Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Retina ; 42(10): 1852-1858, 2022 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976228

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the patients' discomfort and pain experienced during anesthesia, pars plana vitrectomy, and 24 hours postoperatively after sub-Tenon's injection (STI) versus peribulbar block (PB) in elective vitreoretinal surgery. METHODS: Retrospective study involving 80 patients who underwent elective vitreoretinal surgery receiving either PB (Group 1, n = 40) or STI (Group 2, n= 40) between January 2021 and March 2022. Patients' pain experienced during the procedure and 24 hours postoperatively were assessed using a pain scale and a two-section questionnaire. One hour postoperatively, patients were asked to rate the level of pain they felt during the entire procedure by pointing at a 0 to 100 Visual Analog Scale. Subsequently, patients answered a two-section questionnaire regarding pain and discomfort felt 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: According to Visual Analog Scale measurements, patients experienced significantly more pain during PB than during STI 1 hour after surgery. Patients undergoing PB experienced more pain than those who underwent STI, experiencing burning and discharge feeling. Patients undergoing STI had a lower pain level score 24 hours postoperatively despite similar discomfort. CONCLUSION: Sub-Tenon's injection has a lower pain score than PB during the procedure and 24 hours postoperatively, representing a valuable procedure to deliver analgesia in vitreoretinal surgery.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Cirurgia Vitreorretiniana , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(9)2022 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36140501

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The surgical time duration, the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the incidence rate of intraoperative complications, alongside the vision and posturing parameters, were estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the three-dimensional (3D) heads-up visualization system (HUVS) and standard operating microscope (SOM) in cataract surgery. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on 26 June 2022. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to present postoperative BCVA and the mean surgical time duration, whereas the risk ratio (RR) was used to present the incidence rate of intraoperative complications. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's test. The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for randomized clinical trials, the methodological index for non-randomized, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias. The research has been registered with the PROSPERO database (identifier, CRD42022339186). RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of five studies with 1021 participants, the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) of the postoperative BCVA showed no significant difference between patients who underwent HUVS versus SOM cataract surgery (WMD = -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.01 -0.02). In the meta-analysis of nine studies with 5505 participants, the pooled WMD of mean surgical time duration revealed no significant difference between patients who underwent HUVS versus SOM cataract surgery (WMD = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.43-0.76). In the meta-analysis of nine studies with 8609 participants, the pooled risk RR associated with intraoperative complications was 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: 3D HUVS and SOM provide comparable surgical time duration, postoperative BCVA, and incidence rate of intraoperative complications.

3.
J Clin Med ; 11(10)2022 May 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35628970

RESUMO

Intraocular pressure occurring during the Trendelenburg position may be a risk for postoperative visual loss and other ocular complications. Intraocular pressure (IOP) higher than 21 mmHg poses a risk for ocular impairment causing several conditions such as glaucoma, detached retina, and postoperative vision loss. Many factors might play a role in IOP increase, like peak expiratory pressure (PIP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and surgical duration and some others (anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade depth) contribute by reducing IOP during procedures requiring both pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position (25-45° head-down tilt). Despite transient visual field loss after surgery, no signs of ischemia or changes to the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) have been shown after surgery. Over the years, several studies have been conducted to control and prevent IOPs intraoperative increase. Multiple strategies have been proposed by different authors over the years to reduce IOP during laparoscopic procedures, especially those involving steep Trendelenburg positions such as robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), and abdominal and pelvic procedures. These strategies included both positional and pharmacological strategies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA