A retrospective cohort review of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.

PURPOSE: The demand for SIJ fusion among obese patients has grown substantially. However, the clinical relevance of obesity in the context of SI joint fusion has not been well investigated specifically, whether there is a BMI cutoff above which the benefit-risk ratio is low. METHODS: Adult patients ≥ 21 years of age who underwent minimally invasive SIJ fusion between 2020 and 2023. Participants were classified using the National Institutes for Health body mass index (BMI). Patients with a BMI of 30 to 39 with no significant comorbidity are considered obese, patients with a BMI of 35 to 39 with a significant comorbidity or a BMI of 40 or greater are considered morbidly obese. All subjects completed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and 12 months. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the impact of BMI category on score changes. RESULTS: Overall, mean VAS improved at 12 months by 2.5 points (p < .006). Over the 12-month follow-up period, BMI category did not impact mean improvement in VAS (ANOVA p = .08). Mean ODI at 12 months improved by 23.2 points (p < .001). BMI category did impact mean improvement in ODI (ANOVA p = .03). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates similar benefits across all BMI categories. This data suggests that obese patients do benefit from minimally invasive SIJ fusion, specifically the 35-40 BMI cohort of patients, and should not be denied this procedure based on arbitrary healthcare organizations BMI criteria.

Spinopelvic fixation failure in the adult spinal deformity population: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite modern fixation techniques, spinopelvic fixation failure (SPFF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery ranges from 4.5 to 38.0%, with approximately 50% requiring reoperation. Compared to other well-studied complications after ASD surgery, less is known about the incidence and predictors of SPFF. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: Given the high rates of SPFF and reoperation needed to treat it, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report the incidence and failure mechanisms of SPF after ASD surgery. MATERIALS/METHODS: The literature search was executed across four databases: Medline via PubMed and Ovid, SPORTDiscus via EBSCO, Cochrane Library via Wiley, and Scopus. Study inclusion criteria were patients undergoing ASD surgery with spinopelvic instrumentation, report rates of SPFF and type of failure mechanism, patients over 18 years of age, minimum 1-year follow-up, and cohort or case-control studies. From each study, we collected general demographic information (age, gender, and body mass index), primary/revision, type of ASD, and mode of failure (screw loosening, rod breakage, pseudarthrosis, screw failure, SI joint pain, screw protrusion, set plug dislodgment, and sacral fracture) and recorded the overall rate of SPF as well as failure rate for each type. For the assessment of failure rate, we required a minimum of 12 months follow-up with radiographic assessment. RESULTS: Of 206 studies queried, 14 met inclusion criteria comprising 3570 ASD patients who underwent ASD surgery with pelvic instrumentation (mean age 65.5 ± 3.6 years). The mean SPFF rate was 22.1% (range 3-41%). Stratification for type of failure resulted in a mean SPFF rate of 23.3% for the pseudarthrosis group; 16.5% for the rod fracture group; 13.5% for the iliac screw loosening group; 7.3% for the SIJ pain group; 6.1% for the iliac screw group; 3.6% for the set plug dislodgement group; 1.1% for the sacral fracture group; and 1% for the iliac screw prominence group. CONCLUSION: The aggregate rate of SPFF after ASD surgery is 22.1%. The most common mechanisms of failure were pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and iliac screw loosening. Studies of SPFF remain heterogeneous, and a consistent definition of what constitutes SPFF is needed. This study may enable surgeons to provide patient specific constructs with pelvic fixation constructs to minimize this risk of failure.

Effect of revision sacroiliac joint fusion on unresolved pain and disability: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The sacroiliac (SI) joint is recognized as a source of low back pain in 15-30% of patients. Though randomized controlled trials have shown clinical improvement following SI joint fusion in 83.1% of patients, revision rates of 2.9% within 2 years have been reported. There is a paucity of literature reviewing this small yet significant population of patients requiring revision surgery. METHODS: Following IRB approval, retrospective review of patients, who underwent a revision SI joint fusion from 2009 to 2021 was completed. Patient-reported outcomes were measured before and at each clinic visit after surgery with visual analoge scale (VAS) for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patient characteristics (chronic opiate use and prior lumbar fusion) and surgical factors (operative approach, type/number of implants and use of bone graft) were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Paired t and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined if patients met the minimally clinical important differences (MCID) for VAS-back pain and ODI scores at 1 year. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (77% female) with an average age of 49.1 (SD ± 11.1) years met inclusion criteria. Forty-four had single sided revisions and eight bilateral revisions. At 1 year follow-up there was no significant improvement in VAS-Back (p = 0.06) or ODI (p = 0.06). Patients with chronic opioid use were 8.5 times less likely to achieve the MDC for ODI scores (OR 0.118, p = 0.029). There was no difference in outcomes when comparing the different surgical approaches (p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates patients undergoing revision surgery have moderate improvement in low back pain, however, few have complete resolution of their symptoms. Specific patient factors, such as chronic opiate use and female sex may decrease the expected improvement in patient-reported outcomes following surgery. Failure to obtain relief may be due to incorrect indications, lack of biologic fusion and/or presence of co-pathologies. Further clinical examination and consistent long-term follow-up, clarify the role revision surgery plays in long-term patient outcomes.

A Novel Surgical Indication for Scheuermann's Kyphosis.

Scheuermann kyphosis can be treated surgically to restore proper sagittal alignment. Thoracic curves >70° are typically indicated for surgical intervention. However, patients who have reached their natural limit of compensatory lumbar hyperlordosis are at risk of accelerated degeneration. This can be determined by comparing lumbar lordosis on standing neutral radiographs and supine extension radiographs. Minimal additional lordosis in extension compared with neutral, abutment of the spinous processes, or greater lumbar lordosis standing than with attempted extension suggest the patient is maximally compensated. We present a case of an adolescent boy with Scheuermann kyphosis who had reached the limit of his hyperlordosis compensation reserve. He subsequently underwent a T4 to L2 posterior spinal fusion with T7 to T11 Ponte Smith-Petersen grade two osteotomies. He tolerated the procedure well with no intraoperative complications or neuromonitoring changes. The patient has continued to do well and progressed to normal activity at 5-month follow-up.

Pelvic Fixation Construct Trends in Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Purpose: Although many techniques exist, spinopelvic fixation continues to present challenges in the management of adult spinal deformity. Shear forces, complex anatomy, and bone quality are common reasons why spine surgeons continue to explore options for fixation. Methods: A retrospective chart reviewed of patients receiving pelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity over a 12-year period was conducted. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts based on date of surgery: (1) 2010 to 2013, (2) 2014 to 2017, and (3) 2018 to 2021. Pelvic fixation constructs in the study included traditional iliac screws, stacked S2-alar-iliac (S2AI screws), and triangular titanium implants. Results: Of the 494 patients with multiple implant constructs who met the inclusion criteria for this study, patients undergoing pelvic fixation surgery who received at least 2 implants increased by approximately 5% every 4 years (90.2%, 94.6%, 99.1% respectively). Over the 12-year span, the implementation of the S2AI screw grew 120%. Conclusion: At our institution, there is a trend toward using multiple bilateral implant constructs for pelvic fixation, with nearly a tenfold percentage increase between the most recent cohorts. These include iliac screws with S2AI screws, multiple stacked S2AI screws, and S2AI screws used in conjunction with triangular titanium implants in hopes to decrease implant failure.

Sacropelvic Fixation with Porous Fusion/Fixation Screws: A Technical Note and Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to analyze our initial experience using a novel porous fusion/fixation screw (PFFS) for pelvic fixation and determine our rate of screw malposition requiring intraoperative repositioning. METHODS: We reviewed 83 consecutive patients who underwent sacropelvic fixation with PFFS at our institution from June 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 using intraoperative computed tomography-based computer-assisted navigation via an open posterior approach. Following PFFS insertion, intraoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to assess screw positioning. Demographic data were collected, and operative reports and patient images were reviewed to determine what implants were used and if any PFFS required repositioning. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (26M:48F) were included, and 57 (77.0%) had a prior sacroiliac joint or lumbar spine surgery. A stacked screw configuration was used in 62/74 cases (83.8%). A total of 235 PFFS were used and six (2.6%) were malpositioned. Of 88 cephalic screws placed in stacked configuration, 4 were malpositioned (4.5%) and 1/123 caudal screws were malpositioned (0.8%). One of 24 sacral-alar-iliac screws placed in a stand-alone configuration was malpositioned (4.2%). Malpositions included 4 medial, 1 lateral, and 1 inferior, and all were revised intraoperatively without major sequela. CONCLUSIONS: Although PFFSs are larger than traditional sacropelvic fixation screws, stacked sacral-alar-iliac instrumentation can be done safely with computer-assisted navigation. We found a low malposition rate in our initial series of patients, the majority being the cephalad screw in a stacked configuration. This isn't surprising, as these are placed after the caudal screws, which reduces the available corridor size and increases the placement difficulty.

Spine surgeon versus AI algorithm full-length radiographic measurements: a validation study of complex adult spinal deformity patients.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal measurements play an integral role in surgical planning for a variety of spine procedures. Full-length imaging eliminates distortions that can occur with stitched images. However, these images take radiologists significantly longer to read than conventional radiographs. Artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis software that can make such measurements quickly and reliably would be advantageous to surgeons, radiologists, and the entire health system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. Preoperative full-length standing anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of patients that were previously measured by fellowship-trained spine surgeons at our institution were obtained. The measurements included lumbar lordosis (LL), greatest coronal Cobb angle (GCC), pelvic incidence (PI), coronal balance (CB), and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA). Inter-rater intra-class correlation (ICC) values were calculated based on an overlapping sample of 10 patients measured by surgeons. Full-length standing radiographs of an additional 100 patients were provided for AI software training. The AI algorithm then measured the radiographs and ICC values were calculated. RESULTS: ICC values for inter-rater reliability between surgeons were excellent and calculated to 0.97 for LL (95% CI 0.88-0.99), 0.78 (0.33-0.94) for GCC, 0.86 (0.55-0.96) for PI, 0.99 for CB (0.93-0.99), and 0.95 for T1PA (0.82-0.99). The algorithm computed the five selected parameters with ICC values between 0.70 and 0.94, indicating excellent reliability. Exemplary for the comparison of AI and surgeons, the ICC for LL was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) and 0.93 for CB (0.90-0.95). GCC, PI, and T1PA could be determined with ICC values of 0.81 (0.69-0.87), 0.70 (0.60-0.78), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AI algorithm presented here demonstrates excellent reliability for most of the parameters and good reliability for PI, with ICC values corresponding to measurements conducted by experienced surgeons. In future, it may facilitate the analysis of large data sets and aid physicians in diagnostics, pre-operative planning, and post-operative quality control.

Wide anatomical variability of PI normative values within an asymptomatic population: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Studies on sagittal alignment parameters have solely focused on patients with preexisting spinal deformity. Limited data in the literature have analyzed pelvic incidence (PI) values in an asymptomatic patient population. The purpose of this study was to: (1) systematically review the literature to analyze normative PI values in asymptomatic patients; and (2) provide a more definitive geometric measurement guide for determining surgical interventions. METHODS: A systematic review of retrospective studies was performed by searching PubMed to identify studies that analyzed PI measurements in asymptomatic subjects. The following search phrases were used: (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal alignment, radiograph, asymptomatic, normative values, and adults) using Boolean operators AND, OR and NOT. Patients with pathology involving the osseous pelvic anatomy (including fracture, infection, tumor, previous surgery, and lumbosacral fusion) that would prevent measurement of the selected parameters were not included. Pelvic incidence (PI) values were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies met inclusion criteria, including 3629 asymptomatic subjects who underwent standing lateral radiographs (mean age, 41.1 years; range, 24-69 years) for the purposes of analyzing pelvic incidence values. Overall, the mean PI value was 50.0° (range, 24-69) which is consistent with reported values in the literature. CONCLUSION: Wide anatomical variability and broad clinical interpretation of PI normative values do little to guide surgical planning for successful outcomes. However, this systematic review has presented PI-stratified normative values in a large sample of asymptomatic subjects which can serve as a grounded geometric reference for spine surgeons when considering surgical intervention approaches.

Management of High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis.

The Meyerding classification grades the degree of slippage in the sagittal plane on lateral standing neutral imaging: 0% to 25% Grade I, 25% to 50% Grade II, 50% to 75% Grade III, 75% to 100% Grade IV, and greater than 100% Grade V (Spondyloptosis). Grades I and II are considered low-grade and Grades III-V are considered high-grade. There are several etiologies of spondylolisthesis. A classification system of the most common causes: Type I - Dysplastic, Type II - Isthmic (including subtypes: A - Lytic, B - Elongation, and C - Acute fracture), Type III - Degenerative, Type IV - Traumatic, Type V - Pathologic, and Type VI - Iatrogenic. Dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a type of spondylolisthesis that occurs at L5-S1 when dysplastic lumbosacral anatomy is present, and is associated with high-grade slip and spina bifida occulta.