Management and clinical outcome of rectal cancer in patients ≥ 80 years treated in southern France (PACA region) between 2006 and 2008.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is increasingly prevalent in the elderly patients. Their clinical history and outcome after treatment are poorly described. This retrospective study was undertaken to provide more data and to compare therapeutic strategies to the standard of care for younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively provided by gastroenterologists, oncologists, and gerontologists of Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur (PACA). Patients concerned were aged 80 years or older, with a rectal cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2008, irrespective of stage and (the) treatment of the disease. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free-survival (RFS) were correlated with patient characteristics and treatment. The adopted therapeutic strategy was then compared to the standard-of-care for younger patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 36 months. The 3-year OS was 47.4% for the 160 patients analyzed, and 59.2% for the 117 patients treated with curative intent. The 3-year RFS was 76.6% in the "curative" population. In the multivariate analysis, node status and surgery independently influenced OS, while RFS was influenced by age, N status, and gender. For T0-T2 tumors, patients were treated similar to younger patients with an OS of 83.6% and a RFS of 95.2%, respectively. For T3-T4 tumors, 3-year RFS was 65%, even with a less aggressive strategy. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection after evaluation using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) should be the standard treatment for localized rectal cancer (T0-T2) in elderly patients, as it is in younger patients. For locally advanced lesions (T3-T4), results obtained after a conservative approach suggest that a non-surgical strategy can be used in elderly patients.

[Management and clinical outcome in patients over 80 years with rectal cancer treated between 2006 and 2008 in Southern France (PACA region)]. / Prise en charge et devenir des patients de plus de 80ans atteints d'un cancer du rectum, en région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur de 2006 à 2008.

PURPOSE: Rectal cancer is increasingly prevalent in elderly patients. Their clinical history and outcome after treatment are poorly described. This retrospective study was undertaken to provide more data and to compare therapeutic strategies to the standard of care for younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients concerned were aged 80 years or older, with a rectal cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2008 and treated in Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur (PACA), irrespective of stage and treatment of the disease. Overall survival and relapse-free-survival were correlated with patients' characteristics and treatment. The adopted therapeutic strategy was then compared to the standard-of-care for younger patients. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 36 months, among the 160 patients included, the 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival were 59.2% and 76.6%, respectively for the 117 patients who received a treatment with curative intent. In the multivariate analysis, node status and surgery independently influenced overall survival, while relapse-free survival was influenced by age, N status, and gender. For T0-T2 tumours, patients were treated similarly to younger patients with an overall survival of 83.6% and a relapse-free survival of 95.2%. For T3-T4 tumours, the 3-year relapse-free survival was 65%, even with a less aggressive strategy. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection after evaluation using the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) test should be the standard treatment for localized rectal cancer (T0-T2) in elderly patients, as it is in younger patients. For locally advanced lesions (T3-T4), results obtained after a conservative approach suggest that a non-surgical strategy can be used in elderly patients.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the treatment planning of radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix treated with the four-field pelvic technique.

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the planning of radiation therapy for patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with a four-field technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1994 and February 1995, 18 patients with carcinoma of the cervix were entered in the study (1 T1 N-; 2 T2a N-; 1 T2b NO; 10 T2b N-; 2 T2b N+; 2 T3b N+). Node status was assessed by a laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. During the first step, all the patients were simulated with an isocentric four-field pelvic technique. In one group (11 patients) simulation was done based on clinical examination, computed tomography (CT), and standard guidelines. In the second group (seven patients) simulation was based on clinical examination, CT, and with the help of diagnostic MRI, which was available at that time. During the second step, MRI in treatment position with skin markings of the isocenter of the radiation fields was then performed in every patient. During the third step, in each patient, the simulated radiation fields were correlated with the MRI defined target volume by superimposing them on midsagittal and midcoronal MR images. The adequacy of the margins was arbitrarly defined as 1 cm around the MRI defined target volume (tumor of the cervix and its extension, and uterus). RESULTS: In the first group (11 patients), MRI in treatment position led to a change in 7 patients: six inadequate margins in the lateral fields and one in the anterior and lateral field. In almost all the cases, the adjustments were of an increase of 10 mm, equally matched between the anterior and posterior borders of the lateral fields. In the second group (seven patients), MRI in treatment position has led to a change in lateral fields in five patients. The mean adjustment was 10 mm: four increases (two anterior border, one posterior border, one anterior and posterior border), and one decrease of the posterior border. In the two groups, modifications of the anterior border of the lateral fields have allowed adequate margins around the uterine fundus and modifications of the posterior border have allowed adequate coverage of the cervical tumor. CONCLUSION: When treating carcinoma of the cervix with a four-field radiation technique, standard portals do not exist. The design of lateral fields has to be based on individual morbid anatomy, which is given accurately by diagnostic MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging in treatment position assesses the design of simulated lateral fields.