, respectively, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: High preoperative HA level predicts poor postoperative survival of patients with HCC. undergoing hepatic resection.

Is left-sided involvement of hepatocellular carcinoma an important preoperative predictive factor of poor outcome?

BACKGROUND: The tumor location is the most simple clinical factor and important in liver surgery to make surgical procedure. However, no previous study has investigated the prognostic differences and clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma showing specific laterality. This study is the first report to focus on the laterality and aimed to lead to more simple and useful predictive factor rather than recent complicated predictive models. METHODS: Patients who underwent liver resection for the first time for single tumors located within each lobe between 2000 and 2018 were enrolled. We divided them into two groups based on tumor location: a right-sided group and a left-sided group. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival differences in relation to several other factors. RESULTS: There were 595 eligible patients; the 5-year survival rates and disease-free survival rates were 49.5% and 19.1% in the left-sided group and 55.6% and 24.5% in the right-sided group, respectively (p = 0.026). Statistical analyses revealed that the following preoperative prognostic factors were independently significant (p < 0.05) in the left-sided group: indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min, alpha fetoprotein, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonists-II level, and larger tumor size. CONCLUSION: The left-sided group had a poorer prognosis than the right-sided group. A left-sided tumor location is a significant preoperative factor predictive of poor outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

[Preoperative C-reactive protein predicts recurrence after curative resection in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1].

New chemotherapeutic regimens such as S-1 plus docetaxel, S-1 plus oxaliplatin and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin are reported to be effective and safe as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) for advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients. Although the use of these PACs is increasing, it is still unclear how to choose the best regimen for advanced GC patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate which clinical characteristics are associated with recurrence after curative surgery in patients receiving S-1 as PAC. Thirty-nine patients who received a PAC regimen with S-1 for more than 1 year after curative surgery for advanced GC were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model were performed to detect clinical characteristics that correlated with recurrence. Patients were divided into two groups, recurrence, and non-recurrence, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used for comparison of relapse-free survival (RFS). Fifteen patients had a recurrence after surgery (38.5%, 15/39). Multivariate analysis using clinical characteristics revealed that preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) (>0.3/≤0.3, mg/dL) (HR 10.73;95% C.I., 1.824-63.14;P=0.009) was significantly associated with recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test demonstrated that preoperative CRP (>0.3/≤0.3, mg/dL) was also significantly associated with RFS (P<0.001). Therefore, preoperative CRP is significantly associated with recurrence and RFS after curative surgery in advanced GC patients receiving S-1 as PAC.

Impact of Tumor Location on Postoperative Outcome of Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct.

BACKGROUND: The concept of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) has been proposed to be the biliary equivalent of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. While the classification of IPMNs is based on their location of duct involvement, such classification has not been fully evaluated for IPNBs. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of IPNB classification based on its location. METHODS: A total of 306 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection with a diagnosis of bile duct tumor were enrolled. Among these patients, 21 were diagnosed as having IPNB. The IPNBs were classified into two groups as follows: extrahepatic IPNB, which located in the distal or perihilar bile duct, and intrahepatic IPNB, which located more peripherally than the hilar bile duct. The clinicopathological features of the two groups were then compared. RESULTS: Extrahepatic IPNB tended to show more invasive characteristics than intrahepatic IPNB (presence of invasive component: 40.0 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.084). Moreover, patients with extrahepatic IPNB showed significantly poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) than those with intrahepatic IPNB [5-year RFS rate (%): 81.8 vs. 16.2, p = 0.014]. CONCLUSION: Patients with intrahepatic IPNB show more favorable pathological characteristics and postoperative survival outcomes than those with extrahepatic IPNB.

