Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 367, 2017 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29145820

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of evidence based treatments, many people with major depression receive no or delayed professional treatment, which may put them at risk for adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine which demographic and need factors distinguish early, delayed and no treatment use. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2). People with a diagnosis of major depression in the past 12 months were included (N = 434). Mental health care use was assessed during this same period and at follow up (three years later). Multinomial regression analysis was used to distinguish early, delayed and no mental health care users with respect to demographic and need factors. RESULTS: The majority of participants accessed treatment early (62%). Early treatment users were characterized by more severe and persistent symptoms and were more likely not to have a partner compared to no treatment users. The majority of those without treatment reached remission in three years (85%). Delayed treatment users were, compared to early users, characterized by relatively mild symptoms and a persistent or new major depressive disorder at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Early access to treatment and the finding that need factors determine mental health care use among people with depression show that the filters along the pathway to treatment are not influenced by unfavorable determinants like education or age.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Demografia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Psychol Med ; 43(10): 2203-13, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23388154

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Detailed population-based survey information on the relationship between the severity of common mental disorders (CMDs) and treatment for mental health problems is heavily based on North American research. The aim of this study was to replicate and expand existing knowledge by studying CMD severity and its association with treatment contact and treatment intensity in The Netherlands. METHOD: Data were obtained from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a nationally representative face-to-face survey of the general population aged 18­64 years (n=6646, response rate=65.1%). DSM-IV diagnoses and disorder severity were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0). Treatment contact refers to at least one contact for mental health problems made in the general medical care (GMC) or mental health care (MHC) sector. Four levels of treatment intensity were assessed, based on type and duration of therapy received. RESULTS: Although CMD severity was related to treatment contact, only 39.0% of severe cases received MHC. At the same time, 40.3% of MHC users did not have a 12-month disorder. Increasing levels of treatment intensity ranged from 51.6% to 13.0% in GMC and from 81.4% to 51.1% in MHC. CMD severity was related to treatment intensity in MHC but not in GMC. Sociodemographic characteristics were not significantly related to having experienced the highest level of treatment intensity in MHC. CONCLUSIONS. Mental health treatment in the GMC sector should be improved, especially when policy is aimed at increasing the role of primary care in the management of mental health problems.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
3.
Diabet Med ; 28(1): 86-9, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21210541

RESUMO

AIMS: The impact of depression on patients with chronic medical illnesses such as diabetes is well documented. Depression is relatively common in diabetes patients with diabetes-related complications and they are more likely to be referred to specialized outpatient facilities. Only a few studies have addressed the association between depression and multiple diabetes-related complications at these specialized outpatient facilities. The aim of this study was to determine the association between diabetes with multiple complications and depression in patients with Type 2 diabetes at a specialized outpatient clinic. METHODS: After giving informed consent, 1194 patients were screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Additional data on the type of diabetes and complications were taken from the medical records. Logistic regression analysis was conducted, with complications as the predictor variable and the probability of depression as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 596 (63%) patients with Type 2 diabetes participated in the study. The presence of two or more complications (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.02­2.94) was significantly associated with depression. Neuropathy (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.10­2.77) and nephropathy (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.00­2.48) were especially related to depression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Type 2 diabetes with two or more complications, especially neuropathy or nephropathy, are at high risk of depression. Knowing this can help clinicians identify patients at risk for depression and facilitate timely and adequate treatment.


Assuntos
Nefropatias Diabéticas/psicologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/psicologia , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Nefropatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Nefropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Neurology ; 56(5): 618-23, 2001 Mar 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11245713

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The preferred management of patients with suspected low-grade gliomas (S-LGG) remains controversial. The benefits of resection or radiotherapy early in the course of the disease have not been proven in terms of survival. Little is known about the effects of early therapy on quality of life (QOL) and cognitive status. The authors compared functional status, QOL, and cognitive status of patients suspected of having a LGG, in whom treatment was deferred, and patients with proven LGG (P-LGG), who underwent early surgery. METHODS: The authors recruited 24 patients suspected of having an LGG. These patients were matched with 24 patients with a histologically proven LGG and healthy control subjects for educational level, handedness, age, and gender. The two patient groups were also matched for tumor laterality, use of anticonvulsants, and interval between diagnosis and testing. Functional status was determined in both patient groups. QOL and cognitive status were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Matching criteria and functional status did not differ significantly between groups. Both patient groups scored worse on QOL scales than healthy control subjects. Unoperated patients with S-LGG scored better on most items than patients with P-LGG. Cognitive status was worse in both groups than in healthy control subjects, but, again, patients with S-LGG performed better than patients with P-LGG. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a wait-and-see policy in patients with S-LGG has no negative effect on cognitive performance and QOL.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicologia , Glioma/psicologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Psychol Med ; 38(2): 265-77, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17825119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on the relationship between specific chronic somatic conditions and care for co-morbid depression in primary care settings. Therefore, the present prospective, general practice-based study examined this relationship. METHOD: Longitudinal data on morbidity, prescribing and referrals concerning 991 patients newly diagnosed with depression by their general practitioner (GP) were analysed. The influence of a broad range of 13 specific chronic somatic conditions on the initiation of any depression care, as well as the prescription of continuous antidepressant therapy for 180 days, was examined. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to control for history of depression, psychiatric co-morbidity, sociodemographics and interpractice variation. RESULTS: Multilevel analysis showed that patients with pre-existing ischaemic heart disease (72.1%) or cardiac arrhythmia (59.3%) were significantly less likely to have any depression care being initiated by their GP than patients without chronic somatic morbidity (88.0%). No other specific condition had a significant influence on GP initiation of any care for depression. Among the patients being prescribed antidepressant treatment by their GP, none of the conditions was significantly associated with being prescribed continuous treatment for 180 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that patients with ischaemic heart disease or cardiac arrhythmia have a lower likelihood of GP initiation of any care for depression after being newly diagnosed with depression by their GP. This finding points to the importance of developing interventions aimed at supporting GPs in the adequate management of co-morbid depression in heart disease patients to reduce the negative effects of this co-morbidity.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Transtornos Somatoformes/diagnóstico , Transtornos Somatoformes/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA