Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Cancer ; 130(10): 1747-1757, 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician-rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment-related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391). METHODS: Participants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI-16 treatment side-effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t-tests or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI-16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, -0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the similar frequency of clinician-rated AEs, PROs identified greater on-treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician-rated AEs by characterizing patients' experiences during chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Capecitabina , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Neoplasia Residual , Platina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
BMC Med ; 9: 99, 2011 Aug 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21867560

RESUMO

Although imatinib is firmly established as an effective therapy for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the field continues to advance on several fronts. In this minireview we cover recent results of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in newly diagnosed patients, investigate the state of strategies to discontinue therapy and report on new small molecule inhibitors to tackle resistant disease, focusing on agents that target the T315I mutant of BCR-ABL. As a result of these advances, standard of care in frontline therapy has started to gravitate toward dasatinib and nilotinib, although more observation is needed to fully support this. Stopping therapy altogether remains a matter of clinical trials, and more must be learned about the mechanisms underlying the persistence of leukemic cells with treatment. However, there is good news for patients with the T315I mutation, as effective drugs such as ponatinib are on their way to regulatory approval. Despite these promising data, accelerated or blastic phase disease remains a challenge, possibly due to BCR-ABL-independent resistance.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(23): 2539-2551, 2021 08 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34092112

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal v nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine. RESULTS: Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum. CONCLUSION: Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Platina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Capecitabina/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Platina/farmacologia
4.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 10(7): 665-676, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33391851

RESUMO

There is conflicting evidence from the small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have assessed the benefit of survivorship care plans (SCPs) on improving patient outcomes. Yet, published quasi-experimental and descriptive studies provide preliminary evidence suggesting that using survivorship care plans in practice may improve patient knowledge, decrease worry and anxiety, and lead to patient and primary care physician satisfaction. Given the conflicting evidence and the paucity of RCTs, further research is needed to more fully explore the effect of SCP on patient outcomes. To address this knowledge gap, an SCP program was implemented in a community-based oncology clinic and used quality improvement methodology to assess the effect on patient knowledge of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, and to understand patients' satisfaction with the current SCP program. A total of 30 cancer patients were recruited in Southeast Michigan to participate in an SCP quality improvement project and completed surveys to evaluate the SCP program. Data were collected between December 2017 and March 2018. We observed a statistically significant (p = .028) difference between pre- and postintervention (survivorship care plan visit) knowledge scores about cancer diagnosis, treatment received, and follow-up recommendations. Moreover, participants were satisfied with the survivorship care plan and visit.

6.
Leuk Res ; 39(8): 835-9, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26038120

RESUMO

We investigated protracted low-dose oral Clofarabine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Adults with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score of INT-1 or higher who had failed first line therapy were eligible. INT-1 patients had to be transfusion-dependent. We started with oral Clofarabine at 5mg (fixed dose) daily for 10 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle. Toxicity prompted a modification to 1mg PO daily for 10 days and then 1mg PO daily for 7 days. Patients received treatment indefinitely until loss of response or unacceptable toxicity. Nine patients (5 women) were enrolled and evaluable (median age 65 years; range 55-81). A 10-day regimen of oral Clofarabine at 5mg/day induced Grade IV pancytopenia. A dose of 1 mg/day for 7/28 days was very well tolerated without significant toxicity. Three patients had responses (2 with responses lasting up to 21 and 51 cycles) defined as stable disease in spite of no significant change on bone marrow evaluation. Low-dose oral Clofarabine (1mg daily for 7/28 days) proved both effective and safe for patients with MDS who had failed prior therapy. This patient population is particularly sensitive to more protracted Clofarabine treatment schedules.


Assuntos
Nucleotídeos de Adenina/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Arabinonucleosídeos/administração & dosagem , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/tratamento farmacológico , Nucleotídeos de Adenina/efeitos adversos , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Arabinonucleosídeos/efeitos adversos , Clofarabina , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Falha de Tratamento
7.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 57(6): 732-9, 2011 Feb 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21292133

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that gastric bypass surgery (GBS) would favorably impact cardiac remodeling and function. BACKGROUND: GBS is increasingly used to treat severe obesity, but there are limited outcome data. METHODS: We prospectively studied 423 severely obese patients undergoing GBS and a reference group of severely obese subjects that did not have surgery (n = 733). RESULTS: At a 2-year follow up, GBS subjects had a large reduction in body mass index compared with the reference group (-15.4 ± 7.2 kg/m(2) vs. -0.03 ± 4.0 kg/m(2); p < 0.0001), as well as significant reductions in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and insulin resistance. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased. The GBS group had reductions in left ventricular (LV) mass index and right ventricular (RV) cavity area. Left atrial volume did not change in GBS but increased in reference subjects. In conjunction with reduced chamber sizes, GBS subjects also had increased LV midwall fractional shortening and RV fractional area change. In multivariable analysis, age, change in body mass index, severity of nocturnal hypoxemia, E/E', and sex were independently associated with LV mass index, whereas surgical status, change in waist circumference, and change in insulin resistance were not. CONCLUSIONS: Marked weight loss in patients undergoing GBS was associated with reverse cardiac remodeling and improved LV and RV function. These data support the use of bariatric surgery to prevent cardiovascular complications in severe obesity.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Contração Miocárdica , Obesidade/cirurgia , Remodelação Ventricular , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ecocardiografia , Seguimentos , Átrios do Coração , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/diagnóstico por imagem , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA