Mannose-Binding Lectin-Deficient Donors Increase the Risk of Bacterial Infection and Bacterial Infection-Related Mortality After Liver Transplantation.

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is synthesized by the liver and binds to microbes. MBL2 gene polymorphisms produce intermediate/low/null or normal MBL serum levels (MBL-deficient or MBL-sufficient phenotypes, respectively). We aimed to evaluate the incidence and severity of infection, rejection, and survival within 1 year after liver transplantation (LT) according to donor and recipient MBL2 gene polymorphisms. A repeated-event analysis for infection episodes (negative binomial regression, Andersen-Gill model) was performed in 240 LTs. Four hundred twenty-eight infectious episodes (310 bacterial, 15 fungal, 65 cytomegalovirus [CMV]-related, and 38 viral non-CMV-related episodes) and 48 rejection episodes were recorded. The main bacterial infections were urinary (n = 82, 26%) and pneumonia (n = 69, 22%). LT recipients of MBL-deficient livers had a higher risk of bacterial infection (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.48 [95% confidence interval 1.04-2.09], p = 0.028), pneumonia (IRR 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.33-4.33], p = 0.013), and septic shock (IRR 5.62 [95% confidence interval 1.92-16.4], p = 0.002) compared with recipients of MBL-deficient livers. The 1-year bacterial infection-related mortality was higher in recipients of MBL-deficient versus MBL-sufficient livers (65.8% vs. 56.1%, respectively; p = 0.0097). The incidence of rejection, viral, or fungal infection was similar in both groups. Recipient MBL2 genotype did not significantly increase the risk of bacterial infection. LT recipients of MBL-deficient livers have a higher risk of bacterial infection, pneumonia, septic shock, and 1-year bacterial infection-related mortality after LT.

Liver Transplant From Unexpected Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death Donors: A Challenge in Perioperative Management.

Unexpected donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCD) liver transplantation is a complex procedure, in particular when it comes to perioperative recipient management. However, very little has been published to date regarding intraoperative and immediate postoperative care in this setting. Herein, we compare perioperative events in uDCD liver recipients with those of a matched group of donation after brain death liver recipients. We demonstrate that the former group of recipients suffers significantly greater hemodynamic instability and derangements in coagulation following graft reperfusion. Based on our experience, we recommend a proactive recipient management strategy in uDCD liver transplantation that involves early use of vasopressor support; maintaining adequate intraoperative levels of red cells, platelets, and fibrinogen; and routinely administering tranexamic acid before graft reperfusion.

Early non-invasive selection of patients at high risk of severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The early identification of patients at high risk of severe post liver transplant hepatitis C recurrence is relevant, as these patients may be treated using interferon (IFN)-free regimens. METHODS: In a retrospective study with prospectively collected data, we investigated whether the use of several non-invasive methods (fibrosis 4 index [FIB-4], AST-to-platelets ratio index [APRI], enhanced liver fibrosis test [ELF], IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 [IP-10], and transient elastography by Fibroscan) and their combinations 6 months after transplantation could identify those recipients at higher risk of severe recurrence, defined by the presence of significant fibrosis (F ≥2) and/or portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥6 mmHg) 12 months after transplant. Seventy-two hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant patients and 10 recipients in whom HCV was eradicated before transplantation were included in the study. RESULTS: The levels of all biomarkers were significantly higher in HCV-infected recipients than in controls. Among HCV recipients, levels of biomarkers were significantly higher in patients with severe recurrence. Although there were no statistically significant differences between biomarkers, APRI, ELF, and FIB-4 obtained the highest area under the ROC curve values. The combination of serum biomarkers with Fibroscan increased the negative and positive predictive values, although diagnostic accuracy of individual tests was not significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at higher risk of severe HCV recurrence can be identified early, 6 months after transplantation, using readily available non-invasive methods.

Liver stiffness 1 year after transplantation predicts clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent hepatitis C.

The value of transient elastography (TE) to assess clinical outcomes in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has not been explored so far. We studied 144 hepatitis C-infected and 48 non-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected LT recipients and evaluated the prognostic value of TE 1 year after transplantation to predict clinical decompensations and graft and patient survival. In HCV patients, cumulative probabilities of liver decompensation 5 years after LT were 8% for patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) <8.7 kilopascals (kPa) versus 47% for patients with LSM ≥ 8.7 kPa (p<0.001). Five-year graft and patient cumulative survival were 90% and 92% in patients with LSM<8.7 kPa (p<0.001) and 63% and 64% in patients with LSM ≥ 8.7 kPa, respectively (p<0.001). Patients with low LSM 1 year after LT had excellent outcomes independently from receiving antiviral treatment or achieving sustained virological response (SVR). In contrast, graft survival significantly improved in patients with LSM ≥ 8.7 kPa who achieved SVR. No association between outcomes and LSM at 12 months was observed in non-HCV patients. In conclusion, LSM 1 year after LT is a valuable tool to predict hepatitis C-related outcomes in recurrent hepatitis C and can be used in clinical practice to identify the best candidates for antiviral therapy.

Should IFN-γ, IL-17 and IL-2 be considered predictive biomarkers of acute rejection in liver and kidney transplant? Results of a multicentric study.

Acute rejection (AR) remains a major challenge in organ transplantation, and there is a need for predictive biomarkers. In the present multicenter study, we prospectively examined a series of biomarkers in liver and kidney recipients. Intracellular expression of IFN-γ, IL-17 and IL-2 and IL-17 soluble production were evaluated both pre-transplantation and post-transplantation (1st and 2nd week, 1st, 2nd and 3rd month). 142 transplant patients (63 liver/79 kidney) were included in the study. Twenty-eight recipients (14 liver/14 kidney) developed AR. Pre- and post-transplantation intracellular expression of %IFN-γ(+) in CD4(+)CD69(+) and in CD8(+)CD69(+) and soluble IL17 identified liver and kidney transplant patients at high risk of AR. Pre-transplantation, %IL-2(+) in CD8(+)CD69(+) also identified kidney patients at high risk. We constructed pre- and post-transplantation risk prediction models, based on a composite panel of biomarkers, which could provide the basis for future studies and will be a useful tool for the selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive treatments.

Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of invasive aspergillosis in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) has been considered an infrequent complication after renal transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of IA between renal and other types of transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients from Hospital Clinic at Barcelona, who had proven and probable IA, according to the EORTC/MSG criteria, between June 2003 and December 2010. RESULTS: A total of 1762 transplants were performed. From this cohort, 27 cases of IA were diagnosed (1.5%): in 56% (15/27) liver, 33% (9/27) kidney, and 11% (3/27) combined transplant. The median onset time from renal and non-renal transplants to IA was 217 and 10 days, respectively (P < 0.001). There were 6 cases (22%) of late IA (>6 months), all in kidney recipients (P < 0.001). Renal transplant patients with IA more frequently had chronic lung disease (44% vs. 6%) and chronic heart failure (33% vs. 6%); they also had none of the classical risk factors for IA defined for liver transplantation (0% vs. 33%, P = 0.001), and therefore they did not receive antifungal prophylaxis (0% vs. 72%, P = 0.001). In 14/24 patients, serum galactomannan antigen was positive, and this related to higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: While classical risk factors described for IA in liver recipients are still valid, IA appears later in renal patients and is commonly associated with co-morbid conditions.

Applicability and results of Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death liver transplantation.

Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors suffer sudden and unexpected cardiac arrest, typically outside the hospital; they have significant potential to expand the donor pool. Herein, we analyze the results of transplanted livers and all potential donors treated under our type 2 DCD protocol. Cardiac arrest was witnessed; potential donors arrived at the hospital after attempts at resuscitation had failed. Death was declared based on the absence of cardiorespiratory activity during a 5-min no-touch period. Femoral vessels were cannulated to establish normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which was maintained until organ recovery. From April 2002 to December 2010, there were 400 potential donors; 34 liver transplants were performed (9%). Among recipients, median age, model for end-stage liver disease and cold and reperfusion warm ischemic times were 55 years (49-60), 19 (14-21) and 380 (325-430) and 30 min (26-35), respectively. Overall, 236 (59%) and 130 (32%) livers were turned down due to absolute and relative contraindications to donate, respectively. One-year recipient and graft survivals were 82% and 70%, respectively (median follow-up 24 months). The applicability of type 2 DCD liver transplant was <10%; however, with better preservation technology and expanded transplant criteria, we may be able to improve this figure significantly.

Efficacy and safety of maribavir dosed at 100 mg orally twice daily for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter controlled trial.

Maribavir is an oral benzimidazole riboside with potent in vitro activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV), including some CMV strains resistant to ganciclovir. In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, the efficacy and safety of prophylactic oral maribavir (100 mg twice daily) for prevention of CMV disease were compared with oral ganciclovir (1000 mg three times daily) in 303 CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors (147 maribavir; 156 ganciclovir). Patients received study drug for up to 14 weeks and were monitored for CMV infection by blood surveillance tests and also for the development of CMV disease. The primary endpoint was Endpoint Committee (EC)-confirmed CMV disease within 6 months of transplantation. In a modified intent-to-treat analysis, the noninferiority of maribavir compared to oral ganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease was not established (12% with maribavir vs. 8% with ganciclovir: event rate difference of 0.041; 95% CI: -0.038, 0.119). Furthermore, significantly fewer ganciclovir patients had EC-confirmed CMV disease or CMV infection by pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR compared to maribavir patients at both 100 days (20% vs. 60%; p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (53% vs. 72%; p = 0.0053) after transplantation. Graft rejection, patient survival, and non-CMV infections were similar for maribavir and ganciclovir patients. Maribavir was well-tolerated and associated with fewer hematological adverse events than oral ganciclovir. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, maribavir is safe but not adequate for prevention of CMV disease in liver transplant recipients at high risk for CMV disease.

Donor and recipient IL28B polymorphisms in HCV-infected patients undergoing antiviral therapy before and after liver transplantation.

IL28B gene polymorphisms are associated with the response to antiviral therapy in hepatitis C patients. We investigated the influence of IL28B polymorphisms on the response to therapy before and after liver transplantation (LT). Genotyping of SNPs rs8099917 and rs12979860 was performed in 128 HCV-infected liver transplant recipients and in their donors; all patients underwent antiviral treatment after LT. The prevalence of genotypes rs12979860CC and rs8099917TT was higher in donors than in recipients (50% vs.19%, p < 0.001 and 67% vs. 38%, p < 0.001, respectively). Response to antiviral therapy was significantly higher for recipient genotype rs12979860CC as compared to rs12979860CT/TT both before (100% vs. 48% p = 0.013) and after LT (59% vs. 25% p = 0.002). The figures were almost identical for SNP rs8099917. Sustained virological response after LT was particularly high in patients with favorable recipient and donor genotypes (p < 0.01 for both SNPs). In a subgroup of 34 patients treated while awaiting LT, a favorable donor IL28B genotype was associated with an improved virological response after LT. Our results support a major role of recipient IL28B genotype in the response to antiviral treatment for hepatitis C recurrence. Interestingly, donor genotype also seems to influence the response pattern, especially in recipients who have a favorable IL28B genotype.

Characterization of the cross-neutralizing antibody response against hepatitis C virus in the liver transplantation setting.

Neutralizing antibody (nAb) activity during the course of natural infection is believed to be crucial to combating virus propagation. The aim of this study was to measure the impact of nAb response on HCV early kinetics and genetic evolution in the liver transplantation (LT) setting. A cohort of 28 patients undergoing LT for HCV-related cirrhosis was included in the study. Viral load, nAb titers and hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequences were determined in serum samples obtained before and at different time points after LT. Serum nAb titers were assessed using HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp). HVR1 sequences were obtained by direct sequencing. Patients were classified according to viral kinetic patterns (plateau or increasing), during the first week after LT. All patients demonstrated high titers of nAbs before LT, although this was not associated with early kinetic patterns or HVR1 evolution during the first week after LT. We found that in patients with plateau HCV early kinetics, the virus required adaptive mutations, while in those with increasing viral loads, the HVR1 region remained largely conserved (p = 0.015). These data suggest that HCV adaptation via selection of the best-fitted variants may account for early viral kinetics following LT.

Epidemiology and risk factors for late infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Information concerning the risk factors and outcome of late infection (LI) after solid organ transplantation (SOT) still remains scarce. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed all patients undergoing SOT from July 2003 to March 2008, who survived the first 6 months after surgery and with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Risk factors associated with the development of bacterial and cytomegalovirus (CMV) LI and survival were identified. RESULTS: Overall, 942 SOT recipients (491 kidney, 280 liver, 65 heart, and 106 double transplants) were included. During the study period 147 patients (15.6%) developed 276 episodes of LI (incidence rate, 0.43 per 1000 transplantation-days). Bacteria were the most prevalent etiology (88.0%). Primary sources of infection included urinary tract (36.9%), intra-abdominal (16.7%), and sepsis without source (13.4%). Independent risk factors for late bacterial infection were: age (hazard ratio [HR] [per year] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-1,0), female gender (HR 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1-2.6), anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive serostatus (HR 1.8; 95%CI: 1.1-3.0), chronic allograft dysfunction (HR 3.2; 95%CI: 1.7-6.1), early CMV disease (HR 2.2; 95%CI 1.2-4.1), and early bacterial infection (HR 2.5; 95%CI 1.6-3.8). The occurrence of chronic allograft dysfunction was an independent risk factor for late CMV disease (HR 6.5; 95%CI: 1.7-24.6), whereas immunosuppression based on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors protected against the development of late CMV disease (HR 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1-1.0). Cox model selected anti-HCV positive serostatus (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.67; 95%CI: 1.27-5.59), age (aHR [per year] 1.06; 95%CI: 1.02-1.10), and the occurrence of LI (aHR 9.12; 95%CI: 3.90-21.33) as independent factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: LI did not constitute an uncommon complication in our cohort, and patients at risk may benefit from close clinical monitoring.

Applicability and results of liver transplant combined with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. / Aplicabilidad y resultados del trasplante hepático combinado con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante en el tratamiento del colangiocarcinoma perihiliar irresecable.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, a multicenter protocol was developed in Catalonia, Spain, combining neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and liver transplantation (LT) for those patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). AIM: To analyse the effectiveness of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and LT for those patients enrolled in the protocol based on intention-to-treat. METHODS: Observational multicenter study which includes patients ≤ 68 years-old diagnosed with unresectable, solitary tumors ≤ 3 cm in radial diameter, without evidence of lymph node metastases. The protocol was based on a strategy of neoadjuvant therapy with high-dose radiation (45 Gy in total) plus intravenous fluorouracil (5-FU) given as a daily bolus for the first 3 days of radiation follow by oral capecitabine until transplantation. The patient was included in waiting list for LT if no evidence of disseminated disease was found. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2018, 13 patients were enrolled in the transplant protocol. Of those, 61% (8/13) of the patients were transplanted. The average time spent on the waiting list was 122 days (range 5-192). Intent-to-treat survival was 69% and 39% at one and 5 years. Post-transplantation overall survival was 87% and 62% and 29% recurrence rate at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The suitability of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and LT protocol was 61% in our series with long-term overall survival and should be considered as an alternative to resection for patients with localized node-negative hCCA.

ATG-Fresenius treatment and low-dose tacrolimus: results of a randomized controlled trial in liver transplantation.

We report the results of a prospective randomized controlled trial in liver transplantation assessing the efficacy and safety of antithymocyte globulin (ATG-Fresenius) plus tacrolimus monotherapy at gradually decreasing doses. Patients were randomized to either: (a) standard-dose tacrolimus plus steroids;or (b) peritransplant ATG-Fresenius plus reduced-dose tacrolimus monotherapy followed by weaning of tacrolimus starting 3 months after transplantation. The primary end-point was the achievement of very low-dose tacrolimus (every-other-day or once daily dose with <5 ng/mL trough levels) at 12 months after transplantation. Acute rejection occurring during the first 3 months after transplantation was more frequent in the ATG group (52.4% vs. 25%). Moreover, late acute rejection episodes occurred in all recipients in whom weaning was attempted and no recipients reached the primary end-point. This motivated the premature termination of the trial. Tacrolimus trough levels were lower in the ATG-Fresenius group but no benefits in terms of improved renal function, lower metabolic complications or increased prevalence of tolerance-related biomarkers were observed. In conclusion, the use of ATG-Fresenius and tacrolimus at gradually decreasing doses was associated with a high rate of rejection, did not allow for the administration of very low doses of tacrolimus and failed to provide detectable clinical benefits. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00436722.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease.

The outcome of patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease treated with combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is not well known because most series of patients treated with CLKT include not only patients with cirrhosis but also patients with inherited diseases without cirrhosis. To evaluate to what extent the combined kidney transplantation impairs posttransplantation outcome compared to liver transplantation (LT) alone, the outcome of patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease treated with CLKT (n = 20) was compared to that of a group of patients with cirrhosis without chronic kidney disease treated with LT alone matched by age, sex, year of transplantation and severity of cirrhosis (n = 60). The primary end point of the study was survival, and secondary end points were outcome of renal function and complications within 6 months of transplantation. Patients with CLKT had a higher incidence of bacterial infections and transfusion requirements compared to LT patients. The incidence of acute renal failure during the first 6 months was similar, yet the severity of renal failure was greater in patients with CLKT. Hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays were longer in the CLKT group. One- and three-year survival probabilities in patients treated with CLKT were 80 and 75% compared to 97 and 88%, respectively, in patients treated with LT. In conclusion, CLKT for patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease is associated with a relatively high frequency of postoperative complications that moderately impairs short-term survival. However, 3-year survival of patients with cirrhosis treated with CLKT is excellent.

Hepatitis C virus compartmentalization and infection recurrence after liver transplantation.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) compartmentalization may have important implications in the pathogenesis of HCV infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence and relevance of HCV compartmentalization in the setting of liver transplantation (LT). We collected samples of serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), perihepatic lymph nodes (PLN) and liver explant at the time of LT, and serum and PBMC after transplantation from 57 HCV-infected cirrhotic patients undergoing LT: 38 individuals received antiviral treatment before LT and 19 were untreated controls. HCV-RNA levels were determined by real-time PCR and the hypervariable region 1 (HVR-1) was sequenced. HCV-RNA was detected in all samples from control patients. In virological responders, recurrence after LT was associated with residual HCV-RNA in the liver explant. Within the entire cohort, 47% of patients harbored differences in direct sequences from distinct compartments. Quasispecies analysis revealed that in most cases, HVR-1 sequences recovered after infection recurrence were identical or closely related to those isolated from the liver explant and serum at the time of LT. Our study shows that a significant proportion of HCV-infected cirrhotic patients exhibit compartmentalization. Viral variants originating within the liver appear to be the main cause of HCV recurrence after LT.

Severe Hepatitis C Recurrence as a Risk Factor for Opportunistic Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the clinical characteristics, frequency of opportunistic infections (OI), and the outcomes for liver transplant recipients with severe hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence. In addition, the objective was to evaluate HCV recurrence as a risk factor for developing an OI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study recording all liver transplant recipients from July 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012. Patients with liver disease due to HCV were selected. Active surveillance of infections was conducted periodically, and patients were classified according to presence of severe HCV recurrence. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy patients underwent liver transplantation because of chronic HCV. One hundred forty-seven patients presented severe recurrence (SR) (49%) and 50 (17%) of them had post-liver transplant cholestatic hepatitis C. Patients with SR presented OI, especially cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and invasive fungal infections, more frequently than patients without SR (33% vs 13%; P < .001). From the diagnosis of SR to the presentation of OI, the median number of days was 169 (6-2083). Acute allograft rejection (OR 1.8 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.3) donor age ≥60 years (OR 2.9 95% CI 1.3-6.8), and SR (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-5.1) were independently associated with the development of OI in liver transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: A high index of suspicion of opportunistic infections must be maintained when faced with severe HCV recurrence in liver transplant recipients. Moreover, active surveillance against CMV infection and other prophylactic strategies against opportunistic infections should be considered.

Impact of valganciclovir prophylaxis on the development of severe late-cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir in cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor/recipient serodiscordance (D+/R-) patients, concerns about a high incidence of late and invasive CMV disease associated with mortality have emerged. We compared the characteristics of CMV disease in D+/R- patients receiving prolonged valganciclovir prophylaxis with R+ patients. METHODS: We prospectively followed all solid organ transplant recipients from January 2004 to December 2005. CMV prophylaxis with valganciclovir or ganciclovir was administered as follows: donor- recipient serodiscordance (D+/R-), 12 weeks; induction with antithymocyte globulin or acute rejection episodes requiring steroid pulses, 15 to 30 days; and CMV R+ double kidney-pancreas, 15 days. Transplant characteristics and the development of CMV disease variables were collected for all patients. We defined 2 groups according to the risk of CMV disease: CMV donor/recipient mismatch (D+/R-) and recipient CMV-positive (R+) groups. RESULTS: During the study period we performed 481 solid organ transplantations: 237 kidney, 34 kidney-pancreas, 157 liver, 38 heart, 13 liver-kidney, and 2 heart-kidney. Overall, 36 patients developed CMV disease (7.5%). CMV donor-recipient mismatch (D+/R-) was associated with a greater risk of CMV disease compared with CMV-positive recipients (16% vs 7%; P = .036). Prophylaxis against CMV was longer in the D+/R- group (mean days 73 vs 15; P < .001). CMV disease appeared later in the D+/R- than in R+ group (mean days 123 vs 59; P < .001). We observed a trend toward a lower incidence of tissue-invasive CMV disease among the D+/R- group compared with the R+ group without significance (14% vs 41%; P = .382). Three patients died in the first 30 days after the onset of CMV disease, all of them in the R+ group. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, high-risk patients (D+/R-) receiving prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir developed later CMV disease, but this was neither more tissue-invasive nor more life-threatening than in the R+ group.

TH1/TH2 cytokine release pattern during in vivo cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is associated with an increased net immunosuppressive state in solid organ transplant recipients, leading to more bacterial and fungal infections. The release of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines could be one of the responsible factors. METHODS: We prospectively included all patients undergoing solid organ transplantation between April and November 2004. During follow-up, plasma samples were collected in the immediate postsurgical period, at the first and second months, at the time of maximum antigenemia during CMV disease, and at 6 months posttransplantation. We determine the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-10. Log-transformed data were compared by a nonparametric Wilcoxon test for related variables. RESULTS: During the study period, we monitored 146 recipients of solid organ transplantation: 77 kidneys, 8 kidney-pancreas, 46 liver, 11 heart, 2 liver-kidney, and 2 heart-kidney. No differences were observed between the TNF-alpha and IL-10 levels in the immediate postsurgical period or during CMV disease. TNF-alpha and IL-10 levels during CMV disease were higher than levels during the first month (mean TNF-alpha first month = 12.71 pg/mL vs CMV disease = 22.71 pg/mL, P = .028; mean IL-10 first month = 3.47 pg/mL vs CMV disease = 19.2 pg/mL, P = .018). Th1/Th2 ratio (measured as TNF-alpha/IL-10) was 1.75 in the immediate postsurgical period, 7.5 during the first month, 1.86 at the time of CMV disease, and 4.61 at the sixth month. The difference in Th1/Th2 ratio during CMV disease and in the first month was statistically significant (P = .043). CONCLUSION: During CMV disease, we observed an increase in TNF-alpha and IL-10 release, which was similar to that during the postsurgical period. An imbalance toward an anti-inflammatory pattern was noted in these two periods. This could reflect a cooperative factor increasing the net state of immunosuppression during CMV disease.

Gastrointestinal complications in liver transplant recipients: MITOS study.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplant recipients frequently suffer gastrointestinal (GI) complications but their prevalence and their influence on quality of life remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to asses the prevalence, impact on quality of life, and management of GI complications in liver transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an epidemiologic, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Four hundred seventeen liver recipients were recruited in 14 centers. A questionnaire was filled for every patient. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 55 years. The median time since transplantation was 4.1 +/- 4 years. Whereas 19.2% presented some GI disease before transplantation, 49.4% showed this type of complication after transplantation. Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI complication, and anorexia was the GI disorder that affected patients daily activities the most frequently. GI complications were more frequent among female patients, subjects with pretransplantation hiatal hernia, and those readmitted after transplantation. Of the patients with GI complications, 70.9% received pharmacological treatment (89.7% with gastric protectors). Immunosuppressive therapy was also modified because of GI complications. Immunosuppressive drug dose was reduced in 18.1%, transiently stopped in 3.4%, and definitively stopped in 3.4% of cases. The drug most frequently changed was mycophenolate mofetil: dose reduction, 23.6%; transient withdrawal, 5.7%; and definitive withdrawal, 6.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of GI complications in the liver transplant population was approximately 50%. GI complications showed a significant impact on the quality of life of the patients. They were related to female gender, to pretransplantation GI pathology, and posttransplantation hospital admission. These complications were frequently managed with pharmacological therapy or with changes in immunosuppressive therapy.