Intrawound vancomycin powder increases post-operative wound complications and does not decrease periprosthetic joint infection in primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

PURPOSE: A frequent reason for revision surgery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The efficacy of intrawound VP in preventing PJI after primary TKA or UKA is rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and side effects of local high-dose VP application to the joint to prevent PJI in TKA and UKA. METHODS: From 2010 to 2017, 166 consecutive patients that underwent primary TKA or UKA were enrolled. Seventy-five patients (92 knees) did not receive VP (control group), while 90 patients (110 knees, VP group) received VP (intrawound, 1 g) before capsule closure during TKA and UKA. Aseptic wound complications, such as skin erosion, wound dehiscence, and prolonged wound healing, were evaluated within 3 months post-operatively. PJI was assessed within a year post-operatively. RESULTS: Seven patients (7.6%) in the control group and five patients (4.5%) in the VP group had PJI. No significant differences existed in the PJI rates between the groups. Aseptic operative wound complications occurred in 4 patients (4.3%) and 13 patients (11.8%), whereas prolonged operative wound healing occurred in 3 patients (3.3%) and 14 patients (12.7%) of patients in the control and VP group, respectively. Operative wound complications were significantly frequent in the VP group. CONCLUSIONS: Intrawound VP administration does not decrease PJI occurrence in primary TKA and significantly causes aseptic wound complications. The use of intrawound VP for the prevention of PJI after primary TKA and UKA is not recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Comparison of hip muscle volume between fit-and-fill stem and tapered-wedge stem after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral approach.

BACKGROUND: In total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery, hip muscle preservation is important in strengthening the stability of the hip and improving the activities of the patient. However, whether the type of femoral stem affects the recovery of the hip muscles remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative hip muscle recovery among femoral stem varieties after THA. METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) images of 44 patients (44 hips) who underwent THA using an anterolateral approach were reviewed. Twenty-two patients received a fit-and-fill (FF) stem and 22 received the tapered-wedge (TW) stem. The volumes of the gluteus maximus (GMA), gluteus medius (GME), and obturator internus (OI) were measured on three-dimensional models reconstructed using preoperative and 6-month postoperative CT images. Relationships between muscle volume changes and factors including the femoral stem length were evaluated. RESULTS: The GMA and GME volumes increased postoperatively by 8.2% and 8.3%, respectively, in the FF stem group and 7% and 6%, respectively, in the TW stem group, with no group differences. In contrast, the OI volume decreased postoperatively by 17.8% in the FF group and was preserved in TW group (p < 0.001). Moreover, OI volume was decreased in 19 patients (86%) in the FF group and in 11 patients (50%) in the TW group (p = 0.01). The normalized stem length was significantly associated with the postoperative change in OI volume (r = -0.45, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The TW stem showed a significant advantage over the FF stem in terms of OI preservation. Surgeons should pay close attention during surgery to avoid OI injury when using different femoral stem types. We suggest that a short and reduced lateral shoulder femoral stem is a better choice for the preservation of external rotation muscles.

New radiographic index for evaluating acetabular version.

BACKGROUND: Several qualitative radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular retroversion. However, quantitative assessment of acetabular version would be useful for more rigorous research purposes and perhaps to diagnose and treat hip disorders. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We developed a new quantitative index for acetabular version (p/a ratio). We determined the average p/a, compared it with previous radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion, and evaluated its relationship with anatomic acetabular version. METHODS: We calculated the p/a ratio by measuring p (distance from acetabular articular surface to posterior wall) and a (distance from acetabular articular surface to anterior wall) on plain hip AP radiographs and dividing p by a. P and a were assessed on the perpendicular bisector of the line between the teardrop and the lateral edge of the acetabulum. Using 185 hip radiographs from patients with suspected idiopathic osteonecrosis, we measured p/a and compared it with previous qualitative signs for acetabular retroversion. Using 62 hip CT images from patients with no osteoarthritis, we measured the anatomic anteversion at the height of the central femoral head and investigated its relationship with p/a. RESULTS: The average p/a was 2.05 in 185 hips, and most patients with a p/a greater than 2.05 had a negative qualitative retroversion sign. A correlation was observed between central anteversion and p/a (r = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: We believe this ratio can be considered a simple quantitative parameter to assess acetabular version using plain AP radiographs.

Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software.

BACKGROUND: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) - RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA's intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips. RESULTS: The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9-3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was > 0.7 in all lesions (p < 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83-0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was > 0.80 in A45°-P0°. CONCLUSIONS: The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.

Arthroscopic capsular repair using proximal advancement for instability following hip arthroscopic surgery: a case report.

Arthroscopic capsular reconstruction has been reported for joint capsule tear and joint instability after hip arthroscopic surgery. However, the procedure is complicated and requires proficiency. Herein, we present a case of mild dysplasia and instability following arthroscopic surgery performed against pain due to synovitis and labral injury. The patient refused osteotomy of the hip joint, so we performed hip arthroscopic surgery using a new method of arthroscopic capsular repair using proximal advancement. A 37-year-old woman underwent hip arthroscopic surgery two times at the right side and periacetabular osteotomy at the left side. She noticed instability of the right hip joint after the second hip arthroscopic surgery. For the joint capsular management at the second surgery, which was not suitable for capsular plication, arthroscopic capsular repair using proximal advancement was performed by lifting the distal capsule to the acetabular margin. This method is less technically demanding compared with capsular reconstruction, and it can securely achieve joint stability by retensioning the joint capsule and iliofemoral ligament. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by modified Harris hip score (mHHS), non-arthritic hip score (NAHS) and visual analog scale (VAS). The patient reported an increase in the mHHS from 35.2 pre-operatively to 90.1, the NAHS increased from 50 pre-operatively to 88.7, and the VAS score improved from 9 points pre-operatively to 1 point at 2 years post-operatively. To our knowledge, this is the first report on arthroscopic capsular repair using proximal advancement in a patient with hip instability following hip arthroscopic surgery.

Hip arthroscopic Surgery after a Diagnosis of Premature Osteoarthritis of the Hip in Three Unicyclists: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Although an association between femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and sports has been reported, there are no reports regarding arthroscopic findings of osteoarthritis due to FAI in adolescent unicyclists. CASE REPORT: We present three cases of experienced unicyclists with coxarthrosis at puberty (three girls aged 17, 15, and 12 years). All three girls had bone morphology characteristics of FAI (two unicyclists with cam-type FAI and one with mixed-type FAI). None of them had a history of trauma or abnormal blood test result. The patients underwent hip arthroscopic surgery and intra-articular evaluation/treatment (acetabular labral repair, synovectomy, bone marrow stimulation [microfracture], and capsular closure). Arthroscopic findings included severe and extensive cartilage and acetabular labrum damages. After surgery, only two patients were able to return to competition. The characteristics of the unicycle competition may have led to puberty coxarthrosis due to FAI. CONCLUSION: Hip joint symptoms in adolescent unicyclists have a risk for causing severe and extensive damages to the labrum and articular cartilages at an early stage, thereby requiring preventive and attention-seeking measures.

Predictors of Poor Clinical Outcome After Arthroscopic Labral Preservation, Capsular Plication, and Cam Osteoplasty in the Setting of Borderline Hip Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) is frequently diagnosed concurrently with cam impingement. While hip arthroscopy has advanced the treatment of hip joint pathology, including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), arthroscopic treatment for FAI in the setting of BDDH remains a challenge amid a subset of patients. The risk factors of poor clinical results after hip arthroscopic labral preservation and FAI corrections in the setting of BDDH patients have not been well established. HYPOTHESIS: Pre- and intraoperative findings can predict the poor clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI in the setting of BDDH. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Of patients with BDDH (defined as lateral center edge [LCE] angle between 20° and 25°) who underwent arthroscopic procedures for FAI between 2009 and 2014, 45 met inclusion criteria (45 hips: 15 males and 30 females). Their mean age was 31.4 years (range, 12-65 years), and the mean LCE angle was 23.2°. Clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluations up to a minimum of 2 years after surgery were performed for all patients. Failure of the procedure was defined as conversion to subsequent surgery or having a Tönnis osteoarthritis grade of 2, and success was defined as patients who did not need subsequent surgery. Univariate analysis and Cox hazard proportional analysis were performed for both cohorts. RESULTS: Of 45 patients, 11 (24%) had revision surgery (endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty for 5 patients, total hip arthroplasty for 2, and revision hip arthroscopy for 2) or advanced to Tönnis grade ≥2 osteoarthritis and thus constituted the failure group. In the success group, modified Harris Hip Score (median, pre- vs postoperative: 72.1 vs 100, P< .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and nonarthritic hip score (58.8 vs 98.8, P< .001) were significantly improved at the minimum 2-year follow-up. The median age of the failure group was significantly higher than that of the success group (47.0 vs 20.0, P< .001, Mann-Whitney Utest). Risk factors of poor clinical outcomes were identified as follows: age ≥42 years (hazard ratio [HR], 11.6; 95% CI, 2.5-53.9; P= .002, Cox hazard model), broken Shenton line (HR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.9-22.3; P= .003), Tönnis angle ≥15° (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.2-12.9; P= .03), vertical center anterior (VCA) angle ≤17° (HR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.5-17.1; P= .01), Tönnis grade 1 at preoperative radiograph (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.7; P= .04), severe cartilage delamination at acetabulum (HR, 11.8; 95% CI, 3.0-46.1; P< .001), and mild cartilage damage at femoral head (HR, 8.1; 95% CI, 2.1-30.8; P= .002). CONCLUSION: Preoperative predictors of poorer outcomes from hip arthroscopic labral preservation, capsular plication, and cam osteoplasty in the setting of BDDH are age ≥42 years old, broken Shenton line, osteoarthritis, Tönnis angle ≥15°, and VCA angle ≤17° on preoperative radiographs. Intraoperative predictors of poorer outcomes are severe acetabular chondral damage and even mild femoral chondral damage. Although the patients in the setting of BDDH may have good outcomes from isolated hip arthroscopy, caution is suggested for those with the aforementioned risk factors.

