Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA ; 326(22): 2268-2276, 2021 12 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34847226

RESUMO

Importance: It is unclear whether administration of calcium has a beneficial effect in patients with cardiac arrest. Objective: To determine whether administration of calcium during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest improves return of spontaneous circulation in adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial included 397 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and was conducted in the Central Denmark Region between January 20, 2020, and April 15, 2021. The last 90-day follow-up was on July 15, 2021. Interventions: The intervention consisted of up to 2 intravenous or intraosseous doses with 5 mmol of calcium chloride (n = 197) or saline (n = 200). The first dose was administered immediately after the first dose of epinephrine. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was sustained return of spontaneous circulation. The secondary outcomes included survival and a favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3) at 30 days and 90 days. Results: Based on a planned interim analysis of 383 patients, the steering committee stopped the trial early due to concerns about harm in the calcium group. Of 397 adult patients randomized, 391 were included in the analyses (193 in the calcium group and 198 in the saline group; mean age, 68 [SD, 14] years; 114 [29%] were female). There was no loss to follow-up. There were 37 patients (19%) in the calcium group who had sustained return of spontaneous circulation compared with 53 patients (27%) in the saline group (risk ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.49 to 1.03]; risk difference, -7.6% [95% CI, -16% to 0.8%]; P = .09). At 30 days, 10 patients (5.2%) in the calcium group and 18 patients (9.1%) in the saline group were alive (risk ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.27 to 1.18]; risk difference, -3.9% [95% CI, -9.4% to 1.3%]; P = .17). A favorable neurological outcome at 30 days was observed in 7 patients (3.6%) in the calcium group and in 15 patients (7.6%) in the saline group (risk ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.20 to 1.12]; risk difference, -4.0% [95% CI, -8.9% to 0.7%]; P = .12). Among the patients with calcium values measured who had return of spontaneous circulation, 26 (74%) in the calcium group and 1 (2%) in the saline group had hypercalcemia. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, treatment with intravenous or intraosseous calcium compared with saline did not significantly improve sustained return of spontaneous circulation. These results do not support the administration of calcium during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04153435.


Assuntos
Cloreto de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Retorno da Circulação Espontânea/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intraósseas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/fisiopatologia , Solução Salina/administração & dosagem , Análise de Sobrevida , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Resuscitation ; 179: 21-24, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35917866

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Calcium for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (COCA) trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of calcium for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary and secondary outcomes have been reported previously. This article describes the long-term outcomes of the trial. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years were included if they had a non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during which they received adrenaline. The trial drug consisted of calcium chloride (5 mmol) or saline placebo given after the first dose of adrenaline and again after the second dose of adrenaline for a maximum of two doses. This article presents pre-specified analyses of 6-month and 1-year outcomes for survival, survival with a favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale of 3 or less), and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 391 patients were analyzed. At 1 year, 9 patients (4.7%) were alive in the calcium group while 18 (9.1%) were alive in the placebo group (risk ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.24, 1.09). At 1 year, 7 patients (3.6%) were alive with a favorable neurological outcome in the calcium group while 17 (8.6%) were alive with a favorable neurological outcome in the placebo group (risk ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.18, 0.97). Outcomes for health-related quality of life likewise suggested harm of calcium but results were imprecise with wide confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Effect estimates remained constant over time suggesting harm of calcium but with wide confidence intervals. The results do not support calcium administration during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov-number, NCT04153435.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Adolescente , Adulto , Cálcio , Cloreto de Cálcio , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Epinefrina , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 33(6): 1085-93, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17457574

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the anti-inflammatory effects of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) in a porcine model of acute endotoxemia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Animal randomized controlled study at the Laboratory of Clinical Institute, Aarhus University Hospital. SUBJECTS: Eighteen female landrace pigs (30 kg). INTERVENTIONS: By pairwise randomization, pigs were given either LPS or LPS and rhAPC. Both groups received a stepwise increasing LPS infusion for 30[Symbol: see text]min; whereafter the infusion continued at a lower rate (300 min LPS in both groups). The LPS+rhAPC group received rhAPC (100 microg/kg per hour) 15 min before the LPS infusion began and throughout the trial period. RESULTS: While rhAPC showed no modifying effects on peak plasma levels of pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), TNF-alpha and IL-10 peaked significantly later in the rhAPC-treated animals. The profibrinolytic effects of rhAPC were confirmed by decreased plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 levels, while no differences were found in other coagulation markers, hemodynamic, metabolic, or leukocyte data between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant effect of rhAPC on plasma levels of either pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines in this porcine model of acute endotoxemia. However, TNF-alpha and IL-10 peaked significantly later in the rhAPC-treated animals.


Assuntos
Citocinas/análise , Endotoxemia , Proteína C/farmacocinética , Suínos , Animais , Citocinas/imunologia , Dinamarca , Endotoxemia/sangue , Endotoxemia/imunologia , Proteína C/administração & dosagem , Proteína C/metabolismo , Distribuição Aleatória , Proteínas Recombinantes , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA