Phase I trial of myeloablative conditioning with 3-day total marrow and lymphoid irradiation for leukemia.

This prospective phase I trial aimed to determine the recommended dose of 3-day total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) for a myeloablative conditioning regimen by increasing the dose per fraction. The primary end-point of this single-institution dose escalation study was the recommended TMLI dose based on the frequency of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) ≤100 days posthematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); a 3 + 3 design was used to evaluate the safety of TMLI. Three dose levels of TMLI (14/16/18 Gy in six fractions over 3 days) were set. The treatment protocol began at 14 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicities. Nine patients, with a median age of 42 years (range, 35-48), eight with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and one with chronic myeloblastic leukemia, received TMLI followed by unrelated bone marrow transplant. The median follow-up period after HSCT was 575 days (range, 253-1037). Three patients were enrolled for each dose level. No patient showed DLT within 100 days of HSCT. The recommended dose of 3-day TMLI was 18 Gy in six fractions. All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 19 days (range, 14-25). One-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 83.3% and 57.1%, respectively. Three patients experienced relapse, and no nonrelapse mortality was documented during the observation period. One patient died due to disease relapse 306 days post-HSCT. The recommended dose of 3-day TMLI was 18 Gy in six fractions. The efficacy evaluation of this regimen is currently being planned in a phase II study.

Outcomes analysis of pre-brachytherapy MRI in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Various brachytherapy options are available for treating cervical cancer. This study investigated whether pre-brachytherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings could help identify the appropriate brachytherapy technique for cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with cervical cancer who underwent pre-brachytherapy MRI within 7 days before their first high-dose rate brachytherapy treatment between December 2009 and September 2015. Patients who could not undergo MRI at pre-treatment and/or pre-brachytherapy and complete radical radiotherapy were excluded. Conventional intracavitary brachytherapy was the preferred treatment for ≤4 cm and symmetrical tumors. Non-conventional intracavitary brachytherapy, including interstitial brachytherapy, was the preferred treatment for bulky tumors, asymmetrical tumors, tumors with severe vaginal invasion, or bulky barrel-shaped tumors. The 3-year rates of overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Overall survival and local control rates were assessed using Cox regression analysis to identify risk factors for poor overall survival and local control outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included in the study. The median tumor sizes were 52 mm (range 17-85) at the pre-treatment MRI and 30 mm (range 0-78) at the pre-brachytherapy MRI. Six patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2, 67 patients had stage II, 64 patients had stage III, and nine patients had stage IVA disease. A total of 124 (85%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 22 (15%) patients had adenosquamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. The MRI findings showed severe vaginal invasion (pre-treatment: 19 patients, pre-brachytherapy: 10 patients), asymmetrical bulky tumors (pre-treatment: 28 patients, pre-brachytherapy: 16 patients), and severe corpus invasion (pre-treatment: 39 patients, pre-brachytherapy: 18 patients). Based on the pre-brachytherapy MRI findings, non-conventional intracavitary brachytherapy was administered to 34 (23.3%) patients. Brachytherapy seemed to be appropriate for 133 (91.1%) patients and inappropriate for 13 (8.9%) patients. The 3-year rates were 84.2% for overall survival and 90.1% for local control. Grade 3 late rectal complications occurred in two (1%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor characteristics (size, shape, and extent of invasion) were not risk factors, although inappropriate brachytherapy was significantly related to poor local control (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-brachytherapy MRI may help to select appropriate brachytherapy for cervical cancer and reduce the likelihood of inappropriate brachytherapy leading to poor local control.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

The number of deaths from colorectal cancer in Japan continues to increase. Colorectal cancer deaths exceeded 50,000 in 2016. In the 2019 edition, revision of all aspects of treatments was performed, with corrections and additions made based on knowledge acquired since the 2016 version (drug therapy) and the 2014 version (other treatments). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR guidelines 2019) have been prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment and to deepen mutual understanding between healthcare professionals and patients by making these guidelines available to the general public. These guidelines have been prepared by consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. Controversial issues were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2019.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, and Laparoscopic Surgery with Selective Lateral Node Dissection for Poor-Risk Low Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizumab followed by S- 1-based chemoradiotherapy in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined poor-risk locally advanced low rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective phase II trial at a single comprehensive cancer center. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Eligible patients had clinical stage II-III low rectal adenocarcinoma with any of the following MRI-defined poor-risk features: circumferential resection margin (CRM) ≤ 1 mm, cT4, positive lateral nodes, mesorectal N2 disease, and/or requiring abdominoperineal resection. Patients received six cycles of mFOLFOX6 with 5 mg/kg bevacizumab followed by oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 and 22-35) plus radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). Surgery was conducted through a laparoscopic approach. Lateral node dissection was selectively added when the patient had enlarged lateral nodes. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in nine patients during induction chemotherapy and in five patients during chemoradiotherapy. One patient declined surgery with a clinical complete response. Forty-two patients underwent surgery, and 16 had pCR [37.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.4-52.1%]. All underwent R0 resection without conversion, including combined resection of adjacent structures (n = 14) and lateral node dissection (n = 30). Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications occurred in six patients (14.3%). With median follow-up of 52 months, six developed recurrences (lung n = 5, local n = 1; 3-year relapse-free survival 86.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved a high pCR rate with favorable toxicity and postoperative complications in poor-risk locally advanced low rectal cancer. Multicenter study is warranted to evaluate this regimen.