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Worsened Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Labral Preservation and Capsular Closure in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) have a greater risk of acetabular labral tearing and joint instability, which predispose them to developing osteoarthritis. The arthroscopic management of DDH, however, remains controversial. HYPOTHESIS: Specific clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters correlate with and predict a worsened clinical outcome after hip arthroscopic surgery for DDH. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Of patients with DDH who underwent an arthroscopic procedure between March 2009 and June 2011, there were 28 hips in 28 patients (6 male and 22 female) that met the inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 28.4 years. Clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluations up to a minimum of 2 years after surgery were performed for all patients. Failure of the procedure was defined as conversion to subsequent surgery or having a Tönnis osteoarthritis grade of 2 and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) that remained <85, and success was defined as patients who did not need subsequent surgery and had an mHHS >85. Univariate analysis and Cox hazard proportional analysis were performed on the 2 subpopulations. RESULTS: There were 9 patients in the failure group (including 3 hips with T nnis grade 2) and 19 patients in the success group. In 22 of 28 patients, the mean mHHS significantly improved from 61.6 ± 18.8 (range, 12.0-85.0) preoperatively to 94.3 ± 7.0 (range, 73.7-100.0) at final follow-up, and the mean Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) improved from 56.2 ± 13.9 (range, 35.0-81.3) preoperatively to 92.7 ± 9.5 (range, 65.0-100.0) at final follow-up (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Univariate analysis showed that a broken Shenton line was significantly more prevalent in the failure group compared with the success group (8/9 [89%] vs 3/19 [16%] patients, respectively; P < .001). High-grade cartilage delamination (Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network [MAHORN] grades 3-5) was significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (8/9 [89%] vs 3/19 [16%] patients, respectively; P < .001). The median femoral neck-shaft (FNS) angle in the failure group was significantly higher than that in the success group (139° vs 134°, respectively; P = .01). Further, Cox hazard proportional analysis of the failure group showed that the predictors for a poor clinical outcome were the presence of a broken Shenton line, FNS angle >140°, center-edge (CE) angle <19°, body mass index (BMI) >23 kg/m(2), acetabular cartilage damage (MAHORN grades 3-5), and cartilage damage of the femoral head (International Cartilage Repair Society grades 2-4). The most important predictors for a poor clinical outcome at the time of surgery were a broken Shenton line and an FNS angle >140°. CONCLUSION: Patients with a broken Shenton line, FNS angle >140°, CE angle <19°, or BMI >23 kg/m(2) at the time of surgery are not good candidates for the arthroscopic management of DDH.

Effects of combination of whey protein intake and rehabilitation on muscle strength and daily movements in patients with hip fracture in the early postoperative period.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Elderly patients can be at risk of protein catabolism and malnutrition in the early postoperative period. Whey protein includes most essential amino acids and stimulates the synthesis of muscle protein. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resistance training in combination with whey protein intake in the early postoperative period. METHODS: We randomized patients to a whey protein group or a control group. The former group received 32.2 g of whey protein pre- and post-rehabilitation in the early postoperative period for two weeks. Outcomes were knee extension strength on either side by Biodex 4.0, and the ability of transfer, walking, toilet use and stair use by the Barthel Index (BI). We performed initial and final assessments in the second and tenth rehabilitation sessions. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were recruited: 20 in the whey protein group and 18 in the control group. Participants in the whey protein group showed significantly greater improvement in knee extension strength in the operated limb compared with the control group (F = 6.11, P = 0.02). The non-operated limb also showed a similar tendency (F = 3.51, P = 0.07). The abilities of transfer, walking and toilet use showed greater improvements in the whey protein group than in the control group by BI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of whey protein intake and rehabilitation for two weeks in the early postoperative period has a beneficial effect on knee extension strength in both lower limbs and BI (transfer, walking and toilet use) scores in patients with hip fracture.