Novel Treatment with Intraperitoneal MOC31PE Immunotoxin in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results From the ImmunoPeCa Phase 1 Trial.

BACKGROUND: MOC31PE immunotoxin was developed to rapidly kill cells expressing the tumor-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule, which is highly expressed in colorectal cancer. Although cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may offer long-term survival to patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC), most patients experience disease relapse and novel therapeutic options are needed. On this basis, MOC31PE is being developed as a novel therapeutic principle to target PM-CRC. METHODS: This was a dose-escalating phase I trial to evaluate the safety and toxicity (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetic profile, and neutralizing antibody response (secondary endpoints) upon intraperitoneal administration of MOC31PE in patients with PM-CRC undergoing CRS-HIPEC with Mitomycin C. Fifteen patients received the study drug at four dose levels (3+3+3+6), administered intraperitoneally as a single dose the day after CRS-HIPEC. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. There was negligible systemic absorption of the study drug. Drug concentrations in peritoneal fluid samples were in the cytotoxic range and increased in a dose-dependent manner. MOC31PE recovered from peritoneal cavity retained its cytotoxic activity in cell-based assays. All patients developed neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal administration of MOC31PE was safe and well tolerated, and combined with low systemic uptake, MOC31PE seems ideal for local intraperitoneal treatment. The drug will be further evaluated in an ongoing phase II expansion cohort.

TD-11 workshop report: characterization of monoclonal antibodies to S100 proteins.

Fourteen monoclonal antibodies with specificity against native or recombinant antigens within the S100 family were investigated with regard to immunoreactivity. The specificities of the antibodies were studied using ELISA tests, Western blotting epitope mapping using competitive assays, and QCM technology. The mimotopes of antibodies against S100A4 were determined by random peptide phage display libraries. Antibody specificity was also tested by IHC and pair combinations evaluated for construction of immunoradiometric assays for S100B. Out of the 14 antibodies included in this report eight demonstrated specificity to S100B, namely MAbs 4E3, 4D2, S23, S53, 6G1, S21, S36, and 8B10. This reactivity could be classified into four different epitope groups using competing studies. Several of these MAbs did display minor reactivity to other S100 proteins when they were presented in denatured form. Only one of the antibodies, MAb 3B10, displayed preferential reactivity to S100A1; however, it also showed partial cross-reactivity with S100A10 and S100A13. Three antibodies, MAbs 20.1, 22.3, and S195, were specific for recombinant S100A4 in solution. Western blot revealed that MAb 20.1 and 22.3 recognized linear epitopes of S100A4, while MAb S195 reacted with a conformational dependent epitope. Surprisingly, MAb 14B3 did not demonstrate any reactivity to the panel of antigens used in this study.

Human heterophilic antibodies display specificity for murine IgG subclasses.

OBJECTIVES: The study investigated heterophilic antibodies: the human immunoglobulin classes involved and their specificity for different murine IgG subclasses. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using immunofluorometric assays for human IgA, IgM and IgG binding murine IgG1, we analyzed 173 samples displaying positive interference and 97 negative control samples from a previous study. We also set up assays for heterophilic antibody interference using Mabs from different murine IgG subclasses. Three Mabs each of murine IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b subclasses, one murine IgG3 Mab and one rat Mab were used. RESULTS: Elevated levels of human murine IgG1-binding immunoglobulins of IgM class only were found in 40% of interference-positive samples, human IgG only in 1.7%, and human IgA only in 2.3% of the samples. Both elevated human IgG and IgM classes were found in 3.5% of the samples, IgA and IgM in 4.0%, and finally, all three immunoglobulin classes in 1.7% of the samples. Eighty percent of interference positive samples showed heterophilic assay interference for at least one murine IgG1 Mab, 35% for IgG2a, 66% for IgG2b, 52% for IgG3a and 17% for the rat Mab. CONCLUSIONS: Heterophilic antibody interference is mainly caused by IgM class human antibodies with a marked murine IgG subclass specificity. Combining assay antibodies from different murine IgG subclasses may reduce interference in immunoassays.

Immunometric assay interference: incidence and prevention.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the study was to reduce interference in an in-house two-site, two-step immunometric assay. METHODS: In the running laboratory routine, 11 261 samples were tested with a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay with bovine immunoglobulin but no murine immunoglobulins in the buffer, in parallel to our routine CEA assay, using 15 mg/L heat-treated nonspecific murine immunoglobulin (MAK33) in the buffer and with the Fc fragments removed from the capture antibody. RESULTS: The frequency of interference was estimated to be 4.0% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-4.7%). The addition of 15 mg/L native MAK33 had little effect (frequency, 3.9%; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-4.6%), whereas adding 15 mg/L heat-treated MAK33 reduced interference to 0.86% (0.61-1.12%), and adding 50 mg/L reduced it further to 0.06% (0-0.13%). Removing the Fc fragments by itself reduced interference to 0.10% (0.02-0.19%). There were no statistically significant differences for age (P <0.23) or gender (P <0.40) between patients with interference (n = 210) and a randomly selected interference-negative control group (n = 186). Interference was not constant in patients: 15 of 25 individuals positive for interference and with four or more samples screened for interference had an interference-negative sample either before or after the peak of interference. CONCLUSIONS: In a two-site, two-step immunometric assay using mouse monoclonal antibodies, use of heat-treated nonspecific murine immunoglobulin in the buffer or removal of the Fc fragment from the capture antibody could improve performance.

Testing and validating a homogeneous immunometric assay for interference.

We analyzed 95 sera, demonstrating interference in a previous study, with the Kryptor homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) immunoassay (Brahms AG, Berlin, Germany). Only one serum differed, i.e., 6.0 microg/l for Kryptor vs. 13.3 microg/l for a microtiter plate in-house immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), using both aggregated mouse immunoglobulins as blocker and capture monoclonal antibody (Mab) F(ab')2-fragments to reduce interference. Sera were further analyzed with experimental IFMAs with intact capture Mabs and without blocker. The Kryptor-CEA assay Mab GFR44 (capture) had elevated results in 71% of sera with the Kryptor Mab G15 (tracer) or in 81% with our tracer Mab. G15 (capture) had 65% elevated results with GFR44 (tracer) or 99% with our tracer Mab. The latter was reduced from 99% to 62% by adding Kryptor blocker to the buffer or to 30% by adding our blocker. Finally, combining both assay Mabs and assay buffer from Kryptor still gave interference in 16% of sera. Kryptor-CEA assay results thus agreed with our in-house CEA assay results, showing no interference. As the Kryptor-CEA assay antibodies were sensitive to interference and the Kryptor-CEA assay buffer did not reduce interference as efficiently as our in-house assay buffer, the Kryptor-CEA assay format was crucial for the absence of interference.