Omalizumab protects against allergen- induced bronchoconstriction in allergic (immunoglobulin E-mediated) asthma.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab has been shown to suppress responses to inhaled allergens in allergic asthma patients with pretreatment immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≤700 IU/ml. To extend current dosing tables, we evaluated the potential of high omalizumab doses to block allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with higher IgE levels. METHODS: Asthmatic adults (18-65 years; body weight 40-150 kg) were divided into groups according to screening IgE (group 1: 30-300 IU/ml; group 2: 700-2,000 IU/ml) and randomized 2:1 to omalizumab/placebo every 2 or 4 weeks for 12-14 weeks. Allergen bronchoprovocation (ABP) testing was performed before treatment and at weeks 8 and 16. The primary efficacy endpoint, the early-phase allergic response (EAR), was defined as the maximum percentage drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s during the first 30 min after ABP. Serum free IgE was determined as a pharmacodynamic endpoint, and the exhaled fractional concentration of nitric oxide (FE(NO)) was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study. Omalizumab improved EAR; at week 8, EAR was 23.1% for placebo, 9.3% in group 1 (p = 0.018 versus placebo) and 5.6% in group 2 (p < 0.001). At week 16, EAR was 20%, 11.8% (p = 0.087) and 5.1% (p < 0.001), respectively. Free IgE decreased in groups 1 and 2 and remained <50 ng/ml in all patients during weeks 6-16. Omalizumab completely suppressed FE(NO) increases after ABP in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab blocked early asthmatic responses over a broad range of IgE/body weight combinations. Extending the dosing tables enables omalizumab to benefit a wider range of patients.

Magnitude of umeclidinium/vilanterol lung function effect depends on monotherapy responses: Results from two randomised controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Dual therapy with bronchodilators of different pharmacological classes may produce greater lung function improvements than either drug alone. However, the relationship between a patient's response to monotherapy and response to dual bronchodilator therapy is currently unknown. We aimed to investigate whether dual therapy with umeclidinium/vilanterol provides additional benefit over umeclidinium or vilanterol monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) identified as responsive (increase from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] of ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL, Day 1) or non-responsive to monotherapy. METHODS: In two randomised, double-blind, three-way complete-block, cross-over studies (DB2116132 n = 207; DB2116133 n = 182; intent-to-treat), all patients (moderate-to-very severe COPD) were randomised to 1 of 6 sequences and received once-daily umeclidinium 62.5 mcg, vilanterol 25 mcg, and umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg (one treatment/14-day period; 10-14-day washout). Key endpoints were 0-6 h weighted mean FEV1 (Day 14) and trough FEV1 (Day 15). Adverse events, vital signs and COPD exacerbations were assessed. Pooled data are presented. RESULTS: Umeclidinium/vilanterol significantly (p ≤ 0.001, unless stated otherwise) increased 0-6 h weighted mean FEV1 versus umeclidinium in umeclidinium-responders (+114 mL), versus vilanterol in vilanterol-responders (+92 mL) and versus umeclidinium (+70 mL) and vilanterol (+62 mL) in non-responders. Improvements in trough FEV1 occurred with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium in umeclidinium-responders (+77 mL), versus vilanterol in vilanterol-responders (+86 mL), and versus umeclidinium (+42 mL [p = 0.020]) and vilanterol (+58 mL) in non-responders. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol significantly improved lung function in patients with COPD, with quantitatively greater improvements in patients identified as responders to umeclidinium and vilanterol monotherapy than non-responders.