A Novel Approach for Hepatic Arterial Reconstruction after Total Pancreatectomy with Common Hepatic Artery Resection Using Inferior Phrenic Artery.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Because of the anatomical characteristics, pancreatic cancers (PC) can easily invade to visceral vessels such as celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, common hepatic artery (CHA) and portal vein, which makes curative resection difficult. In this study, we report an R0 resection for locally advanced PC by total pancreatectomy, combined resection of CHA, and reconstruction of hepatic artery using autologous left inferior phrenic artery (IPA). METHODS: A 47-year-old woman with complaints of low back pain was referred to our department. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a hypo-attenuation tumor of the pancreatic body measuring 70 mm, which completely encased the CHA. When unresectable locally advanced PC was diagnosed, systematic chemotherapy was administrated. After downstaging, she underwent surgery with curative intent. The tumor completely infiltrated the peripheral part of the CHA and gastroduodenal artery. As the tumor also extended to the head of the pancreas, total pancreatectomy and combined resection of CHA were performed. Then the exposed left IPA and proper hepatic artery were anastomosed with a microvascular technique. RESULTS: R0 resection was performed for restoring hepatic arterial flow and the postoperative course was uneventful without any postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: Hepatic artery reconstruction using IPA is a simple and safe procedure in selected patients.

An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts a poor postoperative survival in primary hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a normal preoperative serum level of alpha-fetoprotein.

PURPOSE: Although alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a useful prognostic marker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a recent study has shown that the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is also associated with the postoperative survival in such patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of the NLR in patients with primary HCC (p-HCC) showing a normal preoperative AFP. METHODS: Among 478 p-HCC patients undergoing curative surgery, 112 who had a normal AFP (< 8 ng/ml) were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, who did not have an elevated NLR (≤ 3.2); and group B, who had an elevated NLR (> 3.2). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to compare clinical features with the overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A multivariate analysis of the clinical features showed that the NLR (> 3.2/≤ 3.2) (hazard ratio 2.366; 95% CI 1.069-5.235; P = 0.034) was closely associated with the OS, along with the age (> 65/≤ 65 years) (P = 0.033). Group B had a significantly lower survival ratio than group A in terms of not only the OS (P = 0.013), but also the cancer-specific survival (P = 0.002) and relapse-free survival (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated NLR (> 3.2) is predictive of a poor survival in patients with primary HCC (p-HCC) showing normal AFP levels.

Risk Factors for Early Recurrence of Single Lesion Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatic resection is established as the treatment for HCC. However, patients sometimes experience early recurrence of HCC (ER HCC) after curative resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 193 patients with single HCC who underwent curative liver resection in our medical center between April 2000 and March 2013. We divided the cohort into two groups; early recurrence group (ER G) which experienced recurrence within 6 months after resection, and non-early recurrence group (NER G). Risk factors for ER HCC were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine out of 193 (20.2 %) patients had ER HCC. Univariate analysis showed Glasgow prognostic score (GPS, p = 0.036), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR, p = 0.001), level of PIVKA-II (p = 0.0001), level of AFP (p = 0.0001), amounts of blood loss (p = 0.001), operating time (p = 0.002), tumor size (p = 0.0001), stage III and IV (p = 0.0001), and microvascular invasions (portal vein: p = 0.0001 and hepatic vein: p = 0.001) to be associated with ER HCC. By multivariate analysis, there were significant differences in high NLR (p = 0.029) and high AFP (p = 0.0001) in patients with ER HCC. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative high AFP (more than 250 ng/ml) and high NLR (more than 1.829) were independent risk factors for ER HCC.

Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index is associated with liver cirrhosis in patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Among various preoperative evaluations of liver function, accurate assessment of liver cirrhosis (LC) is especially important in patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OBJECTIVE: To explore the most significant laboratory parameter associated with LC in patients undergoing surgery for HCC. METHODS: From among 588 HCC patients in our collected database who underwent liver surgery, 371 for whom sufficient laboratory data were evaluable, including direct serum fibrosis markers such as hyaluronic acid and type 3 procollagen peptide (P-3-P), were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define the ideal cutoff values of laboratory parameters, and the area under the ROC curve for LC was measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to clarify the laboratory parameter most significantly associated with LC. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of 13 laboratory parameters that had been selected by univariate analysis showed that the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (≤ 0.8/>0.8) (odds ratio, 2.687; 95% confidence interval 1.215-5.940; P = 0.015) was associated with LC, along with the aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio, the indocyanine green retention ratio at 15 min (ICG R15), and the level of hyaluronic acid. Among these four parameters associated with LC, ROC curve analysis revealed that APRI (0.757) had the largest area under the ROC (aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase 0.505, ICG R15 0.714, and hyaluronic acid 0.743). CONCLUSIONS: APRI is closely associated with LC in patients undergoing surgery for HCC.