A Clinical Evaluation of American Brachytherapy Society Consensus Guideline for Bulky Vaginal Mass in Gynecological Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: American Brachytherapy Society (ABS)-recommended interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) should be considered for bulky vaginal tumor thicker than 5 mm. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ABS consensus guideline for patients with severe vaginal invasion based on our long-term follow-up results. METHODS/MATERIALS: The study included 7 patients with vaginal cancer and 14 patients with cervical cancer invading to the lower vagina. Based on prebrachytherapy magnetic resonance imaging findings, patients received intracavitary brachytherapy (ICT) for vaginal tumors 5 mm or less or IBT for vaginal tumors less than 5 mm. Nine patients received ICT and the remaining 12 patients received IBT. For dosimetric comparison, an experimental recalculation as the virtual IBT for patients actually treated by ICT, and vice versa, was performed. RESULTS: The 5-year local control rate for all tumors was 89.4%. No differences in local control between ICT- and IBT-treated groups were observed (P = 0.21). One patient experienced a grade 3 rectal complication. There were no significant differences in the CTV D90 and rectum D2cc between the 2 groups (P = 0.13 and 0.39, respectively). In the dosimetric study of ICT-treated patients, neither the actual ICT plans nor the experimental IBT plans exceeded the limited dose for organs at risk, which were recommended in the guideline published from the ABS. In the IBT-treated patients, D2cc for bladder and rectum of the experimental ICT plans was significantly higher than for the actual IBT plans (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively), and 11 experimental ICT plans (92%) exceeded the limited dose for bladder and/or rectum D2cc. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor control and toxicity after selected brachytherapy according to vaginal tumor thickness were satisfactory; IBT instead of ICT is recommended for patients with vaginal tumor thickness greater than 5 mm to maintain bladder and/or rectum D2cc.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Japanese mortality due to colorectal cancer is on the rise, surpassing 49,000 in 2015. Many new treatment methods have been developed during recent decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2016) were prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding between health-care professionals and patients by making these Guidelines available to the general public. These Guidelines were prepared by consensus reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches, and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these Guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions held by the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as Clinical Questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2016.

[Concurrent proton therapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cancers].

Charged particles such as protons and carbon-ions offer advantageous physical properties to radiation therapy (RT) for the treatment of various cancers when compared with photons, because they exhibit a spread-out Bragg peak, and may be utilized to achieve a desirable dose distribution to the target volume by using specified beam modulation. Interestingly, the cytocidal effect of protons is almost equal to that of photons, because both protons and photons are considered low-linear energy transfer radiations. Hence, proton beam therapy (PBT) is an attractive RT option, especially in the treatment of locally advanced cancers, as irradiation doses can be safely escalated while sparing the surrounding normal tissues, and because PBT may be concurrently combined with chemotherapy for treating such cancers. Recent advances in PBT techniques including a spot scanning method, as well as an increase in the number of particle therapy institutes are anticipated to yield favorable results through future multi-institutional prospective studies. The University of Tsukuba has carried out several studies to validate the effectiveness of PBT for many types of cancers since 1983. Here, we present our findings on the clinical outcomes of PBT for esophageal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, intrahepatic biliary tract cancer, pancreas cancer, and bladder cancer; future aspects of PBT concurrently combined with chemotherapy for treating locally advanced cancers are also discussed.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Second Course of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases.

PURPOSE: The optimal method for the second course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases remains poorly established. This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted to propose a safe and effective salvage spine SBRT. METHODS: The patients initially treated with SBRT for spine-targeted protocol treatment, or for areas adjacent to the spine, were enrolled. The second SBRT dose was 30 Gy delivered in five fractions; the spinal cord dose constraint was 15.5 Gy at the maximum point dose. The brachial or lumbosacral plexuses were dose-constrained to <30 Gy if the boundary between the nerves and tumors was detected. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade ≥ 3 severe radiation-related toxicity) within a year after the second SBRT. RESULTS: The second SBRT was administered to the same spinal level in 12 patients and to an adjacent spinal level in 8 patients. SBRT2 was performed for 14 painful lesions, 10 MESCC, and 6 oligometastases, with some lesions having multiple indications. The median interval between SBRT sessions was 21 months (range: 6-51 months). The median follow-up duration was 14 months. No radiation myelopathy or local failure was reported during the follow-up period. DLT was confirmed in two patients (10%) within a year, both of whom developed grade 3 lumbosacral plexopathy. These two patients received SBRT twice to the S1-2 and S1-5 vertebrae, respectively, and both experienced paralysis of the tibialis anterior muscle (L5 level). Grade 3 late adverse effects (including lumbosacral plexopathy and vertebral compression fracture) were observed in 25% of the patients throughout the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The second spine SBRT achieved good local control without causing myelopathy. However, one-quarter of the patients experienced grade 3 late adverse effects, suggesting that the treatment protocol carries a risk of toxicity.

Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy boost in patients with cervical cancer ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost is a promising treatment for cervical cancer patients who are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). The aim of this multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ICBT-ineligible patients with untreated cervical cancer were enrolled. Patients underwent whole-pelvic radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) with SBRT boost to the primary lesion. In the phase I dose-escalation cohort (3 + 3 design), patients were treated with SBRT boost of 21 or 22.5 Gy in three fractions. Although dose-limiting toxicity was not confirmed, a dose of 21 Gy was selected for the phase II cohort because it was difficult to reproduce the pelvic organs position in two patients during the phase I trial. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (phase I, n = 3; phase II, n = 18) were enrolled between April 2016 and October 2020; 17 (81%) had clinical stage III-IV (with para-aortic lymph node metastases) disease. The median (range) follow-up was 40 (10-84) months. The initial response was complete response in 20 patients and partial response in one patient. The 2-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84%, 67%, and 81%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was confirmed in one patient each in the acute (diarrhea) and late (urinary tract obstruction) phases. CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that a SBRT boost is more effective than the conventional EBRT boost and can be an important treatment option for ICBT-ineligible patients with cervical cancer. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000036845).

Incidence and Prognostic Factors of Painful Vertebral Compression Fracture Caused by Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Most studies of vertebral compression fractures (VCF) caused by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) do not discuss the symptoms of this complication. In this paper, we aimed to determine the rate and prognostic factors of painful VCF caused by SBRT for spinal metastases. Spinal segments with VCF in patients treated with spine SBRT between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the rate of painful VCF (grades 2-3). Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated as prognosticators. In total, 779 spinal segments in 391 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up after SBRT was 18 (range: 1-107) months. Sixty iatrogenic VCFs (7.7%) were identified. The rate of painful VCF was 2.4% (19/779). Eight (1.0%) VCFs required surgery for internal fixation or spinal canal decompression. The painful VCF rate was significantly higher in patients with no posterolateral tumor involvement than in those with bilateral or unilateral involvement (50% vs. 23%; p = 0.042); it was also higher in patients with spine without fixation than in those with fixation (44% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Painful VCFs were confirmed in only 2.4% of all the irradiated spinal segments. The absence of posterolateral tumor involvement and no fixation was significantly associated with painful VCF.

Dynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy with real-time monitoring of liver tumors using a gimbal-mounted linac: A multi-institutional phase II study.

Background and purpose: This prospective multicenter phase II study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with real-time monitoring of liver tumors using a gimbal-mounted system. Materials and methods: Patients with < 4 primary or metastatic liver tumors with diameters ≤ 50 mm and expected to have a respiratory motion of ≥ 10 mm were eligible. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy in five fractions. The primary endpoint was local control (LC) at 2 years. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related toxicity, and tracking accuracy. Results: Between September 2015 and March 2019, 48 patients (48 lesions) with a median age of 74 years were enrolled from four institutions. Of these, 39 were diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and nine with metastatic liver cancer. The median tumor diameter was 17.5 mm. DTT-SBRT was successfully performed in all patients; the median treatment time was 28 min/fraction. The median follow-up period was 36.5 months. The 2-year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 98.0 %, 88.8 %, and 55.1 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed in 33 (68.8 %) patients. One patient (0.2 %) had local recurrence, 31 (64.6 %) developed new hepatic lesions outside the irradiation field, and nine (18.8 %) had distant metastases (including overlap). Grade 3 late adverse events were observed in seven patients (14.5 %). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related toxicity was observed. The median tracking accuracy was 2.9 mm. Conclusion: Employing DTT-SBRT to treat liver tumors results in excellent LC with acceptable adverse-event incidence.

Preliminary Study on Establishing a Heart Rate Variability-based Method for Objectively Evaluating Bone Metastasis Pain.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to establish an objective evaluation method for pain due to bone metastasis, based on heart rate variability (HRV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients who underwent radiotherapy for painful bone metastases were enrolled. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Autonomic and physical activities were evaluated by measuring HRV using a wearable device. NRS, HADS, and R-R interval (RRI) values were obtained upon starting, completing, and 3-5 weeks after radiotherapy. RESULTS: Between July 2020 and July 2021, 11 patients were enrolled. The median average NRS score was 5 (range=2-10). HADS-assessed median anxiety and depression scores were 8 (range=1-13 and 2-21). For patients with an NRS score ≥4, NRS score was significantly associated with low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) component ratio (p=0.03). Heart rate during physical activity was significantly higher than resting heart rate; however, mean resting LF/HF was significantly higher than LF/HF during physical activity. During rest, excluding patients with a HADS depression score ≥7 in an NRS score 1-3, there was a trend for a positive correlation between the NRS score and the mean LF/HF (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: HRV measurements can objectively evaluate pain due to bone metastasis. However, we must consider that the effects of mental status, such as depression, on LF/HF also affect HRV in patients with cancer with mild pain.

Total neoadjuvant therapy followed by a watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer (TOWARd): protocol for single-arm phase II/III confirmatory trial (JCOG2010).

BACKGROUND: Radical surgery is the standard treatment for rectal cancer, but can impact quality of life. Recently, the concept of total neoadjuvant therapy with a watch-and-wait strategy has been proposed in which patients with a cCR after total neoadjuvant therapy do not proceed to surgery. However, most investigations of a watch-and-wait strategy have reported cases where cCR was achieved coincidentally via total neoadjuvant therapy. The aim is to assess whether total neoadjuvant therapy is effective in early-stage rectal cancer in patients that achieve cCR and are offered a watch-and-wait strategy. METHODS: JCOG2010 (TOWARd) is a multi-institutional, single-arm phase II/III confirmatory investigation of the safety and efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy followed by a watch-and-wait strategy for rectal cancer. Key eligibility criteria include cT2-3 N0 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma, tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm, age 18-75 years, performance status 0-1, and no history of pelvic irradiation or rectal surgery. Total neoadjuvant therapy involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine and radiotherapy: 45 Gy/25 fractions to the whole pelvis plus boost of 5.4 Gy/3 fractions to the primary tumour) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (four cycles of capecitabine/oxaliplatin). Patients will be re-staged every 8 weeks after total neoadjuvant therapy, and those who achieve cCR will undergo a watch-and-wait strategy, those with near complete response will undergo a watch-and-wait strategy or local resection, and those with an incomplete response will undergo radical surgery. The primary endpoint is the cCR rate in phase II and 5-year overall survival in phase III. Secondary endpoints include postoperative anal, urinary, and sexual function. A total of 105 patients (phase II, 40 patients; phase III, 65 patients) will be enrolled over 3.5 years. CONCLUSION: This trial will determine whether total neoadjuvant therapy and a watch-and-wait strategy is an effective alternative to radical surgery for early-stage rectal cancer in patients with cT2-3 N0 M0 and tumour size less than or equal to 5 cm. REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031220288 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220288).

A phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (the JROSG 10-2 trial).

This study assessed the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC). Patients with T1-4N0-3M0 SCCAC received chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 800 mg/m2/day, 96-h infusion) and mitomycin-C (MMC, 10 mg/m2 bolus). Patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were administered 36.0 Gy in 20 fractions or 49.5 Gy in 33 fractions for elective nodal irradiation and 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions for primary tumor and metastatic nodal irradiation. The sample size was considered sufficient to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the true 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) within a width of +15% when the expected true 2-year DFS was 70%. The primary endpoint was 2-year DFS. The secondary endpoints were 2-year overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LC), colostomy-free survival (CFS) and adverse events. Thirty-one patients were enrolled between January 2014 and July 2019. The median follow-up was 33.3 months (range, 16.2-65.8 months). Among the 31 patients, 13%, 32%, 16% and 39% had stage I, II, IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. Thirty patients were treated with IMRT. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 27 patients. The 2-year DFS, OS, LC and CFS rates were 77.4% (95% CI, 58.4-88.5%), 93.5% (95% CI, 76.6-98.3%), 83.9% (95% CI, 65.5-92.9%) and 80.6% (95% CI, 61.9-90.8%), respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 late adverse events; however, no grade ≥ 4 late adverse events occurred. Good DFS with a low rate of late adverse events was observed. Chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and MMC was effective for SCCAC.

Significance of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in the administration of chemotherapy to older adults with cancer: Recommendations by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee.

INTRODUCTION: The number of older patients with cancer is expected to continue to increase owing to the aging population. Recently, the usefulness of geriatric assessment (GA) conducted by multiple staff members from different medical backgrounds has been reported; however, a consensus on the effectiveness of GA has not yet been achieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We, as the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee for elderly patients with cancer, conducted a literature search of randomized controlled trials published before August 2021 that used GA or comprehensive GA (CGA) as an intervention for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. As the key outcomes for answering the clinical question, we focused on survival benefit, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). After a systematic review of these studies, the expert panel member developed recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: For older patients with cancer, GA or CGA is suggested during or before chemotherapy (weakly recommended). Chemotherapy-induced adverse events were significantly reduced by GA/CGA interventions without any adverse effects on survival. Health-related QOL tended to improve with the GA/CGA interventions. DISCUSSION: Although, in our opinion, GA/CGA does require time and resources, it poses no harm patients. Therefore, we suggest expanding the human resources and educating skills of medical providers for clinical implementation of GA/CGA.

Analysis of source dwell position during treatment in brachytherapy using CT scout images.

Purpose: Several cases of inaccurate irradiation in brachytherapy have been reported, occurring similarly to external radiation. Due to a large dose per fraction in brachytherapy, inaccurate irradiation can seriously harm a patient. Although various studies have been conducted, systems that detect inaccurate irradiation in brachytherapy are not as developed as those for external irradiation. This study aimed to construct a system that analyzes the source dwell position during irradiation using computed tomography (CT) scout images. The novelty of the study was that by using CT scout images, high versatility and analysis of absolute coordinates can be achieved. Material and methods: A treatment plan was designed with an iridium-192 (192Ir) source delivering radiation at two dwell positions in a tandem applicator. CT scout images were taken during irradiation, and acquired under different imaging conditions and applicator geometries. First, we confirmed whether a source was visible in CT scout images. Then, employing in-house MATLAB program, source dwell coordinates were analyzed using the images. An analysis was considered adequate when the resulting source dwell coordinates agreed with the treatment plan within ±1 mm, in accordance with AAPM TG56 guidelines for source dwell position accuracy. Results: The source dwelling was visible in CT scout image, which was enlarged or reduced depending on applicator geometries. The applicator was enlarged by 127% when 130 mm away from the center of CT gantry. The analysis results using our in-house program were considered adequate; although, analysis parameters required adjustments depending on imaging conditions. Conclusions: The proposed system can be easily implemented for image-guided brachytherapy and can analyze the absolute coordinates of source dwell position. Therefore, the system could be used for preventing inaccurate irradiation by verifying whether brachytherapy was performed properly.

Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

(1) Background: The superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) in terms of pain palliation for bone metastases remains controversial. (2) Methods: This propensity score-matched study compared the overall pain response (OR) 3 months after radiotherapy among patients with painful (≥2 points on a 0-to-10 scale) non-spine bone metastases. Patients with lesions that were treated with SBRT or cEBRT and whose pain scores were evaluated 3 months after radiotherapy were included in this study. Pain response was evaluated according to the International Consensus Criteria. (3) Results: A total of 234 lesions (SBRT, n = 129; cEBRT, n = 105) were identified in our institutional database. To reduce the confounding effects, 162 patients were selected using a propensity score-matched analysis (n = 81 for each treatment). The OR rate at 3 months after SBRT was significantly higher than that after cEBRT (76.5% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.012). A noteworthy finding of our study is that the same trend was observed even after 6 months (75.9% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.011). The 1-year local failure rates after SBRT and cEBRT were 10.2% and 33.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SBRT is superior to cEBRT for pain palliation in patients with non-spine bone metastases.

Re-irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy in uterine cancer patients with vaginal recurrence after post-operative pelvic irradiation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and dose-volume parameters of re-irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in uterine cancer patients with vaginal recurrence after post-operative pelvic irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated six uterine cancer patients who received re-irradiation with ISBT between January, 2012 and December, 2016. As an initial treatment, all patients received post-operative whole pelvic irradiation of 45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. For vaginal recurrence, all patients were treated with ISBT alone at a dose of 38-42 Gy in 6-7 fractions for clinical target volumes (CTVs) for 3-4 days. RESULTS: Post-operative pelvic irradiation was delivered to five and one patients, using a three-dimensional conformal technique and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, respectively. Median duration from surgery to vaginal recurrence was 25.7 months. Median tumor size just before ISBT was 3.3 cm. Median time from completion of pelvic irradiation to ISBT initiation was 24.1 months. Mean doses per fraction of ISBT for CTV D90 (the minimum dose received by 90% of CTV) and minimum dose received by 2cc (D2cc) for the bladder and for rectum were 6.1 Gy, 4.4 Gy, and 3.8 Gy, respectively. Mean total equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), including external beam radiotherapy and ISBT, for D2cc for the bladder, sigmoid, and rectum were 92.1 Gy, 50.4 Gy, and 81.6 Gy, respectively. Median follow-up duration was 53.3 months. Local recurrence was observed in two patients, and four of the six patients were alive. Grade 2 late rectal complications occurred in two patients, and no late grade ≥ 3 complications were observed in four alive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Re-irradiation with ISBT may be an effective treatment strategy for gynecological cancer patients with vaginal recurrence after post-operative pelvic irradiation.

Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) helps achieve good radiation dose conformity and precise dose evaluation. We conducted a single-centre prospective study to assess the safety and feasibility of total body irradiation with IMRT (IMRT-TBI) using helical tomotherapy in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients with haematological malignancy (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [n = 21], chronic myeloid leukaemia [n = 6], mixed phenotype acute leukaemia [n = 5], acute myeloid leukaemia [n = 4], and malignant lymphoma [n = 3]) who received 12 Gy IMRT-TBI were enrolled with a median follow-up of 934.5 (range, 617-1254) d. At the time of transplantation, 33 patients (85%) achieved complete remission. The conditioning regimen used IMRT-TBI (12 Gy in 6 fractions twice daily, for 3 d) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/d, for 2 d), seven patients were combined with cytarabine, and five with etoposide. We set dose constraints for the lungs, kidneys and lens as the organs at risk. RESULTS: The mean doses for the lungs and kidneys were 7.50 and 9.11 Gy, respectively. The mean maximum dose for the lens (right/left) was 5.75/5.87 Gy. The 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 69, 64, 18 and 18%, respectively. Thirty-six patients developed early adverse events (AEs) (including four patients with Grade 3/4 toxicities), most of which were reversible oral mucositis and may partially have been related to IMRT-TBI. However, the incidence of toxicity was comparable to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. None of the patients developed primary graft failure, or Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In late complications, chronic kidney disease was observed in six patients, a lower incidence compared to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. No radiation pneumonitis or cataracts were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-TBI is safe and feasible for haematological malignancies with acceptable clinical outcomes.KEY MESSAGESIMRT-TBI-helical tomotherapy aids in accurate dose calculation and conformity.It could be used without any considerable increase in the rate of TBI-related AEs.Allo-HSCT with IMRT-TBI may be an alternative to conventional TBI for clinical use.

Safety of biliary stent placement followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer with bile duct obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with malignant bile duct obstruction due to pancreatic cancer are often initially treated with biliary stent placement, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with stents poses a potential risk of increased toxicity. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of biliary stent placement followed by definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent either a plastic stent or a self-expanding metallic stent placement for malignant bile duct obstruction before definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Gemcitabine, TS-1 plus Gemcitabine, or TS-1 was the concurrent chemotherapy/regimen. The primary endpoint was the rate of biliary stent-related toxicities, defined as biliary bleeding, duodenal perforation, or bile duct perforation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. Plastic stents were placed in 23 patients and self-expanding metallic stent in seven patients at the start of irradiation. The median follow-up time was 20 (range, 2-63) months, and 27 patients (90%) completed concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Biliary stent-related toxicity (grade 3 biliary bleeding) was confirmed in one patient (3%) with a plastic stent 9 months after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The median duration of locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 31.1, 7.3, and 10.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not associated with an apparent increase in toxicity and may be an appropriate treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic head cancer with bile duct obstruction.