Establishing minimal clinically important differences for the Pemphigus Disease Area Index.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune blistering disease with potentially life-threatening consequences. Establishing minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for disease severity scores like the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) is crucial for assessing treatment efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To calculate MCIDs for both improvement and deterioration in PDAI scores in patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF), using the anchor-based method. METHODS: A total of 41 patients with pemphigus were recruited, with 35 meeting the MCID analysis criteria. The anchor-based method was used to calculate MCIDs for PDAI scores against the 15-point Likert scale and the Physician Global Assessment visual analogue scale (PGA-VAS) anchors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were employed to determine optimal MCID cutpoints with the highest Youden Index (J). The 15-point Likert scale scores the change in disease severity spanning from -7 to +7, designed to quantify the extent of disease improvement/deterioration since the preceding visit. RESULTS: The MCID for improvement in PDAI activity scores was 2.65 points using the 15-point Likert scale (78.7% correct classification; sensitivity 75.9%; specificity 73.5%) and 2.5 points using the PGA-VAS as the anchor (78.0% correct classification; sensitivity 84.4%; specificity 68.2%). Given the slightly higher correct classification rate using the 15-point Likert scale anchor, the MCID of 2.65 points was selected for PDAI activity score improvement. In contrast, the MCID for deterioration consistently remained at 2.5 points for the 15-point Likert scale anchor (81.0% correct classification; sensitivity 72.7%; specificity 81.0%) and 2.5 points for the PGA-VAS anchor (70.9% correct classification; sensitivity 69.6%; specificity 76.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study marks the inaugural attempt at MCID determination for PDAI scores in pemphigus, filling a critical knowledge gap. The study's calculated MCIDs provide essential benchmarks for clinical trials, treatment evaluation and research design optimization. Future studies should explore international collaborations, to examine potential cross-cultural variations in MCIDs.

Pemphigus is a rare and severe skin disease that causes painful blisters on the skin and mucous membranes. It affects about 1 to 5 people per million worldwide. In pemphigus, the immune system attacks the skin by mistake, leading to blisters that can be life-threatening if they get infected. In the past, the main treatment was steroids, which are effective, but they can have many side effects. Newer treatment options (with drugs such as rituximab) have reduced the risk of complications and relapses. The progress made in treating pemphigus has come from carrying out well-designed research studies. One important tool used to study pemphigus is the 'Pemphigus Disease Area Index' (or 'PDAI' for short). The PDAI helps doctors measure the severity of the disease. However, it has limitations and may not show small improvements that still matter to patients. This is where the 'minimal clinically important difference' (or 'MCID' for short) comes in. The MCID tells us how much change in PDAI scores is meaningful for patients. To date, there have been no studies published on MCIDs for the PDAI. This study, from Sydney, Australia, aimed to determine MCIDs for the PDAI. We studied 41 patients with pemphigus, 35 of whom were included in MCID analysis. The findings showed that a decrease of 2.65 points in PDAI scores means the disease is getting better. An increase of 2.5 points shows that the disease is getting worse. This information can help doctors and researchers understand if treatments are working and how they affect patients. Overall, our study findings are an important step towards improving care and treatments for people living with pemphigus.

A Practical Guide to Using Oral JAK Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis from the International Eczema Council.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) have the potential to dramatically alter the landscape of atopic dermatitis (AD) management due to their promising efficacy results from phase 3 trials and rapid onset of action. However, JAKinibs are not without risk, and their use is not appropriate for all AD patients, making this a medication class that dermatologists should understand and consider when treating patients with moderate-to-severe AD. OBJECTIVE: This consensus expert opinion statement from the International Eczema Council (IEC) provides a pragmatic approach to prescribing JAKinibs, including choosing appropriate patients, dosing, clinical and lab monitoring, as well as long-term use. METHODS: An international cohort of authors from the IEC with expertise in JAKinibs selected topics of interest and were formed into authorship groups covering 10 subsections. The groups performed topic-specific literature reviews, consulted up-to-date adverse event (AE) data, referred to product labels and provided analysis and expert opinion. The manuscript guidance and recommendations were reviewed by all authors as well as the IEC Research Committee. RESULTS: We recommend JAKinibs be considered for patients with moderate to severe AD seeking the benefits of rapid reduction in disease burden and itch, oral administration, and the potential for flexible dosing. Baseline risk factors should be assessed prior to prescribing JAKinibs, including increasing age, venous thromboembolisms, malignancy, cardiovascular health, kidney/liver function, pregnancy and lactation, and immunocompetence. Patients being considered for JAKinib therapy should be current on vaccinations and we provide a generalized framework for laboratory monitoring, though clinicians should consult individual product labels for recommendations as there are variations among the JAKinib class. Patients who achieve disease control should be maintained on the lowest possible dose, as many of the observed AEs occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Future studies are needed in AD patients to assess the durability and safety of continuous long-term use of JAKinibs, combination medication regimens, and the effects of flexible, episodic treatment over time. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to initiate a JAKinib should be shared among patient and provider, accounting for AD severity and personal risk/benefit assessment, including consideration of baseline health risk factors, monitoring requirements and treatment costs.

Keratosis pilaris treatment paradigms: assessing effectiveness across modalities.

This review aims to present a comprehensive synthesis of the existing treatment modalities for keratosis pilaris (KP) and evaluate their therapeutic efficacy. KP is a prevalent chronic dermatological condition typified by its unique 'chicken skin appearance', with the cheeks being the most commonly involved sites. Numerous therapeutic interventions have emerged, given its substantial prevalence and impact on skin aesthetics and psychological wellbeing. Nonetheless, a consistent therapeutic response has been challenging to achieve. This review endeavours to collate and critically appraise the current treatment landscape for KP. An exhaustive literature search was performed using databases such as Ovid, PubMed and Scopus. From an initial count of 459 articles identified after deduplication, 52 were selected for inclusion after a thorough full-text examination for articles with concrete outcome data highlighting the efficacies of different therapeutic modalities; articles that lacked data or were tangential to the core focus on KP treatment were excluded. The included articles were then catalogued based on the nature of treatment strategies and their respective outcomes. Among the various therapeutic interventions, laser and light modalities appear to be supported by the most substantial evidence base. Notably, the Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminium-garnet) laser, attributed to its longer wavelength, emerged as a preferred option. While other therapeutic avenues have also exhibited notable improvements in skin texture and discolouration relative to baseline, the inconsistency in outcome measures underscores the need for a standardized, KP-specific scoring system to foster a more coherent comparison across treatments. Based on the current evidence, Nd:YAG laser therapy demonstrates promising effectiveness with a relatively favourable side-effect profile. However, the landscape of KP treatment is multifaceted, and further studies are essential to solidify recommendations.

Gender equity in academic dermatology: Problems aplenty, yet paths ahead.

Efforts to achieve gender equity of health professionals should be a priority in all fields of medicine, including academic dermatology. This review aimed, first, to summarize available evidence about the status of gender equity in various domains of academic dermatology-headship positions, salary, editor and editorial board appointments, publications, conference presentations, receipt of research grants and academic prizes-second, to identify challenges to achieving gender equity and, third, to articulate the components of a multifaceted strategy for gender parity. A variety of databases were searched. Manual searching of reference lists and searching of grey literature were also undertaken. It was found that, despite improvements in some domains, the gender inequity persists in all of the above-mentioned areas of academic dermatology. Challenges to achieve gender parity include time in pregnancy, disproportionate participation in childrearing and domestic tasks compared with men, suboptimal legislation in many jurisdictions for parenting and childcare leave, and unconscious biases about women. Elements of a multipronged approach include strengthening women's dermatology societies that advocate for women in academia; celebrating the careers of distinguished female academic dermatologists; mentoring; promoting leadership courses; striving for a greater representation of women among editors-in-chief, authors, and conference presenters, among others; seeking better pay, leave conditions and other work entitlements; conducting high-quality research about gender inequity in academic dermatology; imposing sanctions for violations of gender equity; supporting dermatologists' health; and learning from the experience of other fields of academic medicine.

Dermatologic manifestations of hereditary hemochromatosis: A systematic review.

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is a genetic disorder leading to excessive iron absorption, impacting multiple organs, notably the skin, nails and mucosae. The objective of this study is to elucidate the dermatologic manifestations, associated symptoms, pathophysiology and management recommendations of HH. We searched five primary databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science) up to April 2023. Non-English articles were included to minimize language bias. The studies were evaluated using Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine standards, with adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Inaccessible articles were directly sourced from authors. Out of the initial 1582 publications from 1904 to 2023, 22 studies (19 in English, 2 in French and 1 in German) were selected. Most reports were from the USA, UK and France and were predominantly case reports, covering 148 patients with skin symptoms related to hereditary hemochromatosis. We collected data on the cutaneous findings and, when available, their histopathological features. The current study highlights the scope, variety and traits of dermatologic symptoms in hereditary hemochromatosis, pinpointing research gaps and areas for future exploration. Our review accentuates the diverse dermatological manifestations of hereditary hemochromatosis, notably hyperpigmentation, hypertrichosis and resistant pruritus, often linked to excessive iron deposition and subsequent impairment of skin cell function. We also found controversial evidence indicating that skin cancers seem to be associated with hereditary hemochromatosis. Porphyria cutanea tarda and hereditary hemochromatosis were frequently reported together. Given hereditary hemochromatosis's genetic nature, early identification in one individual can substantially guide familial care and preemptive interventions. Clinicians should prioritize hereditary hemochromatosis as a differential when patients present with specific dermatological symptoms, especially in sun-exposed regions. A rigorous assessment ensures accurate diagnosis, facilitating optimal management for both the patient and their family.

S2k guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of linear IgA dermatosis initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

INTRODUCTION: Linear IgA dermatosis (LAD) is a rare subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease (AIBD) defined by predominant or exclusive immune deposits of immunoglobulin A at the basement membrane zone of skin or mucous membranes. This disorder is a rare, clinically and immunologically heterogeneous disease occurring both in children and in adults. The aim of this project is to present the main clinical features of LAD, to propose a diagnostic algorithm and provide management guidelines based primarily on experts' opinion because of the lack of large methodologically sound clinical studies. METHODS: These guidelines were initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force Autoimmune Bullous Diseases (AIBD). To achieve a broad consensus for these S2k consensus-based guidelines, a total of 29 experts from different countries, both European and non-European, including dermatologists, paediatric dermatologists and paediatricians were invited. All members of the guidelines committee agreed to develop consensus-based (S2k) guidelines. Prior to a first virtual consensus meeting, each of the invited authors elaborated a section of the present guidelines focusing on a selected topic, based on the relevant literature. All drafts were circulated among members of the writing group, and recommendations were discussed and voted during two hybrid consensus meetings. RESULTS: The guidelines summarizes evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations (S2 level) on the diagnosis and treatment of LAD. CONCLUSION: These guidelines will support dermatologists to improve their knowledge on the diagnosis and management of LAD.

Cross-sectional burden-of-illness study in atopic dermatitis (MEASURE-AD) in Australia and New Zealand reveals impacts on well-being.

OBJECTIVES: To describe disease burden in individuals with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) and compare it with other geographic regions. METHODS: This multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study (MEASURE-AD) recruited consecutive adolescent and adult patients attending dermatology clinics in 28 countries. Data collected included scores of pruritus, disease severity, sleep, pain, disease control, work and quality of life. RESULTS: This study included 112 ANZ participants (Australia n = 72; New Zealand n = 40) from December 2019 to December 2020. Treatments included topicals (85.7% of patients), non-biologic systemic therapy (28.6%), phototherapy (9.8%) and dupilumab (4.5%). Mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score was 22.3 (95% CI 19.6-25.0) and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measurement (POEM) score was 18.4 (95% CI 16.8-20.0). Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was 6.0 (95% CI 5.5-6.6) (50% had severe pruritus) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 14.3 (95% CI 12.8-15.8). ADerm-Impact sleep domain score was 15.1 (95% CI 13.2-16.9). ADerm-Symptom Scale worst skin pain domain score was 5.0 (95% CI 4.3-5.6). Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) percentages indicated work and productivity impairment. Inadequately controlled AD was self-reported by 41%, with 9.7 flares in the past 6 months. Scores of pruritus, disease severity, sleep, pain, disease control and quality of life in ANZ were often the highest of all the geographic regions studied. CONCLUSION: ANZ patients with AD have a high disease burden, which extends across multiple facets of daily life. Many are inadequately controlled with existing therapies.

