Use of letermovir-valganciclovir combination as a step-down treatment after foscarnet for ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Letermovir (LTV) might be an alternative treatment to nephrotoxic foscarnet (FOS) in Ganciclovir (GCV) resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, its efficacy in controlling active CMV viremia is unclear, as it is only approved for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. METHODS: This case series describes 14 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with moderate-level GCV resistant CMV infection, treated by different step-down strategies after initial FOS therapy: (1) Observation without antiviral follow-up or switch to valganciclovir (VGCV) (pre-LTV era), and (2) Switch to LTV±VGCV (LTV era). RESULTS: One patient died under FOS. Thirteen patients were followed under step-down regimens. All but two patients had ongoing CMV viremia when stopping FOS. In pre-LTV era, 5/9 (56%) experienced a CMV breakthrough > 10 000 IU/ml calling for another course of FOS, as compared to 1/4 (25%) in the LTV era. Addition of VGCV to LTV at low-level viral breakthrough, addressing a possible developing resistance against LTV, prevented viral surge in two patients. In the pre-LTV era, CMV-related death or graft loss occurred in three of nine (33%), compared to no death or graft loss in the LTV era. CONCLUSION: A step-down strategy combining LTV+VGCV, might allow to safely stop FOS at ongoing low-level viremia.

Inadequate Perioperative Prophylaxis and Postsurgical Complications After Graft Implantation Are Important Risk Factors for Subsequent Vascular Graft Infections: Prospective Results From the Vascular Graft Infection Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Reconstructive vascular surgery has become increasingly common. Vascular graft infections (VGIs) are serious complications, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Previously described risk factors for VGIs include groin incisions, wound infections, and comorbidities. We aimed to identify modifiable predictors for VGIs as targets for infection prevention strategies. METHODS: Participants of the prospective Vascular Graft Infection Cohort (VASGRA) with surgery between 2013 and 2017 were included. The observation time was calculated from surgery until a confirmed VGI or the last follow-up. Variables were assessed by infection status, using non-parametric tests. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, adjusted for demographic factors, were applied to assess risk factors for a VGI. RESULTS: A total of 438 predominantly male (83.1%) patients with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63 - 76) contributed to 554 person years of follow-up. Thereof, 39 (8.9%) developed a VGI, amounting to an incidence rate of 7.0/100 person years. We found incisional surgical site infections (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 10.09, 95% CI 2.88 - 35.34); hemorrhage (aHR 4.92, 1.28-18.94); renal insufficiency (aHR 4.85, 1.20 - 19.61); inadequate perioperative prophylaxis in patients with an established antibiotic treatment, compared to the additional application of perioperative prophylaxis (aHR 2.87, 95% CI 1.17 - 7.05); and procedure time increases of 1-hour intervals (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08 - 1.39) to be risk factors for VGIs. CONCLUSIONS: We identified procedure time; inadequate perioperative prophylaxis, especially among patients with an established antibiotic treatment; and several postsurgical infectious and non-infectious complications as modifiable, predictive factors for VGIs and, therefore, as keys to improved surveillance programs and prevention strategies. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01821664.