Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Child Orthop ; 13(5): 508-515, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31695818

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to review the management of all paediatric humerus diaphyseal fractures treated at a single institution over a 20-year period. METHODS: Retrospective review from between 1996 and 2016 identified 96 humerus shaft fractures in paediatric patients (0 to 17 years). After excluding those deceased from inciting trauma, pathological and perinatal fractures, 80 patients remained for analysis. Data collected included age, fracture type, displacement, nerve palsy, treatment, complications and time to union. Radiographs were reviewed at the time of injury and at latest follow-up. RESULTS: Of 80 paediatric humeral diaphyseal fractures, 65 (81%) were treated with immobilization. In all, 15 (19%) fractures were treated with surgical stabilization. Most common indications were fracture displacement, open fractures and to improve mobilization in patients with multiple injuries. Fractures were stabilized with a plate (eight), flexible nails (five), external fixation (one) and percutaneous pinning (one). The operative group, compared with the nonoperative group, was older, had more high-energy mechanisms, more open fractures and increased fracture displacement. All patients in the nonoperative and operative groups went on to union with minimal complications. A nerve palsy was present in five patients (6%)with three of the five involving the radial nerve (4%). All nerve palsies were observed and had full neurological recovery. CONCLUSION: Over a 20-year period nonoperative management of paediatric humerus shaft fractures was successful in the majority of patients. Operative stabilization, when rarely indicated, had a low complication rate and improved radiographic alignment. All nerve injuries fully recovered without surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

2.
Arch Intern Med ; 147(12): 2207-9, 1987 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3500687

RESUMO

Emergent aortocoronary bypass surgery for acute myocardial infarction is controversial. We describe a patient with total occlusion of the left main coronary artery associated with acute anterior wall infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock. The patient underwent successful emergent coronary bypass surgery to manage refractory cardiogenic shock. He has subsequently experienced a prolonged survival (60 months postsurgery). This report suggests that emergent aortocoronary bypass surgery should be considered in patients with acute myocardial infarction with refractory cardiogenic shock in whom other forms of reperfusion are unsuccessful.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Doença Aguda , Angiografia , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veia Safena/transplante
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA