Neoadjuvant chemotherapy impact on outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and silicone implant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCH) has demonstrated efficacy in downsizing tumors and facilitating less extensive surgery. However, immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after NCH has raised concerns regarding higher complication rates. This study evaluates the impact of NCH on outcomes following IBR with a latissimus dorsi flap and implant (LDI) after mastectomy. METHODS: Cases from a prospective maintained database were reviewed, and patients classified according to whether or not they received NCH. Risk factors and major and minor complications in both groups were then analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 196 patients who underwent 198 IBR procedures, 38.4% received NCH and 66.1% did not. The overall complication rate was 46.7% in the non-NCH group and 53.3% in the NCH group (p = 0.650). The presence of comorbidities increased the likelihood of any complication (odds ratio [OR]: 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-8.66; p = 0.008) as well as major complications (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.03-10.95; p = 0.045). Although patients in the NCH group experienced more major complications (10.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.134) and early loss of breast reconstruction (3.9% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.128), these findings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study found no statistically significant association between NCH and higher risk of complications or loss of IBR with LDI after mastectomy.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap and Silicone Implant Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: About 30% to 50% of women with breast cancer undergo mastectomy, and approximately 50% of them will receive adjuvant radiotherapy (ART). This study evaluates the medium- and long-term impact of ART after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) flap and silicone implants. METHODS: Clinical, surgical, and oncological data were retrospectively collected and analyzed based on the medical records of 176 patients who had undergone IBR with LDM flap and silicone implants. RESULTS: The data showed that 7.4% of patients had a history of previous radiotherapy, 56.3% received ART, 31.8% developed capsular contracture with a mean follow-up of 58.1 months, and 14.2% of surgeries were categorized as procedures with a prolonged operating time, lasting above 1 SD of the observed mean. Those who experienced prolonged operating time (odds ratio, 4.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-12.93; P = 0.003) and those who received ART (odds ratio, 7.38; 95% confidence interval, 3.18-17.10; P < 0.001) were more likely to develop capsular contracture. Thirty-two patients (18%) underwent capsulectomy with implant replacement, and 7 patients (4%) had the implant removed. The mean time between IBR and reoperation was 29.1 months. Patients who received ART were 2.84 times more likely to experience reconstruction failure or undergo implant-related reoperation ( P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that IBR with LDM flap and silicone implant followed by ART is a safe procedure, resulting in low rates of reconstruction failure. However, ART increased the likelihood of capsular contracture development and implant-related reoperation, having a negative effect on reconstructed breasts.

The Influence of the Superficial Venous System on DIEP Flap Drainage in Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Autologous tissue has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The use of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has the advantages of giving a natural appearance to the reconstructed breast and being associated with lower morbidity at the donor site when compared with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Venous complications such as venous thrombosis and insufficiency remain the main causes of flap loss and surgical revisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of superficial venous drainage of the DIEP flap and the addition of a second venous anastomosis have on flap survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study collected from a prospective database maintained by our institution. Data was obtained from the medical records of female patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap between March 2010 and March 2017. We evaluated 137 DIEP patients with unilateral breast reconstructions. In 64 (46.7%) the deep venous system was chosen and 73 (53.3%) had an additional superficial vein anastomosed. RESULTS: Out of the 137 patients evaluated, there were 16 (11.67%) cases of revision, 14 (10.21%) were due to venous thrombosis. Twelve cases (8.75%) of flap loss were reported. Reoperation rate was lower in the dual venous drainage group when compared with the single venous drainage group (p = 0.005), as was the rate of flap loss (p = 0.006) and reoperation due to venous thrombosis (p = 0.002). Out of the 125 DIEP flaps, fat necrosis was clinically identified in 7 (5.1%) cases, and the rate was lower in the dual venous drainage system group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Dual venous drainage of a DIEP flap appears to reduce the rates of venous thrombosis, reoperation, total flap loss, and fat necrosis.

The oncological safety of autologous fat grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To present a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis evaluating the oncological safety of autologous fat grafting (AFG). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: AFG for breast reconstruction presents difficulties during follow-up radiological exams, and the oncological potential of grafted fat is uncertain. Previous studies confirmed that the fatty tissue could be transferred under a good condition suitable would not interfere with mammographic follow-up, although the issue of oncological safety remains. METHODS: We reviewed the literature published until 01/18/2021. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR). We included studies that evaluated women with breast cancer who undergone surgery followed by reconstruction with AFG. We synthesized data using the inverse variance method on the log-HR (log of the hazard ratio) scale for time-to-event outcomes using RevMan. We assessed heterogeneity using the Chi2 and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Fifteen studies evaluating 8541 participants were included. The hazard ratios (HR) could be extracted from four studies, and there was no difference in OS between the AFG group and control (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.54, p = 0.71, I2 = 58%, moderate certainty evidence), and publication bias was not detected. The HR for DFS could be extracted from six studies, and there was no difference between the AFG group and control (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.38, p = 0.96, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence). The HR for LR could be extracted from ten studies, and there was no difference between the AFG group and control (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.12, p = 0.43, I2 = 1%, moderate certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: According to the current evidence, AFG is a safe technique of breast reconstruction for patients that have undergone BC surgery and did not affect OS, DFS, or LR.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes with Small-Volume Silicone Implants Associated with Autogenous Fat Grafting in Primary and Revision Breast Augmentation Surgery: Soft Weight Hybrid (SWEH) Concept.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous association of autologous fat grafting (AFG) with silicone implants, defined as a hybrid procedure, has been proposed for breast augmentation (BA). In some patients, larger-volume implants may result in larger incisions, with long-term effects including implant palpability, soft tissue atrophy, and secondary ptosis. Some patients do not want large volume implants, or have insufficient soft tissue coverage. Recent improvements in AFG have led to new surgical options in BA for addressing these cases. OBJECTIVES: This study combines AFG in BA using small-volume implants, known as the SWEH (soft weight hybrid) approach, and evaluates aesthetic advantages and outcomes following primary/secondary BA. METHODS: 25 patients (50 breasts) underwent SWEH procedures; this approach was indicated when the overlying tissue was insufficient to adequately cover the implant and patients refused large-volume implants. Three-dimensional images were obtained using a Divina 3D scanner system (AX3 Technologies, Miami, USA) to assess breast volume (BV) and intermammary distance (IMD) during follow-up. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 29.3 years (range: 21-42) and mean body mass index was 19.3 kg/m2 (15.3-27.2). The most common implant (SmoothSilk surface Round/Ergonomix style) volume was 180 cc (175-215), and patients received a mean volume of 125 cc of fat (89-168)/breast in the subcutaneous tissue. Preoperative average BV measurements were 236.85 cc (170-335). At 3 and 12 months post-procedure, the average BV values were 488.82 and 478.73cc, respectively (p=0.475). The average preoperative IMD was 31.76 mm (range, 22-43); at 3 and 12 months post-procedure, the average IMD was 20.47 and 20.94 mm, respectively (p=0.61). Postoperative complications included subcutaneous banding in the axilla (n = 1; 4%) and hypertrophic scarring (n = 1; 4%). Breast imaging exams were performed; in 2 breasts (8%) localized oil cysts were observed; no cases of suspicious calcifications, fat necrosis, or lumps were seen. Fat retention rate (1 year) was calculated by the difference between the BV expected with 100% fat intake and the real BV observed. In our sample we observed an average of 72.7 (range: 69.2-77.3, SD: 2.63) and 76.7 (range: 72.3-79.9, SD: 2.18) percent of fat intake on the right and the left breast respectively. No rippling, implant malposition, or infection was observed during a mean follow-up of 22 months (6-40). CONCLUSIONS: SWEH is a useful surgical alternative that combines the benefits of AFG and implant-based augmentation, particularly with regard to soft tissue coverage, and avoids the limitations of larger-volume implants. The association of small-volume gel implants and smaller scars can yield satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Reoperative Augmentation Mammoplasty: An Algorithm to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support, Pocket Control, and Smooth Implant Stability with Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling (CRIMS) and its Technical Variations.

BACKGROUND: Reoperative augmentation mammoplasty (RAM) is a challenging procedure, with the highest rates of complications and revision. Complications include implant malposition, lateral displacement, bottoming out, and rotation. These deformities can be addressed with various procedures, but the pocket control and stability of the new smooth implant surface may present limitations. OBJECTIVES: This study revisits a previously described predictable approach in primary breast augmentation and defines a surgical treatment algorithm for RAM technique selection. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, 72 patients (144 breasts) underwent RAM with composite reverse inferior muscle sling (CRIMS) technique and its technical variations (types I-IV). CRIMS technique involves placing a silicone gel implant into the submuscular (SM) pocket with an inferior sling of the pectoralis major muscle based on the dimensions of the implant, in combination with support points/dermal bridge sutures to stabilize the implant and glandular tissue at the lower breast pole (LBP). Reasons for surgery were ptosis (92%), implant and malposition (59.6%). Patients were followed for at least 6 months in 5 cases (6.9%), at least 12 months in 50 cases (69.4%), for at least 36 months in 10 cases (13.8%), and more than 36 months in 7 cases (9.7%) (mean 34 months; range 6-48 months). Patients were evaluated in terms of resolution of symptoms, satisfaction, and complications. Three-dimensional imaging (3DI) obtained from the Divina scanner system was used and followed up for 1 year to evaluate breast position, lower pole stretch (LPS), and intermammary distance (IMD). RESULTS: Eleven cases of minor complications were observed in 9 patients (12.5%): hypertrophic scarring in 4 (5.5%), wound dehiscence in 4 (5.5%), Baker II/III capsular contracture in 1 (1.3%). SmoothSilk surface silicone implants were used in all cases, with an average volume decrease of 120 cc. Sixty-eight patients (94.4%) were either very satisfied/satisfied with their aesthetic result. Breast images were performed in a group of 65 patients (90.2%), and in 7 breasts (10.7%), localized oil cysts were observed. The value for LPS was 7.87% (p <0.0001) between 10 days and 1 year, with the majority occurring early in the first 3 months, indicating that the LBP/implant remains steady during the last months of follow-up. No cases of fat necrosis/seroma were observed. There were no signs of intra/extracapsular ruptures, capsular contracture. There were 2 cases (3%) of minimal implant displacement and no cases of rotation. CONCLUSIONS: CRIMS and its variations can be performed successfully in RAM. An algorithmic approach can facilitate the pre- and intraoperative decision-making process and provide the new pocket control and implant stability with acceptable complication rates. Further accurate evaluation is recommended to understand the benefits or disadvantages of CRIMS compared to other RAM techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Clinical and MRI Evaluation of Silicone Gel Implants with RFID-M Traceability System: A Prospective Controlled Cohort Study Related to Safety and Image Quality in MRI Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: SmoothSilk implants (SSI) are the first generation of implants to incorporate a radio-frequency identification device (RFID-M), a non-invasive traceability system. Although the RFID-M is considered compatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the size of the artifact and its influence on breast tissue vary. This prospective study assessed safety and MRI issues in a cohort of breast reconstruction patients. METHODS: Forty-four SSI were used for breast reconstruction in patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. All patients were evaluated for magnetic field interactions, MRI-related heating and artifacts in a 1.5-T MRI unit using standard T1/T2-weighted sequences utilized in clinical assessment of breast tissue/implants. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 41.5 years (27-53ys) and body mass index was 28+-6.44 kg/m2. In 18/22 patients (81.8%), mastectomies were unilateral. No patients reported local heat/discomfort. All implants showed RFID-M-related artifacts with an estimated mean volume in T1 of 42.9cm3 (26.2-63.6cm3; SD±8.6 and 95% CI, 40.37-45.45) and in T2 of 60.5cm3 (35.4-97.2cm3; SD±14.7 and 95% CI, 56.29-65.01). Artifact volume was smaller in T1 than in T2, to a statistically significant degree (p <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in artifact volume according to surgical indication, breast side or implant volume. There were 4/44 (9%) cases of minor rotation (<45°). In all cases, adequate analysis of the breast tissue was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that SSI with RFID-M technology presented an artifact volume of 42.9cm3 and 60.5cm3 in T1 and T2 images, respectively. Our findings provide detailed information on the quality and location of MRI artifacts in a reconstructed cohort which can help guide clinical decision-making for patients. To our knowledge, this is the first time RFID-M breast implants have been prospectively evaluated for clinical and MRI issues in a cohort of reconstructive patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Subfascial Ergonomic Axillary Hybrid (SEAH) Breast Augmentation: A Surgical Approach Combining the Advantages of Incision, Pocket, Silicone Gel, and Fat Grafting in Primary and Revision Breast Augmentation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous application of the axillary approach (AA) with the subfascial pocket (SF) has been proposed for breast augmentation (BA) surgery. New silicone implant technology and recent improvements in autologous fat grafting (AFG) have ushered in a new era for BA. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the combined subfascial ergonomic axillary hybrid (SEAH) method and evaluate its aesthetic benefits after primary/secondary BA. METHODS: In total, 42 patients (84 breasts) underwent BA with the SEAH technique; this approach was indicated when the overlying tissue was insufficient to adequately cover the implant. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 34.6 years (range, 28-56 years), mean BMI was 18.8 kg/m2 (range, 14.4-26.1 kg/m2). The most common implant (Motiva SmoothSilk surface Ergonomix style) volume was 255 cc (range, 175-355 cc), patients received a mean fat volume of 96 mL (range, 60-145 mL) per breast in the subcutaneous tissue. The average lower pole stretch value was 40.5% (21.75 mm) and 13.1% (9.9 mm) for preoperative to 10 days postprocedure and 10 days to 18 months postprocedure, respectively. Postoperative complications included subcutaneous banding in the axilla (n = 3, 7.1%), small wound dehiscence (n = 1, 2.3%), and hypertrophic scarring (n = 1, 2.3%). No rippling, implant malposition, infection, or fat necrosis was observed during a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 6-32 months). CONCLUSIONS: SEAH is a useful and versatile technique combining the benefits of AFG and implant-based augmentation, particularly with regard to soft tissue coverage, and avoids the limitations of the submuscular position. The combination of ergonomic gel implants and a SF pocket can yield satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Impact of Fat Graft Thickness and Harvesting Technique on Adipocyte Viability in a New Porcine Experimental Model: An Immunohistochemical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has been employed in surgical practice as a filling method. However, controversies remain on the specifics of this technique. So far, few relevant experimental large animal studies have objectively assessed factors related to AFG integration. OBJECTIVES: This study utilized an experimental, medium-sized animal model to compare the feasibility of AFG collected employing 2 different techniques with instruments of distinct thicknesses. METHODS: Twenty minipigs (Sus scropha domesticus) were subjected to AFG harvesting via en bloc resection utilizing 3- (Group I) and 5-mm-diameter (Group II) round punch blades (PBs) and liposuction (LS) with 3- (Group III) and 5-mm-diameter cannulas (Group IV). Both samples were grafted intramuscularly (biceps femoralis). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was employed to identify intact adipocytes, fat necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and oil cysts. Immunohistochemical staining (perilipin-A, tumor necrosis factor alfa, and cluster of differentiation number 31) was utilized to quantify the feasibility of adipocytes, tissue necrosis, and neoangiogenesis, respectively. RESULTS: Hematoxylin and eosin analysis showed that fat necrosis and histiocyte presence were significantly lower in the AFG harvested utilizing a PB than in LS. For perilipin-A, a statistical difference was observed between subgroups I and III (P = 0.001) and I and IV (P = 0.004). Instrument diameter had no effect on graft integration in comparisons between groups II and III (P = 0.059) and II and IV (P = 0.132). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental study, fat collected utilizing a PB demonstrated higher adipocyte viability than fat collected with LS. The diameter of the collection instruments, whether PB or LS, had no effect on graft integration.

Complications after breast reconstruction with alloplastic material in breast cancer patients submitted or not to post mastectomy radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy is a relevant element of breast cancer treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of radiotherapy (RT) on local complications in patients with breast cancer that had undergone breast reconstruction with alloplastic material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of breast cancer patients submitted to mastectomy and breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2013. Clinical and treatment variables were correlated with early and late complications. RESULTS: 251 patients were included; mean age was 49.7 (25 to 78) years. Reconstruction was immediate in 94% of the patients, with 88% performed with a temporary tissue expander. Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) was delivered to 167 patients (66.5%). Early complications were present in 26.3% of the patients. Irradiated patients presented 5.4% incidence of late complications versus 2.4% for non-irradiated patients (p = 0.327). Diabetes (OR = 3.41 95% CI: 1.23-9.45, p = 0.018) and high body mass index (BMI) (OR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.60-4.37, p < 0.0001) were the main risk factors. The overall incidence of late complications was 4.4%, with predominance of severe capsular contracture (8/11). Arterial hypertension (OR = 4.78; 95% CI: 1.97-11.63, p = 0.001), BMI (OR = 0.170; 95% CI: 0.048-0.607, p = 0.006) and implant placement (OR = 3.55; 95% CI: 1.26-9.99, p = 0.016) were related to late complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of complications was low in this population. Radiotherapy delivery translated into a higher but not statistically significant risk of late complications when compared with the non-irradiated patients. Already well-known clinical risk factors for complications after breast reconstruction were identified.

Breast Tissue Expander With Radiofrequency Identification Port: Assessment of MRI Issues.

OBJECTIVE. Breast tissue expanders with magnetic ports are MRI unsafe, preventing patients from benefiting from the diagnostic capabilities of MRI. A tissue expander was recently developed with a radiofrequency identification (RFID) port used for needle location and expansion that may be acceptable for a patient undergoing MRI. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate MRI issues using standardized techniques and well-accepted methods for this tissue expander with RFID port. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The breast tissue expander with RFID port (Motiva Flora Tissue Expander, Establishment Labs) was assessed for magnetic field interactions (translational attraction and torque, 3 T), MRI-related heating (1.5 T/64 MHz and 3 T/128 MHz), artifacts (3 T), and functional changes associated with different MRI conditions (1.5 T/64 MHz and 3 T/128 MHz). RESULTS. Magnetic field interactions were minor (deflection angle of 2° and no torque) and thus will not pose a risk. At 1.5 T/64 MHz and 3 T/128 MHz, the highest temperature elevations (1.7°C and 1.9°C, respectively) were physiologically inconsequential. The tissue expander with RFID port exhibited relatively small artifacts on MRI. Exposures of the tissue expander with RFID port to different MRI conditions did not impact the ability to localize the RFID port or to read the electronic serial number. CONCLUSION. The findings indicated that this tissue expander with RFID port is "MR Conditional" for a patient referred for MRI at 1.5 T or 3 T. Importantly, the relatively small artifact associated with this implant offers potential advantages for patients undergoing MRI compared with tissue expanders that have magnetic ports that create substantial signal losses and distortions on MR images.

Reoperative Transaxillary Approach Algorithm: Extending the Surgical Alternatives for Secondary Breast Augmentation in the Era of Scarless Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although the transaxillary approach (TAA) is useful in primary breast augmentation (BA) surgery, drawbacks of this technique include the need to correct complications arising from reuse of the axillary incision. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of secondary BA procedures performed via the TAA in a cohort of patients operated on by a single surgeon and to provide an algorithm for reoperative TAA technique selection. METHODS: Sixty-two patients (122 breasts) underwent secondary TAA BA, which was indicated for capsular contracture (CC) in 35 patients (56.4%). Periods for analysis included less than 10 days, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and then at 2-year intervals postprocedure. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (69.3%) had a previous premuscular (PM) pocket; in 35 (81.3%) of these patients the new pocket was kept in the same position. Nineteen patients (30.7%) had a previous submuscular pocket, and 15 patients (78.9%) had the new pocket transferred to the PM plane. Ten cases of complications were observed in 8 patients (16.1%), Baker grade II/III CC in 3 (4.8%), and axillary banding in 2 (3.2%), during a mean follow-up of 72 months (range, 6-170 months). Fifty-nine patients (95.1%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their aesthetic result. CONCLUSIONS: Recent progress in surgical techniques has led to significant improvements in aesthetic outcomes following BA. The TAA can play a useful role in secondary BA cases and our results show this procedure to be useful, with acceptable complication rates, and the added bonus of avoiding additional scarring on the breast.

Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy With Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling Technique for Autologous Reinforcement of the Inferior Pole: Technical Refinements and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Single-stage augmentation mastopexy (SAM) is a common procedure, but revision rates are high. Muscle slings have been used in SAM, but despite satisfactory outcomes, most studies do not include objective or accurate measurements of implant/breast position. This article describes a surgical technique for SAM employing a composite reverse inferior muscle sling (CRIMS). OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess outcomes from primary SAM procedures utilizing the CRIMS technique in a cohort of patients operated on by a single surgeon. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (60 breasts) aged a mean of 43.1 ±â€…6.8 years underwent primary CRIMS mastopexy to treat severe ptosis (grade III-IV) in 25 patients (78.1%). The average implant volume was 255 cc (range, 215-335 cc). Three-dimensional imaging obtained from the Divina scanner system was employed to evaluate lower pole stretch and lower pole arc and to determine long-term ptosis. RESULTS: Four cases of complications were observed in 3 patients (9.3%), minor dehiscence in 2 and capsular contraction in 1, during a mean follow-up of 42 months. The value for lower pole stretch was 5.5% (P < 0.0001) between 10 days and 1 year, with the majority occurring early in the first 6 months, indicating that lower pole arc remained steady during the last months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in techniques have led to improvements in aesthetic outcomes following SAM, and CRIMS can play a helpful role. Our results show this procedure is suitable for patients with breast ptosis, with acceptable complication rates and the added bonus of implant stabilization within the pocket.

Hybrid Breast Augmentation: A Reliable Formula for Preoperative Assessment of Fat Graft Volume Based on Implant Volume and Projection.

BACKGROUND: Autogenous fat grafting (AFG) is an established technique used as an adjunct to breast augmentation (BA) to redesign breast shape. Surgeons often use experience and intuition to estimate AFG volume, which can result in incorrect assessment of donor areas and unnecessary fat removal. OBJECTIVES: This aim of this study was to develop a method based on a mathematical formula, which utilizes implant volume and projection to predict AFG volume. METHODS: Thirty patients (60 breasts) underwent primary hybrid BA. A software package (SketchUp) was used to simulate 3-dimensional AFG and implant volumes, which in turn were used to develop an equation for estimating AFG volume according to 3 different implant projections. The results for each group were compared, via Pearson's correlation coefficient, with the results of the clinical series. RESULTS: All patients received Motiva Ergonomix SmoothSilk/SilkSurface implants, ranging in volume from 175 to 355 cc (mean, 265 cc), as well as an average AFG volume of 79.2 cc/breast (range, 50-110 cc). Twenty-nine patients (96.6%) were either very satisfied or satisfied during a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 6-28 months). A high correlation was observed between the AFG performed in the cohort and predictions obtained from the formula (r = 0.938, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The AFG volume in hybrid BA procedures can be estimated utilizing measurements based on implant volume/projection. This low-cost method can be applied to guide surgical decision-making in patients who are candidates for BA.

Is There a Breast Augmentation Outcome Difference Between Subfascial and Subglandular Implant Placement? A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Study.

INTRODUCTION: Subfascial breast augmentation is gaining popularity because of no distortion when the pectoral muscle is contracted and minimizing visualization of the edges of the implant. Although some studies have reported a satisfactory outcome with subfascial technique, it still is controversial the influence of the pectoral fascia and outcome compared to the subglandular technique. Therefore, this prospective randomized study aimed to investigate whether there are clinical/radiological differences between subfascial and subglandular pockets following primary breast augmentation. METHODS: Twenty patient candidates for primary breast augmentation were recruited. Each patient was selected for subfascial or subglandular pockets in a randomized fashion. Both patient and surgeon were blinded. Clinical and radiological differences were evaluated through five independent surgeons and MRI (capsule, folds, fluids, base and projection). Median follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Breast consistency (p = 0.24), implant pocket (p = 0.52), symmetry (p = 1), contour, and shape (p = 0.09) demonstrated no statistically significant difference after the surgeons' assessments at 3 and 12 months after surgery. MRIs demonstrated a larger implant base in the subfascial group (p = 0.024). No differences were observed in capsule thickness (p = 0.42), folds (p = 0.51), fluids (p = 0.28), or projection (0.20). CONCLUSION: The choice between subfascial and subglandular planes shows no clinical differences and can be selected according to individual professional experience, not evidencing any advantages of one over the other. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant.

BACKGROUND: Although general guidelines are available for established silicone gel breast implants, the unique characteristics of the latest Motiva implants warrant specific guidelines. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to generate consensus recommendations and summarize expert-based advice to better understand current surgical practices and to establish guidelines for surgeons transitioning from other implant devices to the Motiva implants. METHODS: A survey was compiled by 12 plastic surgeon experts in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery and 1 biotechnology scientist, and distributed to 36 plastic surgeons to establish a consensus on the use of these devices. Surgical techniques, complication rates, and implant selection were among the topics discussed. RESULTS: The experts agreed on 3 core principles regarding the use of Motiva Round and Ergonomix implants. Firstly, the dissected pocket needs to be close fitting and steps must be taken to prevent expansion of the pocket. Secondly, implant selection must be individualized. Finally, surgical planning and technique must be carefully considered. When questioned about problems they had ecountered, 84.6% of the experts agreed that they experienced fewer overall complications and 76.9% confirmed reduced capsular contracture rates with these devices. Overall, 84.6% of the experts favored selecting Motiva Ergonomix implants over Round implants to achieve a more natural look. In addition, 92.3% of the experts agreed that Motiva implants, due to their innovative technology, reduce the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus of leading practitioners will assist plastic surgeons with patient selection, preoperative planning, and surgical technique. These recommendations are designed to optimize surgical outcomes, resulting in lower overall complication rates, more natural-looking breasts, and highly satisfied patients.