Efficacy and safety of Oleogel-S10 (birch triterpenes) for epidermolysis bullosa: results from the phase III randomized double-blind phase of the EASE study.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of rare, difficult-to-treat, inherited multisystem diseases affecting epithelial integrity. Patients with EB are affected by mechanical fragility of epithelial surfaces including the skin and, as a result, extensive recurrent blistering is a characteristic of the condition. Chronic wounds predispose patients with EB to the development of squamous cell carcinoma, which is a major cause of premature death. OBJECTIVES: EASE was a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of the topical gel Oleogel-S10 (birch triterpenes) in EB. EASE was funded by Amryt Research Limited. METHODS: Patients with dystrophic EB, junctional EB or Kindler EB and a target partial-thickness wound lasting ≥ 21 days and < 9 months that was 10-50 cm2, were enrolled and randomized via computer-generated allocation tables 1 : 1 to Oleogel-S10 or control gel - both with standard-of-care dressings. Study gel was applied to all wounds at least every 4 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with first complete closure of target wound within 45 days. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were enrolled and treated (109 treated with Oleogel-S10, 114 with control gel). The primary endpoint was met; Oleogel-S10 resulted in 41·3% of patients with first complete target wound closure within 45 days, compared with 28·9% in the control gel arm (relative risk 1·44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·01-2·05; P = 0·013). Adverse events (AEs) occurred with similar frequency for Oleogel-S10 (81·7%) compared with control gel (80·7%). AEs were predominantly of mild-to-moderate intensity (4·6% were severe). CONCLUSIONS: Oleogel-S10 is the first therapy to demonstrate accelerated wound healing in EB. Oleogel-S10 was well -tolerated.

Once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% for scalp and body psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIb study.

BACKGROUND: Scalp psoriasis affects most patients with psoriasis, but it can be difficult to treat. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% on scalp and body psoriasis. METHODS: In a phase IIb randomized controlled trial, adults and adolescents aged ≥ 12 years with scalp and body psoriasis were randomized (2 : 1) to roflumilast foam 0.3% or vehicle for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was scalp Investigator Global Assessment (S-IGA) success (score of 'clear' or 'almost clear' plus ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) at week 8. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Significantly more roflumilast-treated patients (59.1%) than vehicle-treated patients (11.4%) achieved S-IGA success at week 8 (P < 0.001); differences favoured roflumilast as early as the first postbaseline visit at week 2 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements were also seen for secondary endpoints, including body IGA success, Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale and the Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index. The safety of roflumilast was generally similar to vehicle. Patients treated with roflumilast experienced low rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), with few discontinuations due to an AE. Few patients with skin of colour (11%) and few adolescents (0.7%) were included. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the further development of roflumilast foam for treating scalp and body psoriasis.

Interventions for bullous pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Oral steroids are the standard treatment. We have updated this review, which was first published in 2002, because several new treatments have since been tried. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid. SEARCH METHODS: We updated searches of the following databases to November 2021: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We searched five trial databases to January 2022, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of treatments for immunofluorescence-confirmed bullous pemphigoid. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors, working independently, evaluated the studies against the review's inclusion criteria and extracted data from included studies. Using GRADE methodology, we assessed the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in each comparison. Our primary outcomes were healing of skin lesions and mortality. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 14 RCTs (1442 participants). The main treatment modalities assessed were oral steroids, topical steroids, and the oral anti-inflammatory antibiotic doxycycline. Most studies reported mortality but adverse events and quality of life were not well reported. We decided to look at the primary outcomes 'disease control' and 'mortality'. Almost all studies investigated different comparisons; two studies were placebo-controlled. The results are therefore based on a single study for each comparison except azathioprine. Most studies involved only small numbers of participants. We assessed the risk of bias for all key outcomes as having 'some concerns' or high risk, due to missing data, inappropriate analysis, or insufficient information. Clobetasol propionate cream versus oral prednisone Compared to oral prednisone, clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body probably increases skin healing at day 21 (risk ratio (RR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.13; 1 study, 341 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Skin healing at 21 days was seen in 99.8% of participants assigned to clobetasol and 92.4% of participants assigned to prednisone. Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body compared to oral prednisone may reduce mortality at one year (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.01; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Death occurred in 26.5% (45/170) of participants assigned to clobetasol and 36.3% (62/171) of participants assigned to oral prednisone. This study did not measure quality of life. Clobetasol propionate cream may reduce risk of severe complications by day 21 compared with oral prednisone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Mild clobetasol propionate cream regimen (10 to 30 g/day) versus standard clobetasol propionate cream regimen (40 g/day) A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen probably does not change skin healing at day 21 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; 1 study, 312 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Both groups showed complete healing of lesions at day 21 in 98% participants. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change mortality at one year (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32; 1 study, 312 participants; low-certainty evidence), which occurred in 118/312 (37.9%) participants. This study did not measure quality of life. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change adverse events at one year (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14; 1 study, 309 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxycycline versus prednisolone Compared to prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day), doxycycline (200 mg/day) induces less skin healing at six weeks (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92; 1 study, 213 participants; high-certainty evidence). Complete skin healing was reported in 73.8% of participants assigned to doxycycline and 91.1% assigned to prednisolone. Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably decreases mortality at one year (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 14; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality occurred in 2.4% (3/132) of participants with doxycycline and 9.7% (11/121) with prednisolone. Compared to prednisolone, doxycycline improved quality of life at one year (mean difference 1.8 points lower, which is more favourable on the Dermatology Life Quality Index, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58 lower; 1 study, 234 participants; high-certainty evidence). Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably reduces severe or life-threatening treatment-related adverse events at one year (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Prednisone plus azathioprine versus prednisone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus prednisone compared to prednisone alone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from two trials (98 participants). These studies did not measure quality of life. Adverse events were reported in a total of 20/48 (42%) participants assigned to azathioprine plus prednisone and 15/44 (34%) participants assigned to prednisone. Nicotinamide plus tetracycline versus prednisone It is unclear whether nicotinamide plus tetracycline compared to prednisone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (18 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. Fewer adverse events were reported in the nicotinamide group. Methylprednisolone plus azathioprine versus methylprednisolone plus dapsone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus methylprednisolone compared to dapsone plus methylprednisolone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (54 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. A total of 18 adverse events were reported in the azathioprine group and 13 in the dapsone group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as, and may cause less mortality than, oral prednisone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Lower-dose clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as standard-dose clobetasol propionate cream and has similar mortality. Doxycycline is less effective but causes less mortality than prednisolone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Other treatments need further investigation.

Evaluating the nature and prevalence of glucocorticoid-induced type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases.

Glucocorticoid use in patients with autoimmune bullous disease is associated with significant morbidity, and in some cases, excess mortality. The hyperglycaemic complications arising from glucocorticoid use have been well-documented and range from mild hyperglycaemia to diabetic ketoacidosis. Patients with pre-existing glucose intolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of developing complications. Several other factors have been investigated for their association with steroid-induced hyperglycaemia, including patient age, sex, family history, dose, regimen and duration of therapy. Findings in the current literature, however, are largely conflicting and evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses. Glucocorticoids should be used with caution, and patients using steroids should be closely monitored for adverse effects.

Phase IIb randomized CONTROL study demonstrates a novel topical isotretinoin formulation, TMB-001, is safe and effective in participants with either recessive X-linked or autosomal recessive lamellar congenital ichthyosis.

