RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mehta cast utilization has gained a considerable momentum as a nonoperative treatment modality for the initial management of infantile idiopathic scoliosis (IIS). Despite its acceptance, there is paucity of data that characterize the radiographic parameters associated with Mehta casting and the factors correlated with a sustained curve correction. METHODS: A retrospective review of IIS patients who underwent Mehta casting was performed with a mean 2-year follow-up. X-rays were evaluated at each visit for the Cobb angle, focal deformity, rib-vertebral angle difference, and height of concavity and convexity of the apical 3 vertebrae. Concave-to-convex height ratios were calculated and tracked for each patient. Radiographic parameters were compared from precasting to after final casting, and from final casting to most recent follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were identified, of whom 18 (40%) were male and 27 (60%) were female, with a mean age of 18.8±9.5 months at first casting and a mean follow-up of 37.7±19.7 months. Following final casting, the mean Cobb angle (25.6 vs. 52.7 degrees), focal deformity (17.4 vs. 30.5 degrees), rib-vertebral angle difference (18 vs. 32.3 degrees), and the concave-to-convex height ratios improved relative to precast parameters, respectively (P<0.001). At final follow-up, mean Cobb angle (16.2 vs. 25.6 degrees) and concave-to-convex height ratios progressively improved when compared with final cast measurements, respectively (P<0.001). Five (11%) patients did not demonstrate sustained curve correction at final follow-up, whereas 4 (9%) required growing-rod placement. Lastly, the regression analysis demonstrated improvements in the focal deformity (17.4 vs. 30.5) and the concave-to-convex height ratios of the +1 and -1 apical vertebrae from the precast to last cast periods (P<0.001). These findings were correlated with sustained Cobb angle correction from cast removal to the most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic parameters associated with control of progressive deformity for IIS include improvements in focal deformity and concave-to-convex height ratios for +1 and -1 apical vertebrae after final casting. Mehta casting is an effective treatment for symptomatic IIS and continues to provide IIS patients with significant curve correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Assuntos
Escoliose/terapia , Contenções/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Costelas/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/fisiopatologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Sublaminar band fixation is a reliable way to anchor spinal rods to the vertebral column. This technique is especially useful when the anatomy precludes safe pedicle screw placement. Sublaminar bands allow for deformity correction and stabilization of the spine. One of the disadvantages of using the sublaminar band technique is the risk for neurologic injury during the passage of the band between the dura and lamina. In this article, we describe a new technique for passing sublaminar bands, i.e., the double sublaminar band passage technique. This technique decreases the number of passes against the dura, thereby decreasing the opportunity for neural injury. In addition, we present an illustrative case of an 11-year-old female with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal instrumented fusion with a hybrid screw and sublaminar band construct.
RESUMO
Background. While biomechanical characteristics of locking screw fixation versus traditional plating has been studied extensively in orthopaedic literature, clinical outcome studies are lacking. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications rate of locking versus traditional nonlocking screws in complex ankle fractures employing distal fibula internal fixation with 1/3 semitubular small fragment plates. Methods. A retrospective review was performed between January 2010 and June 2013 of all patients in whom internal fixation of the fibula in an ankle fracture (open or closed) was performed using only 1/3 semitubular small fragment fibular plates. Patient characteristics, fracture patterns, specific screw choice that were placed in the most distal 2 fibular plate holes (either locking or nonlocking), infectious wound complications, and concomitant syndesmotic injury and the need and corresponding purpose for hardware removal were recorded. Results. A total of 135 patients were found to meet inclusion criteria and were analyzed for this study. Of the patients with locking screws, 25 of 98 (25%) elected to have hardware removed, while 13 of 37 (35%) of those with nonlocking screws elected hardware removal. This did not reach statistical significance (P = .30). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regards to age, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, or use of syndesmotic screw fixation. There was no significant difference in loss of fixation, infection, or other surgical complications in between the groups. Conclusions. There was no significant decrease in the rate of hardware removal with the use of 1/3 tubular locking versus nonlocking plates in the treatment of distal fibula fractures. Despite these screws locking flush to the plate, the hardware is equally symptomatic in both groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the 2 groups and our data suggest that the added expense of using locking screws routinely when fixing lateral malleolar fractures should be carefully considered, especially if the fracture pattern does not warrant locking technology. Levels of Evidence: Prognostic, Level III.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fíbula/lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As the United States transitions to value-based insurance, bundled payments, and capitated models, it is paramount to understand health-care costs and resource utilization. The financial implications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar locking plate for management of unstable distal radial fractures have not been established. We aimed to elucidate cost differences between ORIF and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). Our hypothesis was that ORIF has greater direct perioperative costs than CRPP but that the costs equilibrate over time. METHODS: We reviewed financial data for 40 patients prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo CRPP or ORIF for treatment of a closed, displaced, unstable distal radial fracture. Clinical and functional outcomes, hospital-associated direct perioperative costs, postoperative care and therapy costs, and costs for additional procedures were compared. Cost data were stratified into perioperative, 90-day, and 1-year periods, and were reported utilizing cost ratios (CRs) relative to the CRPP cohort. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square and independent-samples t tests with an alpha level of <0.05. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent CRPP and 23 underwent ORIF with a volar plate. Patients who underwent ORIF incurred greater 90-day (CR = 2.03/1.0, p < 0.001) and 1-year (CR = 1.60/1.0, p < 0.001) direct costs than those who underwent CRPP. The differential was greatest in the immediate perioperative period and gradually decreased over time. Operating room fees (CR = 1.7/1.0, p < 0.001), operating room implants, anesthesia (CR = 1.8/1.0, p < 0.001), and total perioperative costs (CR = 2.7/1.0, p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the ORIF cohort. Rehabilitation and cast technician costs were comparable (CR = 0.9/1.0 [ORIF/CRPP], p = 0.69). At 1 year, the CR for all costs of decreased to 1.6/1.0 (ORIF/CRPP, p < 0.001). Compared with the CRPP cohort, the ORIF cohort demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes at 6, 9, and 12 weeks and similar outcomes at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF for a displaced, unstable distal radial fracture incurred greater direct costs than CRPP. Although implant costs for ORIF provided the greatest cost differential, additional procedures and higher clinic costs in the CRPP cohort narrowed the 90-day and 1-year cost gaps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo , Fixação de Fratura/economia , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Pinos Ortopédicos , Placas Ósseas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scoring System (AOFAS-AH) has not been validated and has significant risk for researcher bias, given that 40 out of 100 points are assessed by study staff subjectively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its recent use in the orthopaedic literature to determine the percentage of previously published studies for which study conclusions would be changed if the AOFAS-AH scores were artificially altered, representing the effect of a systematic researcher bias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles from January 2012 and February 2015 in three orthopaedic journals were queried for use of the AOFAS-AH. Quantities of 4, 8, or 12 points were added to or subtracted from mean AOFAS-AH scores for each study while otherwise maintaining the reported standard deviation to simulate a researcher bias when scoring the subjective sections. Statistical analysis was performed with the adjusted AOFAS-AH mean scores in order to elucidate a potential "reversal" in statistical significance and conclusion. RESULTS: A 1582 original research articles were published during this time period. 128 articles utilized the AOFAS-AH score. 30 articles (23.4%) reported the required statistical data to permit manipulation of AOFAS-AH scores. Nine of the 30 articles (30%) had a reversal following a manipulation of 12 or fewer points. Seven (5.5%) reported the blinding status of the researchers. CONCLUSION: The potential for bias is high with the AOFAS-AH and its continued is questionable. Researchers utilizing the AOFAS-AH should at a minimum appropriately blind study staff and consider pre-study clarification of subjective terminology. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Assuntos
Articulação do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Doenças do Pé/diagnóstico , Ortopedia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sociedades Médicas , Adulto , Viés , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The published literature has not characterized the surgeon's learning curve with the technically demanding technique of a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). PURPOSE: To characterize based on intra- and perioperative parameters, the learning curve for one spine surgeon during his initial phases of performing an MIS TLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of a single institution and single surgeon experience with the unilateral MIS TLIF technique between July 2008 and April 2011. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty-five consecutive patients, with at least 1 year of follow-up, who underwent a unilateral, single-level, index MIS TLIF for the diagnosis of degenerative disk disease or lumbar spinal stenosis with grade I or II spondylolisthesis were analyzed based on data obtained from the medical records and postoperative imaging (computed tomography). OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative radiographic assessment of fusion at 1 year via computed tomography. Surgical parameters of surgical time (skin-skin, minutes), anesthesia time (induction-extubation, minutes), estimated blood loss (mL), intravenous fluids during surgery (mL), intraoperative complications (durotomy), and postoperative complications (pseudarthrosis, implant failure, malpositioned implants, graft-related complications) were also assessed. METHODS: The senior author's first 100 consecutive MIS TLIFs were evaluated initially. Patients undergoing revision or multilevel surgery were excluded leaving a total of 65 consecutive primary MIS TLIFs. The first 33 patients were compared with the second 32 patients in terms of radiographic arthrodesis rates, surgical parameters, and intra-/postoperative complications. A two-tailed Student t test was used to assess for differences between the two cohorts where a p value of less than or equal to .05 denoting statistical significance. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine any association between the date of surgery and surgical time. RESULTS: Average surgical time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative fluids, and duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in the first cohort (p<.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications (two durotomies in both groups) or length of stay. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications at final follow-up based on computed tomography analysis (11 vs. 9, p=.649). In the first cohort, these complications included two cases of radiographic pseudarthrosis: one case of graft migration and one case of medial pedicle wall violation necessitating two revision surgeries. There were two cases of pseudarthrosis and one case of an early surgical site infection identified in the second group requiring three revision surgeries. Last, four cases of neuroforaminal bone growth were demonstrated, two in each cohort. Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a negative correlation between the date of surgery and surgical time (r=-0.44; p<.001) estimated blood loss (r=-0.49; p<.001), duration of anesthesia (r=-0.41; p=.001), and intravenous fluids (r=-0.42; p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MIS TLIF is a technically difficult procedure to the practicing spine surgeon with regard to intra- and perioperative parameters of surgical time, estimated blood loss, intravenous fluid, and duration of anesthesia. Operative time and proficiency improved with understanding the minimally invasive technique. Further studies are warranted to delineate the methods to minimize the complications associated with the learning curve.
Assuntos
Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Curva de Aprendizado , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Região Lombossacral/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Ortopedia , Pseudoartrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: A nationwide population-based database was analyzed to assess the utilization trends of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in spine fusion surgery from 2002-2011. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The utilization of off-label BMP in spine procedures is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to analyze a population-based database to characterize the national trends of BMP utilization in terms of incidence, demographics, costs, and mortality. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was queried for each year from 2002-2011. Patients undergoing an anterior cervical fusion or posterior cervical fusion, anterior lumbar fusion or posterior lumbar fusion, or a posterior thoracic fusion were identified and separated into cohorts. The frequency of BMP utilization was assessed in each surgical cohort by year. Patient demographics, hospital parameters, costs, and mortality rates were assessed. RESULTS: The adjusted annual number of procedures with BMP increased from 1116 in 2002 to 79,294 in 2011 (P < 0.001), representing 26.9% of all spinal fusion procedures. The rate of BMP utilization within each surgical cohort also significantly increased during the 10-year period (P < 0.001). The posterior lumbar fusion cohort accounted for the majority of spinal fusions that used BMP, representing 76.8% of all spinal fusions between 2002 and 2011. The anterior lumbar fusion cohort was associated with the highest proportion of BMP utilization, peaking at 56.9% of all anterior lumbar interbody fusions in 2006. The trend of BMP utilization in the anterior cervical fusion cohort peaked in 2007 with 10.6% of cases and then declined to 6.4% in 2011. There was a statistically significant trend of older patients with increasing comorbidities receiving BMP during this period. Hospital costs (adjusted for inflation) significantly increased an average of $9560 from 2002-2010. There were no significant trends with regard to the length of hospitalization stay and mortality rates during this period. CONCLUSION: This nonconflicted study demonstrates that the utilization of BMP has dramatically increased from 2002-2011. Interestingly, off-label application of BMP accounts for the vast majority of BMP utilization. The increase in the total hospital costs is likely multifactorial; older patients with more comorbidities undergoing surgery as well as the increasing utilization of BMP are all likely contributory factors. The length of hospitalization stay and mortality rates did not increase during the 10-year period.
Assuntos
Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/uso terapêutico , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/economia , Comorbidade , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/mortalidade , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate national trends of cervical spine surgical procedures from 2002 to 2011. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a paucity of literature assessing the current practice trends and outcomes of cervical spine surgery following the 2008 Food and Drug Administration public health notifications regarding bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) utilization in cervical spine surgical procedures. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was accessed for each year across 2002 to 2011. Patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion, posterior cervical fusion, and posterior cervical decompression were identified. Patient and hospitalization parameters including demographics, BMP utilization, costs, early postoperative outcomes, and mortality were assessed for each surgical cohort. A Pearson correlation coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05) was used to analyze trends in patient and hospital outcome parameters during this 10-year period. RESULTS: A total of 307,188 cervical spine procedures were performed from 2002 to 2011. Both the anterior cervical fusion and posterior cervical fusion cohort demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of procedures performed over time (r = +0.9, P < 0.001). A significant uptrend in patient age (r = +1.0, P < 0.001) and comorbidity burden (r = +0.9, P < 0.001) was demonstrated during the studied decade. Overall, BMP utilization (r = +0.7, P = 0.02) also demonstrated a significant increase during this time period, but demonstrated a decline after peaking in 2007. The posterior cervical fusion cohort demonstrated the greatest comorbidity, length of stay, costs, and mortality. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the number of cervical spine procedures has increased between 2002 and 2011, irrespective of the change in BMP utilization after the 2008 Food and Drug Administration warning. Despite an older patient population with greater comorbidities undergoing cervical spine surgeries, hospital length of stay and mortality has not significantly changed. However, we did note a significant increase in costs during this time period. These findings may be related to advances in surgical technology and instrumentation that may be associated with rising hospital costs.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Custos e Análise de Custo , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/mortalidade , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) after lumbar spinal fusion, a population-based database was analyzed to identify the incidence, potential risk factors, hospital resource utilization, and the early postoperative outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A lumbar fusion (LF) is an effective surgical procedure to treat lumbar degenerative pathology. Although rare, a CVA can be a catastrophic event after an LF. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2002-2011. Patients undergoing an elective anterior lumbar fusion, a posterior lumbar fusion, or a combined anterior-posterior lumbar fusion were separated into subcohorts. Patients with a documented postoperative CVA were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), length of stay, costs, early postoperative outcomes, and mortality were assessed. Statistical analysis involved T tests, χ2 analysis, and binary logistic regression with P < 0.001 denoting significance. RESULTS: A total of 264,891 LFs were identified between 2002 and 2011 of which 340 (1.3 per 1000) developed a postoperative CVA. Patients with a CVA were significantly older and demonstrated a greater comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index). Patients with a CVA incurred a significantly greater length of stay, total hospital costs ($41,454 vs. $25,885), and a greater mortality rate (73.7 vs. 0.8 per 1000 patients). Regression analysis demonstrated that age more than 65 years and a history of neurological disorders, paralysis, congestive heart failure, or electrolyte imbalance were associated with an increased risk of a postoperative CVA. CONCLUSION: Patients who developed a postoperative CVA demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of postoperative complications, mortality, and total hospital costs. This study highlights important associated risk factors (e.g., age more than 65, neurological disorders, congestive heart failure) that may enable surgeons to identify high-risk patients prior to surgery. Further studies are warranted to characterize these risk factors and to establish guidelines to mitigate the complications associated with a postoperative CVA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective national database analysis. OBJECTIVE: A national population-based database was analyzed to characterize the "July effect" on the perioperative outcomes of anterior cervical fusions (ACFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Perception biases exist regarding the outcomes of cervical spine surgery based upon the month of admission. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2009-2011. Patients who underwent an ACF in teaching and nonteaching hospitals were identified and separated into cohorts. Patients who were admitted in July were then compared with non-July admissions in both cohorts. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay, costs, postoperative complications, and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 52,499 ACF cases were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of which 26,831 (51.2%) were performed in teaching hospitals and 25,668 (48.8) in nonteaching institutions. July admissions represented 6.8% and 7.4% of cases in the teaching and nonteaching hospital cohorts, respectively. Among July admissions, the teaching cohort incurred a longer hospitalization than the nonteaching cohort (P < 0.05). In contrast, no significant differences in mortality or total hospital costs were demonstrated. In teaching institutions, the in-hospital complications associated with July patients included deep vein thrombosis and surgical site infection (P < 0.05), but this did not reach significance in nonteaching hospitals. Postoperative dysphagia and deep vein thromboses were also significantly more prevalent among July admissions in teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching institutions. CONCLUSION: This national study demonstrated that the early resident academic year was associated with a greater length of stay among July patients in teaching hospitals. This study did not demonstrate an increase in mortality or total hospital costs among July patients in either hospital cohort. In teaching hospitals, ACF-treated patients in July were associated with a greater incidence of postoperative thromboses and surgical site infection. In addition, the incidence of dysphagia was significantly greater among July patients in teaching hospitals than nonteaching hospitals.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estações do Ano , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative patient characteristics, hospital resource utilization, and early postoperative outcomes in patients requiring reintubation after anterior cervical fusion (ACF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Airway compromise is a potential complication after anterior cervical surgery. Postsurgical soft-tissue edema or hematoma formation may be so severe that an unplanned reintubation may be required. The rate of reintubation after ACF and the effect on hospital outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2002-2011. Patients undergoing elective ACF procedures for degenerative diagnoses were selected. Those who required an unplanned reintubation after ACF were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay, costs, number of levels fused, and mortality were analyzed. SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analysis and a P < 0.001 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 262,425 patients underwent an elective ACF between 2002 and 2011 of which 1464 patients (5.6 per 1000 cases) required reintubation during their admission. The rate of reintubation was statistically greater for 3+-level fusions than the 1- to 2-level fusion cases. On average, patients requiring reintubation were older and had a greater number of comorbidities. These patients also incurred a significantly greater hospital stay and total hospital costs than unaffected patients. In addition, significant predictors for reintubation included 3+-level fusions, congestive heart failure, anemia, postoperative aspiration pneumonia, hematoma, thromboembolic events, and dysphagia. CONCLUSION: The reintubation rate after an elective ACF is 0.5%, and it increases to 1.6% after 3+-level fusions. Older patients with greater comorbidities are at an increased risk for reintubation. Given the greater LOS, costs and mortality associated with reintubation, it is imperative to identify patients at increased risk to help improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital resource utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Intubação Intratraqueal/mortalidade , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Intubação Intratraqueal/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative patient characteristics, early postoperative outcomes, and costs between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical total disc replacement (TDR) in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical TDR and ACDF are indicated to treat symptomatic cervical degenerative pathology. The epidemiology, complication rates, and the cost differences between the 2 surgical approaches are not well characterized. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was queried from 2002 to 2009. Patients undergoing cervical TDR or ACDF of 1 to 2 levels were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay, costs, and the in-hospital complications were assessed. SPSS (version 20) was used for statistical analysis with χ test for categorical data and independent-samples t test for continuous data. A value of P ≤ 0.001 denoted statistical significance. Multinomial regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk for complications in the TDR cohort compared with the ACDF cohort. RESULTS: There were 141,230 ACDF cases of 1 to 2 levels and 1830 cervical TDR cases identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. The ACDF cohort was older and demonstrated a greater comorbidity burden than the TDR group (P < 0.001). The ACDF-treated patients demonstrated a significantly greater length of stay than the TDR group (P < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications, mortality, or hospital costs between the surgical cohorts. Multinomial regression did not demonstrate significant differences in the risk for postoperative complications between the surgical techniques. CONCLUSION: The ACDF cohort was significantly older and demonstrated a greater comorbidity burden that likely contributed to the greater length of stay when than the TDR cohort. Both cohorts demonstrated comparable incidences of early postoperative complications and costs. There were no significant differences in the risks for postoperative complications between the surgical cohorts. Further studies are warranted to characterize the long-term complications, costs, and patient outcomes between the 2 surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Discotomia/métodos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Substituição Total de Disco/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Discotomia/efeitos adversos , Discotomia/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Substituição Total de Disco/efeitos adversos , Substituição Total de Disco/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemostatic benefits of using a kaolin-impregnated dressing during pediatric spinal deformity correction surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimizing blood loss and transfusions are clear benefits for patient safety. A technique common in both severe trauma and combat medicine that has not been reported in the spine literature is wound packing with a kaolin-impregnated hemostatic dressing. METHODS: Estimated blood loss and transfusion amounts were analyzed in a total of 117 retrospectively identified cases. The control group included 65 patients (46 females, 19 males, 12.7±4.5 yr, 10.2±4.8 levels fused) who received standard operative care with gauze packing between June 2007 and March 2010. The treatment group included 52 patients (33 females, 19 males, 13.9±3.2 yr, 10.4±4.3 levels fused) who underwent intraoperative packing with QuikClot Trauma Pads (QCTP, Z-Medica Corporation) for all surgical procedures from July 2010 to August 2011. No other major changes in the use of antifibrinolytics or perioperative, surgical, or anesthesia technique were noted. Statistical differences were analyzed using analysis of covariance in R with P value of less than 0.05. The statistical model included sex, age, weight, scoliosis type, the number of vertebral levels fused, and surgery duration as covariates. RESULTS: The treatment group had 40% less intraoperative estimated blood loss than the control group (974 mL vs. 1620 mL) (P<0.001). Patients who received the QCTP treatment also had 42% less total perioperative transfusion volume (499 mL vs. 862 mL) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The use of a kaolin-impregnated intraoperative trauma pad seems to be an effective and inexpensive method to reduce intraoperative blood loss and transfusion volume in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Assuntos
Bandagens , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Hemostáticos/administração & dosagem , Caulim , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral , Tampões de Gaze Cirúrgicos , Adolescente , Bandagens/economia , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Criança , Redução de Custos , Feminino , Hemostáticos/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/economia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Kansas , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/economia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Tampões de Gaze Cirúrgicos/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been utilized in spine surgery for over 10 years as a bone graft substitute. Potential BMP-related adverse effects including retrograde ejaculation and heterotopic neuroforaminal bone formation have been described. Additionally, some studies have suggested an association between BMP and cancer. Inconsistencies exist in the published spine literature with regards to the incidence and association of complications with BMP utilization. In a point-counterpoint format, this article discusses the current evidence concerning the relationship between the utilization of BMP in spinal fusion and the risk of cancer, retrograde ejaculation (RE), neuroforaminal bone formation, and its role in anterior cervical spine surgery and adolescents.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) provide comparable outcomes for degenerative cervical pathology. However, revisions of these procedures are not well characterized. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the rates, epidemiology, perioperative complications, and costs between the revision procedures and to compare these outcomes with those of primary cases. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective database analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 3,792 revision and 183,430 primary cases from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2002 to 2011 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of revision cases, patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital costs, mortality, and perioperative complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision for either one- to two-level cervical TDR or ACDF were identified. SPSS v.20 was used for statistical analysis with χ(2) test for categorical data and independent sample t test for continuous data. The relative risk for perioperative complications with revisions was calculated in comparison with primary cases using a 95% confidence interval. An alpha level of less than 0.05 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 3,536 revision one- to two-level ACDFs and 256 revision cervical TDRs recorded in the NIS database from 2002 to 2011. The revision cervical TDR cohort demonstrated a significantly greater LOS (3.18 vs. 2.25, p<.001), cost ($16,998 vs. $15,222, p=.03), and incidence of perioperative wound infections (13.6 vs. 5.3 per 1,000, p<.001) compared with the ACDF revision cohort (p<.001). There were no differences in mortality between the revision surgical cohorts. Compared with primary cases, both revision cohorts demonstrated a significantly greater LOS and cost. Furthermore, patients who underwent revision demonstrated a greater incidence and risk for perioperative wound infections, hematomas, dysphagia, and neurologic complications relative to the primary procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of perioperative wound infection, LOS, and costs associated with a TDR revision compared with a revision ACDF. We propose that these differences are by virtue of the inherently more invasive nature of revising TDRs. In addition, compared with primary cases, revision procedures are associated with greater costs, LOS, and complications including wound infections, dysphagia, hematomas, and neurologic events. These additional risks must be considered before opting for a revision procedure.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Discotomia/métodos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Substituição Total de Disco/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Discotomia/efeitos adversos , Discotomia/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Reoperação/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Substituição Total de Disco/efeitos adversos , Substituição Total de Disco/economia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Perioperative visual loss (POVL) is a rare but devastating complication that may follow spinal surgeries. The incidence of POVL after spinal fusion is not well characterized during the past decade. PURPOSE: A population-based database was analyzed to characterize the incidence and risk factors for POVL associated with spinal fusion surgery on a national level. STUDY DESIGN: This study consisted of a retrospective database analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 541,485 patients from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Study outcome measures included incidence of POVL, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital costs, mortality, and POVL risk factors. METHODS: Data from the NIS were obtained from 2002 to 2009. Patients undergoing spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, LOS, costs, and mortality were assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted using an independent t test for discrete variables and the chi-square test for categorical data. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of POVL. A p value of less than or equal to .001 was used to denote statistical significance. No funds were received by any of the authors for production of this study. RESULTS: A total of 541,485 spinal fusions were identified in the United States from 2002 to 2009. The overall incidence of POVL was 1.9 events per 10,000 cases. Of patients who had POVL, 56.2% underwent surgery for a diagnosis of spinal deformity. Patients with POVL were significantly younger on average compared with unaffected patients (37.6 years vs. 52.4 years; p<.001). Length of stay and hospital costs doubled for patients with POVL (p<.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that independent predictors of visual loss were deformity surgery (odds ratio [OR]=6.1), diabetes mellitus with end organ damage (OR=13.1), and paralysis (OR=6.0, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated an overall POVL incidence of 1.9 events per 10,000 spinal fusions. Patients undergoing thoracic fusion for deformity correction accounted for the majority of cases of POVL. Despite being a rare complication after spinal fusion, POVL is an adverse event that may not be entirely preventable. Patients undergoing long-segment fusions for deformity and those with certain risk factors should be counseled regarding the risks of POVL.
Assuntos
Cegueira/etiologia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Cegueira/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare arthrodesis rates between patients undergoing a primary single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with either Actifuse or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preclinical animal studies suggest that silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (Actifuse) bone graft substitute offers equivalent or an increased fusion rate compared with other graft enhancers/extenders and rhBMP-2. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing a single-level unilateral MIS TLIF were evenly randomized into 2 cohorts as follows: the Actifuse cohort received Actifuse combined with 5 mL of bone marrow aspirate (n = 26; 50%), whereas the rhBMP cohort received 4.2 mg of rhBMP-2 (n = 26; 50%). A pre hoc G*Power analysis yielded a sample size of n = 26 that was determined through a 2-tailed distribution calculation. Computed tomographic analysis was performed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale scores were obtained to assess the clinical outcomes. Arthrodesis was determined by 2 separate, blinded orthopedic surgeons and a board certified radiologist. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, 65% (17/26) of the Actifuse cohort and 92% (24/26) of the rhBMP-2 cohort demonstrated a radiographical arthrodesis (P = 0.01). In both study cohorts, the 1-year postoperative visual analogue scale scores significantly improved (P < 0.001). Pseudarthrosis rates at 1 year were 35.0% (9/26) and 7.7% (2/26) for the Actifuse and rhBMP-2 groups, respectively (P = 0.01, OR = 6.35, 95% CI = 1.22-33.1). A greater reoperation rate was noted in the Actifuse cohort (35.0%, 9/26) compared with the BMP-2 cohort (7.7%, 2/26; P = 0.01). One patient with BMP-2 also experienced symptomatic neuroforaminal bone growth (3.8%, n = 1/26). CONCLUSION: Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate was associated with a significantly lower rate of arthrodesis than rhBMP-2 in a MIS TLIF. The patients with pseudarthrosis in both cohorts were all clinically symptomatic with an unimproved visual analogue scale score. Additional analysis of Actifuse and other graft enhancers/extenders are needed prior to the utilization for an MIS TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Assuntos
Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Fosfatos de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Silicatos/administração & dosagem , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversosRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective national database analysis. OBJECTIVE: A national population-based database was analyzed to characterize the perioperative complications of lumbar spine procedures performed at teaching and nonteaching hospitals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Perception biases exist regarding the complications of lumbar spine surgery based upon the hospital teaching environment. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2002-2011. Patients undergoing an anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior/posterior lumbar fusion, or lumbar decompression to treat lumbar degenerative pathology were identified and separated into cohorts based upon the teaching status of the hospital. Patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay, complications, mortality, and costs were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 658,616 lumbar procedures were identified from 2002-2011, of which 367,875 (55.9%) were performed at teaching hospitals. An older patient population comprised the teaching hospital cohort and demonstrated a greater comorbidity burden than the nonteaching group (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.90 vs. 2.55; P < 0.001). In addition, the teaching hospital cohort was associated with a significantly greater number of multilevel fusion cases (P < 0.001) and incurred a greater mean length of stay (3.7 vs. 3.0 d; P < 0.001). Patients treated at teaching hospitals demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of postoperative pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, infection, and neurological complications than the nonteaching cohort (P < 0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences in the mean total hospital costs or mortality between the hospital cohorts. Regression analysis demonstrated that teaching status was not a significant predictor of mortality (OR, 1.02; confidence interval 0.8-1.2; P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Patients treated in teaching hospitals for lumbar spine surgery incurred a longer hospitalization and a greater incidence of postoperative complications including pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, infection, and neurological events. These findings may be explained by an increased complexity of procedures performed at teaching hospitals along with an older and a more comorbid patient population. Despite these differences, the teaching status was not a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality after a lumbar spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Hospitais de Ensino , Hospitais , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: A national population-based database was analyzed to characterize the risks of postoperative complications and mortality associated with the patient's body mass index (BMI) after lumbar spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity has been associated with greater perioperative complications and worsened surgical outcomes after lumbar spinal surgery. However, the stratified BMI risks of postoperative complications relative to normal weight patients have not been well characterized. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery between 2006 and 2011. Patients were stratified into BMI cohorts: normal (18.5-24.99 kg/m), overweight (25.00-29.99 kg/m), class 1 (30.00-34.99 kg/m), class 2 (35.00-39.99 kg/m), and class 3 (≥40 kg/m) obesity. Preoperative patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were assessed. The relative risks of 30-day postoperative complications and mortality for each BMI cohort were calculated in reference to the normal weight cohort using a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 24,196 patients underwent lumbar spine surgery between 2006 and 2011 of which 19,195 (79.3%) were overweight or obese. The risk for deep vein thrombosis increased beginning with overweight patients and compounded for the subsequent obesity classes. The risk for superficial wound infection and pulmonary embolism increased beginning with the class 1 obesity cohort. Furthermore, the relative risk increase for urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and sepsis was significantly increased only among class 3 obesity patients. Lastly, there was no relative risk increase in 30-day mortality in any cohort after lumbar spine surgery. CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese patients demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative complications relative to normal weight patients. Despite these findings, a BMI 25 kg/m or more was not associated with a greater risk of mortality. Further studies are warranted to characterize the impact of postoperative complications associated with overweight and obese patients on hospital resource utilization and costs after lumbar spine surgery.
Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Sobrepeso/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective national database analysis. OBJECTIVE: A national population-based database was queried to investigate the incidence and perioperative outcomes associated with sentinel events in lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sentinel events in lumbar spine surgery can have significant medical, social, economic, and legal implications. The incidence and perioperative outcomes associated with these events have not been well characterized. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2002 to 2011. Patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery were identified. Sentinel events including bowel or peritoneal injury, vascular injury, nerve injury, retention of foreign objects, and wrong-site surgery were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), length of stay, total costs, and perioperative outcomes were assessed. The risk for mortality associated with each sentinel event was calculated using a 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 20 and a P value of 0.001 or less denoted significance. RESULTS: A total of 543,146 lumbar spine surgical procedures were recorded from 2002 to 2011, of which 414 (0.8 per 1000 cases) incurred sentinel events. Wrong-site surgical procedures were the most common sentinel events with an incidence of 0.3 per 1000 cases. The incidences for bowel or peritoneal injury, vascular injury, nerve injury, and retention of foreign objects, were 0.06, 0.2, 0.2, and 0.1 per 1000 cases, respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean age (55.9 vs. 56.0, P = 0.911) or comorbidity burden (2.58 vs. 2.63, P = 0.553) between the 2 cohorts. The sentinel event cohort incurred a longer hospitalization, greater costs, and a greater incidence of in-hospital complications, and mortality. Patients with a bowel or peritoneal injury, vascular injury, and wrong-site surgery demonstrated a greater risk of mortality relative to unaffected patients. CONCLUSION: This Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis demonstrates that sentinel events are associated with a significant increase in hospital resource utilization and worsened postoperative outcomes including death. This study demonstrates the financial and medical burden associated with sentinel events in lumbar spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.