An Update on Curing Coma Campaign.

The Curing Coma Campaign (CCC) and its contributing collaborators identified multiple key areas of knowledge and research gaps in coma and disorders of consciousness (DoC). This step was a crucial effort and essential to prioritize future educational and research efforts. These key areas include defining categories of DoC, assessing DoC using multimodal approach (e.g., behavioral assessment tools, advanced neuroimaging studies), discussing optimal clinical trials' design and exploring computational models to conduct clinical trials in patients with DoC, and establishing common data elements to standardize data collection. Other key areas focused on creating coma care registry and educating clinicians and patients and promoting awareness of DoC to improve care in patients with DoC. The ongoing efforts in these key areas are discussed.

Anisocoria After Direct Light Stimulus is Associated with Poor Outcomes Following Acute Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Assessing pupil size and reactivity is the standard of care in neurocritically ill patients. Anisocoria observed in critically ill patients often prompts further investigation and treatment. This study explores anisocoria at rest and after light stimulus determined using quantitative pupillometry as a predictor of discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. METHODS: This analysis includes data from an international registry and includes patients with paired (left and right eye) quantitative pupillometry readings linked to discharge mRS scores. Anisocoria was defined as the absolute difference in pupil size using three common cut points (> 0.5 mm, > 1 mm, and > 2 mm). Nonparametric models were constructed to explore patient outcome using three predictors: the presence of anisocoria at rest (in ambient light); the presence of anisocoria after light stimulus; and persistent anisocoria (present both at rest and after light). The primary outcome was discharge mRS score associated with the presence of anisocoria at rest versus after light stimulus using the three commonly defined cut points. RESULTS: This analysis included 152,905 paired observations from 6,654 patients with a mean age of 57.0 (standard deviation 17.9) years, and a median hospital stay of 5 (interquartile range 3-12) days. The mean admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12.7 (standard deviation 3.5), and the median discharge mRS score was 2 (interquartile range 0-4). The ranges for absolute differences in pupil diameters were 0-5.76 mm at rest and 0-6.84 mm after light. Using an anisocoria cut point of > 0.5 mm, patients with anisocoria after light had worse median mRS scores (2 [interquartile range 0-4]) than patients with anisocoria at rest (1 [interquartile range 0-3]; P < .0001). Patients with persistent anisocoria had worse median mRS scores (3 [interquartile range 1-4]) than those without persistent anisocoria (1 [interquartile range 0-3]; P < .0001). Similar findings were observed using a cut point for anisocoria of > 1 mm and > 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Anisocoria after light is a new biomarker that portends worse outcome than anisocoria at rest. After further validation, anisocoria after light should be considered for inclusion as a reported and trended assessment value.

Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Adults Hospitalized with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.

BACKGROUND: There is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles assessing ASM prophylaxis in adults with moderate-severe TBI (acute radiographic findings and requiring hospitalization). The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) questions were as follows: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with moderate-severe TBI and no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? (3) If an ASM is used, should a long versus short (> 7 vs. ≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes were early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, mortality, and functional outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to generate recommendations. RESULTS: The initial literature search yielded 1998 articles, of which 33 formed the basis of the recommendations: PICO 1: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of ASM compared to no ASM on the outcomes of early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, or mortality. PICO 2: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or mortality, though point estimates suggest fewer late seizures and fewer adverse events with LEV. PICO 3: There were no significant differences in early or late seizures with longer versus shorter ASM use, though cognitive outcomes and adverse events appear worse with protracted use. CONCLUSIONS: Based on GRADE criteria, we suggest that ASM or no ASM may be used in patients hospitalized with moderate-severe TBI (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days, weak recommendation, low quality of evidence).

Caring for Coma after Severe Brain Injury: Clinical Practices and Challenges to Improve Outcomes: An Initiative by the Curing Coma Campaign.

Severe brain injury can result in disorders of consciousness (DoC), including coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, and minimally conscious state. Improved emergency and trauma medicine response, in addition to expanding efforts to prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, has led to an increased number of patients with prolonged DoC. High-quality bedside care of patients with DoC is key to improving long-term functional outcomes. However, there is a paucity of DoC-specific evidence guiding clinicians on efficacious bedside care that can promote medical stability and recovery of consciousness. This Viewpoint describes the state of current DoC bedside care and identifies knowledge and practice gaps related to patient care with DoC collated by the Care of the Patient in Coma scientific workgroup as part of the Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign. The gap analysis identified and organized domains of bedside care that could affect patient outcomes: clinical expertise, assessment and monitoring, timing of intervention, technology, family engagement, cultural considerations, systems of care, and transition to the post-acute continuum. Finally, this Viewpoint recommends future research and education initiatives to address and improve the care of patients with DoC.

Time to maximum pupil constriction is variable in neurocritical care patients.

Quantitative pupillometry (QP) use has grown exponentially. Each QP scan captures images of the pupil before, during, and after light exposure to provide component measures of the pupillary light reflex (PLR). This study explores if the time to maximum constriction (tMC) is uniform among neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) patients. The study enrolled 50 NSICU patients with normal PLR values in a cross-sectional study and adhered to the standard of care for pupil assessments to collect data on tMC within (comparing left eye and right eye) and between patients. The mean tMC of 0.97 (0.17) s was normally distributed across all patients and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The mean tMC was similar for the left pupil (0.98 [0.16]s) and right pupil (0.96 [0.18]s; P =.546). The within-subject mean difference (left versus right eye) tMC was 0.13 (0.12)s and ranged from 0.0 to 0.56 s. The between-subject mean tMC was 0.97 (0.17) s and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The tMC does not occur at a fixed point in time. Clinical applications that seek to characterize pupil health should account for varied tMC and explore relationships to discrete outcomes to determine the clinical usefulness of tMC.

Clinical outcome and cost effectiveness of acute ischemic stroke transfers for endovascular reperfusion therapy from geographically distant counties: Stroke transfer outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular reperfusion therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) has resulted in increased patient transfers to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). Clinical outcomes including the financial impact of these transfers from geographically dispersed population are lacking. Hence, we studied outcomes and cost-effectiveness of stroke transfers from remote areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a 3-year cohort of AIS patients transferred from geographically dispersed counties (<100 mi., 101-200 mi., and >200 mi.). A 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 defined a favorable clinical outcome. Cost-effectiveness is studied by calculating the incremental cost effectiveness ratio, using hospital costs reimbursed data and utility-weighted (UW)-mRS. RESULTS: Among 172 patients transferred for EVT, patients transferred from nearby counties were more likely to undergo intervention compared to other counties (56.9 % vs. 36.7 % vs. 49.2 % p = .11). Irrespective of proximity (in mi.) to CSC [21.5 (14-56.3)] vs. 185 (137-185) vs. 349 (325-355)], there was a similar delay (in min.) to arrival from all locations [321.5 (244-490), 366 (298-432), and 460 (385-554.5) respectively], but no statistically significant differences in favorable outcomes (18.0 %, 34.1 %, and 22.2 %, respectively, p = .41). Patients undergoing EVT had higher hospital costs reimbursed compared to non-EVT patients [$37,303 (25,745-40,658) vs. $14,008 (8,640-21,273) respectively, p < .001] and no statistically significant difference in UW-mRS [0.32 (0.06-0.56) vs. 0.06 (0-0.56), p = .30]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies a need for targeted interventions to improve community awareness and optimize systems of care to improve outcomes and cost-effectiveness of EVT.

A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to using tenecteplase to treat acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase (TNK) is emerging as an alternative to alteplase (ALT) for thrombolytic treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Compared to ALT, TNK has a longer half-life, shorter administration time, lower cost, and similarly high efficacy in treating large vessel occlusion. Nevertheless, there are barriers to adopting TNK as a treatment for AIS. This study aimed to identify thematic barriers and facilitators to adopting TNK as an alternative to ALT as a thrombolytic for eligible AIS patients. METHODS: Qualitative research methodology using hermeneutic cycling and purposive sampling was used to interview four stroke clinicians in Texas. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Enrollment was complete when saturation was reached. All members of the research team participated in content analysis during each cycle and in thematic analysis after saturation. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted between November 2022 and February 2023 with stroke center representatives from centers that either had successfully adopted TNK, or had not yet adopted TNK. Three themes and eight sub-themes were identified. The theme "Evidence" had three sub-themes: Pro-Con Balance, Fundamental Knowledge, and Pharmacotherapeutics. The theme "Process Flow" had four subthemes: Proactive, Reflective self-doubt, Change Process Barriers, and Parameter Barriers. The theme "Consensus" had one sub-theme: Getting Buy-In. CONCLUSION: Clinicians experience remarkably similar barriers and facilitators to adopting TNK. The results lead to a hypothesis that providing evidence to support a practice change, and identifying key change processes, will help clinicians achieve consensus across teams that need to 'buy in' to adopting TNK for AIS treatment.

Multicenter exploration of tenecteplase transition factors: A quantitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase (TNK) is gaining recognition as a novel therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite TNK offering a longer half-life, time and cost saving benefits and comparable treatment and safety profiles to Alteplase (ALT), the adoption of TNK as a treatment for AIS presents challenges for hospital systems. OBJECTIVE: Identify barriers and facilitators of TNK implementation at acute care hospitals in Texas. METHODS: This prospective survey used open-ended questions and Likert statements generated from content experts and informed by qualitative research. Stroke clinicians and nurses working at 40 different hospitals in Texas were surveyed using a virtual platform. RESULTS: The 40 hospitals had a median of 34 (IQR 24.5-49) emergency department beds and 42.5 (IQR 23.5-64.5) inpatient stroke beds with 506.5 (IQR 350-797.5) annual stroke admissions. Fifty percent of the hospitals were Comprehensive Stroke Centers, and 18 (45 %) were solely using ALT for treatment of eligible AIS patients. Primary facilitators to TNK transition were team buy-in and a willingness of stroke physicians, nurses, and pharmacists to adopt TNK. Leading barriers were lack of clinical evidence supporting TNK safety profile inadequate evidence supporting TNK use and a lack of American Heart Association guidelines support for TNK administration in all AIS cases. CONCLUSION: Understanding common barriers and facilitators to TNK adoption can assist acute care hospitals deciding to implement TNK as a treatment for AIS. These findings will be used to design a TNK adoption Toolkit, utilizing implementation science techniques, to address identified obstacles and to leverage facilitators.

Door to needle time trends after transition to tenecteplase: A Multicenter Texas stroke registry.

BACKGROUND: Tenecteplase (TNK) is considered a promising option for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with the potential to decrease door-to-needle times (DTN). This study investigates DTN metrics and trends after transition to tenecteplase. METHODS: The Lone Star Stroke (LSS) Research Consortium TNK registry incorporated data from three Texas hospitals that transitioned to TNK. Subject data mapped to Get-With-the-Guidelines stroke variables from October 1, 2019 to March 31, 2023 were limited to patients who received either alteplase (ALT) or TNK within the 90 min DTN times. The dataset was stratified into ALT and TNK cohorts with univariate tables for each measured variable and further analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression models were constructed for both ALT and TNK to investigate trends in DTN times. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, the TNK cohort (n = 151) and ALT cohort (n = 161) exhibited comparable population demographics, differing only in a higher prevalence of White individuals in the TNK cohort. Both cohorts demonstrated similar clinical parameters, including mean NIHSS, blood glucose levels, and systolic blood pressure at admission. In the univariate analysis, no difference was observed in median DTN time within the 90 min time window compared to the ALT cohort [40 min (30-53) vs 45 min (35-55); P = .057]. In multivariable models, DTN times by thrombolytic did not significantly differ when adjusting for NIHSS, age (P = .133), or race and ethnicity (P = .092). Regression models for the overall cohort indicate no significant DTN temporal trends for TNK (P = .84) after transition; nonetheless, when stratified by hospital, a single subgroup demonstrated a significant DTN upward trend (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In the overall cohort, TNK and ALT exhibited comparable temporal trends and at least stable DTN times. This indicates that the shift to TNK did not have an adverse impact on the DTN stroke metrics. This seamless transition is likely attributed to the similarity of inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as the administration processes for both medications. When stratified by hospital, the three subgroups demonstrated variable DTN time trends which highlight the potential for either fatigue or unpreparedness when switching to TNK. Because our study included a multi-ethnic cohort from multiple large Texas cities, the stable DTN times after transition to TNK is likely applicable to other healthcare systems.

Stroke Screening Process for Spanish-Speaking Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The Balance Eyes Face Arms Speech Time stroke screening tool may have limitations for Spanish-speaking individuals. The purpose of this study is to identify potential screen failure events during evaluation for intervenable acute ischemic stroke events among Spanish-speaking patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center study at an urban academic center during 2020. Patients with a positive stroke screen were stratified by Spanish or non-Spanish. We measured last known well, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the emergency department provider's decision to escalate to complete stroke evaluation with acute ischemic stroke as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Among 796 patients (mean age of 52 years, 56% female, 37% Spanish speaking), 30% of patients with positive stroke screen were converted to complete stroke evaluation. For provider escalation to complete stroke evaluation for the outcome of acute ischemic stroke events, prevalence was 13%, sensitivity 81%, positive predictive value 22%, and negative predictive value 97% for the overall sample. Spanish-speaking patients were less likely to progress from screening to complete stroke evaluation (25.8% vs 32.8%; 95% for difference CI, 0.57-13.5). Importantly, there was no difference in rate of acute ischemic stroke between Spanish- and non-Spanish-speaking patients. DISCUSSION: Over 1 year, with 796 patients triggered at triage by Balance Eyes Face Arms Speech Time for positive stroke screens, only 13% resulted in an acute ischemic stroke. Spanish-speaking patients were less likely to progress from screening to complete stroke evaluation, but the rate of acute ischemic stroke was not different by language.

State-of-the-Art Evaluation of Acute Adult Disorders of Consciousness for the General Intensivist.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a concise review of knowledge and practice pertaining to the diagnosis and initial management of unanticipated adult patient disorders of consciousness (DoC) by the general intensivist. DATA SOURCES: Detailed search strategy using PubMed and OVID Medline for English language articles describing adult patient acute DoC diagnostic evaluation and initial management strategies including indications for transfer. STUDY SELECTION: Descriptive and interventional studies that address acute adult DoC, their evaluation and initial management, indications for transfer, as well as outcome prognostication. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and the following aspects of each manuscript were identified, abstracted, and analyzed: setting, study population, aims, methods, results, and relevant implications for adult critical care practice. DATA SYNTHESIS: Acute adult DoC may be categorized by etiology including structural, functional, infectious, inflammatory, and pharmacologic, the understanding of which drives diagnostic investigation, monitoring, acute therapy, and subsequent specialist care decisions including team-based local care as well as intra- and inter-facility transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Acute adult DoC may be initially comprehensively addressed by the general intensivist using an etiology-driven and team-based approach. Certain clinical conditions, procedural expertise needs, or resource limitations inform transfer decision-making within a complex care facility or to one with greater complexity. Emerging collaborative science helps improve our current knowledge of acute DoC to better align therapies with underpinning etiologies.

Predictive Values for Time from Transducer Stopcock Closure to Accurate Intracranial Pressure Reading.

BACKGROUND: When using an external ventricular drain (EVD) to monitor intracranial pressure (ICP), nurses need to know how long to wait after each manipulation of the transducer before the displayed ICP value represents an accurate signal. This study explores ICP signal equilibration time (EqT) under clinical conditions. METHODS: This was a prospective ex vivo study using a simulated skull, standard EVD tubing, and a strain gauge transducer. All 270 trials simulating 90 combinations of different pressures and common clinical conditions were completed in August 2021. Each trial was recorded on video. Videos were scored using video editing software to obtain the exact start and stop time for each trial. RESULTS: The mean EqT was 44.90 (18.77) seconds. One hundred fifty (55.56%) observations did not reach their expected value within 60 s. The longest mean EqTs were noted when blood was present in the EVD tubing (57.67 [8.91] seconds), when air bubbles were in the tubing (57.41 [8.73] seconds), and when EVD tubing was not flat (level) (50.77 [15.43] seconds). An omnibus test comparing mean EqT for conditions with no variables manipulated (30.08 [16.07] seconds) against mean EqT for all others (47.18 [18.13] seconds) found that mean EqTs were significantly different (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even when no additional variables were introduced, the mean EqTs were ~ 30 s. Common clinical variables increase the length of time before a transducer connected to an EVD will provide an accurate reading. Nurses should wait at least 30 s after turning the EVD stopcock before assuming ICP value reflects accurate ICP.

Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Hospital Course, Confounders, and Medications.

The convergence of an interdisciplinary team of neurocritical care specialists to organize the Curing Coma Campaign is the first effort of its kind to coordinate national and international research efforts aimed at a deeper understanding of disorders of consciousness (DoC). This process of understanding includes translational research from bench to bedside, descriptions of systems of care delivery, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and ethical frameworks. The description and measurement of varying confounding factors related to hospital care was thought to be critical in furthering meaningful research in patients with DoC. Interdisciplinary hospital care is inherently varied across geographical areas as well as community and academic medical centers. Access to monitoring technologies, specialist consultation (medical, nursing, pharmacy, respiratory, and rehabilitation), staffing resources, specialty intensive and acute care units, specialty medications and specific surgical, diagnostic and interventional procedures, and imaging is variable, and the impact on patient outcome in terms of DoC is largely unknown. The heterogeneity of causes in DoC is the source of some expected variability in care and treatment of patients, which necessitated the development of a common nomenclature and set of data elements for meaningful measurement across studies. Guideline adherence in hemorrhagic stroke and severe traumatic brain injury may also be variable due to moderate or low levels of evidence for many recommendations. This article outlines the process of the development of common data elements for hospital course, confounders, and medications to streamline definitions and variables to collect for clinical studies of DoC.

Complementary and alternative medicine carts in the inpatient rehabilitation unit: Access and nurses' use.

PURPOSE: To determine if increased accessibility to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) increases the usage of CAM interventions. METHODS: A prospective pre-post study with a "run-in" design in a hospital with two inpatient rehabilitation floors was used. Data were analyzed with SAS v9.4. RESULTS: CAM use before implementation was 2.8 (1.0); after implementation, 3.1 (0.56). CONCLUSION: Greater access to CAM materials did not significantly increase their use (P = .233). Aromatherapy was used more after increased availability, but heat and cold application decreased. Nurses valued CAM even though independent practice was not fully supported.

Identifying Best Practices to Improve Evaluation and Management of In-Hospital Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

This scientific statement describes a path to optimizing care for patients who experience an in-hospital stroke. Although these patients are in a monitored environment, their evaluation and treatment are often delayed compared with patients presenting to the emergency department, contributing to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Reducing delays and optimizing treatment for patients with in-hospital stroke could improve outcomes. This scientific statement calls for the development of hospital systems of care and targeted quality improvement for in-hospital stroke. We propose 5 core elements to optimize in-hospital stroke care: 1. Deliver stroke training to all hospital staff, including how to activate in-hospital stroke alerts. 2. Create rapid response teams with dedicated stroke training and immediate access to neurological expertise. 3. Standardize the evaluation of patients with potential in-hospital stroke with physical assessment and imaging. 4. Address barriers to treatment potentially, including interfacility transfer to advanced stroke treatment. 5. Establish an in-hospital stroke quality oversight program delivering data-driven performance feedback and driving targeted quality improvement efforts. Additional research is needed to better understand how to reduce the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of in-hospital stroke.

The Curing Coma Campaign and the Future of Coma Research.

Recovery from coma or disordered consciousness is a central issue in patients with acute brain injuries such as stroke, trauma, cardiac arrest, and brain infections. Yet, major gaps remain in the scientific underpinnings of coma and this has led to inaccuracy in prognostication and limited interventions for coma recovery. Even so, recent studies have begun to elucidate mechanisms of consciousness early and prolonged after acute brain injury and some pilot interventions have begun to be tested. The importance and scope of this led in 2019 to the development of the Curing Coma Campaign, an initiative of the Neurocritical Care Society designed to provide a platform for scientific collaboration across the patient care continuum and to empower a community for purposes of research, education, implementation science, and advocacy. Seen as a "grand challenge," the Curing Coma Campaign has developed an infrastructure of scientific working groups and operational modules, along with a 10-year roadmap.

A differential of the left eye and right eye neurological pupil index is associated with discharge modified Rankin scores in neurologically injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Automated infrared pupillometry (AIP) and the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) provide an objective means of assessing and trending the pupillary light reflex (PLR) across a broad spectrum of neurological diseases. NPi quantifies the PLR and ranges from 0 to 5; in healthy individuals, the NPi of both eyes is expected to be ≥ 3.0 and symmetric. AIP values demonstrate emerging value as a prognostic tool with predictive properties that could allow practitioners to anticipate neurological deterioration and recovery. The presence of an NPi differential (a difference ≥ 0.7 between the left and right eye) is a potential sign of neurological abnormality. METHODS: We explored NPi differential by considering the modified Rankin Score at discharge (DC mRS) among patients admitted to neuroscience intensive care units (NSICU) of 4 U.S. and 1 Japanese hospitals and for two cohorts of brain injuries: stroke (including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, and aneurysm, 1,200 total patients) and 185 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients for a total of more than 54,000 pupillary measurements. RESULTS: Stroke patients with at least 1 occurrence of an NPi differential during their NSICU stay have higher DC mRS scores (3.9) compared to those without an NPi differential (2.7; P < .001). Patients with TBI and at least 1 occurrence of an NPi differential during their NSICU stay have higher discharge modified Rankin Scale scores (4.1) compared to those without an NPi differential (2.9; P < .001). When patients experience both abnormalities, abnormal (NPi < 3.0) and an NPi differential, the latter has an anticipatory relationship with respect to the former (P < .001 for z-score skewness analysis). Finally, our analysis confirmed ≥ 0.7 as the optimal cutoff value for the NPi differential (AUC = 0.71, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The NPi differential is an important factor that clinicians should consider when managing critically ill neurological injured patients admitted to the neurocritical care units. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02804438 , Date of Registration: June 17, 2016.

Predictive value of quantitative pupillometry in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus undergoing temporary CSF diversion.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar drain (LD) trials are used to temporarily divert CSF in order to predict clinical improvement prior to definitive CSF diversion in patients with a diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. New technology has improved clinical detection of subtle pupillary changes that may occur during CSF diversion trials. The aim of this study was to determine whether pupillary light response as recorded by automated pupillometry could be used to predict response during lumbar drain trials. METHODS: The authors prospectively gathered quantitative pupillometry data on admission and following each CSF diversion in a cohort of 30 consecutive patients with a presumptive diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus admitted to a university hospital for elective LD trial between January 1, 2020 and March 30, 2021. The value of pupillometry in predicting success of lumbar drainage in alleviating symptoms was correlated to clinical improvement during lumbar drainage. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients undergoing a 4-day LD trial, 16 (55.2%) demonstrated clinical improvement. Pre-drainage pupillometry values did not differ between patients who had clinical improvement or no clinical improvement. Constriction velocity improved compared to baseline in patients who had a successful lumbar drain trial (LD +). There was a non-significant trend towards improved constriction velocity and improved dilation velocity found in patients even after the first aliquot drainage. DISCUSSION: Baseline pupillary function by automated pupillometry did not predict clinical improvement during lumbar drain trials. Improvement in constriction and dilation velocity may be useful to monitor at the outset, after the initial drainage, and at completion of lumbar drain trials.

Harmonization of Physiological Data in Neurocritical Care: Challenges and a Path Forward.

Continuous multimodal monitoring in neurocritical care provides valuable insights into the dynamics of the injured brain. Unfortunately, the "readiness" of this data for robust artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications is low and presents a significant barrier for advancement. Harmonization standards and tools to implement those standards are key to overcoming existing barriers. Consensus in our professional community is essential for success.

Association of External Ventricular Drain Wean Strategy with Shunt Placement and Length of Stay in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) face a protracted intensive care unit (ICU) course and are at risk for developing refractory hydrocephalus with the need for a permanent ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). Management of the external ventricular drain (EVD) used to provide temporary cerebrospinal fluid diversion may influence the need for a VPS, ICU length of stay (LOS), and drain complications, but the optimal EVD management approach is unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the effect of EVD discontinuation strategy on VPS rate. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter observational study at six neurocritical care units in the United States. The target population included adults with suspected aneurysmal SAH who required an EVD. Patients were preassigned to rapid or gradual EVD weans based on their treating center. The primary outcome was the rate of VPS placement. Secondary outcomes were EVD duration, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, and drain complications. RESULTS: A rapid EVD wean protocol was associated with a lower rate of VPS placement, including a delayed posthospitalization shunt, in an adjusted Cox proportional analysis (hazard ratio 0.52 [p = 0.041]) and adjusted logistic regression model (odds ratio 0.43 [95% confidence interval 0.18-1.03], p = 0.057). A rapid wean was also associated with 2.1 fewer EVD days (p = 0.007) and saved an estimated 2.5 ICU days (p = 0.049), as compared with a gradual wean protocol. There were fewer nonfunctioning EVDs in the rapid group (odds ratio 0.32 [95% confidence interval 0.11-0.92]). Furthermore, we found that the time to first wean and the number of weaning attempts were important independent covariates that affected the likelihood of receiving a VPS and the duration of ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid EVD wean was associated with decreased rates of VPS placement, decreased ICU LOS, and decreased drain complications in survivors of aneurysmal SAH. These findings suggest that a randomized multicentered controlled study comparing rapid vs. gradual EVD weaning protocols is justified.