RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the absorbed doses in the tumoral-liver and non-tumoral liver of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing radioembolization with Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres, and compared with those derived from 99mTc-MAA using the partition model. METHODS: A total of 42 HCC patients (28 males and 14 females, mean age 65 ± 11.51 years) who received 45 treatment sessions with 90Y-microspheres between 2016 and 2021 were included. Pre-treatment 99mTc-MAA and post-treatment 90Y-bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT were acquired for each patient. Semi-automated segmentation of regions of interest (ROIs) was performed using MIM Encore software to determine the tumor-liver ratio (TLR) encompassing the liver volume, tumoral-liver, and lungs, and verified by both nuclear medicine physician and interventional radiologist. A partition dosimetry model was used to estimate the administered activity of 90Y-microspheres and the absorbed doses to the tumoral-liver and non-tumoral liver. The student's paired t test and Bland-Altman plot were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean TLR values obtained from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT were 4.78 ± 3.51 and 2.73 ± 1.18, respectively. The mean planning administered activity of 90Y-microspheres based on 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT was 1.56 ± 0.80 GBq, while the implanted administered activity was 2.53 ± 1.23 GBq (p value < 0.001). The mean absorbed doses in the tumoral-liver estimated from 99mTc-MAA and 90Y-bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT were 127.44 ± 4.36 Gy and 135.98 ± 6.30 Gy, respectively. The corresponding mean absorbed doses in the non-tumoral liver were 34.61 ± 13.93 Gy and 55.04 ± 16.36 Gy. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the administered activity of 90Y-microspheres, as estimated from 90Y-bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT, was significantly higher than that estimated from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT resulted in increased absorbed doses in both the tumoral-liver and non-tumoral liver. However, 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT remains a valuable planning tool for predicting the distribution of 90Y-microspheres in liver cancer treatment.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Embolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Microesferas , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/métodos , Agregado de Albumina Marcado com Tecnécio Tc 99m , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/uso terapêutico , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the calculated absorbed dose in target organs and tumors obtained using the different imaging protocols and the calculation methodologies implemented by HERMES HybridViewer dosimetry software for 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy. METHODS: Multiple time-point whole-body planar images and one SPECT/CT image were acquired from 18 patients including 177Lu-PSMA I&T (13 patients) and 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment (5 patients) after administration of 3.80-8.58 GBq injected activity. The regions of interest were drawn in the whole body, kidneys, liver, urinary bladder, salivary glands, and tumors to determine the time-integrated activity (TIA) in source organs. Absorbed doses in target organs were calculated according to the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) scheme using the HERMES HybridViewer dosimetry integrated with OLINDA/EXM V.2.1 that utilizes the non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) for computational digital phantom. RESULTS: The planar-based dosimetry showed a higher dose per injected activity compared to the hybrid-based dosimetry, primarily due to organ overlap. The highest difference in absorbed dose between the imaging scenarios was observed in the spleen with a variation of up to 51.6%, while the difference for other target organs and tumors was less than 40%. CONCLUSION: The dosimetry calculation derived from the 2D planar-based method consistently demonstrates a significantly higher absorbed dose in organs and tumors compared with the hybrid-based method. However, the hybrid method outperforms the planar method in terms of tumor visualization and overlap-free organ delineation.