Behavioral pharmaceutical care scale for measuring pharmacists' activities.

The development and validation of a behavioral pharmaceutical care scale (BPCS) is described. The BPCS items were constructed by conducting an extensive review of the literature on pharmaceutical care and a focus group meeting. To validate the instrument, data were collected from 617 community pharmacists in Florida. Reliability coefficients for the BPCS domains were > 0.70, and the content validity index value for the whole instrument was 0.79. Evidence supporting trait validity of the BPCS was provided by using confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the instrument's dimensionality. Nomologic validity was established by confirming the hypothesis that pharmacists who in a prior survey reported they intend to provide pharmaceutical care would have a significantly higher BPCS score than those who reported they do not intend to provide pharmaceutical care. The behavioral pharmaceutical care scale, developed as a tool for measuring pharmacists' efforts to provide pharmaceutical care, was found to be reliable, sensitive, and valid.

The Pharmacists' Implementation of Pharmaceutical Care (PIPC) model.

PURPOSE: Study purpose was to develop a theoretical framework that will explain pharmacists' behavior relative to the provision of pharmaceutical care. The model was developed from four attitude models by testing their predictive validity relative to pharmaceutical care implementation. Four hypotheses and one research question were investigated to identify determinants of behavioral intention and behavior. METHODS: 617 community pharmacists in the state of Florida, U.S.A., were surveyed twice using mail survey methodology to collect data. The first survey assessed community pharmacists' attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, past behavior recency, self-efficacies, instrumental beliefs and affect. The second survey assessed pharmacists' behavior relative to the implementation of pharmaceutical care. After establishing reliability and validity of measures, regression analysis was used to test hypotheses and research question investigated. RESULTS: The Pharmacists' Implementation of Pharmaceutical Care (PIPC) model developed postulates that (i) behavior is directly determined by past behavior recency, behavioral intention and perceived behavioral control; (ii) psychological appraisal processes-instrumental beliefs, self-efficacies, and affect toward means-influence behavior through past behavior recency; and (iii) behavioral intention is determined by attitude, social norm and perceived behavioral control. CONCLUSIONS: The PIPC model provides a formal scientifically validated theoretical framework which can be used to design successful intervention for pharmaceutical care implementation.

Assessing managed care's role in promoting preventive care.

The current trend of managed health care systems opens the door to more effective control of chronic diseases through preventive care. The goal of this study was to assess managed care's role in promoting preventive care. A mail survey was conducted of a national sample of 1,200 directors, associated with preventive care, in managed care organizations (MCOs) in the U.S. Data was obtained on perceived effectiveness, degree of importance, and likelihood of support for implementation of strategies recommended (case management, utilization review programs, selective contracting, and cost sharing) for ensuring appropriate utilization of preventive services. Also, information was collected on interventions perceived effective in encouraging plan members to utilize and providers to offer preventive services. Response rate was 17.3%. Case management and prospective and concurrent utilization review programs were perceived most effective, important, and likely to receive support for implementation while cost sharing (using deductibles and coinsurance) and retrospective utilization review programs ranked low on all dimensions. Plan member-directed interventions perceived effective in encouraging utilization of preventive services included telephone and mail reminders while computer-generated reminders and medical record audits with feedback were perceived effective in encouraging providers to offer such services. Results identified preferred MCO strategies and interventions for ensuring appropriate utilization of preventive services. Further research is needed to develop methods to encourage people at high risk for chronic diseases not currently utilizing preventive services to receive such services.