Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Head Neck ; 45(8): 1894-1902, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37255301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While a single-stage free-flap reconstruction is the preferred approach for oromandibular defects, a multistaged approach may be necessary in rare cases. These patients can still be effectively restored with functional and aesthetic improvements. METHODS: We report two cases with a history of bilateral failed fibula free flaps. We detail the multistaged reconstruction to repair these complex defects and discuss the considerations when planning such procedures. RESULTS: Both patients successfully underwent a staged reconstruction with an iliac crest osteocutaneous flap following either a rectus abdominis or pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. CONCLUSION: Oromandibular reconstruction is an expected outcome in the contemporary management of oral cavity cancer and osteoradionecrosis. However, complications do occur and can be devastating. In cases of bilateral failed fibula free flaps, a staged approach is a favorable option. Moreover, the iliac crest provides an important reconstructive option with the documented potential for implant born dental rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Neoplasias Bucais , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Fíbula/transplante , Ílio/cirurgia
2.
Laryngoscope ; 130(10): 2349-2353, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31886884

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients who undergo major palatomaxillary reconstruction do not initially achieve their intended oncologic and/or reconstructive goals and require additional surgery. We aim to detail the unique management considerations in this patient population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent palatomaxillary reconstruction by the senior author (m.l.u.) between 1998 and 2016. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients required multiple reconstructions. The median time to second reconstruction was 17 months. The most common reason for a second reconstruction was for recurrent disease (10 of 21), followed by functional/aesthetic reasons (7 of 21) and osteoradionecrosis (4 of 21). Four patients went on to have a third reconstruction, and two underwent a fourth. A total of 27 reconstructions were performed, consisting of 20 soft tissue free flaps, four vascularized bone free flaps, and three locoregional flaps. CONCLUSION: This patient cohort represents unique oncologic and reconstructive challenges. With long-term follow-up, multiple reconstructions may be required to optimize oncologic and functional/aesthetic outcomes. This is the first series of its kind that details the reasons for, as well as the outcomes of, patients who required multiple reconstructive procedures following initial palatomaxillary reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2B Laryngoscope, 130:2349-2353, 2020.


Assuntos
Doenças Maxilares/cirurgia , Palato/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Prostodontia/métodos , Idoso , Estética , Feminino , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Head Neck ; 40(8): 1639-1666, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29537619

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Palatomaxillary defects were historically restored with a prosthetic obturator; however, advances in local and free tissue transfer has provided a viable alternative for appropriately selected patients with palatomaxillary defects. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent palatomaxillary reconstruction by the lead author between 1998 and 2016 was conducted. Patients who were restored with a palatal obturator were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were reconstructed with a total of 159 local, regional, and free flaps with a 96.7% success rate. Seventy-four patients (52.8%) underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation, with 183 implants placed and an 86% success rate. CONCLUSION: Palatomaxillary reconstruction applying a systematic approach, using a multitude of techniques, is a safe and effective way to restore patients without compromising the ability to maintain surveillance. Prosthodontic rehabilitation can be achieved in a high percentage of patients using dental implants, leading to optimal aesthetic and functional results.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo , Maxila/cirurgia , Palato/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implantes Dentários , Restauração Dentária Permanente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Maxilares/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Palatinas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 139(4): 371-81, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23599073

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Functional recovery for patients who undergo maxillomandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone free flaps (VBFFs) is potentially more attainable with computer-assisted implant rehabilitation. This prosthodontic-driven approach uses software planning and surgical templates for implant placement supporting fixed dental prostheses (FDP). Implant success with immediate load (IL) provisional and definitive FDP restorations in VBFFs is reported for the first time in a patient cohort. OBJECTIVES: To determine implant success for FDP restorations and IL restorations. To determine factors that may influence success and predictability to provide FDP restorations in VBFFs. DESIGN: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted of patients who underwent VBFF reconstruction and computer-assisted planning (CP) for FDP implant rehabilitation. This study was conducted with approval from the institutional review board at Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York. SETTING: Clinical procedures were conducted in operating room and outpatient facilities in a tertiary referral medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight consecutive patient treatments were reviewed. Inclusion criteria for all patients were VBFF reconstruction and CP for FDP restoration prior to stage 1 implant surgery. Patients were evaluated for implant success, surgical templates, IL provisional restorations, and prosthodontic framework design. A comparison is made between patients with IL provisional restorations and those patients who did not receive an immediate restoration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Implants that achieved osseointegration and used for prosthetic reconstruction determined success. Prosthodontic design considerations included whether the patient received an IL provisional restoration and 3 categories of FDP metal framework design. RESULTS Ninety-nine implants of 116 implants placed were used for prosthetic restorations, achieving an 85.4% success rate. Twenty-five of 28 patients received FDP restorations. Thirteen of 28 patients received IL provisional restorations at stage 1 implant surgery. Fifty of 56 implants were successful (89.3%) in the IL group. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted implant rehabilitation of reconstructed defects can achieve superior results to provide FDP and IL provisional restorations. This prosthodontic-driven approach also uses unique framework design to account for mandible height discrepancy after fibula free flap reconstruction. Patient management for FDP rehabilitation is also dependent on radiation status, soft-tissue modification, and patient selection.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante/métodos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Reconstrução Mandibular/métodos , Maxila/cirurgia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Feminino , Fíbula/transplante , Humanos , Masculino , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osseointegração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Prosthet Dent ; 90(3): 276-81, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12942062

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Irreversible hydrocolloid is widely used as an impression material for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial impressions. A disadvantage of irreversible hydrocolloid, however, is its limited working time. PURPOSE: This study tested the compression strength (elastic recovery) and working and setting times for an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material after a retarder was added. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The irreversible hydrocolloid (Jeltrate) was mixed with water in a standard water/powder mixture of 18 mL (1 unit) of water and 7 g (1 unit) of the impression material. Test specimens (n = 3) were prepared by adding 2, 4, 6, and 8 drops of monobasic sodium phosphate (the retarder) to each. Three other specimens, to which no retarder was added, served as the control. Specimens were prepared according to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association's specification no.18 guidelines for irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Immediately after the specimens were prepared, the flat end of a polished rod of poly(methyl methacrylate) was placed in contact with its exposed surface and quickly withdrawn. The working-time experiment was a pass/fail test conducted 30 seconds before the initial setting time. The initial setting time was established as extending from the start of the mix to the time when the impression material no longer adhered to the end of the rod. To determine how the compressive strength of the modified irreversible hydrocolloid (with retarder added) compared with that of the control, the mean stress at maximum load (Mpa) was analyzed. The compressive strength (MPa) was calculated. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics and regression analyses. RESULTS: The results of this experiment demonstrated that the elastic recovery of the irreversible hydrocolloid did not change with the addition of sodium phosphate (2 to 8 drops). The percent recovery with was 95.95% +/-.42%, 96.33% +/-.82%, and 96.28% +/-.53% for 0 (control), 2 and 8 drops, respectively. Average setting times for control specimens were 2 minutes 20 seconds +/- 0 seconds for the control specimen (0 drops) to 11 minutes 20 seconds +/- 1 minute 50 seconds for the test specimen with 8 drops. There was a direct relationship (R(2) = 0.85) between the number of drops added and the setting time. All control specimens and test specimens containing 2, 4, 6, and 8 drops of monobasic sodium phosphate produced acceptable levels of elastic recovery (> or =95%). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, predictable longer working and setting times were demonstrated for the irreversible hydrocolloid specimens with 1 to 8 drops of the sodium phosphate solution tested. The specimens with 8 drops of retarder solution exhibited variable setting times and would not be suitable for clinical use. The compressive strength of the modified irreversible hydrocolloid material tested was compromised because of the addition of sodium phosphate solution; however, recovery from deformation remained satisfactory as retarder solution was added.


Assuntos
Coloides/química , Materiais para Moldagem Odontológica/química , Alginatos/química , Força Compressiva , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Elasticidade , Teste de Materiais , Prótese Maxilofacial , Compostos Orgânicos , Fosfatos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA