Esophagectomy Complications Impact Long-term Survival: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of prolonged length of stay (LOS) after esophagectomy on long term survival. BACKGROUND: Complications after esophagectomy have a significant impact in short-term survival. The specific effect of prolonged LOS after esophagectomy is unclear. We hypothesized that postoperative complications that occur after esophagectomy, resulting in prolonged LOS, have a detrimental effect on long term survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing esophagectomy between 2004 and 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database. To eliminate the confounding effect of short-term mortality, we included only patients who survived at least 90 days postoperatively. Demographics, disease characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Postoperative LOS was used as a surrogate for postoperative complications. The highest quintile of LOS was defined as excessive LOS (ELOS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analyses were performed to examine survival. RESULTS: A total of 20,719 patients were identified. Of those 3826 had ELOS, with median LOS 26days (range 18-168days). Their median survival was 30.6 months compared to 53.6 months in the entire non-ELOS group (P < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis ELOS (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.67) was an independent predictor of overall mortality. Higher disease stage, higher age, male sex, higher Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score, and readmission after discharge were also significant negative predictors of long-term survival, whereas surgery in an academic institution, being at the highest income quartile and having private or Medicare insurance predicted longer survival (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Postoperative complications after esophagectomy, resulting in ELOS, predict lower long-term survival independent of other factors. Counseling patients about surgery should include the detrimental long-term effects of postoperative complications and ELOS. Avoiding ELOS (LOS exceeding 18 days) could be considered a quality metric after esophagectomy.

The presence of a dedicated cardiac surgical intensive care service impacts clinical outcomes in adult cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative critical care management is an integral part of cardiac surgery that contributes directly to clinical outcomes. In the United States there remains considerable variability in the critical care infrastructure for cardiac surgical programs. There is little published data investigating the impact of a dedicated cardiac surgical intensive care service. METHODS: A retrospective study examining postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgical patients before and after the implementation of a dedicated cardiac surgical intensive care service at a single academic institution. An institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database was queried for study variables. Primary endpoints were the postoperative length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and mechanical ventilation time. Secondary endpoints included mortality, readmission rates, and postoperative complications. The effect on outcomes based on procedure type was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1703 patients were included in this study-914 in the control group (before dedicated intensive care service) and 789 in the study group (after dedicated intensive care service). Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Length of stay, mechanical ventilation hours, and renal failure rate were significantly reduced in the study group. Coronary artery bypass grafting patients observed the greatest improvement in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated cardiac surgical intensive care service leads to significant improvements in clinical outcomes. The greatest benefit is seen in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass, the most common cardiac surgical operation in the United States. Thus, developing a cardiac surgical intensive care service may be a worthwhile initiative for any cardiac surgical program.

Impact of troponin I level on coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes.

PURPOSE: The effect of preoperative cardiac troponin level on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear. We investigated the impact of preoperative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) level as well as the time interval between maximum cTnI and surgery on CABG outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent isolated CABG at our institution between 2009 and 2016 and had preoperative cTnI level available were identified using our Society of Thoracic Surgeons registry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify a cTnI threshold level. Subjects were divided into groups based on this value and outcomes compared. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients were included. ROC analysis identified 5.74 µg/dL as the threshold value associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Patients with peak cTnI >5.74 µg/dL underwent CABG approximately 1 day later, had twice the risk of adverse postoperative events, and had 2.8 day longer postoperative length of stay than those with peak cTnI ≤5.74 µg/dL. cTnI level was not associated with mortality or 30-day readmission. Time interval between peak cTnI and surgery did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSION: Elevated preoperative cTnI level beyond a certain threshold value is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes but is not a marker for increased mortality. Time from peak cTnI does not affect postoperative outcomes or mortality and may not need to be considered when deciding timing of CABG.

Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons as a Framework to Evaluate Cardiopulmonary Bypass Management Skills of Resident Trainees.

