Prevalence and predictors of outcomes among ESRD patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis (ESRD) patients are at high risk for contracting COVID-19. In this propensity matched cohort study, we examined the prevalence of COVID-19 in emergency room (ER) patients and examined whether clinical outcomes varied by ESRD status. METHODS: Patients who visited George Washington University Hospital ER from April 2020 to April 2021 were reviewed for COVID-19 and ESRD status. Among COVID-positive ER patients, the propensity for ESRD was calculated using a logistic regression model to create a propensity-matched sample of ESRD vs non-ESRD COVID-19 patients. A multivariable model examined whether ESRD was an independent predictor of death and other outcomes in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Among the 27,106 ER patients, 2689 of whom were COVID-positive (9.9%). The odds of testing positive for COVID-19 were 0.97 ([95% CI: 0.78-1.20], p = 0.76) in ESRD vs non-ESRD patients after adjusting for age, sex, and race. There were 2414 COVID-positive individuals with non-missing data, of which 98 were ESRD patients. In this COVID-positive sample, ESRD patients experienced a higher incidence of stroke, sepsis, and pneumonia than non-ESRD individuals. Significant independent predictors of death included age, race, sex, insurance status, and diabetes mellitus. Those with no insurance had odds of death that was 212% higher than those with private insurance (3.124 [1.695-5.759], p < 0.001). ESRD status was not an independent predictor of death (1.215 [0.623-2.370], p = 0.57). After propensity-matching in the COVID-positive patients, there were 95 ESRD patients matched with 283 non-ESRD individuals. In this sample, insurance status continued to be an independent predictor of mortality, while ESRD status was not. ESRD patients were more likely to have lactic acidosis (36% vs 15%) and length of hospital stay ≥ 7 days (48% vs 31%), but no increase in odds for any studied adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In ER patients, ESRD status was not associated with higher odds for testing positive for COVID-19. Among ER patients who were COVID positive, ESRD was not associated with mortality. However, insurance status had a strong and independent association with death among ER patients with COVID-19.

Serum and Urine Osmolality as Predictors of Adequate Diuresis in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Determination of adequacy of decongestion remains a significant challenge in the management of acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS: This is a prospective single center cohort study of patients (>18 years old) admitted for AHF on intravenous diuretics, with BNP >100 pg/mL or echocardiographic findings of reduced ejection fraction or diastolic dysfunction, and at least 1 clinical sign of volume overload. Patients with eGFR ≤45 mL/min or on dialysis, and with exposure to contrast dye or nephrotoxins were excluded. Serum and spot urine osmolality were obtained in the early morning simultaneously daily for 5 days or until discharge. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the optimal cutoffs for the osmolality values in the prediction of heart failure (HF) readmissions Results: Of the total 100 patients, 62% were male and 59% were Black American. The mean age was 64.41 ± 12.53 and 34% had preserved ejection fraction. Patients with 30-day readmission had higher serum osmolality (mOsm/kg) on admission (305 [299-310] vs. 298 [294-303]; p = 0.044) and had higher drop in serum osmolality between admission and discharge (-7.5 [-9.0, -1.25] vs. -1.0 [-4.0, 4.0]; p = 0.044). Serum osmolality on admission of >299 mOsm/kg (sensitivity: 83%, specificity: 61%) and drop in serum osmolality between admission and discharge of >2 mOsm/kg (sensitivity: 83%, specificity: 65%) was associated with 30-day HF readmissions. No patients discharged with urine osmolality more than 500 mOsm/kg had 30-day readmissions, but this was not statistically significant, p = 0.334. CONCLUSION: Measurement of serum osmolality and urine osmolality may have some utility in AHF, but interpretation should consider baseline values and dynamic changes to account for individual differences in sodium and water handling.

Rituximab Use and Hypogammaglobulinemia.

BACKGROUND Rituximab is a genetically engineered chimeric (murine-human) monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against CD20 antigen on the surface of B cells. Commonly reported adverse effects are chills and fevers, which are usually associated with the first infusion. Recent studies have shown an association between rituximab use and low immunoglobulin (Ig) level due to a reduction in plasma cell precursors, which leads to an increased risk of infections with the use of rituximab. CASE REPORT We present a case of hypogammaglobulinemia associated with rituximab use in a patient with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA). A 59-year-old woman presented with shortness of breath. After an extensive workup, she was diagnosed with GPA. She received rituximab for the induction of remission. Laboratory workup, which was done five days after she received the second rituximab dose, showed IgG and IgM levels below the level of normal. One month after her second dose of rituximab, she presented to the Medical Intensive Care Unit as a transfer from an outside facility intubated and sedated due to acute respiratory failure secondary to septic shock with E. coli bacteremia. The patient died on admission despite aggressive management, including the ACLS protocol. CONCLUSIONS Rituximab is an effective medication in the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Obtaining an immunoglobulin level at baseline and before each rituximab cycle is of great clinical importance and helps guide physicians in prescribing B cell-targeted therapy.