Multidisciplinary management of difficult-to-treat drug resistant tuberculosis: a review of cases presented to the national consilium in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Patients with drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) with comorbidities and drug toxicities are difficult to treat. Guidelines recommend such patients to be managed in consultation with a multidisciplinary team of experts (the "TB consilium") to optimise treatment regimens. We describe characteristics and treatment outcomes of DR-TB cases presented to the national DR-TB consilium in Uganda between 2013 and 2019. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a nation-wide retrospective cohort of DR-TB patients with poor prognostic indicators in Uganda. Patients had a treatment outcome documented between 2013 and 2019. Characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between cases reviewed by the consilium with those that were not reviewed. RESULTS: Of 1,122 DR-TB cases, 189 (16.8%) cases from 16 treatment sites were reviewed by the consilium, of whom 86 (45.5%) were reviewed more than once. The most frequent inquiries (N = 308) from DR-TB treatment sites were construction of a treatment regimen (38.6%) and management of side effects (24.0%) while the most frequent consilium recommendations (N = 408) were a DR-TB regimen (21.7%) and "observation while on current regimen" (16.6%). Among the cases reviewed, 152 (80.4%) were from facilities other than the national referral hospital, 113 (61.1%) were aged ≥ 35 years, 72 (40.9%) were unemployed, and 26 (31.0%) had defaulted antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, 141 (90.4%) had hepatic injury, 55 (91.7%) had bilateral hearing loss, 20 (4.8%) had psychiatric symptoms and 14 (17.7%) had abnormal baseline systolic blood pressure. Resistance to second-line drugs (SLDs) was observed among 9 (4.8%) cases while 13 (6.9%) cases had previous exposure to SLDs. Bedaquiline (13.2%, n = 25), clofazimine (28.6%, n = 54), high-dose isoniazid (22.8%, n = 43) and linezolid (6.7%, n = 13) were more frequently prescribed among cases reviewed by the consilium than those not reviewed. Treatment success was observed among 126 (66.7%) cases reviewed. CONCLUSION: Cases reviewed by the consilium had several comorbidities, drug toxicities and a low treatment success rate. Consilia are important "gatekeepers" for new and repurposed drugs. There is need to build capacity of lower health facilities to construct DR-TB regimens and manage adverse effects.

Prevalence of Intestinal Helminth Coinfection in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Uganda.

Background: Although a third of people with tuberculosis (TB) are estimated to be coinfected with helminths, the prevalence is largely unknown among people with drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We determined the prevalence of helminth coinfection among people with DR-TB in Uganda. Methods: In a multicenter, cross-sectional study, eligible Ugandan adults with confirmed DR-TB were consecutively enrolled between July to December 2021 at 4 treatment centers. Sociodemographic data were collected using a questionnaire. Participants underwent anthropometric and blood pressure measurements, and blood samples were evaluated for random blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, nonfasting lipid profile, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and a complete blood count. Fresh stool samples were evaluated for adult worms, eggs, and larvae using direct microscopy after Kato-Katz concentration techniques. Results: Of 212 participants, 156 (73.6%) were male, 118 (55.7%) had HIV, and 3 (2.8%) had malaria coinfection. The prevalence of intestinal helminth coinfection was 4.7% (10/212) (95% confidence interval, 2.6%-8.6%). The frequency of helminth infections was Ancylostoma duodenale (n = 4), Schistosoma mansoni (n = 2), Enterobius vermicularis (n = 2), Ascaris lumbricoides (n = 1), and Trichuris trichiura (n = 1). Conclusions: The prevalence of helminth coinfection was low among people with DR-TB. More studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of helminth/DR-TB coinfection.

Treatment outcomes of drug resistant tuberculosis patients with multiple poor prognostic indicators in Uganda: A countrywide 5-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Comorbid conditions and adverse drug events are associated with poor treatment outcomes among patients with drug resistant tuberculosis (DR - TB). This study aimed at determining the treatment outcomes of DR - TB patients with poor prognostic indicators in Uganda. METHODS: We reviewed treatment records of DR - TB patients from 16 treatment sites in Uganda. Eligible patients had confirmed DR - TB, a treatment outcome in 2014-2019 and at least one of 15 pre-defined poor prognostic indicators at treatment initiation or during therapy. The pre-defined poor prognostic indicators were HIV co-infection, diabetes, heart failure, malignancy, psychiatric illness/symptoms, severe anaemia, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, low body mass index, elevated creatinine, hepatic dysfunction, hearing loss, resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or second-line aminoglycosides, previous exposure to second-line drugs (SLDs), and pregnancy. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes were treatment success, mortality, loss to follow up, and treatment failure as defined by the World Health Organisation. We used logistic and cox proportional hazards regression analysis to determine predictors of treatment success and mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Of 1122 DR - TB patients, 709 (63.2%) were male and the median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 36.0 (28.0-45.0) years. A total of 925 (82.4%) had ≥2 poor prognostic indicators. Treatment success and mortality occurred among 806 (71.8%) and 207 (18.4%) patients whereas treatment loss-to-follow-up and failure were observed among 96 (8.6%) and 13 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Mild (OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.84, p = 0.004), moderate (OR: 0.18, 95% CI 0.12-0.26, p < 0.001) and severe anaemia (OR: 0.09, 95% CI 0.05-0.17, p < 0.001) and previous exposure to SLDs (OR: 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.48, p < 0.001) predicted lower odds of treatment success while the number of poor prognostic indicators (HR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.30-2.01, p < 0.001), for every additional poor prognostic indicator) predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: Among DR - TB patients with multiple poor prognostic indicators, mortality was the most frequent unsuccessful outcomes. Every additional poor prognostic indicator increased the risk of mortality while anaemia and previous exposure to SLDs were associated with lower odds of treatment success. The management of anaemia among DR - TB patients needs to be evaluated by prospective studies. DR - TB programs should also optimise DR - TB treatment the first time it is initiated.