Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 204, 2022 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35287615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening for maternal anogenital Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization in pregnancy with initiation of intravenous intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal GBS infection. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and the more typically used vaginal-rectal culture for screening for maternal anogenital GBS colonization in the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: Eligible English-language studies published until January 2020 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Studies were compiled that assessed for GBS colonization utilizing vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and vaginal-rectal culture during the third trimester of pregnancy. Nonoriginal research articles and studies that did not assess pregnant patients, did not use culture-based screening, or did not compare vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture with vaginal-rectal culture were excluded. The search identified 559 articles with three prospective cohort studies that met inclusion criteria, including 643 participants. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Patient characteristics and associated pain with specimen collection were abstracted. Meta-analyses of both the raw agreement and the Cohen's kappa statistic were performed. RESULTS: Within the three included studies, the range of GBS detection was 17.6-34.0%, consistent with the anticipated prevalence of GBS colonization reported in earlier publications. For both raw agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient, the test for heterogeneity was not significant, indicating low heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimate of the raw agreement was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95-0.98) and of the Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), indicating (according to the Landis and Koch criteria) an "almost perfect" agreement between the compared clinical tests. In the two studies that assessed procedure-related patient discomfort, vaginal-rectal swabbing caused more discomfort. CONCLUSION: Use of vaginal-perineal culture for assessment of maternal GBS colonization is comparable to the more typically utilized vaginal-rectal culture and is associated with less discomfort.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Períneo/microbiologia , Gravidez , Reto/microbiologia , Vagina/microbiologia
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 38(6): 535-543, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33065743

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of severe insulin resistance (insulin requirements ≥2 units/kg) at delivery and the relationship between severe insulin resistance, glycemic control, and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with type-2 diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with type-2 diabetes mellitus who delivered between January 2015 and December 2017 at a tertiary academic medical center. Maternal demographic information, self-monitored blood sugars, and insulin doses were abstracted from the medical record. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify maternal baseline characteristics associated with severe insulin resistance at delivery. RESULTS: Overall 72/160 (45%) of women had severe insulin resistance. Women in the severe insulin resistance group demonstrated evidence of suboptimal glycemic control as evidenced by higher mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values (7.2 [ ± 1.1] vs. 6.6 [ ± 1.3%], p = 0.003), higher mean fasting (104.0 [ ± 17.4] vs. 95.2 [ ± 11.7 mg/dL], p < 0.001) and postprandial glucose values (132.4 [ ± 17.2] vs. 121.9 [ ± 16.9 mg/dL]), p < 0.001), and a higher percentage of total glucose values that were elevated above targets (37.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.8-50] vs. 25.6 [95% CI: 13.3-41.3%], p < 0.001). Maternal HbA1c ≥6.5% and insulin use prior to pregnancy were associated with a higher prevalence of severe insulin resistance, while Hispanic ethnicity and non-White race were associated with a lower prevalence of severe insulin resistance. The rates of adverse perinatal outcomes including large for gestational age (LGA) birth weight, cesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Severe insulin resistance is common among pregnant women with type-2 diabetes, and it is associated with suboptimal glycemic control. Future studies are necessary to develop strategies to identify women with severe insulin resistance early in pregnancy and facilitate adequate insulin dosing. KEY POINTS: · Severe insulin resistance is common.. · BMI does not predict severe insulin resistance.. · Suboptimal glycemic control is common..


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Controle Glicêmico/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/cirurgia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Automonitorização da Glicemia/métodos , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 62(4): 771-780, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30998602

RESUMO

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection remains a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Adoption of screening for maternal genital tract colonization and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced early-onset neonatal GBS infections. For women with an allergy to penicillin, recommended agents for prophylaxis have been well-outlined, but compliance with guideline recommendations is poor. There have been ongoing efforts in vaccine development, but no vaccination currently is available for either preconception or antenatal administration. This article will review established screening techniques, intrapartum antibiotic prophylactic regimens, and management specifically of the penicillin-allergic pregnant woman who is colonized with GBS.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus agalactiae , Adulto , Antibacterianos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
4.
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med ; 21(2): 100-5, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26778525

RESUMO

Preterm birth (PTB) remains a primary cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to outline the association between infection and PTB. We performed a search of the PubMed database for relevant scientific work published in English from 1995 to July 2015. Whereas there is substantial evidence regarding infection as a strong risk factor for preterm birth, the role of specific bacterial and viral infections is not totally conclusive. Newer high-dimensional biological technologies such as microbiomics and metabolomics offer hope to identify the causative pathogens. In addition, strategies have been developed to reduce PTB.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA