[Nogitecan Hydrochloride Treatment for Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer].

Nogitecan hydrochloride(topotecan)has shown efficacy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, but has not been used widely in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of topotecan in 12 patients (median age, 62 years) treated for recurrent ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2013. Four patients had relapsed after primary treatment, and 8 had relapsed at least twice. Seven patients had been treated with more than 3 prior regimens. Initial treatment of the 12 patients consisted of intravenous topotecan (1.0-1.4 mg/m2/day) for 5 consecutive days. Initial doses were based on previous chemotherapy and/ or renal function, with reduced doses administered to patients with severe adverse effects during prior courses of treatment. The 12 patients received a total of 54 courses of topotecan(range, 1-15 courses). Of these 12 patients, one achieved a partial response and 6 had stable disease. The median time to progression was 14.4 weeks. All 12 patients had grade 3-4 myelosuppression, while none had febrile neutropenia or severe non-hematologic toxicities. Patients who received higher doses or increased courses of chemotherapy had apparently more severe adverse events. These findings suggested that topotecan should be used as a second- or third-line treatment, rather than later, in patients with tumor recurrence, with its dose reduced according to the physical status of each patient. Such strategies may enhance both the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Prognosis of bulky pTIIB cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy comparing adenocarcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma using propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether radical hysterectomy (RAH) can effectively treat true Stage IIB (pTIIB) cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) because FIGO (clinical) Stage IIB cervical cancer is rarely treated with RAH and radiotherapy has unfavorable effects on AC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data for 82 patients with Stage pTIIB cervical cancer who underwent RAH at our institution between January 1997 and December 2017. The end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n = 60) and AC (n = 22) patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with and without propensity score matching was conducted to identify the impact of RAH. RESULTS: Para-aortic lymph node metastasis and tumor diameter were significant factors for recurrence, and adjuvant chemotherapy prevented recurrence on multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the groups. Five-year DFS and OS of the SCC group were 0.505 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.268-0.702) and 0.619 (95% CI 0.351-0.803), respectively, and those of the AC group were 0.444 (95% CI 0.232-0.638) and 0.602 (95% CI 0.351-0.782), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bulky Stage pTIIB cervical cancer is hard to cure, but RAH plus adjuvant therapy might be an option for radio-resistant pTIIB cervical AC.

A study of treatments and outcomes in elderly women with cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: With the population aging, development of safe and effective treatments for elderly patients with cancer is needed. Although old age is considered a poor prognostic factor, this is not only because of the patient's disease condition or response to treatment, but also because of treatment strategy and intensity. The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of age on treatment and prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: Women with stage Ib-IV cervical cancer treated at our institution between 1997 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by age into groups for analysis, <65 years and ≥65 years. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Subsequently, Cox proportional hazards models were developed to find independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 959 patients included in our study, 247 were ≥65 and 712 were <65 years of age. Elderly patients tended to be at a more advanced stage than younger patients (p < 0.001). Elderly patients more commonly had comorbidities. More received standard treatment in the younger patient group at any disease stage than in the elderly patient group (p < 0.001). Similar rates of adverse effects caused by surgery or radiotherapy were seen in patients from both groups. Although overall survival was statistically shorter in elderly patients (74.7 vs. 57.1%, p < 0.001), there was no significant difference in disease-specific survival for patients treated only with standard treatment. In multivariate analyses, clinical stage, histological type, treatment intensity, and primary surgery remained independent prognostic factors. Age was not an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of age on prognosis in patients with cervical cancer was less than we expected. Elderly patients might have better outcomes depending on the type of standard treatment they receive. The appropriate modality and intensity of treatment should be based on the patient's general condition and background.