BACKGROUND: In two severe congenital ichthyosis subtypes, autosomal recessive lamellar ichthyosis (ARCI-LI) and X-linked recessive ichthyosis (XLRI), cutaneous manifestations include widespread scaling. Approved topical treatment options are limited to emollients and keratolytics. AIM: This analysis from the randomized phase IIb CONTROL study assessed whether the efficacy and safety of TMB-001, a novel topical isotretinoin ointment formulation, differed between ARCI-LI and XLRI subtypes. METHODS: Participants ≥ 9 years with genetically confirmed XLRI or ARCI-LI and ≥ 2 (of 4) Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) assessment areas with ≥ 3 scaling score were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to TMB-001 0.05%/TMB-001 0.1%/vehicle, twice daily for 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with ≥ 50% reduction vs. baseline in VIIS scaling (VIIS 50; primary endpoint) and ≥ 2-grade reduction in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)-scaling score vs. baseline (key secondary endpoint) were evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Among enrolled participants (TMB-001 0.05%, n = 11; 0.1%, n = 10; and vehicle, n = 12), 52% had ARCI-LI and 48% XLRI subtypes. Mean age was 33.6 and 35.4 years for participants with ARCI-LI and XLRI, respectively. Overall, 33%, 50% and 17% of participants with ARCI-LI and 100%, 33% and 75% of participants with XLRI achieved VIIS 50 in the TMB-001 0.05%, TMB-001 0.1% and vehicle groups, respectively (nominal P = 0.24 for 0.05% vs. vehicle, intent-to-treat population). Improvement of ≥ 2-grade IGA score was observed in 33%, 50% and 0% of participants with ARCI-LI and 83%, 33% and 25% of participants with XLRI in the TMB-001 0.05%, TMB-001 0.1% and vehicle groups, respectively (nominal P = 0.03 for 0.05% vs. vehicle, intention-to-treat population). Most AEs were application-site reactions. CONCLUSION: Regardless of congenital ichthyosis subtype, TMB-001 demonstrated greater proportions of participants achieving VIIS 50 and ≥ 2-grade IGA improvement vs. vehicle.

Characteristics and outcomes for participants with congenital ichthyosis who responded to treatment with the topical isotretinoin formulation TMB-001: results from the Phase IIb CONTROL study.

BACKGROUND: Emollients and keratolytics are frequently used to manage symptoms of congenital ichthyosis (CI). Systemic retinoid treatment is complicated by teratogenicity and dose-limiting adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: This analysis from the randomized Phase IIb CONTROL study investigated the characteristics of participants who responded to treatment with TMB-001, a novel topical isotretinoin ointment formulation. METHODS: Participants ≥ 9 years of age with genetically confirmed CI and ≥ 2 (out of 4) Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) assessment areas with ≥ 3 scaling score were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to TMB-001 0.05%, TMB-001 0.1% or vehicle, twice daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of participants with ≥ 50% reduction in VIIS-scaling (VIIS-50) compared with baseline and ≥ 2-grade reduction in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)-scaling score compared with baseline. Changes in body surface area (BSA) involvement, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores and Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (I-NRS) scores were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 33 participants (11 randomized to TMB-001 0.05%, 10 to TMB-001 0.1% and 12 to vehicle), median age was 29 years (range 9-80), and most were male (64%) and White (79%). Baseline demographics were generally similar among participants who did or did not achieve TMB-001 treatment success. Participants who had lower mean BSA involvement and higher DLQI and I-NRS scores at baseline were more likely to achieve VIIS-50. Similarly, higher baseline DLQI and I-NRS scores were associated with IGA response; BSA involvement was similar for IGA responders vs. nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Higher DLQI and I-NRS scores at baseline were associated with participants achieving treatment success by VIIS-50 and IGA response. Lower BSA involvement was associated with VIIS-50 success.

Efficacy and safety of etrasimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ADVISE).

BACKGROUND: Etrasimod is an oral, selective, sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor1,4,5 modulator in development for immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Efficacy and safety of orally administered S1P receptor modulation in atopic dermatitis (AD) have not yet been examined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of etrasimod monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD defined as baseline validated Investigator's Global Assessment (vIGA-AD) score ≥ 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16, and body surface area involvement ≥10% were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily oral etrasimod 1 mg, 2 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was percent change in EASI score from baseline at week 12, assessed in the Full Analysis Set (all randomized participants). Key secondary outcomes were achievement of a vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline and EASI-75 response at Week 12. Safety was assessed during the double-blind period. RESULTS: One hundred and forty participants were randomized to etrasimod 2 mg (n = 47), 1 mg (n = 47) or placebo (n = 46). At Week 12, percent change in EASI score was -57.2% in the etrasimod 2-mg group versus -48.4% in the placebo group (p = 0.18). A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving etrasimod 2 mg achieved vIGA-AD scores of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-point improvement at Week 12 versus placebo (29.8% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.045); however, EASI-75 response was not statistically significant versus placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 59.6%, 40.4% and 47.8% of participants receiving etrasimod 2 mg, 1 mg and placebo, respectively. There were no serious AEs or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome was not met, although efficacy was observed for etrasimod 2 mg on several clinician- and patient-assessed measures, and both 1- and 2-mg doses were well tolerated, warranting further clinical investigation in AD.

Median canaliform nail dystrophy in a 2-year-old boy: Case report and review of the literature.

Median canaliform nail dystrophy (MCD) is a rare nail abnormality with an unknown etiology. We report the case of MCD of both great toenails in a 2-year-old boy presenting with a fir tree nail pattern and longitudinal splits. MCD was treated with topical marigold therapy (Tagetes sp.). By 15 weeks, the proximal 50% of the MCD had normalized. The report highlights a potential new treatment of marigold therapy for MCD.

A review of JAK and IL-23 inhibitors to treat vitiligo.

Vitiligo is an autoimmune skin disorder resulting in the depigmentation of skin characterised by patches of varying sizes and shapes. A common disorder of pigmentation that affects 0.5%-2% of the global population. Despite its well-understood autoimmune pathogenesis, the targets for effective cytokine intervention remain unclear. Current first-line treatments include oral or topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors and phototherapy. These treatments are limited, have varying efficacies, and are associated with significant adverse events or can be time-consuming. Therefore, biologics should be explored as a potential treatment for vitiligo. There are currently limited data for the use of JAK and IL-23 inhibitors for vitiligo. A total of 25 studies were identified in the review. There is promising evidence regarding the use of JAK and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of vitiligo.

Fibrillar matrix, Echogenicity, Contour, Thickness, and Suture (FECTS) vs. Global: A comparison of 2 scales developed to assess ultrasound images post rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is commonly used to assess rotator cuff repair (RCR), but no standardized criterion exists to characterize the tendon. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to (1) develop content validity for ultrasound specific criteria to grade the postoperative appearance of a tendon after RCR, (2) assess the reliability of the criteria, and (3) assess the feasibility to use these assessments. METHODOLOGY: Following expert consultation and literature review for content validity, 2 scales were created: 1) the Fibrillar matrix, Echogenicity, Contour, Thickness, and Suture (FECTS) scale and 2) the Rotator Cuff Repair-Investigator Global Assessment (RCR-IGA). A prospective cohort study was undertaken on patients who had received a RCR and serial B-mode ultrasound images. Four raters assessed the 64-ultrasound images using the scales created in a blinded fashion using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The FECTS scale was a composite score with 5 key parameters and the RCR-IGA scale was a 5-point global score. The intrarater reliability for the FECTS scale was excellent for the most experienced rater (0.92) and fair for the rater with no experience (0.72). The intrarater reliability for the RCR-IGA scale was excellent for 3 of the 4 raters (0.80-0.87) and fair when used by the least experienced rater (0.56). Inter-rater testing for all the FECTS scale parameters had excellent reliability (0.82-0.92) except for Fibrillar matrix (0.73). The average time to complete the FECTS scale per image was 23 seconds and 11 seconds for the RCR-IGA scale. CONCLUSION: The FECTS scale and the RCR-IGA scale are reliable tools to assess the ultrasonic appearance of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. The FECTS scale was more reliable for less experienced assessors. The RCR-IGA scale was easier, more time efficient and reliable for those with experience.

