Uric Acid Control in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in a Southeastern US Urban Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Uric acid (UA) control may be insufficient in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in the current era. It is unclear, however, whether this is the result of environmental effects, patient anthropometrics or insufficient dosing of medical therapy (allopurinol). METHODS: We have collected data on multiple clinical and laboratory parameters of 114 CKD clinic patients attending the nephrology clinic of the University of Mississippi Medical Center with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m2. We assessed the correlates of UA levels and the allopurinol doses along with achieved serum UA and urine pH. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of middle-aged to elderly patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 62.1 (11.6) years; 45.6% were female, 68.4% were African American and 47.4% had a history of gout. The mean UA level was 7.7 (2.49) mg/dL (range 3.1-16), allopurinol dose was 192 (99) mg/day (range 50-450) and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 23.8 (11.3) mL · min-1 · 1.73 m2. While the overall serum bicarbonate level was 25 (3.2) mEq/L, urine pH was <6 in 60.5% of the cohort. Significant univariate correlates of the administered doses of allopurinol were weight (r 0.317, P = 0.001), body mass index (BMI; r 0.313, P = 0.001), and female sex (r -0.198; P = 0.035). Achieved UA levels correlated directly with BMI (r 0.201, r = 0.036) but inversely with the allopurinol dose (r -0.196; P = 0.036). During logistic regression analysis with stepwise selection, only weight (ß 0.313, P = 0.001) and sex (ß -0.190, P = 0.039) proved to be predictive of the allopurinol dose; as for the achieved UA level, only BMI (ß 0.271, P = 0.006) and the allopurinol dose (ß -0.258; P = 0.009) had a significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CKD, conventional dosing recommendations for allopurinol are unlikely to suffice in reaching target serum UA goals. In our cohort, larger-than-usual allopurinol doses were well tolerated.

Kidney biopsy for renal tubular acidosis: when tissue diagnosis makes a difference.

Renal tubular acidosis (RTA) is a disorder with variable presentations and oftentimes a nebulous underlying primary diagnosis. We describe a rare cause of RTA as an unusual complication of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. We report a case of a 33-year-old male with history of hypertension, acid reflux, allergic rhinitis, and low testosterone admitted with complaints of fatigue, weight loss, and unexplained acidosis for ~ 2 months. His medications prior to admission included losartan, omeprazole, potassium chloride, sildenafil, and testosterone propionate injections. His physical exam was unremarkable with a blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg. Initial lab work showed a nonanion gap metabolic acidosis with serum bicarbonate level of 16 mM/L and potassium 3 mM/L. Urine studies showed urine pH of 6.5 and a positive urine anion gap. The serum creatinine was within normal range(1.13 mg/dL). He required massive doses of bicarbonate and potassium supplementation with minimal improvement of serum chemistries achieved. The cause of apparent distal RTA remained elusive despite extensive blood, urine, and imaging testing. Ultimately a renal biopsy was obtained showing mild to moderate tubule-interstitial inflammation with 5% fibrosis. PPI therapy (omeprazole) was stopped, and he was started on prednisone 60 mg per day. Two weeks later, his RTA findings resolved, and he no longer required bicarbonate and potassium supplementation. Our case highlights the importance of recognizing a unique complication of RTA following PPI therapy. It also underscores the possible need for considering a kidney biopsy in the setting of nondiagnostic laboratory work up to uncover the underlying etiology of RTA and suspected allergic interstitial nephritis (AIN).