A single-centre, retrospective study of incisional hernia repair outcomes post kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: Incisional hernias (IH) after kidney transplantation (KTx) can cause significant morbidity in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). We aimed to report the outcomes of surgical repair of IH in KTR from our centre. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all the IH repairs in KTR from May 2018 to May 2023. We documented pre-transplant baseline characteristics, peri- and post-KTx events and outcomes and post-IH repair complications. We also documented length of stay, survival, and hernia recurrence post-IH repair. RESULTS: We performed 35 incisional hernia repairs in 34 KTR from May 2018 to May 2023 with an overall incidence of 1.63% symptomatic IH. Mean patient age was 56.7 ± 10.1 years and mean body mass index (BMI) 29.7 ± 6.49 kg/m2. A history of previous hernia operation and open abdominal operations was present in 11.4% and 22.9% of the population, respectively. The types of repairs performed were primary (5.7%), onlay (62.9%), inlay (2.9%) and retromuscular sublay (28.6%). Mean hernia neck size was 8.9 ± 5.6 cm. After IH repair, there was no perioperative mortality with an average 5.5 ± 3.9 days of length of stay. There were seven episodes (20%) of IH recurrence. There was a 6% of superficial wound dehiscence rate and a 3% of surgical site infection. Pearson's correlation test revealed that post-operative hernia recurrence was not related with neck size, post-transplant complications or pre- and post-transplant characteristics, as well as post-transplant outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate in our cohort was 20%. Known risk factors for IH in KTR as well as post-KTx events were not correlated with hernia recurrence or other post-hernia repair complications.

Expanding the donor pool in pancreas transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current era of organ shortage has necessitated expansion of the currently available organ donor pool, to increase the number of pancreases available for transplant. This review summarizes the cumulative efforts of various centers in making this possible. RECENT FINDINGS: Various centers are consistently reporting their experience with marginal donors; recent additions to the cohort have been increase in pancreases from donors after cardiac death (controlled and uncontrolled), update on long-term outcomes of live pancreas donors, as well as efforts at objectively assessing donor risk. SUMMARY: It has become important for the transplanting surgeon to make difficult decisions on organ suitability and appropriateness depending upon the recipient's status. Further more, limiting further damage to these vulnerable grafts is important in improving utilization as well as successful transplantation.

Peripheral blood sampling for the detection of allograft rejection: biomarker identification and validation.

Currently, acute allograft rejection can only be detected reliably by deterioration of graft function confirmed by allograft biopsy. A huge drawback of this method of diagnosis is that substantial organ damage has already taken place at the time that rejection is diagnosed. Discovering and validating noninvasive biomarkers that predict acute rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction, is of great importance. Many studies have investigated changes in the peripheral blood in an attempt to find biomarkers that reflect changes in the graft directly or indirectly. Herein, we will review the promises and limitations of the peripheral blood biomarkers that have been described in the literature so far.

Pancreas allograft thrombosis.

Thrombosis of the transplanted pancreas is a common and often catastrophic event. Predisposing factors include the hypercoagulable state of many patients with diabetic renal failure, preservation-related graft endothelial injury, and low-velocity venous flow. Clinical management includes optimization of modifiable risk factors, controlled anticoagulation, graft monitoring, and early therapeutic intervention.