A cadaver study comparing three fibreoptic-assisted techniques for converting a supraglottic airway to a cuffed tracheal tube.

After rescuing an airway with a supraglottic airway device, a method to convert it to a cuffed tracheal tube is often needed. The best method to do this has never been directly studied. We compared three techniques for conversion of a standard LMA® Unique airway to a cuffed endotracheal tube using a fibrescope. The primary endpoint was time to intubation, with secondary endpoints of success rate, perceived difficulty and preferred technique. We also investigated the relationship between level of training and prior training and experience with the techniques on the primary outcome. The mean (95% CI) time to intubation using a direct tracheal tube technique of 37 (31-42) s was significantly shorter than either the Aintree intubation catheter technique at 70 (60-80) s, or a guidewire technique at 126 (110-141) s (p < 0.001). Most (13/24) participants rated the tracheal tube as their preferred technique, while 11/24 preferred the Aintree technique. In terms of perceived difficulty, 23/24, 21/24 and 9/24 participants rated the tracheal tube technique, Aintree technique and guidewire technique, respectively, as either very easy or easy. There was no relationship between prior training, prior experience or level of training on time to completion of any of the techniques. We conclude the tracheal tube and Aintree techniques both provide a rapid and easy method for conversion of a supraglottic airway device to a cuffed tracheal tube. The guidewire technique cannot be recommended.

The establishment of an anaesthetist-managed intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring service and initial outcome data.

Neurophysiological monitoring has been recommended to reduce the risk of neurological damage during a wide variety of surgeries. While the concept of an anaesthesia-led intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) service is not new, the quality of this service provision has not been studied. In this article, we present our experience with the establishment of this service, and the results of our audit of 302 cases monitored over the initial four years. Our results identified that an anaesthesia-led IONM service was able to achieve a reliable signal in 95.4% of cases and capture significant alerts in 15.6% of these cases with sensitivity, specificity, false positive and negative rates consistent with published data. Our results indicate an anaesthesia-led IONM service is effective in identifying patients at an increased risk of an adverse outcome.