A translation re-initiation variant in KLHL24 also causes epidermolysis bullosa simplex and dilated cardiomyopathy via intermediate filament degradation.

This study shows that gain-of-function variants in KLHL24 causing EBS and DCM, do not only originate in the start-codon and suggest that any nonsense-inducing variant affecting nucleotides c.4_84 will likely cause the same effect on protein level and a similar potential lethal phenotype.

Applicability of glucocorticoid toxicity index in pemphigus: Comparison between two groups of rituximab-treated and rituximab-naïve patients.

Rituximab (RTX) combined with short-term glucocorticoids (GC) is an effective therapeutic option for pemphigus. The newly developed Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) tool provides the possibility to measure GC toxicities over time. To compare 1-year GTI between two groups of RTX-treated and RTX-naïve patients with pemphigus. The responsiveness of the GTI was also investigated. A prospective cohort of 129 adults with newly diagnosed pemphigus was conducted. GC-related toxicities were assessed at 3-month intervals according to Composite and Specific lists of the GTI. Of the patients, 76.7% (n = 99) received RTX. Throughout the time intervals, RTX-treated patients had lower GTI compared to RTX-naïve ones (p = 0.036). The mean GTI at 1-year was 34.3 in the RTX-treated group and 50.8 in the RTX-naïve group (p = 0.04). The most commonly observed GC-related toxicity was neuropsychiatric manifestations for 34% (224 events). The relapse rate of RTX-treated patients (1%) was significantly lower than RTX-naïve patients (10%) (p = 0.037). The GTI showed no correlation with cumulative GC consumption in both groups (p > 0.05, both). Patients treated with GC alone had remarkably higher GTI than patients treated with GC plus RTX. The GTI is an applicable tool to quantitatively capture GC toxicities at the patient level in pemphigus.

Clinical features of chronic bullous dermatosis of childhood.

BACKGROUND: Chronic bullous dermatosis of childhood (CBDC) is a rare autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, which can develop following vaccination or medication, or with an autoimmune condition or illness, among other causes. AIM: To identify and better understand the clinical features of CBDC by performing a systematic review, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. METHODS: Eligible studies included publication since 1980, CBDC diagnosis, case studies, subjects aged < 18 years, clinical features and no language restriction. A database search was conducted including Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus on 14 July 2021 (see Appendix for search terms). Data were assessed for risk of bias. Jamovi was used for statistical analysis. Age and sex were compared with mucocutaneous involvement, cutaneous involvement, other symptoms, human leucocyte antigen type and lesion descriptions. RESULTS: After removing duplicate references using Endnote, 351 papers were identified, of which 91 met the inclusion criteria. These papers included 130 cases of CBDC: 110 children and 20 neonates. The ratio of male : female patients was 19 : 1 for neonates and 74:55 for children. χ² analysis with 1 degree of freedom showed that CBDC in neonates was associated with facial (χ²(1) = 9.67, P < 0.01), mouth (χ²(1) = 31.0, P < 0.001), upper airway (χ²(1) = 52.7, P < 0.001), oesophageal (χ²(1) = 34.6, P < 0.001), ophthalmic (χ²(1) = 6.27, P = 0.01) involvement and with respiratory distress (χ²(1) = 22.7 P < 0.001). CBDC in children was associated with genital (χ²(1) = 3.96, P < 0.05), arm (χ²(1) = 6.99, P < 0.01) and leg (χ²(1) = 7.03, P < 0.01) involvement. CBDC in male patients was associated with facial (χ²(1) = 7.01, P < 0.01), scalp (χ²(1) = 5.96, P < 0.02) and perianal (χ²(1) = 7.22, P < 0.01) involvement. CONCLUSION: Neonates with CBDC are more likely to have a mucocutaneous distribution of lesions, whereas children are more likely to have cutaneous lesions. The limitations of this study include selection bias, and the small neonate sample size makes the study unrepresentative of the population. The review highlights the need for further research into the clinical features of CBDC in neonates.