Transplantation Within 6 Months of Registration does not Enhance Survival for Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Determine if timing of transplantation affects patient mortality. BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation has emerged as an excellent treatment option for select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the optimal timing of transplantation is not known. METHODS: We reviewed all patients registered for a standardized pCCA protocol between 1996 - 2020 at our center. After adjusting for confounders, we examined the association of waiting time with patient mortality in an intention-to-treat cohort (n=392) and those who received a liver transplant (n=256). RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time from registration to transplant or drop out was 5.74 (3.25-7.06) months. Compared to a short wait time (0-3 months), longer waiting times did not affect all-cause mortality: (3-6 months) hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.84; (6-9 months) HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.39-1.65; (9-12 months) HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.26-1.22. Subgroups with a shorter waiting time had similar survival to those with long waiting times: living donor available HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.67-1.42; AB or B blood group HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.62-1.39. Longer waiting times were associated with decreased all-cause mortality after transplantation (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97). This benefit began after a 6 month waiting time minimum (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.26-1.10) and increased further after 9 months (HR; 0.43 95% CI 0.20-0.93). Waiting time was not associated with residual adenocarcinoma in the explant (odds ratio 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A waiting time of at least 6 months will optimize results with transplantation without affecting overall (intention-to-treat) patient survival.

De Novo Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancer in Liver-Transplant Recipients: Identifying the Higher-Risk Populations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are common after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to identify the risk and timing of the more common GI malignancies, colorectal and pancreatic cancer, to aid in optimizing potential posttransplant screening practices. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database of all adult liver-transplant recipients from 1997 to 2017 were analyzed and a comparison made with cancer incidence from general population data using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Of 866 de novo GI malignancies, 405 colorectal and 216 pancreas were identified. The highest cumulative incidence for colorectal cancer occurred in recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), recipients over the age of 50 with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)/cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and females >50 years with alcohol-associated liver disease and HCC/CCA, with risk increasing above the general population within 5 years of transplant. Patients with PSC and HCC/CCA or NASH and HCC/CCA have the highest cumulative incidence of pancreatic cancer also rising within 5 years following transplant, with those patients >50 years old conferring the highest risk. CONCLUSIONS: These data identify a high-risk cohort that warrants consideration for intensified individualized screening practices for colorectal cancer after liver transplantation. In addition to recipients with PSC, further study of recipients with NASH and HCC/CCA and females with alcohol-associated liver disease and HCC/CCA may be better tailored to colorectal cancer screening ideals. Higher-risk patient populations for pancreatic cancer (PSC and NASH with HCC/CCA) would benefit from further study to determine potential screening practices. GI malignancies occur at higher rates in liver-transplant patients compared with the general population. In the era of individualized medicine, this study identifies the highest-risk transplant recipients (PSC and NASH cirrhosis with coexisting HCC/CCA) who may benefit from altered screening practices for these malignancies.

Increasing nonalcoholic steatohepatitis overlap in liver transplant recipients: Additive risk for de novo malignancy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with metabolic conditions that increase the risk of de novo malignancy following transplant. Patients often have more than one underlying liver disease, which could change the risk of de novo malignancy. This study assessed the incidence of NASH overlap and its effect on de novo malignancy in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Data was analyzed from the United Network for Organ Sharing database for all liver transplant recipients from 1997 to 2017 for NASH alone or in combination with another liver disease. RESULTS: There is an increasing prevalence of NASH overlap. Of the 98,679 patients included in the analysis, 1238 had a de novo malignancy identified (7.4% by 5 years post-transplant). The cumulative incidence of de novo malignancy increases in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)/NASH overlap after 5 years and was increased in alcohol-related liver disease (ALD)/NASH through 10 years compared to ether disease alone. NASH overlaps with "other" diseases experience a cumulative incidence similar to NASH and not the "other" disease. An increased risk of de novo solid organ malignancy was associated with older age, male gender, previous malignancy, and multiorgan transplant. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of liver transplant recipients with NASH overlap is increasing. These patients may experience different long-term outcomes than patients with either diagnosis alone. De novo malignancy risk can be influenced by multiple factors and metabolic comorbidities. Further study of patients with overlap diagnoses is important moving forward to guide individualized care and cancer screening programs.

The transcription factor ETS1 promotes apoptosis resistance of senescent cholangiocytes by epigenetically up-regulating the apoptosis suppressor BCL2L1.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an idiopathic, progressive cholangiopathy. Cholangiocyte senescence is important in PSC pathogenesis, and we have previously reported that senescence is regulated by the transcription factor ETS proto-oncogene 1 (ETS1) and associated with overexpression of BCL2 like 1 (BCL2L1 or BCL-xL), an anti-apoptotic BCL2-family member. Here, we further explored the mechanisms regulating BCL-xL-mediated, apoptosis resistance in senescent cholangiocytes and uncovered that ETS1 and the histone acetyltransferase E1A-binding protein P300 (EP300 or p300) both promote BCL-xL transcription. Using immunofluorescence, we found that BCL-xL protein expression is increased both in cholangiocytes of livers from individuals with PSC and a mouse model of PSC. Using an in vitro model of lipopolysaccharide-induced senescence in normal human cholangiocytes (NHCs), we found increased BCL-xL mRNA and protein levels, and ChIP-PCRs indicated increased occupancy of ETS1, p300, and histone 3 Lys-27 acetylation (H3K27Ac) at the BCL-xL promoter. Using co-immunoprecipitation and proximity ligation assays, we further demonstrate that ETS1 and p300 physically interact in senescent but not control NHCs. Additionally, mutagenesis of predicted ETS1-binding sites within the BCL-xL promoter blocked luciferase reporter activity, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic deletion of ETS1 reduced senescence-associated BCL-xL expression. In senescent NHCs, TRAIL-mediated apoptosis was reduced ∼70%, and ETS1 deletion or RNAi-mediated BCL-xL suppression increased apoptosis. Overall, our results suggest that ETS1 and p300 promote senescent cholangiocyte resistance to apoptosis by modifying chromatin and inducing BCL-xL expression. These findings reveal ETS1 as a central regulator of both cholangiocyte senescence and the associated apoptosis-resistant phenotype.

Surveillance for hepatobiliary cancers in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBCa). Surveillance for GBCa is recommended, but the clinical utility of surveillance for other hepatobiliary cancers (HBCa) in PSC, namely CCA and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether surveillance is associated with better survival after diagnosis of HBCa in patients with PSC. Medical records of PSC patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Rochester from 1995 to 2015 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had ≥1 year of follow-up and developed HBCa. Patients were categorized according to their surveillance status (abdominal imaging, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and alpha-fetoprotein). The primary endpoints were HBCa recurrence, HBCa-related death, and all-cause mortality. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier survival method; HBCa-related survival was assessed using competing risk regression. Tests of significance were two-tailed, and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. From 1995 to 2015, a total of 79 of 830 PSC patients were diagnosed with HBCa. Cumulative follow-up was 712 and 283 person-years pre- and post-HBCa diagnosis, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of patients (54/79) developed CCA, 21% (17/79) HCC, 6% (5/79) GBCa, 3% (2/79) both CCA and HCC, and 1% (1/79) both HCC and GBCa. Fifty-one percent (40/79) were under HBCa surveillance, and 49% (39/79) were not. Patients in the surveillance group had significantly higher 5-year overall survival (68% versus 20%, respectively; P < 0.001) and significantly lower 5-year probability of experiencing an HBCa-related adverse event (32% versus 75%, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with the no-surveillance group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that HBCa surveillance significantly improves outcomes, including survival, in patients with PSC. (Hepatology 2018;67:2338-2351).

Overcoming adherence issues and other barriers to optimal care in gout.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review presents research published over the last year examining use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) as well as trends over time in adherence to this class of agents. Additionally, it explores factors associated with nonadherence to ULTs for chronic gout and interventions to improve chronic gout management. RECENT FINDINGS: New literature suggests prescriptions of ULTs for prevalent and incident gout patients remains lower than expected based on the burden of the disease in the population. Overall ULT adherence remains suboptimal, in part related to inadequate patient education and copayment costs; although one study demonstrated improvement in adherence over a 15-year study period. Finally, interventions that include patient education and medication titration based on laboratory results successfully lowered serum urate levels to less than 6 mg/dl in the majority of patients. SUMMARY: Gout remains a prevalent disease that is poorly managed despite effective treatments. Recent research suggests that ULTs are underutilized and even when prescribed are not well adhered to. Patient-centered interventions that focus on education about pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle modifications with medication titration have resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving recommended serum urate levels.

EUS-directed transgastric ERCP with EUS-guided rendezvous for difficult biliary cannulation in a patient with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Video 1Xxx.