RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Childhood-onset glomerular disease often requires ongoing treatment and follow-up into adulthood. However, few studies have analyzed the associated impact and distress experienced by patients with this condition during the transition from childhood to adolescence and adulthood. METHODS: At three facilities, we recruited patients who developed idiopathic nephrotic syndrome or IgA nephropathy during childhood and were at least 18 years old at the time of study entry. Among them, a questionnaire-based survey was administered to patients who consented to participate, and the results were analyzed in conjunction with clinical information. RESULTS: Data from a total of 38 patients were analyzed. Of these patients, 15 had idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and 23 had IgA nephropathy. The age of transition from pediatrics to the adult medicine department was correlated with the number of recurrences. Many patients also reported being significantly affected by exercise restrictions and physical decline associated with their diseases and medications. Various impacts, including distress, affected decision-making regarding higher education, with patients engaging in higher education at a significantly higher rate compared with the regional average (66.7% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: We analyzed the impact of childhood-onset glomerular disease and distress during the transition period from pediatric to adult care. This study highlighted the significant impact of medications and exercise restrictions on patients' decisions regarding higher education. Future prospective studies will be needed to examine patients' distress in more detail and establish management approaches to enhance patient quality of life.
Assuntos
Glomerulonefrite por IGA , Nefrose Lipoide , Síndrome Nefrótica , Transição para Assistência do Adulto , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Síndrome Nefrótica/tratamento farmacológico , Glomerulonefrite por IGA/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Methods for determining the radiation dose received by exposed biota require major improvements to reduce uncertainties and increase precision. We share our experiences in attempting to quantify external dose rates to free-ranging wildlife using GPS-coupled dosimetry methods. The manuscript is a primer on fundamental concepts in wildlife dosimetry in which the complexities of quantifying dose rates are highlighted, and lessons learned are presented based on research with wild boar and snakes at Fukushima, wolves at Chornobyl, and reindeer in Norway. GPS-coupled dosimeters produced empirical data to which numerical simulations of external dose using computer software were compared. Our data did not support a standing paradigm in risk analyses: Using averaged soil contaminant levels to model external dose rates conservatively overestimate the dose to individuals within a population. Following this paradigm will likely lead to misguided recommendations for risk management. The GPS-dosimetry data also demonstrated the critical importance of how modeled external dose rates are impacted by the scale at which contaminants are mapped. When contaminant mapping scales are coarse even detailed knowledge about each animal's home range was inadequate to accurately predict external dose rates. Importantly, modeled external dose rates based on a single measurement at a trap site did not correlate to actual dose rates measured on free ranging animals. These findings provide empirical data to support published concerns about inadequate dosimetry in much of the published Chernobyl and Fukushima dose-effects research. Our data indicate that a huge portion of that literature should be challenged, and that improper dosimetry remains a significant source of controversy in radiation dose-effect research.