Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 42(3): 746-751, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38372720

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Less frequently, there is involvement of the musculoskeletal system, and occurrence of systemic manifestation with non-specific symptoms such as fever, fatigue and myalgia. Therefore, leprosy can often mimic autoimmune diseases such as arthritis, vasculitis, or collagenosis and be mis-diagnosed. METHODS: This study describes a series of cases of leprosy mimicking autoimmune diseases in patients treated in the Rheumatology Department of our centre in the period 2019 to 2023. All patients were investigated regarding leprosy criteria and had clinical evaluation, serum markers, and histopathological analyses recorded. The diagnosis of leprosy was confirmed using skin biopsy followed by testing for acid-fast bacillus (AFB) or smear microscopy. RESULTS: Six patients who were initially investigated for autoimmune diseases were identified as diagnosed as leprosy cases, fulfilling both clinical and histopathologic criteria, two of whom presented with symptoms of polyarthritis with an inflammatory characteristic, two diffuse erythematous-violaceous lesions, three recurrent fever, three arthralgia, and one Raynaud's phenomenon, which are all characteristics present most frequently in rheumatologic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: We must consider the bacillary infection as a differential diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. Histopathological analysis is an important tool and the gold standard for diagnostic confirmation.


Assuntos
Artrite , Doenças Autoimunes , Hanseníase , Humanos , Hanseníase/diagnóstico , Hanseníase/tratamento farmacológico , Hanseníase/microbiologia , Mycobacterium leprae , Pele/patologia , Doenças Autoimunes/diagnóstico , Doenças Autoimunes/patologia
2.
Acta Trop ; 249: 107091, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065376

RESUMO

Tick-borne diseases have a significant impact on human and animal populations, posing an increasing threat to public health, particularly in the context of climate change. Along with the various natural hosts of ticks, birds play a notable role in transmitting ticks and tick-borne pathogens, indicating the importance of monitoring flyways and establishing a cooperative network for comprehensive surveillance and to collect diverse tick samples across various regions. This study aimed to develop an international network for surveillance of disease, collection of sufficient tick samples, and overall identification of the geographical distribution of host and ticks in Asian regions, especially in 11 countries on East Asian and Central Asian flyways. Ticks were collected from wild animals, domestic animals, and vegetation to identify the differences between Ixodid ticks and understand tick distribution. We collected a total 6,624 of ticks from 11 collaborating Asian countries, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Japan, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Mongolia and Pakistan. We identified 17 host animals and 47 species of both residential and migratory birds. Ticks from birds collected from four countries (ROK, Japan, Hong Kong and Mongolia) belonged to two genera, Haemaphysalis and Ixodes, including Haemaphysalis (H.) longicornis, H. flava, H. concinna, H. hystricis, H. formosensis, Ixodes (I.) nipponensis and I. persulcatus. The potential of migratory birds to cross ecological barriers with ticks and tick-borne diseases indicated the need for further investigations to understand the migration of birds as potential vectors and the new influx of zoonotic diseases along migratory bird flyways. This study suggests the potential risk of spreading tick-borne diseases through birds, thus highlighting the importance of international cooperative networking.


Assuntos
Ixodes , Ixodidae , Infestações por Carrapato , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos , Animais , Humanos , Animais Domésticos , Infestações por Carrapato/epidemiologia , Infestações por Carrapato/veterinária , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos/veterinária , Aves , Paquistão
3.
Adv Rheumatol ; 64(1): 58, 2024 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39135131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination to mitigate the infection severity risks. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, especially those under immunosuppression or with associated comorbidities. However, few studies have assessed the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with RA. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with RA. METHODS: This data are from the study "Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases," a Brazilian multicentric prospective phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in IMRDs in Brazil. Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA of all centers were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) or CoronaVac (Sinovac/Butantan). Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily and returned at the end of 28 days for each dose. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients with RA were include, 90% female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed, mainly after the first dose. The most common AEs after the first dose were pain at the injection (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%), myalgia (30,5%) and fatigue (26,6%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection (66% vs 32 %, p < 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p < 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p < 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%), headache (21%) and fatigue (18%). Arthralgia (41,4% vs 25%, p = 0.02) and pain at injection (51,4% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No serious AEs were related. With Regard to RA activity level, no significant difference was observed between the three time periods for both COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSION: In the comparison between the two immunizers in patients with RA, local reactions and musculoskeletal symptoms were more frequent with ChAdOx1 than with CoronaVac, especially after the first dose. In summary, the AE occurred mainly after the first dose, and were mild, like previous data from others immunizing agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Vaccination did not worsen the degree of disease activity.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humanos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Feminino , Masculino , Brasil/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/etiologia , Mialgia/induzido quimicamente , Mialgia/etiologia , Artralgia/etiologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA