Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Euro Surveill ; 28(23)2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289427

RESUMO

BackgroundIn 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) accelerated development of European-level severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance.AimWe aimed to establish SARI surveillance in one Irish hospital as part of a European network E-SARI-NET.MethodsWe used routine emergency department records to identify cases in one adult acute hospital. The SARI case definition was adapted from the ECDC clinical criteria for a possible COVID-19 case. Clinical data were collected using an online questionnaire. Cases were tested for SARS-CoV-2, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), including whole genome sequencing (WGS) on SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive samples and viral characterisation/sequencing on influenza RNA-positive samples. Descriptive analysis was conducted for SARI cases hospitalised between July 2021 and April 2022.ResultsOverall, we identified 437 SARI cases, the incidence ranged from two to 28 cases per week (0.7-9.2/100,000 hospital catchment population). Of 431 cases tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, 226 (52%) were positive. Of 349 (80%) cases tested for influenza and RSV RNA, 15 (4.3%) were positive for influenza and eight (2.3%) for RSV. Using WGS, we identified Delta- and Omicron-dominant periods. The resource-intensive nature of manual clinical data collection, specimen management and laboratory supply shortages for influenza and RSV testing were challenging.ConclusionWe successfully established SARI surveillance as part of E-SARI-NET. Expansion to additional sentinel sites is planned following formal evaluation of the existing system. SARI surveillance requires multidisciplinary collaboration, automated data collection where possible, and dedicated personnel resources, including for specimen management.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Influenza Humana , Pneumonia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano , Infecções Respiratórias , Adulto , Humanos , Lactente , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Pandemias , RNA Viral/genética , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Hospitais , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/diagnóstico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia
2.
Euro Surveill ; 28(4)2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36700868

RESUMO

BackgroundTimely treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI) can reduce severe outcomes in influenza patients.AimWe assessed the impact of antiviral treatment on in-hospital deaths of laboratory-confirmed influenza patients in 11 European Union countries from 2010/11 to 2019/20.MethodsCase-based surveillance data from hospitalised patients with known age, sex, outcome, ward, vaccination status, timing of antiviral treatment, and hospitalisation were obtained. A mixed effect logistic regression model using country as random intercept was applied to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for in-hospital death in patients treated with NAIs vs not treated.ResultsOf 19,937 patients, 31% received NAIs within 48 hours of hospital admission. Older age (60-79 years aOR 3.0, 95% CI: 2.4-3.8; 80 years 8.3 (6.6-10.5)) and intensive care unit admission (3.8, 95% CI: 3.4-4.2) increased risk of dying, while early hospital admission after symptom onset decreased risk (aOR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.90-0.93). NAI treatment initiation within 48 hours and up to 7 days reduced risk of dying (0-48 hours aOR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.45-0.59; 3-4 days 0.59 (0.51-0.67); 5-7 days 0.64 (0.56-0.74)), in particular in patients 40 years and older (e.g. treatment within 48 hours: 40-59 years aOR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.66; 60-79 years 0.50 (0.39-0.63); ≥80 years 0.51 (0.42-0.63)).ConclusionNAI treatment given within 48 hours and possibly up to 7 days after symptom onset reduced risk of in-hospital death. NAI treatment should be considered in older patients to prevent severe outcomes.


Assuntos
Influenza Humana , Oseltamivir , Humanos , Idoso , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Neuraminidase , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Guanidinas/uso terapêutico , Zanamivir/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Euro Surveill ; 28(47)2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997666

RESUMO

IntroductionTwo large multicentre European hospital networks have estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 since 2021.AimWe aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) patients ≥ 20 years, combining data from these networks during Alpha (March-June)- and Delta (June-December)-dominant periods, 2021.MethodsForty-six participating hospitals across 14 countries follow a similar generic protocol using the test-negative case-control design. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) as two doses of a two-dose or one of a single-dose vaccine ≥ 14 days before onset.ResultsWe included 1,087 cases (538 controls) and 1,669 cases (1,442 controls) in the Alpha- and Delta-dominant periods, respectively. During the Alpha period, VE against hospitalisation with SARS-CoV2 for complete Comirnaty PSV was 85% (95% CI: 69-92) overall and 75% (95% CI: 42-90) in those aged ≥ 80 years. During the Delta period, among SARI patients ≥ 20 years with symptom onset ≥ 150 days from last PSV dose, VE for complete Comirnaty PSV was 54% (95% CI: 18-74). Among those receiving Comirnaty PSV and mRNA booster (any product) ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose, VE was 91% (95% CI: 57-98). In time-since-vaccination analysis, complete all-product PSV VE was > 90% in those with their last dose < 90 days before onset; ≥ 70% in those 90-179 days before onset.ConclusionsOur results from this EU multi-country hospital setting showed that VE for complete PSV alone was higher in the Alpha- than the Delta-dominant period, and addition of a first booster dose during the latter period increased VE to over 90%.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BNT162 , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Eficácia de Vacinas , Hospitalização , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia
4.
Euro Surveill ; 28(47)2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997665

RESUMO

IntroductionThe I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital networks have been measuring COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in participating European countries since early 2021.AimWe aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in patients ≥ 20 years hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) from December 2021 to July 2022 (Omicron-dominant period).MethodsIn both networks, 46 hospitals (13 countries) follow a similar test-negative case-control protocol. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) and first booster dose vaccination as last dose of either vaccine received ≥ 14 days before symptom onset (stratifying first booster into received < 150 and ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose). We measured VE overall, by vaccine category/product, age group and time since first mRNA booster dose, adjusting by site as a fixed effect, and by swab date, age, sex, and presence/absence of at least one commonly collected chronic condition.ResultsWe included 2,779 cases and 2,362 controls. The VE of all vaccine products combined against hospitalisation for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was 43% (95% CI: 29-54) for complete PSV (with last dose received ≥ 150 days before onset), while it was 59% (95% CI: 51-66) after addition of one booster dose. The VE was 85% (95% CI: 78-89), 70% (95% CI: 61-77) and 36% (95% CI: 17-51) for those with onset 14-59 days, 60-119 days and 120-179 days after booster vaccination, respectively.ConclusionsOur results suggest that, during the Omicron period, observed VE against SARI hospitalisation improved with first mRNA booster dose, particularly for those having symptom onset < 120 days after first booster dose.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Eficácia de Vacinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , RNA Mensageiro
5.
Euro Surveill ; 27(35)2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36052721

RESUMO

BackgroundUnderlying conditions are risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes but evidence is limited about how risks differ with age.AimWe sought to estimate age-specific associations between underlying conditions and hospitalisation, death and in-hospital death among COVID-19 cases.MethodsWe analysed case-based COVID-19 data submitted to The European Surveillance System between 2 June and 13 December 2020 by nine European countries. Eleven underlying conditions among cases with only one condition and the number of underlying conditions among multimorbid cases were used as exposures. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using 39 different age-adjusted and age-interaction multivariable logistic regression models, with marginal means from the latter used to estimate probabilities of severe outcome for each condition-age group combination.ResultsCancer, cardiac disorder, diabetes, immunodeficiency, kidney, liver and lung disease, neurological disorders and obesity were associated with elevated risk (aOR: 1.5-5.6) of hospitalisation and death, after controlling for age, sex, reporting period and country. As age increased, age-specific aOR were lower and predicted probabilities higher. However, for some conditions, predicted probabilities were at least as high in younger individuals with the condition as in older cases without it. In multimorbid patients, the aOR for severe disease increased with number of conditions for all outcomes and in all age groups.ConclusionWhile supporting age-based vaccine roll-out, our findings could inform a more nuanced, age- and condition-specific approach to vaccine prioritisation. This is relevant as countries consider vaccination of younger people, boosters and dosing intervals in response to vaccine escape variants.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Euro Surveill ; 27(21)2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35620997

RESUMO

IntroductionIn July and August 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant dominated in Europe.AimUsing a multicentre test-negative study, we measured COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic infection.MethodsIndividuals with COVID-19 or acute respiratory symptoms at primary care/community level in 10 European countries were tested for SARS-CoV-2. We measured complete primary course overall VE by vaccine brand and by time since vaccination.ResultsOverall VE was 74% (95% CI: 69-79), 76% (95% CI: 71-80), 63% (95% CI: 48-75) and 63% (95% CI: 16-83) among those aged 30-44, 45-59, 60-74 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. VE among those aged 30-59 years was 78% (95% CI: 75-81), 66% (95% CI: 58-73), 91% (95% CI: 87-94) and 52% (95% CI: 40-61), for Comirnaty, Vaxzevria, Spikevax and COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen, respectively. VE among people 60 years and older was 67% (95% CI: 52-77), 65% (95% CI: 48-76) and 83% (95% CI: 64-92) for Comirnaty, Vaxzevria and Spikevax, respectively. Comirnaty VE among those aged 30-59 years was 87% (95% CI: 83-89) at 14-29 days and 65% (95% CI: 56-71%) at ≥ 90 days between vaccination and onset of symptoms.ConclusionsVE against symptomatic infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant varied among brands, ranging from 52% to 91%. While some waning of the vaccine effect may be present (sample size limited this analysis to only Comirnaty), protection was 65% at 90 days or more between vaccination and onset.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
7.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 163(7): 2047-2054, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830340

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have questioned the effectiveness of surgery for the management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (ubAVM). Few studies have examined functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) prior and 12 months after surgical repair of ubAVM. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effectiveness of surgical management of ubAVM by measuring patients' perceived QOL and their ability to perform everyday activities. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, patients diagnosed with an unbAVM were assessed using the Quality Metric Short Form 36 (SF36), the DriveSafe component of the off-road driver screening tool DriveSafeDriveAware (DSDA), the modified Barthel Index (mBI) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Reassessments were conducted at the 6-week post-operative follow-up for surgical patients and at 12-month follow-up for surgical and conservatively managed patients. RESULTS: Forty-five patients enrolled in the study, of which 35 (78%) had their ubAVM surgically treated. Patients undergoing surgery had a significantly lower ubAVM Spetzler-Ponce Class (SPC). There was no significant difference 12 months after presentation in function or QOL for either the conservative or surgical group. The surgical group had significantly higher QOL of life scores from pre-surgery to 12 months post-surgery (PCS p < 0.01; MCS p = 0.02). Higher SP grade ubAVM was significantly related to poorer function in the surgical group (SP C compared with SP A; p = 0.04, mean difference - 12.4, 95%CI - 24.3 to - 0.4). CONCLUSION: Function and QOL are not diminished after surgical treatment of low Spetzler-Ponce Class unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. QOL is higher 12 months after surgery for ubAVM than for those who do not have treatment for their ubAVM.


Assuntos
Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas , Qualidade de Vida , Encéfalo , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Euro Surveill ; 26(2)2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446304

RESUMO

The European monitoring of excess mortality for public health action (EuroMOMO) network monitors weekly excess all-cause mortality in 27 European countries or subnational areas. During the first wave of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Europe in spring 2020, several countries experienced extraordinarily high levels of excess mortality. Europe is currently seeing another upsurge in COVID-19 cases, and EuroMOMO is again witnessing a substantial excess all-cause mortality attributable to COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , Mortalidade/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Sistemas Computacionais , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem
9.
Euro Surveill ; 26(29)2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34296676

RESUMO

We measured COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection at primary care/outpatient level among adults ≥ 65 years old using a multicentre test-negative design in eight European countries. We included 592 SARS-CoV-2 cases and 4,372 test-negative controls in the main analysis. The VE was 62% (95% CI: 45-74) for one dose only and 89% (95% CI: 79-94) for complete vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines provide good protection against COVID-19 presentation at primary care/outpatient level, particularly among fully vaccinated individuals.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde
10.
Aust Occup Ther J ; 68(2): 106-114, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368324

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This prospective study examines the test-retest reliability of touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware (DSDA). In a future study, the authors intend assessing the usefulness of DSDA to measure progress of patients undergoing treatment for neurological conditions. Evidence of test-retest reliability is required first. METHODS: Australian adults with current driver's licences (N = 39) aged 20 to 91 years (Mage  = 58) recruited from a convenience sample were assessed with DSDA. The assessment was repeated 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months later to match planned assessments of patients undergoing neurosurgical treatment in future research. DSDA classification, DriveSafe subtest score, and DriveAware subtest scores were analysed as a whole sample, and in three age groups. RESULTS: DSDA classification and DriveAware scores were consistent over repeated tests. DriveSafe scores increased between test 1 and 2 (p = .006), and thereafter no significant change from test 2 to 4. DriveSafe scores of older participants (70+ years) increased between test 1 and 2 more notably than younger participants' scores. No DriveSafe scores decreased over time. CONCLUSION: DSDA classification and DriveAware scores demonstrated test-retest reliability for all age groups. DriveSafe scores did not demonstrate test-retest reliability between test 1 and 2 for participants 70+ years. However, DriveSafe scores demonstrated test-retest reliability after test 2, possibly indicating an initial learning effect for the DriveSafe score only. The authors posit that this result may have been influenced by older adults' reduced familiarity with iPad technology at first assessment. Further longitudinal research is required to confirm whether these results are consistent in a sample population with diagnosed cognitive impairment. Future research will assess whether repeated assessment of DSDA may be useful for monitoring and screening cognitive fitness to drive in patients who have undergone neurosurgical treatment and whether declining scores may indicate cognitive changes in ability to drive.


Assuntos
Condução de Veículo , Terapia Ocupacional , Idoso , Austrália , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
11.
Euro Surveill ; 25(22)2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32524949

RESUMO

Residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) are a vulnerable population group. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related deaths in LTCF residents represent 30-60% of all COVID-19 deaths in many European countries. This situation demands that countries implement local and national testing, infection prevention and control, and monitoring programmes for COVID-19 in LTCF in order to identify clusters early, decrease the spread within and between facilities and reduce the size and severity of outbreaks.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Coronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Surtos de Doenças , Assistência de Longa Duração , Casas de Saúde , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Populações Vulneráveis
12.
Euro Surveill ; 25(26)2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32643601

RESUMO

A remarkable excess mortality has coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. We present preliminary pooled estimates of all-cause mortality for 24 European countries/federal states participating in the European monitoring of excess mortality for public health action (EuroMOMO) network, for the period March-April 2020. Excess mortality particularly affected ≥ 65 year olds (91% of all excess deaths), but also 45-64 (8%) and 15-44 year olds (1%). No excess mortality was observed in 0-14 year olds.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte/tendências , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Coronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Surtos de Doenças , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Vigilância da População , Dados Preliminares , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem
13.
Euro Surveill ; 24(48)2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31796152

RESUMO

IntroductionInfluenza A(H3N2) clades 3C.2a and 3C.3a co-circulated in Europe in 2018/19. Immunological imprinting by first childhood influenza infection may induce future birth cohort differences in vaccine effectiveness (VE).AimThe I-MOVE multicentre primary care test-negative study assessed 2018/19 influenza A(H3N2) VE by age and genetic subgroups to explore VE by birth cohort.MethodsWe measured VE against influenza A(H3N2) and (sub)clades. We stratified VE by usual age groups (0-14, 15-64, ≥ 65-years). To assess the imprint-regulated effect of vaccine (I-REV) hypothesis, we further stratified the middle-aged group, notably including 32-54-year-olds (1964-86) sharing potential childhood imprinting to serine at haemagglutinin position 159.ResultsInfluenza A(H3N2) VE among all ages was -1% (95% confidence interval (CI): -24 to 18) and 46% (95% CI: 8-68), -26% (95% CI: -66 to 4) and 20% (95% CI: -20 to 46) among 0-14, 15-64 and ≥ 65-year-olds, respectively. Among 15-64-year-olds, VE against clades 3C.2a1b and 3C.3a was 15% (95% CI: -34 to 50) and -74% (95% CI: -259 to 16), respectively. VE was -18% (95% CI: -140 to 41), -53% (95% CI: -131 to -2) and -12% (95% CI: -74 to 28) among 15-31-year-olds (1987-2003), 32-54-year-olds (1964-86) and 55-64-year-olds (1954-63), respectively.DiscussionThe lowest 2018/19 influenza A(H3N2) VE was against clade 3C.3a and among those born 1964-86, corresponding to the I-REV hypothesis. The low influenza A(H3N2) VE in 15-64-year-olds and the public health impact of the I-REV hypothesis warrant further study.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/isolamento & purificação , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vigilância da População/métodos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Potência de Vacina , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/genética , Humanos , Memória Imunológica , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/genética , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estações do Ano , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 160(3): 559-566, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29327142

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on disability and quality of life (QOL) after surgery versus conservative management for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (uAVMs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that QOL and disability are worse after surgery ± preoperative embolisation for uAVM compared with conservative management. METHODS: We included consecutive patients diagnosed with uAVM from a prospective population-based study in Scotland (1999-2003; 2006-2010) and a prospective hospital-based series in Australia (2011-2015). We assessed outcomes on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Short Form (SF)-36 at ~ 12 months after surgery or conservative treatment and compared these groups using continuous ordinal regression in the two cohorts separately. RESULTS: Surgery was performed for 29% of all uAVM cases diagnosed in Scotland and 84% of all uAVM referred in Australia. There was no statistically significant difference between surgery and conservative management at 12 months among 79 patients in Scotland (mean SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) 39 [SD 14] vs. 39 [SD 13]; mean SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS) 38 [SD 14] vs. 39 [SD 14]; mRS > 1, 24 vs. 9%), nor among 37 patients in Australia (PCS 51 [SD 10] vs. 49 [SD 6]; MCS 48 [SD 12] vs. 49 [SD 10]; mRS > 1, 19 vs. 30%). In the Australian series, there was no statistically significant change in the MCS and PCS between baseline before surgery or conservative management and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a statistically significant difference between surgery ± preoperative embolisation and conservative management in disability or QOL at 12 months.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/cirurgia , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/terapia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação da Deficiência , Embolização Terapêutica , Feminino , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Escócia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Euro Surveill ; 22(14)2017 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28424146

RESUMO

Since December 2016, excess all-cause mortality was observed in many European countries, especially among people aged ≥ 65 years. We estimated all-cause and influenza-attributable mortality in 19 European countries/regions. Excess mortality was primarily explained by circulation of influenza virus A(H3N2). Cold weather snaps contributed in some countries. The pattern was similar to the last major influenza A(H3N2) season in 2014/15 in Europe, although starting earlier in line with the early influenza season start.


Assuntos
Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Mortalidade , Estações do Ano , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Pública , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Adulto Jovem
16.
Euro Surveill ; 21(40)2016 Oct 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27748251

RESUMO

The risk of communicable disease transmission during air travel is of public health concern and has received much attention over the years. We retrospectively reviewed information from nine flights (≥ 8 hours) associated with infectious tuberculosis (TB) cases in Ireland between September 2011 and November 2014 to investigate whether possible transmission had occurred. Twenty-four flights notified in Ireland associated with sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB cases with a history of air travel were reviewed. Nine were suitable for inclusion and analysed. Six cases of infectious TB travelled on nine flights. A total of 232 passengers were identified for contact tracing; 85.3% (n = 198) had sufficient information available for follow-up. In total, 12.1% (n = 24) were reported as screened for TB. The results revealed no active TB cases among passengers and 16.7% (n = 4) were diagnosed with latent TB infection (LTBI) all of whom had other risk factors. Despite the limited sample size, we found no evidence of M. tuberculosis transmission from infectious passengers. This study identified challenges in obtaining complete timely airline manifests, leading to inadequate passenger information for follow-up. Receipt of TB screening results from international colleagues was also problematic. The challenge of interpreting the tuberculin skin test results in determining recent vs earlier infection was encountered.


Assuntos
Viagem Aérea , Aeronaves , Busca de Comunicante/estatística & dados numéricos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adulto , Busca de Comunicante/métodos , Notificação de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Escarro/microbiologia , Teste Tuberculínico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/transmissão
17.
Euro Surveill ; 21(16)2016 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27124420

RESUMO

Since the 2008/9 influenza season, the I-MOVE multicentre case-control study measures influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically-attended influenza-like-illness (ILI) laboratory confirmed as influenza. In 2011/12, European studies reported a decline in VE against influenza A(H3N2) within the season. Using combined I-MOVE data from 2010/11 to 2014/15 we studied the effects of time since vaccination on influenza type/subtype-specific VE. We modelled influenza type/subtype-specific VE by time since vaccination using a restricted cubic spline, controlling for potential confounders (age, sex, time of onset, chronic conditions). Over 10,000 ILI cases were included in each analysis of influenza A(H3N2), A(H1N1)pdm09 and B; with 4,759, 3,152 and 3,617 influenza positive cases respectively. VE against influenza A(H3N2) reached 50.6% (95% CI: 30.0-65.1) 38 days after vaccination, declined to 0% (95% CI: -18.1-15.2) from 111 days onwards. At day 54 VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 reached 55.3% (95% CI: 37.9-67.9) and remained between this value and 50.3% (95% CI: 34.8-62.1) until season end. VE against influenza B declined from 70.7% (95% CI: 51.3-82.4) 44 days after vaccination to 21.4% (95% CI: -57.4-60.8) at season end. To assess if vaccination campaign strategies need revising more evidence on VE by time since vaccination is urgently needed.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estações do Ano , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Vaccine ; 42(16): 3547-3554, 2024 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704257

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Within influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies at primary care level with a laboratory-confirmed outcome, clinical case definitions for recruitment of patients can vary. We used the 2022-23 VEBIS primary care European multicentre study end-of-season data to evaluate whether the clinical case definition affected IVE estimates. METHODS: We estimated VE using a multicentre test-negative case-control design. We measured VE against any influenza and influenza (sub)types, by age group (0-14, 15-64, ≥65 years) and by influenza vaccine target group, using logistic regression. We estimated IVE among patients meeting the European Union (EU) acute respiratory infection (ARI) case definition and among those meeting the EU influenza-like illness (ILI) case definition, including only sites providing information on specific symptoms and recruiting patients using an ARI case definition (as the EU ILI case definition is a subset of the EU ARI one). RESULTS: We included 24 319 patients meeting the EU ARI case definition, of whom 21 804 patients (90 %) meet the EU ILI case definition, for the overall pooled VE analysis against any influenza. The overall and influenza (sub)type-specific VE varied by ≤2 % between EU ILI and EU ARI populations. DISCUSSION: Among all analyses, we found similar VE estimates between the EU ILI and EU ARI populations, with few (10%) additional non-ILI ARI patients recruited. These results indicate that VE in the 2022-23 influenza season was not affected by use of a different clinical case definition for recruitment, although we recommend investigating whether this holds true for next seasons.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Eficácia de Vacinas , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Lactente , Estações do Ano , Recém-Nascido , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle
19.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(1): e13243, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204584

RESUMO

Background: Influenza A(H3N2) viruses dominated early in the 2022-2023 influenza season in Europe, followed by higher circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and B viruses. The VEBIS primary care network estimated the influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) using a multicentre test-negative study. Materials and Methods: Primary care practitioners collected information and specimens from patients consulting with acute respiratory infection. We measured VE against any influenza, influenza (sub)type and clade, by age group, by influenza vaccine target group and by time since vaccination, using logistic regression. Results: We included 38 058 patients, of which 3786 were influenza A(H3N2), 1548 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and 3275 influenza B cases. Against influenza A(H3N2), VE was 36% (95% CI: 25-45) among all ages and ranged between 30% and 52% by age group and target group. VE against influenza A(H3N2) clade 2b was 38% (95% CI: 25-49). Overall, VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 46% (95% CI: 35-56) and ranged between 29% and 59% by age group and target group. VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 clade 5a.2a was 56% (95% CI: 46-65) and 79% (95% CI: 64-88) against clade 5a.2a.1. VE against influenza B was 76% (95% CI: 70-81); overall, 84%, 72% and 71% were among 0-14-year-olds, 15-64-year-olds and those in the influenza vaccination target group, respectively. VE against influenza B with a position 197 mutation of the hemagglutinin (HA) gene was 79% (95% CI: 73-85) and 90% (95% CI: 85-94) without this mutation. Conclusion: The 2022-2023 end-of-season results from the VEBIS network at primary care level showed high VE among children and against influenza B, with lower VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2).


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vírus da Influenza A , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Criança , Humanos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/genética , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/genética , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Eficácia de Vacinas , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
20.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(2): e13255, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403302

RESUMO

We conducted a multicentre hospital-based test-negative case-control study to measure vaccine effectiveness (VE) against PCR-confirmed influenza in adult patients with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) during the 2022/2023 influenza season in Europe. Among 5547 SARI patients ≥18 years, 2963 (53%) were vaccinated against influenza. Overall VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 11% (95% CI: -23-36); 20% (95% CI: -4-39) against A(H3N2) and 56% (95% CI: 22-75) against B. During the 2022/2023 season, while VE against hospitalisation with influenza B was >55%, it was ≤20% for influenza A subtypes. While influenza vaccination should be a priority for future seasons, improved vaccines against influenza are needed.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Pneumonia , Adulto , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estações do Ano , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/genética , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eficácia de Vacinas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA