Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy Initiation Strategies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: Overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase is not significantly different by treatment with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but emerging evidence reveals differences in costs and safety profiles. We evaluated the 1-year cost-effectiveness of TKI initiation with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib among a hypothetical cohort of incident patients with CML from a US payer's perspective. METHODS: We constructed a decision analytic model to assess quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs, net monetary benefit, and incremental cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies. We used published studies and data from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan database for model parameters. To calculate TKI costs, we used the 2018 Federal Supply Schedule estimates for generic imatinib and branded second-generation TKIs. We evaluated cost-effectiveness under various willingness-to-pay thresholds. We accounted for uncertainty with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, imatinib was favored over dasatinib and nilotinib at a lower cost per QALY gained. Imatinib remained the favored strategy after 1-way variations in TKI costs, TKI switching, QALYs, adverse event risk, and CML progression. When we assessed model uncertainty with prespecified parameter distributions, imatinib was cost-saving compared with dasatinib in 40% of 100 0000 simulations and was favored over all simulations compared with nilotinib. First-line treatment with second-generation TKIs was cost-effective in 50% of simulations at a $200 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Generic availability of imatinib provides a more cost-effective treatment approach in the first year compared with other available TKIs for newly diagnosed patients with CML.

Cost Effectiveness of Early Treatment with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Adolescent Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of early treatment with direct-acting antiviral therapy in adolescent patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection compared with treatment deferral. STUDY DESIGN: We constructed a Markov model to assess the cost effectiveness of treating a hypothetical cohort of 30 000 adolescent patients with chronic HCV at age 12 years compared with deferring treatment until adulthood from a societal perspective. Model inputs for transition probabilities, HCV treatment and medical care costs, and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) utilities were derived from the literature and wholesale acquisition estimates. Deterministic sensitivity analyses varied parameters for non-HCV medical care and treatment cost, reinfection rates, treatment uptake, disease progression, liver transplant survival, and treatment with recently approved pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents. Discounted costs and total QALYs per person were quantified after 30 years. Cost effectiveness was evaluated as the incremental change in total medical costs per QALY gained. RESULTS: The incremental cost effectiveness of early treatment initiation compared with deferred treatment was approximately $27 000 per QALY gained after 30 years and considered cost effective. In a scenario analysis, hypothetical treatment initiation with currently available pangenotypic agents would be even more cost effective, ranging from $10 000 to $21 000 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness estimates were sensitive to variations in decompensated cirrhosis progression in adolescence, adult reinfection, and treatment uptake in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment in adolescent patients with chronic HCV infection with currently available direct-acting antivirals seems to be cost effective compared with deferred treatment. Future efforts to control the HCV epidemic should include increasing the number of children treated.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Commercially Insured Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer Initiating First-Line Therapy in the United States.

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) represents a substantial economic burden for patients in the United States. Patients with advanced or recurrent EC have a much poorer prognosis than patients with early-stage EC. Data on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for patients with advanced or recurrent EC specifically are lacking. Objectives: To describe HCRU and costs associated with first-line (1L) therapy for commercially insured patients with advanced or recurrent EC in the United States. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with advanced or recurrent EC using the MarketScan® database. Treatment characteristics, HCRU, and costs were assessed from the first claim in the patient record for 1L therapy for advanced or recurrent EC (index) until initiation of a new anti-cancer therapy, disenrollment from the database, or the end of data availability. Baseline demographics were determined during the 12 months before the patient's index date. Results: A total of 7932 patients were eligible for inclusion. Overall, mean age at index was 61 years, most patients (77.3%) had received prior surgery for EC, and the most common 1L regimen was carboplatin/paclitaxel (59.1%). During the observation period, most patients had at least one healthcare visit (all-cause, 99.9%; EC-related, 82.8%), most commonly outpatient visits (all-cause, 91.4%; EC-related, 68.7%). The highest mean (SD) costs (US dollars) were for inpatient hospitalization for both all-cause and EC-related events ($8396 [$15,130] and $9436 [$16,784], respectively). Total costs were higher for patients with a diagnosis of metastasis at baseline than for those without a diagnosis of metastasis. Discussion: For patients with advanced or recurrent EC in the United States, 1L therapy is associated with considerable HCRU and economic burden. They are particularly high for patients with metastatic disease. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for new cost-effective treatments for patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent EC.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer Initiating First-Line Therapy in the United States.