Usefulness of preoperative C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein levels for prognostication of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The C-reactive protein level has been reported as a prognostic predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery. We investigated the usefulness of preoperative C-reactive protein levels in predicting outcomes after living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and identified preoperative risk factors. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed 96 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation in March 2003-November 2009. The effect of preoperative variables on overall survival was evaluated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower for C-reactive protein levels >0.3 mg/dL than for C-reactive protein levels ≤0.3 mg/dL (55.8% vs. 89.8%; P=0.001). In multivariate analysis, C-reactive protein levels >0.3 mg/dL (P=0.006) and alpha-fetoprotein levels >200 ng/mL (P<0.001) were significant risk factors for survival. For patients within Milan criteria (n=68), the 3-year overall survival rate with 2 risk factors (n=8) was 20%; of these patients, 63% experienced recurrence. For patients outside Milan criteria (n=28), the 5-year overall survival rate without 1-2 risk factors (n=21) was 80.9%; of these patients, 33% experienced recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative C-reactive protein levels predicted prognosis after living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein levels together with Milan criteria may improve hepatocellular carcinoma patient selection for liver transplantation.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Literature Review and Our Experience of NAC-GS.

In addition to established evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), evidence of the effects of neoadjuvant treatments (NATs), including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, has also been accumulating. Recent results from prospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NATs may be beneficial not only for borderline resectable PDAC, but also for resectable PDAC, by increasing the likelihood of successful R0 resection, decreasing the likelihood of the development of lymph node metastasis, and improving recurrence-free and overall survival. In addition, response to NAT may be informative for predicting the clinical course after preoperative NAT followed by surgery; in this way, the postoperative treatment strategy can be revised based on the effect of NAT and the post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. On the other hand, the response to NAT and AC is also influenced by the tumor biology and the patient's immune/nutritional status; therefore, planning of the treatment strategy and meticulous management of NAT, surgery, and AC is required on a patient-by-patient basis. Our experience of using gemcitabine plus S-1 showed that this NAT regimen achieved tumor shrinkage and decreased the levels of tumor markers but failed to provide a survival benefit. Our results also suggested that response/adverse events to NAT may be predictive of the efficacy of AC, as well as survival outcomes.

Pathological complete response of hepatocellular carcinoma confirmed by conversion hepatectomy following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy: a case report and literature review.

The combination regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) is currently used as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Herein, we report a rare case of curative hepatic resection performed as conversion surgery in a patient with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma following preoperative Atezo/Bev therapy. After five treatment cycles of Atezo/Bev therapy, followed by four cycles of atezolizumab monotherapy, the tumor marker levels decreased to baseline levels and 22 small daughter nodules disappeared, leaving only the primary tumor. Therefore, we performed resection of the primary tumor as conversion surgery, and postoperative histopathology confirmed complete tumor necrosis. No cancer recurrence has been observed until the 5-month postoperative follow-up, and the patient remains drug free. Consistent with the findings in this case, a review of previously reported cases revealed that in cases of successful conversion surgery, neoadjuvant Atezo/Bev therapy was associated with intra-tumoral bleeding, immune-related adverse events, and normalization of the tumor marker levels.

Robotic surgery is associated with a decreased risk of circumferential resection margin positivity compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether robotic surgery (RS) decreases the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) in patients with rectal cancer (RC) undergoing mesorectal excision (ME). BACKGROUND: Although it is well known that CRM positivity affects postoperative outcomes in patients with RC undergoing ME, few studies have investigated whether RS is superior to conventional LS for the risk of CRM positivity. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive electronic search of the literature up to December 2022 to identify studies that compared the risk of CRM positivity between patients with RC undergoing robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was analyzed using I2 statistics. RESULTS: Eighteen studies, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 propensity score matching (PSM) studies, involved a total of 9203 patients with RC who underwent ME were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that RS decreased the overall risk of CRM positivity (RR, 0.82; 95 % CI, 0.73-0.92; P = 0.001; I2 = 0 %) compared with conventional LS. Results of a meta-analysis of the 4 selected RCTs also showed that RS decreased the risk of CRM positivity (RR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.43-0.91; P = 0.01; I2 = 0 %) compared with conventional LS. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed that RS is associated with a decreased risk of CRM positivity compared with conventional LS in patients with RC undergoing ME.

A resected case of pancreatic head cancer developing 40 years after lateral pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis.

A 72-year-old male patient presented to our department complaining of with upper abdominal pain and jaundice. He had a history of a side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy performed 40 years previously for chronic pancreatitis. A diagnostic workup revealed a tumor 3 cm in size in the pancreatic head as the etiology of the jaundice. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with resectable pancreatic cancer. Following two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, an extended pancreatoduodenectomy was performed because of tumor invasion at the previous pancreaticojejunostomy site. Concurrent portal vein resection and reconstruction were performed. Pathological examination confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma (T2N1M0, Stage IIB). This case highlights the clinical challenges in pancreatic head carcinoma following a side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy. Although pancreaticojejunostomy is believed to reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis, clinicians should be aware that, even after this surgery, there is still a chance of developing pancreatic cancer during long-term follow-up.

Proposal of an integrated staging system using albumin-bilirubin grade and serum alpha-fetoprotein values for predicting postoperative prognosis of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Because repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is a potentially invasive procedure, it is necessary to identify patients who truly benefit from repeat hepatectomy. Albumin-bilirubin grading has been reported to predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, as prognosis also depends on tumor factors, a staging system that adds tumor factors to albumin-bilirubin grading may lead to a more accurate prognostication in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Albumin-bilirubin grading and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were combined and the albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score was created ([albumin-bilirubin grading = 1; 1 point, 2 or 3; 2 points] + [alpha-fetoprotein<75 ng/mL, 0 points; ≥5, 1 point]). Patients were classified into three groups, and their characteristics and survival were evaluated. The predictive ability of the albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score was compared with that of the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program and the Japan Integrated Stage scores. RESULTS: Albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score significantly stratified postoperative survival (albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score = 1/2/3: 5-year recurrence-free survival [%]: 22.4/20.7/0.0, p < 0.001) and showed the highest predictive value for survival among the integrated systems (albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score/Japan Integrated Stage/Cancer of the Liver Italian Program: 0.785/0.708/0.750). CONCLUSIONS: Albumin-bilirubin-alpha-fetoprotein score is useful for predicting the survival of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing repeat hepatectomy.

Clinical influence of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection on oncologic outcomes of patients with mid-low rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although several recent meta-analyses have investigated the clinical influence of the addition of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-low rectal cancer (RC) undergoing mesorectal excision (ME), most studies included in such meta-analyses were retrospectively designed. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical influence of prophylactic LLND on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search of the literature up to July 2022 was performed to identify studies that compared oncologic outcomes between patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME who underwent LLND and patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME who did not undergo LLND. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects models and the generic inverse variance method to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and heterogeneity was analyzed using I2 statistics. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies, consisting of 3 randomized and 3 propensity score matching studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis of 2 randomized studies demonstrated no significant effect of prophylactic LLND on improving oncologic outcomes concerning overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.89-1.69; I2 = 0%; P = .22) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81-1.31; I2 = 28%; P = .83). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis revealed no significant influence of prophylactic LLND on oncologic outcomes-OS and RFS-in patients with mid-low RC who underwent ME.