Should asymptomatic cervical stenosis be treated in the setting of progressive thoracic myelopathy? A systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Unlike tandem stenosis of the cervical and lumbar spine, tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis (TCTS) of the spine is less common, and the approach and order of intervention are controversial. We aim to review the literature to evaluate the incidence and interventions for patients with cervical and thoracic stenosis. We provide illustrative cases to demonstrate that thoracic myelopathy in the setting of asymptomatic cervical stenosis can be treated safely. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature through electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed to present the current literature that evaluates TCTS as it relates to incidence and surgical interventions. We also present two cases of patients undergoing operative intervention for thoracic myelopathy in the setting of concurrent cervical stenosis. RESULTS: A total of 26 English original studies and case reports were identified. Nine studies evaluated the incidence of TCTS. 20 studies with a total of 168 patients with TCTS presented information on surgical intervention options. There is an overall aggregate incidence of 11.6% (530/4751) based on incidence studies. 165 patients underwent thoracic intervention. Of these patients, 63 patients underwent cervical intervention first, 29 underwent thoracic intervention first, and 73 underwent simultaneous, single-stage intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with myelopathy, both cervical and thoracic spine should be evaluated for TCTS. Order of operative intervention is tailored to clinical and radiographic information. In cases of thoracic myelopathy with asymptomatic cervical stenosis, thoracic intervention can be pursued with precautions to prevent further cervical cord injury.

Total Resection of Pediatric Desmoid Tumor of the Left Neck with Utilization of 3D Virtual Surgical Planning.

A 13-year-old girl with a painful left neck mass was referred to our institution due to suspicions of malignancy. The patient reported pain that accompanied her frequent neck spasms. Computed tomography revealed a large, soft-tissue mass in the left neck, deep to the sternocleidomastoid. The lesion anteriorly displaced the internal carotid artery and both displaced and crushed the internal left jugular vein. Uniquely, a three-dimensional virtual reality model combining magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography data was used to determine the lesion's resectability and visualize which structures would be encountered or require protection while ensuring total resection. During operation, we confirmed that the mass also laterally displaced the brachial plexus, cranial nerves X and XI, and spinal nerves C3-C5 (including the phrenic) of the cervical plexus. Postsurgical pathological analysis confirmed a diagnosis of desmoid tumor, also known as aggressive fibromatosis, whereas DNA sequencing revealed a CTNNB1 mutation, a somatic genetic marker found in approximately 90% of desmoid tumor cases. When possible, the most widely used method for the treatment of desmoid tumors has been gross resection. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and local excision are also used in the treatment of fibromatoses when complete resection is judged infeasible. In this case, a complete surgical resection with tumor-free surgical margins was performed. A standard cervical approach with a modified posterolateral incision site was implemented to avoid a conspicuous anterior neck scar. No flap, nerve repair, or reconstruction was warranted. At 1 year of postsurgical follow-up, the patient showed minimal scarring and no signs of recurrence.