Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Use of the transradial approach (TRA) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased in recent years. TRA has a lower mortality rate than the transfemoral approach (TFA) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Comparative studies have systematically excluded patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational registry study of consecutive patients undergoing emergent revascularization between February 2007 and January 2012. An analysis of the clinical evolution of patients with CS during hospitalization was performed. RESULTS: Of 1,400 emergency procedures, 122 had CS, of which 80 underwent PCI by TRA (65.6%) and 42 underwent PCI by TFA (34.3%). The main reason for choosing TFA was the absence of radial pulse (54.9%). Mortality (64.3% vs 32.5%, P = .001), serious access site complications (11.9% vs 2.5%, P = .03), access site complications requiring blood transfusion (7.1% vs 0%, P = .04), and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, stroke, serious bleeding, and postanoxic encephalopathy) (73.8% vs 43.8%, P = .001) were greater in patients treated by TFA. In the multivariate analysis, TRA was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.39 [0.15-0.97]); other predictive factors were age ≥75 years (3.47 [1.35-8.92]), previous treatment with diuretics (3.67 [1.21-11.12]), and success of the procedure (0.07 [0.02-0.24]). CONCLUSIONS: Transradial approach for PCI is possible and safe in up to two-thirds of patients with CS. Absence of radial pulse was the main factor preventing use of TRA. In multivariate analysis, TRA was associated with a lower risk of mortality.

Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach.

Previous trials in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have not shown a definitive benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) by transfemoral approach over thrombolysis. The transradial approach (TRA) is associated with a significant decrease in mortality, MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event), and serious access site complications compared with the transfemoral approach. We have evaluated clinical outcomes in a cohort of real-life unselected ≥75-year-old patients with STEMI treated by TRA-PPCI. This is a single-center prospective, observational registry of consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI between February 2007 and February 2013. MACE was defined as death, reinfarction, or stroke. A total of 307 patients were treated by PPCI, 293 (95.1%) with TRA-PPCI (mean age 80 ± 2 years, 42% women). Patients had high co-morbidity levels (cardiogenic shock on admission 8.5%, previous myocardial infarction 11.6%, diabetes 30.4%, previous renal failure 25.6%, previous PCI 9.6%, and peripheral arterial disease 14.3%); IIbIIIa inhibitors were used in 45.1% of patients. Severe bleeding and need for transfusion were recorded for 6.5% and 9.9% of patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year MACE were 11.9%, 17.4%, and 22.2%, respectively. Excluding 25 patients with cardiogenic shock on admission, the in-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year MACE were 7.8%, 13.1%, and 17.9%, respectively. In conclusion, TRA-PPCI was feasible in the vast majority of elderly patients with STEMI. In-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year MACE were lower than reported for transfemoral access, suggesting a benefit of the TRA in these patients.