An analysis of interagency collaboration: Lessons learned from Colorado's early intervention program.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe interagency collaboration in Part C Early Intervention (EI) programs. METHODS: Between 18 April and 9 May 2022, 48 EI service coordinators (SCs) from 14 programs in one state completed adapted versions of the Interagency Collaboration Activities Scale (IACAS) and Relational Coordination Survey (RCS). Assessing perceptions of shared structures (IACAS) and coordination quality (RCS), these combined measures summarized interagency collaboration with 11 organizations. Mean (SD) survey responses were estimated and ranked. RESULTS: Sample SCs represent a breadth of professional disciples and vary substantially in their current and desired collaborations. The quantity of SCs collaborating with organizations ranged from 0% to 98%. Nearly all (98%) reported collaborating with the school districts, few (15%) reported collaborating with insurance, and none reported collaborating with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. The majority of SCs expressed desire to increase their collaborations with most of the listed organizations. The perceived quality of collaborations varied substantially at both individual and organizational levels. When comparing SC perceptions of shared structures and coordination quality, SCs reported more favourable collaborations with school districts (IACAS rank: first and RCS rank: first) and less favourable collaborations with insurance (IACAS rank: ninth and RCS rank: seventh). Some organizations rankings varied across both scales, including pediatric primary care (IACAS rank: third and RCS rank: eighth) and hospitals (IACAS rank: sixth and RCS rank: second). Overall, SCs reported low perceived existence of shared structures while coordination quality varied by organization. Opportunities for collaborative growth were identified. DISCUSSION: Despite its importance and required implementation in EI, perceptions of interagency collaboration varied substantially within and between EI programs. There is a suggested need to increase the quantity of SCs that collaborate and identified opportunities to increase the quality of collaborations that already exist.

Caregiver Health Beliefs Associated with Use of Pediatric Therapy Services Among Children with Special Health Care Needs.

OBJECTIVES: (1) Explore the relationship between various sociodemographic factors and caregiver health beliefs (CHBs), and (2) examine whether these relationships were associated with the use of pediatric therapy services. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, secondary data analysis using the 2011 Survey of Pathways Diagnosis and Services dataset. 4,032 children ages 6-17 years had complete data on caregiver health beliefs and pediatric therapy use. Select CHBs reflected whether caregivers believe (1) problems related to their child's condition can be prevented or decreased with treatment, (2) they have the power to change their child's condition, and (3) their child's condition is a mystery. Pediatric therapy included physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. We performed multivariate logistic regression to test the associations between CHBs and select child and family characteristics (Aim 1) and use of pediatric therapy services (Aim 2). RESULTS: Caregivers with lower educational attainment were more likely to believe their child's condition was a mystery and less likely to believe they had the power to change their child's condition. Use of pediatric therapy services tended to be lower among children whose caregivers believed they had the power to change their child's condition and higher among children whose caregivers believed their child's condition was a mystery. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings add to existing research that suggests CHBs differ across groups of caregivers. This, combined with the recognition that CHBs also likely differ from providers, underscores the importance of eliciting caregiver beliefs, values, and priorities to help ensure the provision of truly family-centered care. SIGNIFICANCE: Pediatric therapy services support and optimize child development. Significant service use disparities exist, however, with children representing various marginalized groups being less likely to use pediatric therapy services. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying such disparities. We sought to explore the relationship between family sociodemographic factors, caregiver health beliefs, and pediatric therapy use. Our findings suggest that caregivers with fewer socioeconomic resources expressed beliefs that are consistent with limited knowledge and agency regarding their child's condition. Thus, providers must work to engage families in conversations about their child's development, elicit their knowledge and beliefs, and identify social or financial barriers to care.

Creation of a Community-Driven Decision Support Tool for Caregivers of Children With Developmental Concerns.

PURPOSE: Despite increasing standardization of developmental screening and referral processes, significant early intervention service disparities exist. The aims of this article are to: (a) describe methods used to develop a decision support tool for caregivers of children with developmental concerns, (b) summarize key aspects of the tool, and (c) share preliminary results regarding the tool's acceptability and usability among key stakeholders. METHOD: Content and design of the decision support tool was guided by a systematic process outlined by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaborative. Three focus group interviews were conducted with caregivers (n = 7), early childhood professionals (n = 28), and a mix of caregivers and professionals (N = 20) to assess caregiver decisional needs. In accordance with the IPDAS, a prototype of the decision support tool was iteratively cocreated by a subset of caregivers (n = 7) and early child health professionals (n = 5). RESULTS: The decision support tool leverages images and plain language text to guide caregivers and professionals along key steps of the early identification to service use pathway. Participants identified four themes central to shared decision making: trust, cultural humility and respect, strength-based conversations, and information-sharing. End-users found the tool to be acceptable and useful. CONCLUSIONS: The decision support tool described offers an individualized approach for exploring beliefs about child development and developmental delay, considering service options within the context of the family's values, priorities, and preferences, and outlining next steps. Additional research regarding the tool's effectiveness in optimizing shared decision-making and reducing service use disparities is warranted.