A MULTIFACTORIAL APPROACH FOR IMPROVING THE SURGICAL PERFORMANCE OF NOVICE VITREORETINAL SURGEONS.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively analyze and compare the novice vitreoretinal surgeons' performance after various types of external exposures. METHODS: This prospective, self-controlled, cross-sectional study included 15 vitreoretinal fellows with less than 2 years of experience. Surgical performance was assessed using the Eyesi simulator after each exposure: Day 1, placebo, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg caffeine; Day 2, placebo, 0.2, and 0.6 mg/kg propranolol; Day 3, baseline simulation, breathalyzer reading of 0.06% to 0.10% and 0.11% to 0.15% blood alcohol concentration; Day 4, baseline simulation, push-up sets with 50% and 85% repetition maximum; Day 5, 3-hour sleep deprivation. Eyesi-generated total scores were the main outcome measured (0-700, worst to best). RESULTS: Performances worsened after increasing alcohol exposure based on the total score (χ2 = 7; degrees of freedom = 2; P = 0.03). Blood alcohol concentration 0.06% to 0.10% and 0.11% to 0.15% was associated with diminished performance compared with improvements after propranolol 0.6 and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively (∆1 = -22 vs. ∆2 = +13; P = 0.02; ∆1 = -43 vs. ∆2 = +23; P = 0.01). Propranolol 0.6 mg/kg was positively associated with the total score, compared with deterioration after 2.5 mg/kg caffeine (∆1 = +7 vs. ∆2 = -13; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Surgical performance diminished dose dependently after alcohol. Caffeine 2.5 mg/kg was negatively associated with dexterity, and performance improved after 0.2 mg/kg propranolol. No changes occurred after short-term exercise or acute 3-hour sleep deprivation.

Biocompatibility of polyvinyl alcohol/trisodium trimetaphosphate as vitreous substitute in experimental vitrectomy model in rabbits.

Synthetic hydrogels have been proposed as vitreous substitutes recently. This study aims to evaluate the biocompatibility of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) crosslinked with trisodium trimetaphosphate (SMTP) hydrogel in rabbit vitrectomized eyes. Seven animals were submitted to pars plana vitrectomy and the vitreous was replaced by PVA/SMTP hydrogel. Optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiogram, clinical, and electrophysiological (ERG) examinations were analyzed at baseline, on postoperative days 7 and 30. The fellow eye was used as the control group. Hydrogel opacification was observed and ERG recordings were reduced in the hydrogel group in rod response, b-wave cone response and flicker. A histological analysis showed retinal disorganization, presence of multinucleated cells, and intraretinal hydrogel particles. The PVA/SMTP hydrogel showed poor biocompatibility. Novel biomaterials compounds should be analyzed in vivo.

Ocular inflammation after agitation of siliconized and silicone oil-free syringes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Noninfectious endophthalmitis may be misdiagnosed, leading to serious clinical implications. So far, its causative factors remain unknown. Therefore, this study assessed the role of silicone oil and syringe agitation in the development of inflammation after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included subjects with an indication of intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy prior to vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Aflibercept was injected 48 h before surgery. The control group received the injection without agitation, while the intervention group was injected with a previously agitated syringe by flicking with either a siliconized or silicone oil-free syringe. The primary endpoint was the presence of anterior chamber reaction (ACR) at 48 h. Aqueous samples were collected and underwent cytometric bead array analysis for quantification of interleukins and chemokines. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were included (21 in the agitation group and 20 in the no-agitation group). None of the included eyes showed baseline signs of AC cells, hyperemia or pain complaint, while 10% of control group and 80% of agitation group showed AC cells 48 h after injection of aflibercept with SR syringe. There were no differences in the mean variations of all cytokines and chemokines by agitation status. However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial discloses a potential role of agitation and siliconized syringes in the development of inflammation after an intravitreal injection of aflibercept. These findings have important clinical implications for all healthcare practitioners who perform intravitreal injections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, RBR-95ddhp. Registered 12 May 2019, http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-95ddhp/.

Association of Weight-Adjusted Caffeine and ß-Blocker Use With Ophthalmology Fellow Performance During Simulated Vitreoretinal Microsurgery.

Importance: Vitreoretinal surgery can be technically challenging and is limited by physiologic characteristics of the surgeon. Factors that improve accuracy and precision of the vitreoretinal surgeon are invaluable to surgical performance. Objectives: To establish weight-adjusted cutoffs for caffeine and ß-blocker (propranolol) intake and to determine their interactions in association with the performance of novice vitreoretinal microsurgeons. Design, Settings, and Participants: This single-blind cross-sectional study of 15 vitreoretinal surgeons who had less than 2 years of surgical experience was conducted from September 19, 2018, to September 25, 2019, at a dry-laboratory setting. Five simulations were performed daily for 2 days. On day 1, performance was assessed after sequential exposure to placebo, low-dose caffeine (2.5 mg/kg), high-dose caffeine (5.0 mg/kg), and high-dose propranolol (0.6 mg/kg). On day 2, performance was assessed after sequential exposure to placebo, low-dose propranolol (0.2 mg/kg), high-dose propranolol (0.6 mg/kg), and high-dose caffeine (5.0 mg/kg). Interventions: Surgical simulation tasks were repeated 30 minutes after masked ingestion of placebo, caffeine, or propranolol pills during the 2 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: An Eyesi surgical simulator was used to assess surgical performance, which included surgical score (range, 0 [worst] to 700 [best]), task completion time, intraocular trajectory, and tremor rate (range, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]). The nonparametric Friedman test followed by Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test was applied for multiple comparisons. Results: Of 15 vitreoretinal surgeons, 9 (60%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 29.6 (1.4) years and mean (SD) body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 23.15 (2.9). Compared with low-dose propranolol, low-dose caffeine was associated with a worse total surgical score (557.0 vs 617.0; difference, -53.0; 95% CI, -99.3 to -6.7; P = .009), a lower antitremor maneuver score (55.0 vs 75.0; difference, -12.0; 95% CI, -21.2 to -2.8; P = .009), longer intraocular trajectory (2298.6 vs 2080.7 mm; difference, 179.3 mm; 95% CI, 1.2-357.3 mm; P = .048), and increased task completion time (14.9 minutes vs 12.7 minutes; difference, 2.3 minutes; 95% CI, 0.8-3.8 minutes; P = .048). Postcaffeine treatment with propranolol was associated with performance improvement; however, surgical performance remained inferior compared with low-dose propranolol alone for total surgical score (570.0 vs 617.0; difference, -51.0; 95% CI, -77.6 to -24.4; P = .01), tremor-specific score (50.0 vs 75.0; difference, -16.0; 95% CI, -31.8 to -0.2; P = .03), and intraocular trajectory (2265.9 mm vs 2080.7 mm; difference, 166.8 mm; 95% CI, 64.1-269.6 mm; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that performance of novice vitreoretinal surgeons was worse after receiving low-dose caffeine alone but improved after receiving low-dose propranolol alone. Their performance after receiving propranolol alone was better than after the combination of propranolol and caffeine. These results may be helpful for novice vitreoretinal surgeons to improve microsurgical performance.

Optimizing Visualization of Membranes in Macular Surgery With Heads-Up Display.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine which optical parameter profiles (OPPs) can be utilized to improve the visualization of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) and the internal limiting membrane (ILM) using a three-dimensional heads-up microscope during 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen independent graders were asked to complete a questionnaire comparing each of the OPPs against the unaltered control image for each given surgical case. RESULTS: Analysis of the graders' responses indicated that higher values of hue are correlated with better visualization of ERM/ILM before and after dye application. There was overall agreement that OPPs could be used to enhance the visualization of the ERM and ILM during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of OPPs to improve the visualization of specific structures is still new and heavily dependent on surgeon preference. The authors' study shows that some OPPs may enhance the visualization of the ERM and ILM during macular surgery. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:584-587.].

Diathermy for 23-gauge sclerotomy: a functional and morphologic study to avoid ocular hypotony.

PURPOSE: To evaluate diathermy to minimize sclerotomy leakage during small-gauge vitrectomy and prevent ocular hypotony. METHODS: This observational prospective study included 327 patients (327 eyes) who underwent diathermy to close the sclerotomy sites during 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). All patients were operated by a single surgeon (ED) and evaluated at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Patients with glaucoma, topical/systemic steroids use exceeding 30 days, ocular inflammation, or trauma were excluded. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher Exact test, and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to evaluate potential risk factors. The primary outcomes were open sclerotomies, leakage, and ocular hypotony. RESULTS: Sclerotomies remained open in 12 (3.6%) and 2 (0.6%) patients, respectively, at 30 and 60 days postoperatively, revealing no case of ocular hypotony. Leakage only occurred in four patients (1.2%) during week 1 postoperatively. Multivariate analysis indicated that additional vitreoretinal surgeries and longer surgeries were risk factors for persistent sclerotomy opening. CONCLUSION: Diathermy was safe and feasible to close sclerotomies. Vitreoretinal surgery reoperations and longer surgeries were the most significant (P<0.05) risk factors for persistent sclerotomy opening, which may be functionally closed without evidence of leakage or ocular hypotony.

New perspectives on macular hole surgery at three years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the functional and anatomical success rates as well as the safety of sutureless combined surgery involving vitreous base removal and internal limiting membrane peeling after Brilliant Blue G (0.5 mg/mL) staining for the management of idiopathic macular holes after three years. METHODS: Forty-six eyes of 46 patients with an idiopathic macular hole were enrolled in this retrospective study. The inclusion criteria were macular holes with a minimum linear diameter below 1,500 mm, 0.05 or better decimal best-corrected visual acuity and duration of symptoms less than two years. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy, optic nerve atrophy, advanced glaucoma, and other chronic ocular diseases. The surgical procedure included internal limiting membrane peeling after Brilliant Blue G (0.5 mg/mL) staining, along with C3F8 tamponade and face-down positioning for three days postoperatively. Ophthalmologic examinations and optical coherence tomography were performed at 1 and 7 days and 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. If no anatomic closure of the macular holes occurred within the first month, the area of the internal limiting membrane peeling was enlarged in a second procedure. Multiple logistic regression and chi-squared tests were used for data analyses, and p-values of <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Out of 46 eyes with a preoperative idiopathic macular hole, anatomic closure was achieved in 42 (91.3%) after one procedure and in 45 (97.8%) after an additional surgery. The median postoperative best-corrected visual acuity improvement was 0.378 (range: 0.050-0.900) decimal. None of the patients experienced macular hole reopening, surgery-related complications, or ocular complications related to the dye. CONCLUSION: Combined surgery including vitreous base removal and internal limiting membrane peeling after staining with Brilliant Blue G (0.5 mg/mL) for the management of idiopathic macular holes resulted in adequate staining, best-corrected visual acuity improvement, and macular hole closure with no signs of ocular toxicity at the three-year follow-up examination.

New perspectives on macular hole surgery at three years of follow-up / Novas perspectivas em cirurgia de buraco macular com de 3 anos de seguimento

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the functional and anatomical success rates as well as the safety of sutureless combined surgery involving vitreous base removal and internal limiting membrane peeling after Brilliant Blue G (0.5 mg/mL) staining for the management of idiopathic macular holes after three years. Methods: Forty-six eyes of 46 patients with an idiopathic macular hole were enrolled in this retrospective study. The inclusion criteria were macular holes with a minimum linear diameter below 1,500 mm, 0.05 or better decimal best-corrected visual acuity and duration of symptoms less than two years. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy, optic nerve atrophy, advanced glaucoma, and other chronic ocular diseases. The surgical procedure included internal limiting membrane peeling after Brilliant Blue G (0.5 mg/mL) staining, along with C3F8 tamponade and face-down positioning for three days postoperatively. Ophthalmologic examinations and optical coherence tomography were performed at 1 and 7 days and 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. If no anatomic closure of the macular holes occurred within the first month, the area of the internal limiting membrane peeling was enlarged in a second procedure. Multiple logistic regression and chi-squared tests were used for data analyses, and p-values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Out of 46 eyes with a preoperative idiopathic macular hole, anatomic closure was achieved in 42 (91.3%) after one procedure and in 45 (97.8%) after an additional surgery. The median postoperative best-corrected visual acuity improvement was 0.378 (range: 0.050-0.900) decimal. None of the patients experienced macular hole reopening, surgery-related complications, or ocular complications related to the dye. Conclusion: Combined surgery including vitreous base removal and internal limiting membrane peeling after staining with Brilliant Blue G (0.5 mg/mL) for the management of idiopathic macular holes resulted in adequate staining, best-corrected visual acuity improvement, and macular hole closure with no signs of ocular toxicity at the three-year follow-up examination.

RESUMO Objetivo: Determinar, após 3 anos de seguimento, as taxas de sucesso funcional e anatômico e a segurança da cirurgia combinada sem sutura, incluindo remoção da base vítrea e da membrana limitante interna após coloração com azul brilhante (0,5 mg/ml) para o manejo de buracos maculares idiopáticos. Métodos: Quarenta e seis olhos de 46 pacientes com buraco macular idiopático foram incluídos neste estudo retrospectivo. Os critérios de inclusão foram: buraco macular com diâmetro linear mínimo menor que 1500 micrômetros, acuidade visual com melhor correção de 0,05 decimal ou melhor e tempo de sintomas menor que 2 anos. Os critérios de exclusão foram gravidez, atrofia do nervo óptico, glaucoma avançado ou outra doença ocular crônica. A técnica cirúrgica incluiu a remoção da membrana limitante interna após coloração com Azul Brilhante 0,5 mg/ml, tamponamento com C3F8 posicionamento em prona ção durante 3 dias de pós-operatório. O seguimento foi realizado por exame oftalmológico e Tomografia de Coerência Óptica no 1 e 7 dias, 1, 6, 12, 24 e 36 meses de pós-operatório. Se o fechamento anatômico do buraco macular não fosse atingido na visita de um mês, realizava-se um segundo procedimento no qual a área do peeling da membrana limitante interna era ampliada. Para análise estatística, foram utilizados testes de regressão logística múltipla e Qui-quadrado. Valores de p menores que 0.05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados: Dos 46 olhos com buraco macular idiopático, 42 (91,3%) obtiveram fechamento do buraco macular após um procedimento cirúrgico e 45 (97,8%) após uma cirurgia adicional. A média de melhora da acuidade visual com melhor correção no pós-operatório foi de 0.378 (0.050-0.900) decimal. Não foram observados: reabertura do buraco macular, complicações relacionadas ao procedimento cirúrgico ou complicações relacionadas ao corante. Conclusão: A cirurgia combinada sem sutura que incluiu remoção da base vítrea e remoção membrana limitante interna após coloração com Azul Brilhante (0,5 mg/ml) para o tratamento de buracos maculares idiopáticos foi realizada com adequada capacidade de coloração, melhora da acuidade visual e fechamento do buraco macular sem sinais de toxicidade ocular no seguimento de 3 anos.