BACKGROUND: Nontechnical skills are critical in cardiac surgery but currently there is no formal paradigm to teach these in residency training. We investigated the use of the Nontechnical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) system as a framework to assess and teach nontechnical skills related to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management. METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of Integrated and Independent pathway thoracic surgery residents who participated in dedicated nontechnical skills evaluation and training. Two CPB management simulation scenarios were utilized. All residents received a lecture on CPB fundamentals and then individually participated in the first simulation ("Pre-NOTSS"). Immediately following this, nontechnical skills were rated by self-assessment and by a NOTSS trainer. All residents then underwent group NOTSS training followed by the second individual simulation ("Post-NOTSS"). Nontechnical skills were rated as before. NOTSS categories assessed included Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Communication and Teamwork, and Leadership. RESULTS: Nine residents were divided into 2 groups: Junior (n = 4, PGY1-4) and Senior (n = 5, PGY5-8). Pre-NOTSS resident self-ratings were higher for Senior than Junior in the categories of Decision Making, Communication and Teamwork, and Leadership while trainer ratings were similar between the groups. Post-NOTSS, resident self-ratings were higher for Senior than Junior in Situation Awareness and Decision Making while trainer scores were higher for both groups in Communication and Teamwork and Leadership. CONCLUSIONS: The NOTSS framework in conjunction with simulation scenarios provides a practical framework to evaluate and teach nontechnical skills related to CPB management. NOTSS training can lead to improvements in both subjective and objective ratings of nontechnical skills for all PGY levels.

The impact of social determinants of health on management of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) can be important contributors in health care outcomes. We hypothesized that certain SDOH independently impact the management and outcomes of stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). STUDY DESIGN: Patients with clinical stage I NSCLC were identified from the National Cancer Database. The impact of SDOH factors on utilization of surgery, perioperative outcomes and overall survival were examined, both in bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 236,140 patients were identified. In multivariate analysis, SDOH marginalization were associated with less frequent use of surgery, lower 5-year survival and, in surgical patients, more frequent use of open surgery and lower 90-day postoperative survival. CONCLUSION: SDOH disparities have a significant impact in the management and outcomes of stage I NSCLC. We identified SDOH patient groups particularly impacted by such disparities, in which higher utilization of surgery and minimally invasive approaches may lead to improved outcomes.

Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery protocol reduces perioperative opioid use.

Objective: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols are relatively new in cardiac surgery. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery addresses perioperative analgesia by implementing multimodal pain control regimens that include both opioid and nonopioid components. We investigated the effects of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol at our institution on postoperative outcomes with particular focus on analgesia. Methods: Single-center retrospective study comparing perioperative opioid use before and after implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol at our institution. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (study group from year 2020) and pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (control group from year 2018). Baseline and perioperative variables including total opioid use from the day of surgery to postoperative day 5 were collected. Opioid use was calculated as morphine milligram equivalents and compared between the 2 cohorts. Results: A total of 466 patients were included: 250 in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group and 216 in the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, but the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group had significantly more subjects with intravenous drug use history (P < .0001), endocarditis (P < .0001), and liver disease (P = .007) compared with the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group. Every day from the day of surgery to postoperative day 5, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group had significant reduction (57%) in opioid use compared with the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group. Total opioid use for the entire length of stay was 259 morphine milligram equivalents in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group versus 452 morphine milligram equivalents in the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group (P < .0001). Subgroup analysis of subjects with intravenous drug use history did not demonstrate a significant reduction in opioid use. Conclusions: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols with an emphasis on multimodal pain management throughout perioperative care are associated with a significant reduction in the postoperative use of opioid analgesics.

Fifteen-year experience with pericardiectomy at a tertiary referral center.

PURPOSE: Pericardiectomy has traditionally carried relatively high perioperative mortality and morbidity, with few published reports of intermediate- and long- term outcomes. We investigated our 15-year experience performing pericardiectomy at our institution. METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients who underwent pericardiectomy at our institution between 2005 and 2019. Baseline demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes including long-term survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included in the study. 66.7% of subjects underwent isolated pericardiectomy while 33.3% underwent pericardiectomy concomitantly with another cardiac surgical procedure. The most common indications for pericardiectomy were constrictive (79.4%) and hemorrhagic (9.5%) pericarditis. Preoperatively, 76.2% of patients were New York Heart Association class II and III, while postoperatively, 71.4% were class I and II. One-, three-, five-, and ten- year overall mortality was 9.5, 14.3, 20.6, and 25.4%, respectively. Overall pericarditis recurrence rate was 4.8%. CONCLUSION: Pericardiectomy carries relatively high overall mortality rates, which likely reflects underlying disease etiology and comorbidities. Patients with prior cardiac intervention, history of dialysis, and immunocompromised state are associated with worse outcomes.

Impact of time between diagnosis to treatment in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

There is a paucity of data describing the effect of time interval between diagnosis and surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. We describe our 8-year experience and investigate the impact of time interval between symptom onset, diagnosis and surgery on outcomes. Retrospective single-center study utilizing our Society of Thoracic Surgeons registry and patient records. Subjects were grouped by time interval between radiographic diagnosis and surgical treatment: Group A (0-4 h), Group B (4.1-8 h), Group C (8.1-12 h), and Group D (12.1 + h). Data were analyzed to identify factors associated with mortality and outcomes. 164 patients were included. Overall mortality was 21.3%. Group C had the greatest intervals between symptom onset to diagnosis to surgery, and also the highest mortality (66.7%). Preoperative tamponade, cardiac arrest, malperfusion, elevated creatinine, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and blood transfusions were associated with increased mortality, while distance of referring hospital was not. Time intervals between symptom onset, diagnosis and surgery have a significant effect on mortality. Surgery performed 8-12 h after diagnosis carries the highest mortality, which may be exacerbated by longer interval since symptom onset. Time-dependent effects should be considered when determining optimal strategy especially if inter-facility transfer is necessary.

Preoperative stroke before cardiac surgery does not increase risk of postoperative stroke.

The optimal time when surgery can be safely performed after stroke is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate how cardiac surgery timing after stroke impacts postoperative outcomes between 2011-2017 were reviewed. Variables were extracted from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, statewide patient registry, and medical records. Subjects were classified based upon presence of endocarditis and further grouped by timing of preoperative stroke relative to cardiac surgery: Recent (stroke within two weeks before surgery), Intermediate (between two and six weeks before), and Remote (greater than six weeks before). Postoperative outcomes were compared amongst groups. 157 patients were included: 54 in endocarditis and 103 in non-endocarditis, with 47 in Recent, 26 in Intermediate, and 84 in Remote. 30-day mortality and postoperative stroke rate were similar across the three subgroups for both endocarditis and non-endocarditis. Of patients with postoperative stroke, mortality was 30% (95% CI 4.6-66). Timing of cardiac surgery after stroke occurrence does not seem to affect postoperative stroke or mortality. If postoperative stroke does occur, subsequent stroke-related mortality is high.

Outcomes of Surgical Coronary Revascularization Performed Before Solid Abdominal Organ Transplants.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac risk stratification and coronary angiography are routinely performed as part of kidney and liver transplant candidacy evaluation. There are limited data on the outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization in this patient population. This study investigated outcomes in patients with end- stage renal or hepatic disease who were undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to attain kidney or liver transplant candidacy. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent isolated CABG at our institution, Indiana University School of Medicine (Indianapolis, IN), between 2010 and 2016. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: pretransplant (those undergoing surgery to attain renal or hepatic transplant candidacy) and nontransplant (all others). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 1801 patients were included: 28 in the pretransplant group (n = 22, kidney; n = 7, liver) and 1773 in the nontransplant group. Major adverse postoperative outcomes were significantly greater in the pretransplant group compared with the nontransplant group: 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 2.8%; P = .009), neurologic events (17.9% vs 4.8%; P = .011), reintubation (21.4% vs 5.8%; P = .005), and total postoperative ventilation (5.2 hours vs 5.0 hours; P = .0124). The 1- and 5-year mortality in the pretransplant group was 17.9% and 53.6%, respectively. Of the pretransplant cohort, 3 patients (10.7%) underwent organ transplantation (all kidney) at a mean 436 days after CABG. No patients underwent liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after CABG in pre-kidney transplant and pre-liver transplant patients are poor. Despite surgical revascularization, most patients do not ultimately undergo organ transplantation. Revascularization strategies and optimal management in this high-risk population warrant further study.

Eleven-Year Experience Treating Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury at a Tertiary Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: Blunt thoracic aortic injury treatment has evolved over the past decade particularly with respect to endovascular intervention options. We investigated the trends in blunt thoracic aortic injury management and outcomes over an 11-year span at the sole tertiary referral center in our state. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who presented to our institution with blunt traumatic aortic injury between 2007 and 2017. Baseline demographics including aortic injury grade, injury severity score, and abbreviated injury scale were collected. Outcomes were compared by type and timing of treatment, which included either nonoperative management, endovascular repair, or open surgical repair. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to examine treatment group differences and factors associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients were reviewed. The distribution of injury severity was grade 1 (30%), grade 2 (8%), grade 3 (30%), and grade 4 (31%). Overall, 27% of patients underwent endovascular repair, 29% open surgery, and 44% definitive nonoperative management. Over the study period, there was a dramatic decline in open surgery and a corresponding rise in endovascular treatment. Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 22%. Mortality by treatment subgroup was 30% for nonoperative management, 8.2% for endovascular treatment, and 21% for open surgery. Delaying endovascular or open surgical treatment by at least 24 hours after admission was associated with significantly improved 30-day survival. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural intervention, whether endovascular or surgical, is associated with improved mortality compared with nonoperative treatment. Delayed intervention, particularly in the case of high-grade injuries, may allow for initial patient stabilization and improved outcomes.