Background: Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) typically have limited treatment options and poor long-term survival outcomes following first-line therapy. Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes data are limited for patients in this setting. Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study was to describe real-world demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and overall survival among patients in the United States with primary advanced or recurrent EC who initiated at least 1 line of therapy (LOT). Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of primary advanced or recurrent EC in a real-world database from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2021, were included. The date for inclusion was the date of EC diagnosis documentation; patients were indexed for treatment patterns and outcomes at the start of the first LOT and at the start of each subsequent LOT they initiated. Data were stratified by subgroups of patients who had mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. Results: A total of 1961 patients who received at least 1 LOT were included. Most patients in this cohort, and the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup, received a platinum combination as first-line treatment, with carboplatin-paclitaxel being the most common regimen. Only 53% of patients who received first-line treatment subsequently received second-line therapy. Of the patients who received at least 1 LOT, use of immunotherapy in the second-line setting was more common in the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup. Median overall survival ranged from 14.1 to 31.8 months across the 5 most frequently used first-line treatment regimens in the ≥1 LOT cohort and became shorter with each subsequent LOT. Discussion: The use of platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent EC predominates in the real-world setting, despite the poor long-term survival outcomes associated with most of these regimens. Conclusions: Patients with recurrent/advanced EC have a poor prognosis, highlighting the need for therapies with more durable benefits.

Postoperative Use of Biologics was Less Common among Patients with Crohn's Disease With Emergent/Urgent Versus Elective Intestinal Resection.

Background & Aims: Given the risk of intestinal resection for Crohn's disease, postoperative treatment may be informed by several risk factors, including resection type. We compared postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's disease between emergent/urgent versus elective resection. Methods: We identified patients with intestinal resection for Crohn's disease between 2002-2018 using the MarketScan databases. We classified emergent/urgent resections as those occurring after emergency department admission or after the second day of admission. We estimated adjusted risk differences for the association between resection type (emergent/urgent versus elective) and 6-month postoperative medication strategy (biologic monotherapy, biologic combination therapy with an immunomodulator, immunomodulator monotherapy, other non-biologic medication for Crohn's [5-aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids], or no medications for Crohn's). Results: During 6 months after resection among 4,187 patients, 23% received biologic monotherapy, 6% received combination therapy, 16% received immunomodulator monotherapy, and 36% received other non-biologics. Compared to elective resection, emergent/urgent resection was associated with more common use of "other non-biologic" medications (risk difference 6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8%, 10.0%), but less common use of biologic monotherapy (risk difference -3.2%; 95% CI -6.2%, -0.1%) and no medications (risk difference -3.6%; 95% CI -6.6%, -0.6%). Conclusions: Although patients with emergent/urgent resection may benefit from more aggressive postoperative therapy, there was evidence that emergent/urgent resection was more associated than elective resection with postoperative use of non-biologics for Crohn's disease. Future studies of treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness of postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's patients should consider these differences between resection types, which may be important drivers of longer-term outcomes.

Health care costs and utilization prior to diagnosis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis in Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis (AV) is a complex group of autoimmune disorders affecting blood vessels in multiple organ systems. Delays in diagnosis are common because AV symptoms can be nonspecific and present heterogeneously. This may result in increased health care utilization in the months preceding diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether Medicare beneficiaries with AV experienced increased health care utilization and costs in the year before the first diagnosis recorded in claims, relative to beneficiaries without AV. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used 2015-2016 Medicare Part A/B claims and Part D prescription drug data. Beneficiaries with newly diagnosed AV were identified by having 1 or more inpatient claims or 2 or more noninpatient claims 7 or more days apart in 2016 with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code for AV, with no AV claims in the year prior. Beneficiaries with AV were matched 1:1 on age and sex to beneficiaries without any diagnoses for any type of systemic vasculitis in 2016. Beneficiaries with Part A/B coverage (AB, n = 1,460) and Part A/B/D coverage (ABD, n = 3,252) were analyzed separately. We estimated generalized linear mixed models with a negative binomial distribution to compare health care costs and utilization by AV status. RESULTS: Beneficiaries with AV had approximately 3 times higher Medicare Part A/B payments (incidence rate ratio [95% CI]: AB: 2.94 [2.44-3.53]; ABD: 2.95 [2.64-3.29]) and 2.5 times higher beneficiary Part A/B payments (AB: 2.47 [2.14-2.84]; ABD: 2.62 [2.40-2.87]) vs beneficiaries without AV. Beneficiaries with AV experienced significantly higher utilization across all categories, with the largest differences observed in hospital outpatient visits (AB: 2.69 [2.22-3.27]; ABD: 3.08 [2.73-3.47]). CONCLUSIONS: In the year prior to AV diagnosis, Medicare beneficiaries have significantly higher health care costs and utilization than beneficiaries without AV. DISCLOSURES: Dr Huang was supported by the University of North Carolina and GlaxoSmithKline Health Outcomes Fellowship during the time of the study and reports current employment at Horizon Therapeutics, Deerfield, IL. Dr Nguyen received predoctoral funding through a fellowship appointment sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb during the time of the study and reports current employment at GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA. Dr Derebail receives personal fees from Travere Therapeutics, Bayer, and UpToDate, outside of the submitted work. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes and Impaired Work Productivity in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Remission.

Background and Aims: This study aimed to evaluate associations between disease severity, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and work productivity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD [Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)]). Methods: Patients diagnosed with CD or UC enrolled in CorEvitas' IBD Registry (May 2017 to September 2019) were included (N = 1543; CD, n = 812; UC, n = 731). Disease severity was assessed using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (CD) and partial Mayo Score (UC); psychosocial PROs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) and work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI]) were assessed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses assessed associations between PROs and disease severity. Results: Among CD patients, 67.4% were in remission, 19.2% had mild disease, and 13.4% had moderate/severe disease; among UC patients, 52.7% were in remission, 35.3% had mild disease, and 12.0% had moderate/severe disease. For CD patients in remission, unadjusted percentages of patients with PROMIS scores outside normal limits ranged from 18.9% (depression) to 34.9% (fatigue). For CD patients in remission, 54.3% reported work productivity loss, and 57.1% reported activity impairment. The unadjusted percentage of UC patients in remission with scores outside normal limits ranged from 15.7% (depression) to 28.7% (fatigue) for PROMIS and 10.5% (absenteeism) to 43.5% (activity impairment) for WPAI. Impairment increased with IBD severity. Congruently, adjusted estimates showed significant impairment in PROMIS and WPAI scores for CD and UC patients in remission. Conclusion: In this real-world analysis, IBD patients across the spectrum of activity, from remission to severe disease, experienced impaired psychosocial function and reduced work productivity. Impairment, even among patients in remission, indicates an unmet need in this patient population.

Sending The Wrong Price Signal: Why Do Some Brand-Name Drugs Cost Medicare Beneficiaries Less Than Generics?

The current Medicare Part D benefit may require greater out-of-pocket spending for beneficiaries filling prescriptions for higher-price generic drugs, compared to those filling brand-name counterparts. This can occur among patients who reach the catastrophic coverage phase under the Part D benefit, when differences between the prices for generic and brand-name drugs are not large. This scenario may be common with specialty drugs (typically high-price products used to treat rare or complex conditions), when the number of generic manufacturers or clinical alternatives are limited. In this study we demonstrated that patients would pay more out of pocket for generic medications than for brand-name drugs in these cases, driven by manufacturer discounts provided in the Medicare Part D coverage gap. Overpayments for specialty generic drugs relative to brand-name drugs ranged from $869 to $1,072 in 2019, despite lower point-of-sale prices for these drugs. Policy makers should consider modifying the Part D benefit to increase incentives for generic drug use.

Economic and objective burden of caregiving on informal caregivers of patients with systemic vasculitis.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic vasculitis (SV) is associated with substantial economic impact to patients and the healthcare system but little is known about the burden of SV on informal caregivers. We evaluated the objective caregiving burden experienced by informal caregivers of patients with SV. METHODS: We surveyed adult patients and their informal caregivers on the physical, emotional, social and economic impacts of SV. We asked patients about the extent to which they felt they were a burden to their identified caregivers. Caregivers reported the direct and indirect economic impact of SV, including employment disturbance, income loss and relative time investment of caregiving for their care recipient's SV. We used the Inventory of Caregiving Activities Questionnaire to compute the objective caregiving burden. RESULTS: We analysed data from 68 SV patient-caregiver dyads. Patients reported moderate levels of subjective burden to their caregivers. Over one-quarter of caregivers reported ever having lost some income owing to caregiving for SV. Caregivers reported spending a median of 19 weekly hours on various caregiving tasks, including a median 17 weekly hours on household activities. DISCUSSION: Given the extended hours that caregivers spend caring for their care recipient, intervention targets should aim to reduce caregiver burnout in the SV population. Future research should examine the relationship between the objective burden of caregiving for SV and the overall physical health, mental health and quality of life of caregivers.