Giant Pulmonary Artery Thrombotic Material, Due to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, Mimics Pulmonary Artery Sarcoma.

In this article, we present the case of a 38-year-old female who suffered from serious respiratory distress. After an extensive pulmonary artery imaging diagnostic work-up (CTPA, MRA and PET), we were unable to differentiate between chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) vs. pulmonary artery sarcoma (PAS) due to extensive filling defects and extraluminal findings. Although surgery was postponed for nine months due to the COVID-19 pandemic, CTEPH diagnosis, due to a high-thrombus burden, was finally confirmed after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Conclusively, imaging findings of rare cases of CTEPH might mimic PAS and the surgical removal of the lesion are both needed for a final diagnosis. What is Already Known about This Topic? Pulmonary artery sarcoma (PAS) is a rare but aggressive malignancy, which originates from the intimal layer of the pulmonary artery (PA); Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is based on chronic, organized flow-limiting thrombi inside PA circulation and subsequent pulmonary hypertension. What Does This Study Contribute? Since radiological findings of CTEPH cases might rarely mimic PAS, pulmonary artery endarterectomy and subsequent histopathologic study are needed for a final diagnosis.

Diagnostic performance of electrocardiographic criteria in echocardiographic diagnosis of different patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) is considered the initial screening method for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) despite its low sensitivity. However, there are no data on how ECG criteria for LVH perform in patients with concentric (cLVH) and eccentric LVH (eLVH). METHODS: In the setting of the Corinthia cross-sectional study, ECGs were analyzed in 1,570 participants of the study. Seven ECG LVH criteria were calculated (Sokolow-Lyon voltage, index, and product, sex-specific Cornell voltage and product, Lewis voltage, and the Framingham), whereas LVH was defined, based on echocardiographic data, as left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area (BSA) of at least 125 g/m2 in men and at least 110 g/m2 in women. RESULTS: Regarding the frequency encountered for each ECG LVH criterion, there was no difference between eLVH and cLVH. However, when ECG criteria were compared as continuous variables between LVH groups, Cornell voltage and product were higher in cLVH individuals, with a value of Cornell voltage >13.95 mV having 61% sensitivity and 62% specificity to differentiate cLVH from eLVH (p = .05). Even after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and hypertension, the occurrence of Cornell voltage or product increased the odds of cLVH by 1.6 times (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Cornell voltage and product criteria disclosed a superior discriminative ability for the detection of LVH via ECG. When further categorizing LVH as concentric and eccentric, Cornell product depicted the higher discriminative ability for cLVH.

Omitting aspirin in PCI patients: Myth or reality?

In the current era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with the use of contemporary drug-eluting stents, refined techniques, and adjunctive pharmacotherapy, the role of aspirin peri-PCI remains undisputable. Beyond the initial period, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for 6 months in stable coronary artery disease and 12 months in acute coronary syndromes is the standard of care. However, concerns regarding bleeding adverse events caused by aspirin have led to shortened DAPT duration or even omission of aspirin. Aspirin free-strategies have been increasingly encountered in several studies and showed a significant reduction in bleeding events, without any sign of increased ischemic risk. Individualization of DAPT duration particularly in high bleeding risk patients appears therefore mandatory, making aspirin not necessary in several cases. Moreover, recent randomized trials have shed light on how to treat PCI patients in the presence of concomitant anticoagulant treatment with P2Y12 monotherapy and excluding aspirin. These aspirin-free strategies have been proved safer than the "older" standard triple antithrombotic treatment, without compromising safety. Ongoing studies may further dispel the myths and establish real facts regarding post-PCI-tailored treatment with or without aspirin.

Double or Triple Antithrombotic Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have traditionally received triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor plus an oral anticoagulant (OAC) to reduce atherothrombotic events, even though this strategy is associated with a high risk of severe bleeding. Recent trials have indicated that dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT), consisting of a P2Y12 inhibitor plus an OAC, may be superior to TAT in terms of bleeding risk; however, the trade-off regarding ischemic complications may be questionable. Patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI) before undergoing PCI warrant special consideration because of the accompanying high ischemic risk, including stent thrombosis, which might be exacerbated by an aspirin-free strategy such as DAT. In particular, in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), the highly prothrombotic milieu may necessitate initial TAT, though durations may vary, making a tailored antithrombotic regimen for this high-risk subset of patients a fairly challenging and difficult scenario for clinicians. Since patients with MI, especially STEMI, are underrepresented in randomized trials, data regarding the optimal antithrombotic treatment in such patients are sparse. This review aims to analyze the outcomes of different antithrombotic regimens in patients with MI and AF undergoing PCI, define the role of DAT versus TAT regarding safety and efficacy outcomes, and address controversial issues and future perspectives.

P2Y12 inhibitors for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: current understanding and outcomes.

Introduction: Inhibition of P2Y12 platelet receptors consists a crucial target of pharmacologic treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients. Several controversial issues however still remain and these are analyzed.Areas covered: The significance of early and strong platelet inhibition in the early phase of STEMI and the role of pretreatment are discussed. Concerns regarding morphine administration are raised. The role of crushing integral tablets to expedite the onset of action of oral P2Y12 inhibitors is emphasized. New data on the intravenous cangrelor are reported. Antiplatelet therapies as adjunct to thrombolysis, as well as the role of de-escalation antiplatelet therapy are analyzed.Expert opinion: Pharmacodynamic studies convincingly demonstrate a gap in the onset of antiplatelet action in STEMI cases, even when prasugrel or ticagrelor loading dose is used. The clinical benefit, however, of the early platelet inhibition and pretreatment is not entirely clear. Morphine delays the onset of action of oral agents, while this is expedited by crushing the integral tablets. Cangrelor devoids of these deficiencies by achieving fast and strong platelet inhibition in all clinical scenarios. Concomitant administration of novel antiplatelet agents with thrombolysis and de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment necessitate further study to reach definite conclusion.

Increasing awareness of physicians against severe leptospirosis: A treatable but potentially fatal zoonotic infection.

Leptospirosis is a worldwide, often severe and potentially fatal zoonotic infection. Here, we present the case of a 35-year-old man with severe leptospirosis infection that was identified early and was treated effectively, with a quite impressive complete recovery. Delaying of early diagnosis and treatment is crucial for the development of an unfavorable clinical course and increases the risk of a lethal outcome.